Oscars 2014: Why Are Special Effects Wizards Planning to Protest at the Ceremony?

The visual-effects industry wants to keep jobs in the U.S.

  • Share
  • Read Later
Tim Boyle / Getty Images

Oscar statuettes are displayed on Jan. 23, 2004, at the Museum of Science and Industry in Chicago, Illinois

If you catch a glimpse of something not quite normal on the red carpet outside Sunday’s Oscar ceremony, here’s what you’re likely to be looking at: the March in March, a protest by members of Hollywood’s visual effects industry.

That’s because — even though a hefty portion of today’s movies rely on the on-screen magic they can make — America’s effects industry is in big trouble.

As The Wrap reported when planning got underway about a month ago, their dissatisfaction stems from a perception that tax subsidies offered by other countries are encouraging filmmakers to get their visual effects work done overseas, harming the U.S. effects industry. A similar protest took place last year, inspired by a bankruptcy filing from one of the sector’s best-known companies.

(MORE: What Makes an Oscar Winner)

Now, it seems, the real hope for the VFX industry won’t come from something you might see on the news.

Yesterday, a comprehensive story at PandoDaily explained a legal technicality that’s offering them something to grab onto. As David Sirota reports, a VFX blogger named Daniel Lay hired lawyers to investigate any opportunities that might be available for VFX wizards in court. Those lawyers discovered that this winter, the MPAA clarified their position that digital products should count as trade goods — in other words, that a digital file made in another country and brought to the U.S. should be subject to all the same laws that apply to physical imports. The MPAA took this stance to curb digital piracy, but Lay and his team believe that the same rules would apply to components of a movie (like the effects) as the whole movie, which means the import taxes might cancel out the subsidies, making it more cost-effective for VFX to be completed domestically.

And as for the bankruptcy that inspired last year’s protest?

It’s now the subject of a new half-hour documentary, the entirety of which was just posted on YouTube. You can watch the whole thing here:


So Rhythm and Hughes opened up Offices in Vancouver and India.. and when their company collapsed they blame the Studios for taking work out of Los Angeles? Did they themselves not take work out of their LA Offices to put in Canada and India presumably where it is cheaper?


If the digital assets become subject to duties, what would prevent the studios form making an entire movie in Canada and then get all the subsidies and the advantages they want from from the duties?


"If you catch a glimpse..."  very apropos as that's all it will be, is a glimpse.  The really entertaining thing about the documentary was at the ending when the film fades to black and has a some text fade in, "Change starts now".  These are the words of dreamers, and dreamers are artists. But Hollywood is run by businessmen and those dreamers don't stand a snowball's chance in hell of changing the studios nor winning against their lawyers.  Fortunately for the businessmen the can walk all over the artists and the artists will come clamoring back for more just like the abused girlfriend they are.

Good documentary, now get back to work.