Tuned In

Oprah's Oprah Moment: I Have a Half-Sister!

“I can’t tell you how many times I’ve done a story like this on The Oprah Winfrey Show,” Oprah Winfrey told her audience today. But this time the story Winfrey was relating—a successful, middle-aged woman discovering that she has had a secret half-sister since she was nine years old—was about herself.

And it was, well, like something right out of Oprah.

The big secret that Winfrey had been touting: she discovered, last fall, that she had a half-sister, Patricia, living in Milwaukee. Patricia was born to Oprah’s mother when Oprah was nine years old, and given up for adoption without Oprah’s knowing it. She spent years in and out of foster homes, eventually had a family of her own, and in 2007, she came to discover that she was in fact related to the talk show host. (And if those were not enough strange twists, though Patricia was not named by Oprah’s mother, she has the same name as Oprah’s other half-sister, Pat, who died in 2003.)

What unfolded afterward was what, for most of us, would be the stuff of bizarre dreams: America’s top talk-show host interviewing her own family members about a secret that had eluded her for half her life. She asked Patricia—who was remarkably calm considering the circumstances—how she felt to suddenly find herself a celebrity sibling; she asked her own mother how she felt about the secret that she kept, then told her mother, in an address to the camera, that she should “let go” the shame of the adoption as Oprah had let go her own teen pregnancy.

Winfrey spent much of the episode with red-rimmed eyes, getting choked up as she brought Patricia onstage and told her how moved she was that her new relative did not try to sell her story or exploit the situation in the press. “There have been few times that I’ve been anywhere and not been sold out,” Oprah said. “There have been few times when you can bring anybody new into your life and not have that person in some way betray you or use you or take advantage of you.”

It was in that spirit, Oprah said, that she had not mentioned the secret to any other press before this episode, because, she told her audience, “We all know how the media is” and how it would exploit the story. As if Oprah Winfrey—have you heard that she has a new TV network?—is not part of the media (or has never exploited a story)?

And fine: this is essentially a personal matter, albeit one she’s making public. It’s not as if there’s some urgent compelling public right to know here, or as if Oprah is somehow complicit in a scandal. Still, let’s not mistake what was happening here: sure, by keeping the revelation on her own show, she was avoiding a more sensational interview in another forum. But she was also controlling the terms—and more important, the questions. It’s not as if Oprah was being interviewed by her sister, or niece, or mother: she was interviewing them.

And more important, there wasn’t another journalist—Piers Morgan last week, or Barbara Walters last month—asking Oprah how she feels about the situation and what she’ll do now. (It would have been interesting, for instance, for someone to follow up on how Oprah’s mother had a baby without her nine-year-old daughter knowing—not that it’s implausible, just that it’s unusual and bore asking.)

It was a strange, strange experience all around. But maybe one of the strangest aspects of the episode was that it was happening to very likely the most famous woman in the world—every aspect of whose life has been examined and, presumably, whose every past secret would be, if not exposed, at least rumored about.

Instead, it highlighted how, after 25 years on national TV, Oprah Winfrey has become someone who we know everything about—her childhood, her abuse, her pregnancy, her family, her friends, her favorite things—and who, on some elemental levels, who we know very little about. And who, evidently, is still finding out stunning things about herself and her history.

Maybe it’s shouldn’t surprise us. Strange things happen in families all the time—long-lost uncles, past siblings who are never spoken of. Maybe the circumstances of growing up in and around a family just like that is precisely the sort of thing that drives a person to host a show about secrets and letting go, to develop the detachment necessary to handle megafame, to build a career around offering her audience help in figuring out the puzzles of their lives.

It’s an interesting question, anyway. Maybe it would take an Oprah Winfrey to figure it out. Maybe she’ll do a show about it sometime.

Related Topics: oprah winfrey, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Entertainment

    IFC Films

    Kerouac's On the Road Comes to Cannes: Where's the Beat?

    Walter Salles’ film of the Beat Generation classic wastes a strong cast, including Twilight‘s Kristen Stewart, in a needless tribute to ’50s wanderlust

    Surprise! The Lowest-Rated Show in Broadcast History Is Actually GreatSlate

    Adam Rose/FOX

    Glee Watch: NYADA, NYADA, NYADA

    Spoilers for the season finale of Glee below:

    One beef I often have with Glee episodes is that they move too fast, go in too many directions, try to cram in too much at once. You might say that about “Goodbye,” the season 3 finale, but in this case that approach seemed about right. It’s an episode about graduation, and graduation is something that, no matter how much you plan for and anticipate it, still goes too fast. Graduating is something you do, but in the moment it feels like something that happens to you, suddenly and all at once, like going over a waterfall.

  • http://www.stevebeste.com Steve Beste

    I bet that Gayle got a very nice gift, thinking diamond necklace, before Oprah announced she found her half-sister.

    And, It shoulda been me.

  • evietoo

    She was living with her father in TN at the time.

    Not that I ever watch the show. Not me…

  • http://twitter.com/poniewozik James Poniewozik

    Thanks–that would clear up this aspect of it. Though my Oprahology is limited, I wasn’t clear at what points (if at all), she had lived in TN with her father before her own pregnancy, and various chronologies I’d looked at put her in Milwaukee during this period, starting at age six. (But clearly she moved a lot as a child.)

  • http://sassyhunkylad.wordpress.com sassyhunkylad

    Oh Lordy,

    Who cares? Aren’t we sick of Oprah, whose only claim to fame is talk, talk, and more talk. Enough already. And isn’t it swarmy that everything she touches has to have HER name on it–show, magazine, network.

    And, yes, how could she not know that her mama had a kid when (she) Oprah was 9? Either Oprah had blinders on or was terribly naive at 9! Sounds like her mama was a “good-time” gal, for sure!

    Let’s hope Oprah finds fulfillment sometime, somewhere as the “vessel” of God (“Use me, Lord, use me up until I’m dry!).

    Oh Lordy!

  • daltonii

    And yet, here YOU are…posting a snarky comment.

    Rather hypocritical.

  • tyrantking

    Many’s the time I walked home after football practice so my mom could finish the day’s episode of Oprah. Thanks for that O!

  • katy93

    “Strange things happen in families all the time—long-lost uncles, past siblings who are never spoken of.”

    Word.

    In my family one of my great-uncles was married to one great-aunt, had kids with her, divorced her, and married her sister. They had children, too, and only when he died did the two sets of kids find out about each other. (They did live in different states about 1600 miles away from one another.) The fascinating thing is that nobody I’ve talked to thought it was a secret–lots of us knew about both families, but somehow it never occurred to us to wonder if all the cousins/half-siblings knew about each other. I mean, it’s not the first thing you ask about at holiday gatherings, is it? You ask about school and jobs and kids and stuff, not “oh by the way, you did know your dad has four other kids halfway across the country, right?”

    Coincidentally, about seven people in the family have taken up tracing the family tree with almost compulsive enthusiasm. Small wonder.

  • chancelor

    Oprah Winfrey is not the most famous woman in the world! Outside of America she is not only irrelevant, people also usually dont understand her importance.
    Some examples for more famous women:
    Mother Theresa (although dead),
    Queen Elizabeth,
    Sonia Ghandi ( very well known among 1,2 billion indians),
    Angela Merkel ( very well known at least among 500 million people in the EU),
    Madonna,

    On a seemingly unrelated note:
    the Superbowl is not watched by 1 billion people, but by about I guess hundred
    million people in America and hardly anyone else

  • tyrantking

    JK Rowling

  • tyrantking

    I’ve wondered about situations like this. Does that make them more than just half siblings? Like 3/4 siblings? Or is it sufficient to say they are siblings and cousins?

  • fesade

    GOD WORK IN MYSTERIOUS WAYS !!!

    It is true that good things happen to good people no matter how long it takes. Oprah Winfrey spend most of her life and wealth taking care of people she dosn’t even know. She went as far as caring for Orphans around the world, creating hope for the hopeless by creating schools, so that kids could have a better life than the one she had as a kid.

    Oprah’s recent discovery is just another way God shows her more blessing by revealing to her the family she thought she never have. Amazing isn’t it? What a great way to celebrate thanksgiving!

    Patricia, the half-sister on the other hand did not reveal the secret since 2007. Someone else could have jumped rightaway, considering the callibre of Oprah in the society. That by itself is a testimony of discipline and selflessnes which seems to run in the genes of the Oprah’s family. Pat was more interested in protecting her sister Oprah.

    I am so thankful that the part of her life that is incomplete is now complete. YOU ARE NOT ALONE AFTERALL! Keep on doing what you are doing Sister, God will continue to show you pleasant surprises. -Festus Adeoye

blog comments powered by Disqus