Tuned In

Fringe Watch: Flash Forward

FOX
FRINGE: Peter (Joshua Jackson, L) connects with Olivia (Anna Torv, R) in the FRINGE Season Three finale episode "The Day We Died" airing Friday, May 6 (9:00-10:00 PM ET/PT) on FOX. ©2011 Fox Broadcasting Co. CR: Liane Hentscher/FOX

Spoilers ahead for the Fringe season finale:

Fringe committed more than ever to hardcore sci-fi, if that were possible, in its multipart finale, with mixed results. I thought the last installment, “The Day We Died,” was not Fringe’s finest moment as an individual finale. But it left me reasonably hopeful for the overarching storyline as Fringe heads into its fourth (and I’m guessing final?)* season.

*This, by the way, is only a guess, based on no inside knowledge but simply the ratings—enough for renewal but definitely meager in recent weeks—and the hope that the show gets a certain end date in time enough to wrap up effectively.

Though J.J. Abrams is not minutely involved in the day-to-day of Fringe, it’s always been hard to avoid comparing this with other Bad Robot series on some level, and the multipart finale made it even harder. The penultimate episode, “The Last Sam Weiss,” cranked up the Alias vibe higher than ever, substituting the First Men for Milo Rambaldi—right down to the discovery of an ancient manuscript that anachronistically depicted the central character as some kind of prophesied savior (here Olivia rather than Sydney).

But in “The Day We Died,” it turned out that Fringe was Lost as well! Well, sort of, in that the twist that the finale was built on concerned time-travel and, with it, hardcore time-geek issues like making a consciousness move forward in time (a la Desmond) and—you guessed it—whether What Happened Happened. Fringe, however, seems to be proposing an alternative solution to the causality paradox: that while certain events are written in stone, one can change one’s choices within the set parameters to alter the future. Or, as Walter put it: “I can’t change what happens because it’s already happened. But you can make a different choice within what happened. I simply need to find a way to bring your consciousness forward to now so that you can witness what will happen if you make the same choice.”

Well, God bless John Noble for being able to utter that mouthful and make it sound like it emerged from the lungs of an actual human being. Without a strong cast, much of the technical exposition and explanation in this episode would have played like the dullest kind of sci-fi cliché; as it was, there was a bit too much dialogue on the order of “Go back to Science Division. See if maybe something’s wrong with the radiation detection sensors.”

The principals in this series are at least capable of selling that, however. A guy like Lance Reddick can, in the smallest of scenes, convince me that he has been changed and hardened by 15 years of experience, even while sporting a distracting artificial eye. (One thing I love about Fringe, in its presentation of both universes, is its choice of disturbing, small changes and unexplained details that suggest by implication the larger, horrific events that we haven’t seen.)

But even capable performances weren’t enough to get me really invested in the first 45 minutes of the final episode, if only for the simple fact that I had to assume, by the laws of television, that all of it—the disastrous future, Olivia’s death—would somehow be negated by the end of the episode. Besides the assumption that Fringe was not going to write off Olivia for a full season, for instance, I could not imagine a full year of the show set in a 2026 where Peter, Astrid and company were somehow still in their 2011 bodies—plus or minus a different haircut—preserved, one assumes, by military-grade advances in cosmetic science.

I look, then, at the first several acts of the finale as a wormhole that got us from point A to point B. That point B, however, is a promising setup for Fringe’s endgame. Just as the—overall extremely strong—third season was structured around switching between the two warring universes, the fourth will twist that twist by bringing the two together, having Olivia and Walter play opposite themselves in an effort to save their inextricably linked worlds. (Let’s hope their body doubles are getting generous raises!) And the twist has dramatically interesting potential: I’m much more interested, for instance, in Walternate as a complex, hardened, but reasonably motivated frenemy than as the evil supervillain we glimpsed in most of this episode.

Oh, and that final twist? No, I don’t expect Peter to actually permanently have disappeared, any more than I expected Olivia to actually permanently have died. But I am very interested to see how Fringe gets him back, and how nicely the universes play together in the process. Time travel paradox stories, are like history: they can’t fundamentally be changed when it comes down to it. But it’s the choices you make along the way that can be very interesting indeed.

Related Topics: fringe, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Entertainment

    Matt Stroshane / Disney Parks / Getty Images

    Disney's Fantastic Voyage

    The kids are the go-to demographic on the Fantasy, the newest vessel in Disney’s fleet of floating theme parks

    14 Revelations From A New Tell-All Book On Christian BaleHuffington Post

    Bambi; Photo: Ruth Corney

    Grafitti Artist Bambi Paints Jubilee Tribute to the Queen

    TIME meets the female Banksy bringing royalty to London’s streets

  • gnatalby

    I had the same issue you did with regard to the stakes, although I thought it was a technically good episode.

    I actual have a pet peeve when tv shows advertise the death of a character than then something happens to them that isn’t actual for real death. This plagues sci fi/fantasy series like Buffy and Doctor Who and it just makes me feel annoyed and manipulated.

    Part of this is because I am an emo angst junkie and I know I would feel completely destroyed in the best way if say, the machine actually killed Peter and Walter and the Oliviae actually had emotional fall out from that.

    The final scene with all the Observers worked for me, though. It emphasized for me that they are not human.

  • intangiblefancy

    I find it interesting that the future setting, and the resulting lack of stakes, was the sticking point for so many professional reviewers. I’m actually glad that they only spent one episode there, more and I might have gotten antsy to get back to the present. Throw me into a future apocalyptic society like this though and I just want to know more about it. The other thing, is that in my view, all this did happen. Peter got in the machine, destroyed the other universe, people lived their lives for 15 years getting married and going to jail and such, and this version of Peter watched Olivia die. Then Walter came up with the idea of sending Peter’s consciousness forward through time (somehow) to change things, and we’re back to a 2011 where Peter never existed. So that previous time loop did matter, in that it (hopefully) helped save the universe. The time travel logic does sort of make my head hurt though.

    I didn’t like the cliffhanger very much, though. What I’m troubled by is that if Peter never existed, then everything that happened on the show never happened from the point of view of the current characters (or at least happened very differently). So Peter was never kidnapped, and we don’t have that Peter/Walter relationship that sort of drove the show. Maybe the writers have a good way to get out of this. Either by restoring the old timeline somehow or at least having the characters remember it, but I’m afraid they might have bitten off more than they could chew. Anyways, I didn’t like the way it was handled, with all the alternates looking at each other, then just having the Observers come in and explain everything.

    The episode has just gotten under my skin in a really weird way. As much as I was loving the show, it was a weird finale and sort of has me rethinking some of the flaws of the season, which were definitely there.

  • http://twitter.com/poniewozik James Poniewozik

    “Throw me into a future apocalyptic society like this though and I just want to know more about it.”

    That likely would have been my reaction under other circumstances–I’m a sucker for alternative-history scenarios. But in this instance, the 2026 future wasn’t that intriguing, since it was very much like the apocalyptic world of Over There (the amber, the disasters like vortexes, the state security apparatus)–with twists on the characters fates that seemed familiar (i.e., Walter was sprung from jail to help rather than from an asylum) and were almost certain to be negated by the end of the episode.

  • gnatalby

    Obviously it mattered and, from the POV of the show was real, but that doesn’t mean the stakes were real. Did you ever think the show was going to proceed with Olivia dead?

  • intangiblefancy

    I had figured out they weren’t going to stay in this time-frame by the end of the previous episode. If only because the show doesn’t have the budget to stay in an apocalyptic future and age up the actors for an entire season.

    I guess I just wasn’t bothered by the lack of stakes, and was glad to spend time in this world with these characters for an episode. It was a weird way to spend a finale though, and I can’t really blame anyone who didn’t like it.

  • rosseau

    James, that’s precisely the reason I liked the future world. It was just what we had been seeing Over There, but somehow bleaker. I could accept it as true. Some of the critics writing there was nothing at stake missed Dickens’ A Christmas Carol? It was a future yet to be. Olivia’s death was shocking. Walter’s imprisonment and guilt was poignant. Walternate’s anger was palpable. In fact, one could argue the future was there only for the Walter/Walternate character scenes, and John Noble’s acting. But also playing the theme out. The entire premise of the show is the consequences of a horrible choice, one made from grief and hurt, and so greatly tragic that it spirals everything downward. A lovable character became a monster for a moment and no matter how hard he tried to make up for it, he couldn’t–his choice only led to further unintended woe. It’s a vision of humanity that is tragic and bleak–that no matter what good we do, our flaws and bad choices–even one bad choice made out of love– will be of greater import and will always have reverberations. In this case, literally the end of the world.

    Fringe, unlike Lost, you could say was honest. It told us where we were. For a full season Lost jerked the audience around. Was the sideways reality more intriguing because it was more intriguing or was it because we didn’t know how it would tie in with over here? And from what I remember, outside of the redundant characters-finding-redemption stories, the main hook in sideways world while we were in sideways world was seeing the characters lead different lives and how they would run into each other as different people. It became “what will my favorite Lost character be in this universe?.” And then the ending, one could say, did not justify and affirm the audience’s interest of how the two worlds would meet. Fringe didn’t do this. In one episode only, it just presented a future logically based on what had gone before–and thematically important– and let us know that. I’m surprised it’s being criticized for a lean, plausible within the rules story, when Lost was praised for doing something similar over a full season in an unnecessary, game like manner.

    I also took note of how this finale and the final two episodes of Justified unwittingly commented on the news of the week.

  • dwhitcomb

    I think I heard a Faraday reference early on in this episode but I just can’t remember who said it and the context…

  • http://xweaponx.wordpress.com xweaponx

    I’m HOPING that your “guess” is wrong regarding the 4th and “final” season of Fringte – Remember, the X files was in the same “Kiss of Death” Timeslot for several YEARS and that show got 9 (?) seasons. This show, if supported by Fox, could last as long, maybe longer- Where the X-files and Fringe differ, is that the X files just explored the basic prospect of “Spooky” Mulder and his “Little Green Men” whereas the Fringe writers go fishing into the tech handbag and they pull out the most intriguing of actual “Fringe” science we know about and build a story each week which is a sort of round-table discussion (Usually by Walter) of that topic.

    Now, one other show that used unbelievable technobabble was “Star Trek: The Next Generation” in which the Tech Supervisors Rick Sternback (formerly the illustrator of Larry Niven novels) and Mike Okuda actually “wrote” a whole “Physics” to explain how a to wrap a warp drive around the ships computer so that the entire computer was faster-than-light, that is about as crazy as any Fringe science is crazy: And we had a Levar Burton/Geordi Laforge to extrapolate it all for us and make it sound sensible, so when inane psuedoscientific technical problems arose, there was a semblance of believability in those discussions (not to mention, it was kind of cool).

    But in Fringe when Walter is talking about some scientific principle, or anomaly, or theory, it is the real deal: I read a lot, I’ve heard of most of this stuff at one time or another even before the onset of Fringe. I don’t agree it takes just John Noble’s skill as a thesbian to make me believe what the character is saying, I do not think it absolutely requires John Noble to be saying an outlandish thing for me to believe it: Because I believe it anyway, at least the science they choose to build a Fringe episode around. But the way Walter Delivers the line you mention about bringing Peter’s consciousness into the future, raises it all up a few notches. In a way we already knew this was happening, because of the foreshadowing from previous episodes and even some things from season 1 pointed to this eventually happening: In Season 1 Walter postulated making a machine that could reach back and rip any person from any time in the past. Perhaps “The Machine” is this machine.

    Walter is a well written and documented character… This is what attracts me to the show, and not just Walter although he is the central tragic character, you can bet that even the most apparently minor character, even if shown on screen for a short time, seems to have been given a whole history, at least a well thought out background.

    This attention to detail, I’ve never seen it done as well as this, all factors in, this is why the characters are beloved characters. Abrams never hides the fact that this show could be a continuation of X-Files, even makes reference to that show directly. On the other hand, “easter eggs” all through the series have pointed to and homaged films like “The Matrix”, “A Scanner Darkly”, and even “Inception” (This happened specifically in the 3rd Season episode “L.S.D”), and to other shows, so if you are correct that some of the plot elements have been directly heisted from Alias, it was probably intentional.

    And I am glad that you see Peter’s vanishing point the same way I do: I think I laughed out loud in complete suprise when I realised Peter negated himself… But I am not worried, the Fringe Writers including one of my favourite writers Akiva Goldsman, now has 22 more episodes in which to explain what the Futz happened!

    Thank you for your very thoughtful review.

  • http://xweaponx.wordpress.com xweaponx

    dwhitcomb, it was “Red Universe” Brandon.

blog comments powered by Disqus