Tuned In

Game of Thrones Watch: It’s All in the Execution

HBO
Ep 1 scene 21

Before you read this post, climb up the wall, adjust your satellite dish and watch the pilot episode of Game of Thrones:

Because I hit on a lot of the thematic issues in my big review/preview, and because I need to knock out this Game of Thrones post faster than usual, I’m going to try something a little different in this post and run down some comments on the “Winter Is Coming” episode, chronologically, DVD-commentary-style. Then, because I’ve watched this pilot so many times at this point, I’m curious what you have to say in the comments. Let’s begin with…

The Prologue. I am going to make an effort, in these episode reviews, to write for newcomers to the series and forget that I’ve read the books. So here and elsewhere I will spare you how I imagined The Wall, the land beyond, and the White Walkers looking. (Note: in the books, the walkers are “The Others”; perhaps the terms was avoided because of Lost.) But this scene, while horrifying and spectacular, is also an interesting choice with which to start the series, both on TV and in the novels. If you watched only this, you would think you’re watching a zombie series. Instead, we never return to this setting.

But the scene—besides scaring the bejesus out of me—has an important function. It establishes that, even though the day-to-day reality of the characters is mundane medieval life, we are in fact in a world where the supernatural is real—though it has not touched the lives of most of the characters for generations. (As the next scenes show, even the Starks, living close to the Wall in the North, don’t believe the Walkers are a threat anymore.) It also shows that Game of Thrones plays on a big field. Which brings us to…

The Opening Titles. Cool. HBO is still the class of the field when it comes to opening titles that are little works of art in themselves. (Some AMC, FX and, to a lesser extent, Showtime series manage this as well.) A classic HBO title sequence is not only amazing to look at but metaphorically tells you what the themes will be. Game of Thrones may not be my all-time fave (that might be John from Cincinnati), but I’m not sure that I’ve seen an opening sequence that does as much work as this one, in terms of theme, function and simple practical information. The concept—a gameboard-like map springing to life—suggests the idea of gamesmanship. It recalls the turning gears and cranks of siege engines. With its angry, banded sun and glimpse of a tree bearing a face, it suggests a medieval cosmology—a flat earth watched by not-necessarily-benevolent gods. And in a sprawling series with many locations, it is literally a map: it highlights the sites where the episode’s action will take place (and will change from episode to episode).

The Starks. Here we get our first major stretch of character-drawing, which, this being Game of Thrones, involves a beheading. And it outlines some characters in, ahem, swift strokes. We learn that Jon is a bastard (“Father’s watching. And your mother,” emphasis added). We meet feisty daughter Arya, drawn from her joyless stiching by the sounds of archery, characterized worldlessly with an arrow shot and a cocky curtsey. And in Ned Stark’s insistence in carrying out his executions himself, taking no pleasure in it, we see the harsh sense of honor to which he holds himself. (And his family: just as important as his carrying out his own dirty work is his insistence that ten-year-old Bran see him do it.)

The Direwolves. A stag being eaten by maggots, a she-wolf impaled by antlers. Message: get used to seeing a lot of dead things. That there are five cubs—one for each Stark child, plus the runt for bastard Jon—is significant because the direwolf is the sigil (the heraldic animal) of their house. Another character note: “You’ll train them yourselves, you’ll feed them yourselves, and if they die, you’ll bury them yourselves.” And the stag? The sigil of House Baratheon, family of King Robert, whom we’ll shortly be meeting when we encounter…

The Royal Family. This is among the sections in which the exposition, necessary though it is, felt heavy-handed in the pilot. The most egregious example for me was the arrival of the royal retinue in Winterfell, in which we literally get introductions to each character, either through Arya’s running commentary or Robert’s greeting the Starks. Plausible? Of course. Natural? Not really. (For instance, how do we know that Jaime Lannister is the Queen’s twin brother? Arya says, “That’s Jaime Lannister, the Queen’s twin brother!”) Robert’s visit to the crypt, on the other hand, is no less expository—it reveals how the two men are linked, by battle and by Robert’s love for Ned’s dead sister—but far more affecting.

The Landscape: Time for a detour to check out the scenery. The CGI is stunning in this series, as you can see from the vista of King’s Landing, which made me want to book a vacation there. More evocative, though, are the set-design details; the holy women surrounding the body of the deceased Hand of the King, for instance, whose trappings suggested a culture and religion somewhat familiar and yet different from anything in our world. We get snippets of Westeros culture too, in the scene between Catelyn and Ned in the Godswood: that castles here communicate by raven, for instance, and that there is religious history within religious history (the Starks come from a history of worshipping “the old gods,” as opposed to the new ones of present-day Westeros).

The Godswood scene, like some of the CGI here, had a bit of an uncanny-valley vibe, lit with an otherworldly light that didn’t feel quite natural. But it too did a lot of narrative and character lifting: we get a feel for Catelyn and Ned as an old married couple with a long history, which Michelle Fairley and Sean Bean capture nicely—theirs is a deep but careworn love. And—through the catch in Catelyn’s voice—what a disturbing change accepting the King’s offer could mean. Here, and in the slight menace to the royal reception, you get the sense that the attentions of the crown are a great, but potentially dangerous, honor. Thanks in no small part to…

The Lannisters. We first meet Cersei and Jaime discussing a secret that she fears Jon Arryn has learned; we meet brother Tyrion in a whorehouse. There will be a lot of talk about the sex in GoT, and generally I’m OK with it. When later we see Daenerys traded off by her brother and inspected like a heifer for market, it seems exploitative because it is exploitative, and the series is not shrinking from its implications for the woman (girl to us, but woman to her culture) being traded. (The wedding scene too, though maybe kitschy in its staging, sets up a world in which life and sex are cheap.) The whorehouse scene, on the other hand, which worked in more exposition—sexposition?—was a bit too “It’s pay cable! Boobies!” for me.

Where were we? Ah, the Lannisters. The contrast between them and the Starks cannot be more, well, stark. They’re urbane where the Starks are rugged; glamorous where the Starks are rough-hewn; self-interested where the Starks are all about duty; blonde where the Starks are brunette. (And blunt where the Starks are reserved, as you can see by the greeting Sansa gets from her potential future mother-in-law: “Have you bled yet?”) But before you get to comfortable, it’s time to meet…

The Targaryens. Pentos, where we first see Dany and Viserys, looks something like the Monaco of this fantastical world, a place where you’ll expect to find decadent exiled royals. These are some of the most fascinating scenes for me early on, because they’re so unlike what we see across the sea in Westeros, and thus hint at the richness and mysteries we might see as the plot expands. (Curved swords! Dragon eggs!) But being more exotic, they’re also easier, frankly, to laugh at, so I’m curious if newcomers found the settings—and the encounters with the Dothraki—to be hokey.

(There’s also the simple physical portrayal at first glance—a glowingly white maiden being given over to a glowering dark savage—that sets off alarms in the eyes of a viewer from our reality. I don’t know if it’s possible to be racist toward a race that does not actually exist, but at minimum the Dothraki seem like a kind of grabbag of exotic/dark/savage signifiers. Of course, Viserys, selling off his sister for power—to a chieftain he holds in contempt but for his army—comes across hardly any more noble.)

What redeems that for me early on are the performances, especially the understated work of Emilia Clarke. It would be very easy to make a character in her situation—essentially being sold into high-class sex slavery—melodramatic or pitiable. Instead, she makes Dany understandably frightened and yet regal, carrying herself like someone made conscious of her duty to family since birth.

Quote of the Episode. “Let me give you some advice, bastard. Never forget what you are. The rest of the world will not. Wear it like armor, and it can never be used to hurt you.” We get a small glimpse—pun not intended—of Tyrion here, but Peter Dinklage in a few lines and scenes owns the character.

A Whodunit… There’s been a lot of set-up, history, character and background given in the first 50 minutes; the last 15 set about giving us plot, some driving throughlines to pull us through the coming episodes. First off: the allegation that the last Hand of the King was murdered, perhaps by the Lannisters, who may simply see Robert’s fat arse as keeping the Iron Throne warm for them. Thrones may be a fantasy epic, but it’s also shaping up to be that oldest of TV formats: a crime mystery.

…and an Oh-No-He-Didn’t. Or two crime mysteries? One more difference between the Starks and the Lannisters: they have, shall we say, different sibling dynamics. I said I wouldn’t reference the books in these reviews, but reading them, Bran’s defenestration was as much of a holy-crap moment for me as it was here.

And there you have your pilot—a very different one from many first episodes, even on HBO, in that it didn’t so much tell a single story or establish symmetries among the subplots. Rather, it just set a very large table: a big welcome-to-Westeros that said boldly that no one here is safe.

(By the way, a request/demand: no spoilers from the books in the comments. I’ll assume some of you have read the books and some haven’t, but I don’t want anything ruined for those coming to the story for the first time, so confine your comments to what’s actually happened on-screen. There are other fan sites, like Winter Is Coming, that are great for discussion among those who have already read the books. Thanks in advance.)

Related Topics: game of thrones, Television
  • Latest on Entertainment

    IFC Films

    Kerouac's On the Road Comes to Cannes: Where's the Beat?

    Walter Salles’ film of the Beat Generation classic wastes a strong cast, including Twilight‘s Kristen Stewart, in a needless tribute to ’50s wanderlust

    Surprise! The Lowest-Rated Show in Broadcast History Is Actually GreatSlate

    Adam Rose/FOX

    Glee Watch: NYADA, NYADA, NYADA

    Spoilers for the season finale of Glee below:

    One beef I often have with Glee episodes is that they move too fast, go in too many directions, try to cram in too much at once. You might say that about “Goodbye,” the season 3 finale, but in this case that approach seemed about right. It’s an episode about graduation, and graduation is something that, no matter how much you plan for and anticipate it, still goes too fast. Graduating is something you do, but in the moment it feels like something that happens to you, suddenly and all at once, like going over a waterfall.

  • http://tomcamfield.wordpress.com/ Tom Camfield

    I thought it was great, I used to read these books when I was much younger, and being able to go back to them (without having to wade through thousands of pages) was a treat. I wasn’t expecting much, I’ve never been a Sean Bean fan, but I thought it was done well, with plenty of gore and sex to make me look forward to certain equally gory scenes from the books.

    One big, and good, change was the map at the beginning; the book shied away from showing the land across the sea in map form, so I was always a bit lost as to what exactly was going on over there. Really looking forward to the next episode. Might even pick up the books again…

  • itsanhonor

    The credits had really neat little details like all the actor’s had the sigil (wolf, lion, even the kraken, etc.) of their character’s houses next to their names, which was cool until you realize they made a graphical “typo” and gave Sophie Turner the Targaryean dragon.

    Good thing they’re going to have a create a bunch more of these to correct that error.

  • William H. Brewer

    I was impressed with the things they changed from the novel: they made sense to me (either as condensation, or in making the story more compelling in a visual medium), and nearly all of them struck me as consistent with the characters and the overall story. (Catelyn’s resistance to Ned’s appointment is the one I’m not so sure about.)

    For example, instead of having an extended (kind of dull) feast scene, we get a few character-revealing glimpses; instead of Jon getting slowly drunk and pissed off, we get the message from his sword practice and his exchange with Tyrion. Nicely done, IMO.

  • itsanhonor

    Great point. I remembered that Jon was at the feast in the book, but this worked as a much better pacing choice given the length of the pilot.

    Arya getting carried off by Robb at one look from his mother was also pretty nice touch.

  • lawrencetokill

    What did you think of the Hound, from his intro to his exhange with Tyrion? A small part of the episode, but I enjoyed that they took the time to give him something.

  • rellimarual

    My biggest gripe with the adaptation is Dany’s wedding night, which if you recall is not the grim degradation depicted in the show, but rather surprisingly awesome. Khal Drogo turns out to be a really good lover.

    I guess I can see why they did this — they want to emphasize that everyone is treating her like a thing — but in the book it’s the first sign she has that the Dothraki are not the savages her people assume they are. Since all the other Dothraki scenes are pretty cheesy/porny/borderline racist, the overall effect is a lot more simplistic than the book’s.

  • lawrencetokill

    I had basically the same initial reaction, but from what they showed, it’s not absolutely super certain yet just how their love/rape scene ended or how they feel about it. It was an odd cutaway for an HBO sex/rape scene, seemed abrupt. So maybe there’s more to the scene later, or maybe not.

  • The Hoobie

    @rellimarual: Yes! I was coming here to say the same thing! Dany’s wedding night in the book is really a lovely surprise. I’m hoping, along with lawrencetokill, that maybe in this first episode they cut away a little early, and in the second episode they’ll show it more like it was in the book?

    I had another “I think the book might have done this better” quibble, but I realize it could be spoilery, so I’ll save it for next Sunday.

    Hmm…. I’m torn about the way the show introduced Tyrion vs. the way the book did. He sure was surrounded by a lot of extraneous HBO boobies when we first met him last night, but, IIRC, in the book, he makes his entrance by doing some acrobatic tumbling before he talks to Jon—tumbling that was effective in the book in disorienting Jon but that might have made him look jester-like onscreen.

    (I should note that I’m only 170 pages into the first book as a first-time reader, so only really about 30 pages ahead of where the first episode ended…. And I may not get a chance to read any further ahead this week, so, yeah. And that’s assuming it’s a good idea to try to keep up with both, anyway. :-) )

    Two things I did like about the episode last night were the pretty deliberate pacing (I thought it would be necessarily more overstuffed and frenetic), as well as the almost-AMC-like attention to setting the mood of the series.

  • Omagus

    I cosign with lawrencetokill. I was initially disappointed that the wedding night appeared to have been turned into a rape scene but I want to see how they follow it up.

  • rosseau

    I’m timing my reread of the novel to the show. I don’t worry about literalness–seeing what I just read come to life without an adaptation change–here because the novel’s genre, fantasy, gives quite a bit of room to wonder and epic scope. (In contrast, there were bits of Jane Eyre, which I saw over the weekend, that were dull because they just dramatized a scene from the book without adding a cinematic change). But this might, just might, be a successor to LOTR. From the opening scene, it felt epic and I was pleasently surprised the director was Tim Van Patten who I guess is fluid enough to do an American historical drawing room scene and a medieval action scene with zombies.

    I’m in the minority in liking Dany’s wedding night change. Her enjoyment in the book came just a little to quick for me. This way, she can get used to the idea and realistically fall in love with Drogo. Like Fay Wray is terrified of Kong in the remake, but over time comes to like him, which becomes more powerful and emotional.

  • IntownWriter

    I haven’t read the books; have never been a big fantasy fan; and had few expectations for this series.

    One episode and I’m completely hooked. The books are on-order from Amazon, and I can’t wait for next week’s episode.

    I do love my HBO! (And Tuned In, o’course: this was a typically excellent piece.)

  • shootthecritic

    I know nothing about the books, so thank you for laying out the characters the way you did. Of course with these types of shows (with a huge cast and intertwining plot lines), one learns as they go alone, eventually reaching a good level of understanding but never getting too comfortable with all the names/plots/subplots (unless they’re you, in which case they are super familiar with everything). Anyway, I watched the premiere earlier today, and I really enjoyed it.
    I am excited that HBO is back with an “action” series. By action I mean special effects, death, sex, murder plots, deception, and kings and queens. Like “Rome”– but this is clearly nothing like “Rome.” I actually can’t compare it to any other HBO show I’ve seen, so that’s kind of nice. Something different, while remaining true to the ensemble-cast formula.
    I’m not crazy about a lot of the very generic and stereotypical dynamics (incestuous, plotting, and deceptive siblings; loyal husband and leader, torn between duty and family; bastard son trying to prove his worth; young, innocent girl traded to indifferent and aggressive warrior for a political alliance; impossibly cold and self-interested brother who trades her, etc, etc.) BUT they’re still fun to watch, and I’m hoping the fantasy aspects (which I love) and more interesting characters (Tyrion) move the series away from that kind of predictability.
    But, again, thanks for the nice, clarifying summary of characters.
    -Shoot the Critic, http://shootthecritic.com

  • kaptingimpy

    Very happy with the first episode. Not perfect (I agree with the above take on Dany’s wedding) but a good start.

    Unlike James, though, I really didn’t like the credits which were pretty but off tonally. It struck me as too steampunk for a classically medieval setting, and was too bright and clean for a dark, gritty show.

  • http://dexterest.wordpress.com dexterest

    Speaking of the opening titles. Anyone notice that the family sigils of the characters appear next to their actors’ names. However, in the opening titles of this first episode, Emilia Clarke’s sigil is the Lannisters’ lion sigil, not the Targaryen sigil that appears next to Harry Lloyd. Hope this is fixed in later episodes.

blog comments powered by Disqus