Tuned In

TV Weekend: The Killing

AMC

The Killing, which debuts Sunday night on AMC, is one of those murder stories in which the only things possibly as sad as the death it documents are the lives that survive it.

Yes, the title crime—the gruesome murder of Seattle teenager Rosie Larsen—is heartbreaking. But then there is the family she leaves behind, including two working-class parents who clearly pressed themselves to the limit trying to keep their family afloat and a young daughter under control, only to see everything shatter. There are her amoral, rudderless classmates, some seeming to bear guilt, if not for the murder, then for other things they don’t want known. There are the city politicians who see Rosie’s death as a talking point. And there is the investigator, Sarah Linden (Mireille Enos), a single mom who was hours away from moving out of town, burned out on homicide work, before this case draws her back in.

The Killing is based on the Danish series Forbrydelsen, which covered a single murder investigation, one day at a time, for a 20-episode season. The Killing aims to do the same over 13 episodes. Which means that—apart from deft writing by creator Veena Sud and some fine performances—one advantage it has is time. We usually divide dramas into “procedurals” (those, like CSI, that solve single cases in an hour) and “serials” (those that tell arcing stories over a season or more). The Killing is a serial procedural, which mans that not only can it patiently go through the process of building a case, turning over rocks and chasing false leads, it can also deeply probe the effects of the murder on those left behind.

One thing The Killing uses its gift of time for is setting mood, which, unlike the go-to mode of many cop shows, is not so much “dark” or “gritty” as melancholy. Taking advantage of its Northwest setting (it was actually shot in Vancouver) it seem to use the constant local rain—falling or just fallen, glistening on the street and dampening the dirt—as a co-star.

And Enos, who gave one of the best of a slew of great performances on Big Love (as a pair of polygamist twin sisters), was a fantastic choice for Sarah in this role. She has a quiet strength, and an ability to convey emotional turmoil through placidity. Her Sarah is, in a TV world of eccentric detectives, shockingly normal. She’s a single mom. She goes jogging. She has a son who’s been acting out at the thought of moving. She wears thick chunky sweaters—she could as easily be a proofreader as a crime-scene investigator.

But Linden brings to her work a quiet intensity that seems to be about more than public service, one that, to look at her tired eyes, has worn on her. When she catches her last case—when she has a flight scheduled that night to move to Sonoma Valley with her boyfriend and son—her departure date keeps getting pushed off. And the harrowing investigation, in that steady rain, contrasted with the idea of sunny Sonoma, becomes a metaphor for the difficulty of really changing her life.

That investigation breaks down into three parallel stories. First: the crime itself. Rosie turns up missing—the first hour is devoted to finding her body—and Linden begins asking questions around Rosie’s school, working with Stephen Holder (a perfectly skeevy Joel Kinnaman), the former narcotics cop who is supposed to replace her. Holder is cynical, tactless and given to questionable interrogation methods (like plying kids with fake weed to get them to talk). But while he has plenty to learn from Linden, his methods turn out to be not unsuited to the fishy, drug- and sex-saturated subculture of Rosie’s high school.

Second, there’s a political subplot, because the car Rosie’s body is found in turns out to have been stolen (or “stolen”?) from the campaign of mayoral candidate Darren Richmond (Billy Campbell). A widower and political idealist, Richmond is principled—or seems so—but his instincts to help the investigation soon conflict with the best interests of his campaign, especially when the cops ask him to withhold news in the early hours of the case.

Finally, and maybe most powerfully, there is the Larsen family. Rosie’s dad Stanley (Brent Sexton) is the owner of a small moving company, already overwhelmed by the normal terrors of raising a teen daughter, then forced to keep things together for his young sons. And as Rosie’s mother Mitch, Michelle Forbes is fantastic: tough but brittle, she’s fiercely dedicated to her family, but in a way that implies what trying to give her kids a better life has cost her.

Two working-class parents, a girl who may have mixed in with a bad crowd (or not) and disappears: it’s a not-unfamiliar setup, and many cop shows would give you a few seconds of anguish with them. In the excruciating but excellent scene in which they learn of Rosie’s death—I don’t want to spoil it with details—The Killing shows you their pain… and then stays with it. And stays with the anger, the numbness, the frustration, the self-punishment that follow.

The Killing itself is a slow burn, or rather drizzle. Three episodes in, I can tell you that I’m drawn in by the characters and eager to see a fourth; I can’t guess whether the story is finally going to be satisfying, and the show is deliberate and sparing in parceling out details on the case.

But it’s so far moving and captivating. Though the milieu is a little different, and the narrative style very different, there’s something in The Killing that reminds me of The Lovely Bones: a murder story that’s less about the killing than about the fact that a murder is a crime that does not end when the victim stops breathing.

Related Topics: AMC, The Killing, tv weekend, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Entertainment

    IFC Films

    Kerouac's On the Road Comes to Cannes: Where's the Beat?

    Walter Salles’ film of the Beat Generation classic wastes a strong cast, including Twilight‘s Kristen Stewart, in a needless tribute to ’50s wanderlust

    Surprise! The Lowest-Rated Show in Broadcast History Is Actually GreatSlate

    Adam Rose/FOX

    Glee Watch: NYADA, NYADA, NYADA

    Spoilers for the season finale of Glee below:

    One beef I often have with Glee episodes is that they move too fast, go in too many directions, try to cram in too much at once. You might say that about “Goodbye,” the season 3 finale, but in this case that approach seemed about right. It’s an episode about graduation, and graduation is something that, no matter how much you plan for and anticipate it, still goes too fast. Graduating is something you do, but in the moment it feels like something that happens to you, suddenly and all at once, like going over a waterfall.

  • mcnater

    How about a tip of the hat to Murder One, which pioneered this sort of format, although I’m not positive it was the first. Any extra insight on that for me James? I remember watching Murder One when I was 15 and made quite the impact.

  • http://twitter.com/poniewozik James Poniewozik

    Murder One was a similar sort of premise in its first season, though that focused on the trial. This sort of thing being evolutionary, I’d have a hard time saying which series was “first,” although Wiseguy–though it did not begin with season-long arcs–was something of a breakthrough in US TV.

  • mcnater

    Interesting, I hadn’t heard of Wiseguys…a touch too young for it. Is that a show worth re-visiting?

  • http://twitter.com/poniewozik James Poniewozik

    Very good performances, especially by Kevin Spacey. It’s worth a look for curiosity, though in the age of cable dramas, not all of it has aged well.

  • http://piiittiiiii.wordpress.com donvito1312

    Tip of the hat for the Danish original. What a wonderful show. You should watch it!

  • The Hoobie

    Yes, but if I ever become a celebrity, “Frank McPike” is absolutely going to be my fake hotel and restaurant reservation name. (You heard it here first, folks!)

    And whatever happened to William Russ? He (and Jonathan Banks!) deserved more of a career after Wiseguy.

  • The Hoobie

    Aspects of the show sound like they would be right up my Rubicon-loving alley, but I don’t think I can watch it right now. We’ve just had a death in the family, and also, even though our kids are still fairly wee, I don’t need any incitement to worry about our ability to help them navigate teenagerhood at the moment. Another show to add to my long “when I have world enough, emotional wherewithal enough, and time” list. Right now I’d much rather watch shows about tiny horses and animal anus art.

    I’m also wondering what the show would do with a second season. Would it follow another case for 13 episodes? With the same detectives or a different cast? What did the Danish version do?

  • simcastic

    Absolutely loved the premier last night. I will admit, i was crying my eyes out when the parents found out their daughter was dead…and then again when they told the children. What an amazing job they did on it. Definitely looking forward to more episodes.

  • van68

    As the commenters above already noted, The Killing isn’t particularly groundbreaking — in addition to Murder One and (to a lesser extent) Wiseguy, there’s also Twin Peaks (season-long investigation of a teen’s murder in the Pacific Northwest) and Insomnia, the 1997 Norwegian detective thriller (and its 2002 American remake) that used the perpetual quasi-daylight of the Arctic Circle to evoke a similar mood to the gray moistness of this series’ setting.

    More importantly, though, The Killing so far seems to share the quality of these predecessors. The character-building of the first hour and the procedural tidbits found in the second half show this to be a cut above network fare. I’ll keep watching.

  • rosseau

    1) Please no more aerial shots of the city. I get they’re trying to make Seattle isolated, foreboding, and haunted (I was reminded of Elsinore) but a few times is enough.
    ..
    2) This reminded me a of a lot of things: the original Insomnia, Seven, The Pledge. Hopefully Linden will fair better than Jack Nicholson. I don’t know if these are deliberate and the show plans to surprise us with originality later or if they’re deliberate in that it sets up a straw man: make the audience have lowered expectations and then just slightly exceed them, not with originality but with being marginally different than the other works it references.

    3) Must we again encounter stupid, out of control, high school students yearning to break the confines of academics by engaging in orgies/Satanic cults? Though providing an expert bit of audience manipulation–the boyfriend was so repugnant, you wanted his father to hit him– the show’s portrayal of the secret sadistic lives of the American teenager isn’t exactly true. My high school didn’t have serial killers and blood parties. By now this is a cliche. Can we get normal intelligent students on this show?

    4)Despite all that, I kind of liked it. The actress who plays Linden is very good in her solitude and attitude. There’s something beguiling about her. The atmospherics were moody. There were some great shots, like the car suspended over the water, and the family’s story was heartbreaking. So I hope good things will come and the show will prove its artistic reason for being.

  • danamc18

    Just got around to watching the first two hours. I found it to be very compelling. It was quite heavy and depressing, but I’m not complaining. Just saying that I can see that itself being a turnoff to many viewers. I for one was drawn in by the morose tone of the show.

    Also, it was beautifully shot. I felt it was quite cinematic in many ways. That is probably my favorite aspect of the show thus far.

    Going in, I knew what Michelle Forbes and Mireille Enos are capable of acting-wise (being a fan of their respective turns in HBO series). But I was still blown away by them. Particularly by Forbes when Rose’s body is discovered. However, I think there’s also a lot to be said for Enos’ performance. She said so much without saying a word.

    Looking forward to seeing more episodes.

blog comments powered by Disqus