<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ricky Gervais&#039; Golden Globes Insurrection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://entertainment.time.com/2011/01/17/ricky-gervais-golden-globes-insurrection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://entertainment.time.com/2011/01/17/ricky-gervais-golden-globes-insurrection/</link>
	<description>What’s good, bad and happening, from pop culture to high culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:54:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fortified33</title>
		<link>http://entertainment.time.com/2011/01/17/ricky-gervais-golden-globes-insurrection/#comment-27333</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fortified33]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunedin.blogs.time.com/?p=13754#comment-27333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surely, there is a difference between a roast and an award celebration. If you are talking about roasts like Dean Martin used to host with Don Rickles, etc. then yes, now that&#039;s a roast!
Gervais attempts to be clever were wasted on most watching I think, in or out of the room. Obviously, some think he is something magical in the world of comedy.
There are so many better comedians out there, not to mention better hosts. But that&#039;s my opinion.
Ricky aside, I found most of the ceremony boring. I have not seen enough movies or series to say who deserved what. I thought Glee was too much over the top, it seems like there are shows just as good now, although I watch it myself because of the musical performances which are stellar, not the comedy, which is just average for TV thiese days I thilnk.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely, there is a difference between a roast and an award celebration. If you are talking about roasts like Dean Martin used to host with Don Rickles, etc. then yes, now that&#8217;s a roast!<br />
Gervais attempts to be clever were wasted on most watching I think, in or out of the room. Obviously, some think he is something magical in the world of comedy.<br />
There are so many better comedians out there, not to mention better hosts. But that&#8217;s my opinion.<br />
Ricky aside, I found most of the ceremony boring. I have not seen enough movies or series to say who deserved what. I thought Glee was too much over the top, it seems like there are shows just as good now, although I watch it myself because of the musical performances which are stellar, not the comedy, which is just average for TV thiese days I thilnk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anniehouse</title>
		<link>http://entertainment.time.com/2011/01/17/ricky-gervais-golden-globes-insurrection/#comment-27332</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anniehouse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 02:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunedin.blogs.time.com/?p=13754#comment-27332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that Gervais was brilliant. I actually thought he was a little tame with his comments about the usual Hollywood suspects. It was great that he called out the Foreign press for their ridiculous endorsement of &quot;The Tourist&quot;. It could have only been money or sex!  His edgy humor is one of the reasons they asked him back. Last year these were the same folks laughing about his Mel Gibson intro. It was fun to watch though. I hope they will have him back to host next year. Cheers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Gervais was brilliant. I actually thought he was a little tame with his comments about the usual Hollywood suspects. It was great that he called out the Foreign press for their ridiculous endorsement of &#8220;The Tourist&#8221;. It could have only been money or sex!  His edgy humor is one of the reasons they asked him back. Last year these were the same folks laughing about his Mel Gibson intro. It was fun to watch though. I hope they will have him back to host next year. Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjwilstein</title>
		<link>http://entertainment.time.com/2011/01/17/ricky-gervais-golden-globes-insurrection/#comment-27331</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mjwilstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 02:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunedin.blogs.time.com/?p=13754#comment-27331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of my favorite Ricky Gervais jokes from last night&#039;s Golden Globes are here:
http://gtcha.me/ieWtc6]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of my favorite Ricky Gervais jokes from last night&#8217;s Golden Globes are here:<br />
<a href="http://gtcha.me/ieWtc6" rel="nofollow">http://gtcha.me/ieWtc6</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dangogh123</title>
		<link>http://entertainment.time.com/2011/01/17/ricky-gervais-golden-globes-insurrection/#comment-27330</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dangogh123]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunedin.blogs.time.com/?p=13754#comment-27330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Concerning last night’s GG Awards… I’d just like to say that Hollywood reminds me a bit of ancient Rome, i.e.  A decadent civilization that that feeds on narcissism while dishing out a diet mediocrity to a hero worshiping society who’s minds have become so constipated on a smorgasbord of crapola they cant tell the difference between a great work of art and a donut.  The only reason I watch the bloody awards was to see some of these overpaid self-absorbed entertainers get taken down a notch. Let’s face it, Ricky only dished it out where it was deserved, I didn’t hear any distasteful remarks about Tilda Swinton or Juliann Moore! I’m sure Gervais’ jokes had a more appreciative audience any where outside of North America…Best line of the night was when they were about to give out the award for the Best Foreign film and Gervais said in so many words, why bother, because most viewers and everyone in the little ‘Beverly Hill’s glitter palace’ really couldn’t give a hoot! ………After, all at the end of the day, the majority of them are only glorified ‘’carni people’’ with bank a account.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerning last night’s GG Awards… I’d just like to say that Hollywood reminds me a bit of ancient Rome, i.e.  A decadent civilization that that feeds on narcissism while dishing out a diet mediocrity to a hero worshiping society who’s minds have become so constipated on a smorgasbord of crapola they cant tell the difference between a great work of art and a donut.  The only reason I watch the bloody awards was to see some of these overpaid self-absorbed entertainers get taken down a notch. Let’s face it, Ricky only dished it out where it was deserved, I didn’t hear any distasteful remarks about Tilda Swinton or Juliann Moore! I’m sure Gervais’ jokes had a more appreciative audience any where outside of North America…Best line of the night was when they were about to give out the award for the Best Foreign film and Gervais said in so many words, why bother, because most viewers and everyone in the little ‘Beverly Hill’s glitter palace’ really couldn’t give a hoot! ………After, all at the end of the day, the majority of them are only glorified ‘’carni people’’ with bank a account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rambl3r1969</title>
		<link>http://entertainment.time.com/2011/01/17/ricky-gervais-golden-globes-insurrection/#comment-27329</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rambl3r1969]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunedin.blogs.time.com/?p=13754#comment-27329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to say that if you&#039;re offended by a joke about being an atheist, then you need to work on your empathy a little bit.

Try thinking about what it would be like if the one thing that disqualified you from major office was the fact that you&#039;re an atheist. You can be Hindu, Muslim, any flavor of Christian -- as long as you believe in God. If you don&#039;t, well, too bad. You&#039;re not to be trusted.

Take a joke, for Heaven&#039;s sake.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that if you&#8217;re offended by a joke about being an atheist, then you need to work on your empathy a little bit.</p>
<p>Try thinking about what it would be like if the one thing that disqualified you from major office was the fact that you&#8217;re an atheist. You can be Hindu, Muslim, any flavor of Christian &#8212; as long as you believe in God. If you don&#8217;t, well, too bad. You&#8217;re not to be trusted.</p>
<p>Take a joke, for Heaven&#8217;s sake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeia56</title>
		<link>http://entertainment.time.com/2011/01/17/ricky-gervais-golden-globes-insurrection/#comment-27328</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeia56]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunedin.blogs.time.com/?p=13754#comment-27328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t watch the Globes, but I&#039;ve heard mixed reviews about Gervais. I&#039;m all for edgy humour that skirts the line between funny and rude, but by some accounts Gervais may have stepped over the line last night.

Making fun of hollywood celebrities (some of whom are probably friends with Gervais) who are used to being mocked is one thing, but it sounds like he may have offended some people with his final joke. Personally, I&#039;m okay with it, and as far as jokes go it&#039;s really not that funny, but it sounds like it may have ruffled a few feathers.

As for the winners, well I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s a problem with the winners as much as a problem with the nominations themselves. Take Chris Colfer for example. Is he a good actor? Yes. Is he the best supporting actor on television? No. Is he the best of the nominees? Maybe, he&#039;s the only one I&#039;ve watched regularly so I can&#039;t judge the others.

Some bloggers and forums are up in arms over the fact that Chris Colfer won. My problem isn&#039;t so much that he won as much as Aaron Paul, Terry O&#039;Quinn and Michael Emerson weren&#039;t even nominated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t watch the Globes, but I&#8217;ve heard mixed reviews about Gervais. I&#8217;m all for edgy humour that skirts the line between funny and rude, but by some accounts Gervais may have stepped over the line last night.</p>
<p>Making fun of hollywood celebrities (some of whom are probably friends with Gervais) who are used to being mocked is one thing, but it sounds like he may have offended some people with his final joke. Personally, I&#8217;m okay with it, and as far as jokes go it&#8217;s really not that funny, but it sounds like it may have ruffled a few feathers.</p>
<p>As for the winners, well I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s a problem with the winners as much as a problem with the nominations themselves. Take Chris Colfer for example. Is he a good actor? Yes. Is he the best supporting actor on television? No. Is he the best of the nominees? Maybe, he&#8217;s the only one I&#8217;ve watched regularly so I can&#8217;t judge the others.</p>
<p>Some bloggers and forums are up in arms over the fact that Chris Colfer won. My problem isn&#8217;t so much that he won as much as Aaron Paul, Terry O&#8217;Quinn and Michael Emerson weren&#8217;t even nominated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gillaspie</title>
		<link>http://entertainment.time.com/2011/01/17/ricky-gervais-golden-globes-insurrection/#comment-27327</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Gillaspie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunedin.blogs.time.com/?p=13754#comment-27327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The best part was Ricky roasting Steve Carell&quot;s Office and Steve saying back: &quot;That never gets old.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best part was Ricky roasting Steve Carell&#8221;s Office and Steve saying back: &#8220;That never gets old.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjrinaldi</title>
		<link>http://entertainment.time.com/2011/01/17/ricky-gervais-golden-globes-insurrection/#comment-27326</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pjrinaldi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunedin.blogs.time.com/?p=13754#comment-27326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess i was right. It&#039;s the TMZ generation of humor. Wow, lamenting a time when we laughed at people who trip and fall. wow. You guys ever see &quot;Idiotocracy&quot;? &quot;Ow, my balls!&quot; Looks like that&#039;s not 3 thousand years in the future. it&#039;s here and now.

There was a time when the &quot;host&quot; of a program didn&#039;t take shots at the people that were on his &quot;show&quot;. You guys must think Billy Crystal was a lame ass. If Gervais did one joke that was not at the expense of someone, to the point of causing embarrassment, (not good natured actually witty fun, just a total punch. &quot;Helped him off the toilet and put his teeth in his mouth&quot;) i might feel different. Oddly, I am a fan of Gervais. I have ALL of his podcasts. I think the Office (UK) is literally the best comedy that has ever been on TV, I saw him live twice, and, sorry, this was not indicative of his work. This is him feeling like he needed to cause waves, red faces, &quot;OOOOs&quot;, to set himself apart. Watch him come out and say &quot;I told them not to have me host&quot;. So disappointing. Sorry, i don&#039;t need to laugh at rich people, and watch them squirm, to have fun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess i was right. It&#8217;s the TMZ generation of humor. Wow, lamenting a time when we laughed at people who trip and fall. wow. You guys ever see &#8220;Idiotocracy&#8221;? &#8220;Ow, my balls!&#8221; Looks like that&#8217;s not 3 thousand years in the future. it&#8217;s here and now.</p>
<p>There was a time when the &#8220;host&#8221; of a program didn&#8217;t take shots at the people that were on his &#8220;show&#8221;. You guys must think Billy Crystal was a lame ass. If Gervais did one joke that was not at the expense of someone, to the point of causing embarrassment, (not good natured actually witty fun, just a total punch. &#8220;Helped him off the toilet and put his teeth in his mouth&#8221;) i might feel different. Oddly, I am a fan of Gervais. I have ALL of his podcasts. I think the Office (UK) is literally the best comedy that has ever been on TV, I saw him live twice, and, sorry, this was not indicative of his work. This is him feeling like he needed to cause waves, red faces, &#8220;OOOOs&#8221;, to set himself apart. Watch him come out and say &#8220;I told them not to have me host&#8221;. So disappointing. Sorry, i don&#8217;t need to laugh at rich people, and watch them squirm, to have fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Poniewozik</title>
		<link>http://entertainment.time.com/2011/01/17/ricky-gervais-golden-globes-insurrection/#comment-27325</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Poniewozik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunedin.blogs.time.com/?p=13754#comment-27325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That last is a good point, which I mentioned on Twitter but didn&#039;t manage to work into my review here last night. It&#039;s not at all uncommon for the last half of an awards show to be very light on the host... in fact (in recent years at least) it may be more common than not. (For one thing, it helps bring the show in on time, another perennial complaint about some awards shows.) Gervais&#039;s absence seemed even longer and more absolute than usual (I&#039;m pretty sure he was off camera for a full hour), but it&#039;s entirely possible that was according to plan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That last is a good point, which I mentioned on Twitter but didn&#8217;t manage to work into my review here last night. It&#8217;s not at all uncommon for the last half of an awards show to be very light on the host&#8230; in fact (in recent years at least) it may be more common than not. (For one thing, it helps bring the show in on time, another perennial complaint about some awards shows.) Gervais&#8217;s absence seemed even longer and more absolute than usual (I&#8217;m pretty sure he was off camera for a full hour), but it&#8217;s entirely possible that was according to plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cabral312</title>
		<link>http://entertainment.time.com/2011/01/17/ricky-gervais-golden-globes-insurrection/#comment-27324</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cabral312]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunedin.blogs.time.com/?p=13754#comment-27324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought Ricky Gervais was hilarious, last night. Although I have to say I am dissapointied in the winners last night. Glee won for best comedy series, seriously? It feels like I am one of the few people in the world ho HATES Glee. And while Jim Parsons probably deserved his award for best actor, I really wanted Steve Carell to win since this is his last season.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Ricky Gervais was hilarious, last night. Although I have to say I am dissapointied in the winners last night. Glee won for best comedy series, seriously? It feels like I am one of the few people in the world ho HATES Glee. And while Jim Parsons probably deserved his award for best actor, I really wanted Steve Carell to win since this is his last season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grape_crush</title>
		<link>http://entertainment.time.com/2011/01/17/ricky-gervais-golden-globes-insurrection/#comment-27323</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grape_crush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunedin.blogs.time.com/?p=13754#comment-27323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was the first Golden Globes I paid attention to in years...and Ricky Gervais didn&#039;t rip on anyone who wasn&#039;t too big to shrug it off. The only reason there appeared to be discomfort in the audience is that, outside of a roast, it&#039;s considered impolite to laugh at someone who might be giving you your next job.

&lt;i&gt;...Gervais, who came off atypically tame at last year&#039;s awards...&lt;/i&gt;

Watching an awards show is like watching the NFL and NBA draft day coverage; mostly we only pay attention to the big selections and our attention wanders off for the rest...in other words, &lt;i&gt;boring&lt;/i&gt;.

Last night was a welcome change, as it was actually entertaining.

&lt;i&gt;Gervais conspicuously vanished for much of the last half of the show.&lt;/i&gt;

Maybe there was a complaint or two, maybe it&#039;s because he wasn&#039;t as needed, as the latter half is what most people are waiting for anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was the first Golden Globes I paid attention to in years&#8230;and Ricky Gervais didn&#8217;t rip on anyone who wasn&#8217;t too big to shrug it off. The only reason there appeared to be discomfort in the audience is that, outside of a roast, it&#8217;s considered impolite to laugh at someone who might be giving you your next job.</p>
<p><i>&#8230;Gervais, who came off atypically tame at last year&#8217;s awards&#8230;</i></p>
<p>Watching an awards show is like watching the NFL and NBA draft day coverage; mostly we only pay attention to the big selections and our attention wanders off for the rest&#8230;in other words, <i>boring</i>.</p>
<p>Last night was a welcome change, as it was actually entertaining.</p>
<p><i>Gervais conspicuously vanished for much of the last half of the show.</i></p>
<p>Maybe there was a complaint or two, maybe it&#8217;s because he wasn&#8217;t as needed, as the latter half is what most people are waiting for anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neets' wanderings and stumblings</title>
		<link>http://entertainment.time.com/2011/01/17/ricky-gervais-golden-globes-insurrection/#comment-27322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neets' wanderings and stumblings]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunedin.blogs.time.com/?p=13754#comment-27322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hollywood needs to grow a funny bone.  What is with this &#039;holier than thou&#039; attitude?  Gervais is brilliant and refreshingly added his typically brilliant British &#039;have a laugh at yourself&#039; gift to what is normally a back slapping, oh aren&#039;t we brilliant saving the world, type rubbish that these awards are normally seeped in.

What happened to laughing when someone trips over a step?  Remember comedy began with slapstick which included laughing at other&#039;s misfortunes.  But his wit was not directed at misfortunes at all, rather at the ridiculousness of Hollywood&#039;s grand perception of itself.

Take a chill pill and have a laugh like the rest of the world does.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hollywood needs to grow a funny bone.  What is with this &#8216;holier than thou&#8217; attitude?  Gervais is brilliant and refreshingly added his typically brilliant British &#8216;have a laugh at yourself&#8217; gift to what is normally a back slapping, oh aren&#8217;t we brilliant saving the world, type rubbish that these awards are normally seeped in.</p>
<p>What happened to laughing when someone trips over a step?  Remember comedy began with slapstick which included laughing at other&#8217;s misfortunes.  But his wit was not directed at misfortunes at all, rather at the ridiculousness of Hollywood&#8217;s grand perception of itself.</p>
<p>Take a chill pill and have a laugh like the rest of the world does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fromvikingstock</title>
		<link>http://entertainment.time.com/2011/01/17/ricky-gervais-golden-globes-insurrection/#comment-27321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fromvikingstock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunedin.blogs.time.com/?p=13754#comment-27321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For me the highlight of the evening was watching Robert Downey Jr make five of Hollywood&#039;s most beautiful women smile and squirm with his flirting-on-steroids presentation speech:

http://youtu.be/MHZYBt4xKMA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me the highlight of the evening was watching Robert Downey Jr make five of Hollywood&#8217;s most beautiful women smile and squirm with his flirting-on-steroids presentation speech:</p>
<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='753' height='454' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/MHZYBt4xKMA?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee CK</title>
		<link>http://entertainment.time.com/2011/01/17/ricky-gervais-golden-globes-insurrection/#comment-27320</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Renee CK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunedin.blogs.time.com/?p=13754#comment-27320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll jump on the bandwagon.  I thought Gervais was brilliant.  Does anyone think that Charlie Sheen doesn&#039;t know what he did?  Hasn&#039;t Tom Cruise been denying his homosexual side forever?  This is not news.  To deny it doesn&#039;t make it go away.  Embracing it and making it funny not only doesn&#039;t make it true, but it points to the ridiculousness of the gossip.

This felt to me like a very personal, fun night. The Oscars can have their pomp and circumstance, this was a night for the stars to have fun, laugh, and some of them go home with awards.

Trying to deny that a lot of this is overinflated is like trying to get Helena Bonham Carter to wear a conservative pantsuit with matching shoes; it&#039;s simply unnatural.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll jump on the bandwagon.  I thought Gervais was brilliant.  Does anyone think that Charlie Sheen doesn&#8217;t know what he did?  Hasn&#8217;t Tom Cruise been denying his homosexual side forever?  This is not news.  To deny it doesn&#8217;t make it go away.  Embracing it and making it funny not only doesn&#8217;t make it true, but it points to the ridiculousness of the gossip.</p>
<p>This felt to me like a very personal, fun night. The Oscars can have their pomp and circumstance, this was a night for the stars to have fun, laugh, and some of them go home with awards.</p>
<p>Trying to deny that a lot of this is overinflated is like trying to get Helena Bonham Carter to wear a conservative pantsuit with matching shoes; it&#8217;s simply unnatural.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timburns116</title>
		<link>http://entertainment.time.com/2011/01/17/ricky-gervais-golden-globes-insurrection/#comment-27319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[timburns116]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tunedin.blogs.time.com/?p=13754#comment-27319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, he&#039;s not a believer so he should shut his trap!  The last thing someone who believes in God needs to know is that there are people who do not!  It harshes our faith, man]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, he&#8217;s not a believer so he should shut his trap!  The last thing someone who believes in God needs to know is that there are people who do not!  It harshes our faith, man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
