New Study Reveals Which Authors Have Ignored Women Most

Just in time for International Women's Day, an analysis of pronouns in literature reveals that, for some writers, it's as if women don't even exist

  • Share
  • Read Later
Hulton Archive/Getty Images

The English poet and dramatist, William Shakespeare (1564 - 1616), circa 1610.

Just in time for International Women’s Day, Mar. 8, a recent study—reported this morning by Popular Science—has found that some of the most respected authors in literary history don’t exactly treat men and women equally. Well, at least not when it comes to pronouns.

(MOREA New PBS Documentary Tells the Story of One Revolution (and Begins Another))

The survey was conducted by Ben Schmidt, a graduate student at Princeton who studies intellectual history (and the brilliant mind behind Prochronisms, a site that examines the time-period-appropriateness of language used in movies and TV). Schmidt’s blog “Sapping Attention” focuses on “text mining and digital humanities”: he scans texts for elements that can tell us something about the context, rather than just the content, of the work. For his most recent post, Schmidt examined works by some of the most well-respected “canonic” authors—the top 100 whose work is in the Bookworm database of 19th-century literature—to determine how many times they used male versus female pronouns, cross-referenced against the author’s gender.

What did he find? Charles Haddon Spurgeon, a 19th-century British preacher, used nearly 20 male pronouns for each female one, the most unbalanced ratio on the list. On the other end of the spectrum, Jane Austen had about three female per male. But the chart—nicely presented at Schmidt’s site—is not even on both sides. Shakespeare is presented as the average, but his work contains about three male per female. Austen is one of only four authors to use more female than male. Almost every writer who refers to females more frequently is a woman. To generalize, women wrote about women and men, but there were more male writers and they mostly wrote about men—which means women’s stories are disproportionately excluded from the literature we respect the most.

(MOREWhy Text Mining May Be The Next Big Thing)

In addition, the women who do write are often restricted to less well-respected library shelves. When Schmidt breaks it down by genre, we see that the pronouns can indicate more than just to whom the author is referring:

…that Louisa May Alcott is a juvenile writer and James Fenimore Cooper a literary writer presumably has as much to do with gender as with content….  That highlights one of the most important things to keep in mind when doing this sort of work: that it’s a convenient abstraction that gender and classification might be two different things, but in fact gender is so important that we have to assume it bleeds over into other form of classifications. This is one of the great problems with using established libraries (because they are “biased”) but also one of the opportunities, because we should be able to see some of the ways bias is instantiated into categories.

But Schmidt’s sources aren’t modern—and the canon can always evolve. Who knows what the same study on an International Women’s Day of the future might show?

2 comments
RameshRaghuvanshi
RameshRaghuvanshi

I think man is  unable to   understand the psyche of woman .Freud famously told   that I never understand what woman want from man. Till I think only great writer Tolstoy described very accurately psyche of women.othersare failed becausevery difficult to understand the psyche of women

boots
boots

it's not about bias. Male authors write more about male characters because generally speaking most men understand other men's thought processes and reasons for their behavious. Even the ones we don't like/disagree with, we often understand why they do the things they do. It's not the case with women. Most women are unreadable to most men or only readable sometimes. If your choice is between writing about something that you know really well and something that you only understand sometimes, which one would you choose?