Tuned In

Mad Men Watch: Yesterday, All My Troubles Seemed So Far Away

AMC
AMC

SPOILER ALERT: Before you read this post, pop in your earplugs, put on an old Beatles movie—maybe you should invite your dad and your girlfriend!—then catch last night’s episode of Mad Men.

It is not  a revelation to say that Mad Men is a show about secrets. But it has never been as much about secrets as “Hands and Knees,” an episode that seemed constructed toward the end point of getting several characters in a room, each of them knowing a secret story—in some cases more than one—and not being able to reveal any of them to one another. The situation would have been obvious even without the show at long last using a Beatles song, closing aptly with an instrumental of “Do You Want to Know a Secret?”

And where much of the run of the series has looked at the fallout of secrecy in Don Draper’s life, this episode further asked the question: is it always better to come clean, or is it sometimes best to keep it hidden? Here’s a look at the stories, scored to the musical stylings of those loveable British moptops The Fab Four:

Help! When Don Draper was younger—so much younger than today—he assumed the identity of a soldier killed in Korea. The deception dogged him for years, but he had seemed to escape its fallout professionally by confronting Pete in season one. And though confessing to Betty (among other things) ended his marriage in season three, it at least freed him to start exploring the question, “Who Is Don Draper?” this season.

But with the Defense department asking questions in connection with the North American Aviation deal, Don now needs his old adversary Pete Campbell like he’s never done before. Jon Hamm, who brilliantly scraped bottom with Don in “The Suitcase,” plays him in a new level of misery in this episode as the encroachment of his past sends him into a full-blown panic attack. Hamm brings the childlike fear back onto his man’s face as the old reflexes kick in, the self-preservation, the instinct to run—and the vomiting, again with the vomiting, as if Don could somehow purge himself through his own mouth.

Oddly enough, Pete—who tried to bring Don down with his secret earlier and despises Don for it now—complies in the end, not only making the huge contract going away to preserve Draper but taking the blame for it himself. Perhaps Pete sees, pragmatically, that while he resents “living with Don’s shit over his head,” it does him no good at this point for Don (and maybe SCDP) to go down in flames. Though one has to wonder if Trudy’s talk with him—comforting him with how good their lives are now—reached him in some way as well.

It’s ironic, however, that Pete had his heart-to-heart with Trudy by way of refusing to share with her the secret that was burdening him. (A secret she seems to suspect at first has something to do with her, perhaps recalling Pete’s fling with / rape of the au pair last reason.) But at least he’s honest enough to tell her that there’s something he’s not telling her.

You’ve Got to Hide Your Love Away: Lane, meanwhile, discovers that openness is not the cure for everything, as he introduces his Playboy-bunny girlfriend to his visiting father, who dismisses her politely and then canes him across the skull for it. It’s interesting that the episode never explicitly clarifies whether (as Lane accuses), his father is upset that his girlfriend is black; in fact, Lane almost seems to be hoping his father will react with racism, as though that would make the confrontation easier for him. But whatever his father’s feelings about that, Lane’s acting out unleashes a reaction like something out of Kafka’s The Judgment, as the seemingly mild-mannered old man rises up brutally in patriarchal fury and brings his son to all fours, demanding that he get his house in order. (A Strong performance by Jared Harris, by the way, whose oddly brash, almost giddy behavior through the episode belies—we see in retrospect—the fear he must have felt over his father’s reaction.)

She’s Got a Ticket to Ride: Joan, meanwhile, finds herself alone on a train, having gone to Westchester for an abortion* after conceiving a baby with Roger after their mugging. I’ll admit I was disappointed with this storyline, simply because it played into the old TV/movie fallback of having one-time sex lead to an immediate pregnancy. (As it did already with Pete and Peggy. And curiously, Joan had had to go to some effort to try to conceive with Greg, while Pete had had problems making a baby with Trudy as well. Apparently on Mad Men, guilt is a powerful fertility aid.) As much of a device as the pregnancy was, though, nice work by Christina Hendricks here, showing the force of will with which Joan maintains her outward composure, first in dealing with Roger—and insisting on going alone, perhaps so as to stress that this means nothing bigger for their relationship—then in meeting the mother of the very young-looking teen daughter in the waiting room, and not being able to admit that she’s not there with a daughter of her own.

*[Though, as commenters have pointed out, we don't in fact know she got the abortion.]

Treat Me Like You Did the Night Before: Roger, meanwhile, gets another, quite different relationship bombshell dropped on him, as Lee Garner Jr. takes him out to, essentially, divorce him after decades handling Lucky Strike. The potential effect on SCDP is obvious—how many times have we been told that Lucky Strike is the majority of the firm’s billings?—but the effect on Roger is physical and immediate. “You’re trying to kill me,” he protests to Lee, with increasing pathos in his voice, and it seems he’s not speaking figuratively. After pleading with Lee for 30 days to try to make some rain, he reaches into his pocket and pops a pill, looking drained, tired and ancient. And what’s up next for him—sitting behind his desk drinking vodka straight, while desperately calling names from his Rolodex (one of them, it turns out, now dead)—is not likely to boost his health.

I’ve Just Seen a Face: Looking at Don’s budding relationship with intelligent, grown-up Faye last week, I asked, “will he ultimately be overruled by the Don Draper who wants a Megan?” Sure enough, and unsurprisingly, given what we know and have seen of Don, he closes the episode looking with soft eyes at the new girl on his desk. Faye’s worries from last episode—in which she felt she “failed” the test of surrogate-mothering Sally, who pointedly sunk easily into Megan’s arms after falling in the hallway—may be justified. It seemed at first that Don’s crisis has brought them closer together. Faye is in many ways just what Don needs here. She knows enough (from her father) to know that Don is not having a heart attack; she knows enough of people to see what kind of reaction he’s having, and why; and she has enough presence of mind to suggest (wisely or not I don’t know) that his best recourse may be to lawyer up and plead for clemency.

Don responds by telling her the truth, or a slightly cleaned-up version, of how he came to be himself. (And is it just me, or did a see a hint of what-have-I-gotten-myself-into in her eyes as he spooned her?) Yet I have my doubts whether Don can be with a woman with as much knowledge of him, and therefore as much power, as Faye has. There is still the Don who wants a Betty, pretty, mothering, soft—and, in Megan’s case, a little subservient and lacking confidence. Is it her naturally clear French skin that catches his eye at the end of this episode? Or the fact that, whereas Faye has seen him at his lowest, he still has a power advantage over Megan—even after he nearly got caught for desertion, she spent the episode abjectly apologizing to him?

In all, this was one of those Mad Men episodes whose mechanics seemed a bit too out in the open; it really did play almost as if the writers had conceived of a brilliant set piece—all the SCDP partners in one room, having an argument informed by several secret subtexts known only to us—and then worked backward from there. But the episode definitely sets up some season-finale-scale conflicts and questions for the final few episodes. Will Don turn to Megan for comfort? Will SCDP be able to find a new, big, Lee Garner (or Connie Hilton) sized fish? Tomorrow never knows!

Now for the hail of B-sides:

* While I had issues of the mechanics of “Hands and Knees,” credit to it for not falling into another TV cliché, the one in which a female character asserts her ability and right to choose abortion but manages somehow to decide to keep the baby, nearly every time. (The rare exception last season being Friday Night Lights.)

* Likewise, the dynamic between Roger and Joan was interesting; Roger kept veering between being supportive and upstanding and saying something unintentionally awful. (“We avoided a tragedy,”* “So you want to keep it?” “No, of course not,” however he actually meant it, was probably not quite the phrase for that moment. Though perhaps not quite as indecorous as the doctor’s lecture at him in front of Joan: “You’ve used this woman. And you’ve ruined her.”) *Wrong indecorous phrasing: “tragedy” was actually Joan’s line, sorry.

* I know a lot of Mad Men fans have been down on Betty and the use of her character lately. But it was refreshing to see her have a phone conversation with Don that (however short-lived the feeling) did not end in acrimony (when Don called to tell Sally about the Beatles tickets, I reflexively expected Betty to have a problem, but she was uncomplicatedly happy). And the interrogation with the G-men was nicely handled: “Would you describe him as a man of integrity?” “We divorced.”

* It seems absurd that, even on basic cable, a show as adult-themed and frank as Mad Men should have to bleep the word “fuck.” The FCC does not regulate indecency on cable channels, including basic cable, so the decision is made by the individual network, usually out of concern over the reactions of sponsors or carriers. (Or the audience, but how much of the Mad Men audience, seeking out an HBO-style drama, would have cared?) The bleeped “fuck” (if Mad Men has done this before, I’m forgetting it) took me briefly out of the scene, and although I don’t much like substituting “screw” or what have you, that might have been the better of poor options here. (Clearly, “fuck” and not “screw” is what Roger would have said in the moment, though.)

* It didn’t take much to identify secrets as the theme of this episode, but Matthew Weiner’s actual use of the most appropriate Beatles song triple-underlined it. Interestingly, Mad Men often selects period-precise music for the closing credits—suggesting that they would have used a song from “Help!,” just out in August 1965, but instead went with the irresistible “Do You Want to Know a Secret” from 1963.

Related Topics: Television, Tuned In
  • Latest on Entertainment

    IFC Films

    Kerouac's On the Road Comes to Cannes: Where's the Beat?

    Walter Salles’ film of the Beat Generation classic wastes a strong cast, including Twilight‘s Kristen Stewart, in a needless tribute to ’50s wanderlust

    Surprise! The Lowest-Rated Show in Broadcast History Is Actually GreatSlate

    Adam Rose/FOX

    Glee Watch: NYADA, NYADA, NYADA

    Spoilers for the season finale of Glee below:

    One beef I often have with Glee episodes is that they move too fast, go in too many directions, try to cram in too much at once. You might say that about “Goodbye,” the season 3 finale, but in this case that approach seemed about right. It’s an episode about graduation, and graduation is something that, no matter how much you plan for and anticipate it, still goes too fast. Graduating is something you do, but in the moment it feels like something that happens to you, suddenly and all at once, like going over a waterfall.

  • evietoo

    Nearly every reviewer is sure Joan went through with the abortion, yet many commenters question it. The episode seemed purposely vague on the did-she/didn’t-she point.

    Do you all know something that viewers don’t?

  • http://twitter.com/poniewozik James Poniewozik

    No, we have no advance info. Certainly Mad Men is not above a shocker like that, but the episode didn’t seem to me purposely vague, so much as naturalistic. (Though having said, that, you make me want to watch again.) Joan seemed to be talking about it the way she would talk about it, and I don’t know what would have worked as incontrovertible confirmation short of: “I did it. I had the abortion. The embryo is terminated,” &c. Also, it’s not as if Joan could hide a pregnancy from Roger in the longer term without skipping town or something. But no, it’s entirely an assumption, which could well be wrong.

  • lfranti

    I will say I was very interested in Betty this episode. She lies for Don (despite saying she wishes he were dead earlier in the season) to the G-men. Later, when she’s in bed with Henry I thought she was going to tell him about Don. However, she only told him about the G-men coming. She then proceeded to tell him she didn’t want any secrets between them but omits the fact that she had lied to them. Considering Henry’s expressed interest in moving up in politics, this is a huge omission.

  • sherrildc

    I also assumed she didn’t go throught with it — I wondered why they set up Joan having two earlier abortions, only to put her through another one, and her saying “We avoided a tragedy” could read either way. (In terms of confirmation, the standard post-medical-procedure scene with the doctor/nurse giving her advice, moral or medical, as Joan gets dressed to leave would have done it, though Mad Men is never standard.) But now I’m not so sure. You make a good point — every other show would have her keep the baby. Maybe introducing the abortion theme earlier in the season keeps this episode from disintegrating into must-see (or must-not-see) tv.

  • otterface

    Two thoughts:

    1. My first thought on Lucky Strike’s departure: OK, so the firm may be doomed. But on the plus side: Sal can come back!

    2. On the f-word front: I don’t think “Mad Men” has done that before — in part because I think that word was bandied about a bit less back then than it is now — but there was an egregious instance of it on “Breaking Bad”, where one of the three words abbreviated in the episode title “IFT” was bleeped. Because, I guess, AMC didn’t want to offend the sensibilities of all the children watching the show where meth dealers dissolve bodies in bathtubs.

  • riverlark

    Is Don (Dick?) technically a deserter? No matter his name, he was wounded and badly enough that that person was sent home. Obviously the identity switch was never a good idea. But I’m curious whether he deserted the army.

  • http://twitter.com/poniewozik James Poniewozik

    Well, I certainly wouldn’t bet money on anything. But Roger at least begins the conversation assuming she’d had the abortion; he asks if she should be on her feet. The little nod she gives him could be her signal that she’s keeping the baby–if so, though, he processed it almost instantly, without even much of a pause. Having watched the scene again, I think that’s entirely possible, but having her communicate it that way (as opposed to saying something oblique, much like “we avoided a tragedy”) would seem more for the purpose of creating mystery than serving the conversation.

  • dannyd3

    lfranti makes a good point about Betty, this subtle ommission and the reaction of Betty at dinner when she sees Don with another woman hints at how she feels about Henry and Don. Whilst she certainly no longer trusts or repects Don espescially, she seems to extend no more deferance to Henry.
    On another point, how immense is Sally Draper becoming , she has really fleshed out as a character.
    And Megan (AKA the surrogate) is sooooooooooooo hot

  • tyrantking

    It was a long time ago, but I seem to remember that Don was nearing the end of his tour, whereas Dickwas just beginning his.

  • conversets

    Dick/Don was sent home because Don’s duty tour was up. Dick knew this; that’s why he changed dogtags with Don after they were shelled. That easily could be called desertion.

  • http://direwire.wordpress.com direwire

    I am so surprised of Pete helping Don and taking the bullet for him, this is not something that you expect from the guy who tried to blackmail Done earlier in the show. Would this mean they gonna change the looks of Pete into a more human character? I hope that they don’t, the personal traits and faults of every one on the set is what makes me a fan of the show.

  • glynnmacn

    I have to say I disagree with you about Joan’s abortion and “falling into another TV cliché.” Joan is not a teenager trying to make “the right choice” (whatever that is) she is a grown woman who’s had two previous abortions (that we know about) and who clearly wants a child. I can’t see how keeping the baby and possibly lying about its parentage to a husband away at war could be considered a cliche.

    Moreover, Joan keeping the baby strikes me to be as much in line with the times, and Mad Men (as you said, a show about secrets), and Joan’s “force of will” as anything else. And far from cliche. Not to mention it would make a terrific storyline — the seven week interval is just enough for her to know the child is not Greg’s but also short enough for her to perhaps deceive both him and the outside world.

    All reasons why I am firmly in the camp of ‘fingers crossed she didn’t have it.’

  • kdkenney

    I am also interested to see where they’re taking Pete. He seems to be evolving. Two seasons ago he was livid with his wife about having children and now he’s all excited about being a father. That, or he views it as something that makes him more virile to those around the office. As far as keeping Don’s secret, I think his concern as much as anything is what happens to the firm if Don is exposed and has to leave. He reacted with shock when Don suggested it. Ultimately, I think Pete will do something that shows he has not been redeemed. At least that’s what I hope. I don’t want him to become likable.

  • mikeijames

    although many find themselves baffled that jon hamm did not win a statuette for his break downs last season, the physical and emotional performance he gave this episode certainly secured him another nomination if not the win outright. the last two episode stand as the stuff of the most fantastic maddict dreams. the drama careened to such a high pitch in almost every storyline while maintaining every subtle nuance that separates mad men from the pack. what i loved about this episode in particular came in how everyone maintained secrets even as they revealed them: you hit the nail on the head with pete, but joan did the same thing, roger did the same thing, don did the same thing, lane did the same thing, even betty did the same thing. who finds themselves responsible for the other two of joan’s terminated pregnancies? from tonight’s episode, one cannot assume roger. why can’t she go to her doctor? surely, he’d understand marital infidelity since he himself has dallied with joan. why did betty lie — a lie of omission maybe, but i lie nonetheless — to henry? what lies has roger told for lee garner, jr.? why did roger not come clean to anyone about losing lucky strike including joan? seriously, all of the secrets and lies made this episode have almost as much tension as the penultimate episodes last season, so one wonders what surprises they have in store as we move forward. and i love how the secrets they kept really told us so much more about who these characters are than what they revealed.

  • mikeijames

    regarding sal: i had that self-same thought during that scene.

  • Bemused

    Ditto on Sal.

  • http://twitter.com/poniewozik James Poniewozik

    The cliche, IMO, is not so much a character deciding not to have an abortion as it is taking the character through a suspense-building will-she-won’t-she, bringing her up to the verge of having the procedure, then having her change her mind and have the baby. This isn’t limited to teenage characters; see, e.g., the way Sex and the City handled Miranda’s decision to have her baby. (And compare that with Claire’s decision to have an abortion on Six Feet Under.)

    In other words, my fingers aren’t crossed one way or another: I have no particular interest in TV characters having abortions or choosing not to, I just think it’s used too often as a cliffhanger (which, the pressures of TV being what they are, is usually resolved in one direction).

    The refreshing thing, TV-wise, would have been to have a woman decide to have an abortion, go to have an abortion, and then have the abortion, period. Or, conversely, decide not to have an abortion, and in fact not have one, period, without a will-she-won’t-she buildup. My reference to the show avoiding the cliche was based on the assumption that Mad Men had dispensed with the “cliffhanger” approach and just had Joan had the abortion. Which may well be wrong. If she decided to have the baby, I think it’s perfectly in character, for all the reasons you stated. It’s just that handling the decision in a did-she-or-didn’t-she manner is, I think, the kind of thing I’d hope Mad Men would avoid.

  • http://bennettphillips.wordpress.com bennettphillips

    On your second point, they also dipped the audio in the Mad Men pilot. After Don shuts down Pete’s attempt to get friendly with him in the hallway, Pete says “Fuck you” under his breath as Don walks away.

  • leglaw

    Hmm, let’s see: First Don reveals his deepest secret to Faye and then, as the episode closes, he casts a long look at Megan that strongly suggests he’s headed there next. If you ask me, scorning Faye could come at a rather high price — just sayin’

  • katy93

    I didn’t see Dick’s stealing of Don’s identity as solely motivated by the desire to get out of Korea, although I didn’t discount it, either. I think Don was more attracted by the idea of throwing away everything about his life. It’s a classic “do you want to take this showcase or whatever’s behind the curtain” problem…and Don’s showcase sucked so bad that felt anything would be preferable.

    I think the new identity was more important than escaping Korea. And given the choice, Don always picks the new identity. Which is why I don’t think Faye has a shot. He’s given her real information–he might have to be himself.

  • http://imafungi1.wordpress.com/ imafungi1

    Regarding the use of the word “fuck” on the show. Pete says “Fuck you” to Don in the pilot, but it’s unclear if it’s muted or if he just says it under his breath.

  • http://scottcrabtree.wordpress.com scottcrabtree

    Where was Peggy? No stranger to secrets she!

    Meanwhile, I have some predictions — or at least predictive ideas worth tossing around — and would love to hear others:

    1) Our heroes are swallowed up by one of the big ad firms we keep hearing about. And Sal is working there.

    2) Cooper could be gone after this season. As well as Price, and perhaps even Sterling.

    3) Faye, sorry, but you don’t stand a chance.

    4) The plot is moving quickly through the decade. Will they have to get a new actress for post-pubescent Sally?

  • The Hoobie

    I loved the scenes with Sally and with Lane happily preparing for what he thought would be his son’s visit. On this show where people can be so harsh to children, it was great to see Don, Betty, and Lane simply delighting in their kids and their kids’ happiness. I wonder if those scenes didn’t make Joan’s predicament seem even more poignant.

    On another note, between Mad Men and Rubicon, was Sunday Do NOT Challenge the Older Gentleman Night on AMC, or what?! Poor Lane.

    And yeah, I agree that Dr. Faye’s on her way out; as soon as she used the “we” word—”we’ll figure out what to do,” I was like, “Yep, buh-BYE Dr. Faye!” As difficult as the burden of his secret is for Don to carry alone, that doesn’t mean he wants to share in its management with anyone. But how does he ditch her now that she knows?!

  • http://dontmournorganize.wordpress.com dontmournorganize

    I think Don’s got his hands full with Faye. We’ve already seen her fly off the handle (Don’s overheard phone conversation). The writers at Mad Men aren’t above the cliches of the period – one I remember most, “Hell has no fury like a woman scorned.”

    Why did Joan tell the mother in the room that her (Joan’s) daughter is 15? It seemed like Joan thought about it for a second before she answered. Is that how old Joan’s child would be? Is that how old Joan was at her first abortion? Is she saying that the mother should have had an abortion when she was 15 instead perpetuating the cycle?

blog comments powered by Disqus