Tuned In

Outsourced! Jeff Zucker Out at NBC

Everybody’s Losing Their TV Job Day continues, as the New York Times breaks the news that NBC Universal head Jeff Zucker will step down once the company is taken over by Kable Town Comcast. Zucker tells Bill Carter that the move is not his choice, but it was clear the new owners wanted to bring in their own team.

Over the past decade, Zucker has taken plenty of shots—including from here—as he continually rose at NBC and the larger corporation regardless of the network’s setbacks, failure to develop new hits and the experiment / affiliate rebellion of Jay Leno in primetime. (At one point it seemed the pattern of divergent results-vs.-reward would only end when NBC went out of business and Zucker became Emperor of the Universe.) His ability to defy gravity, it would seem, has finally failed him.

While I’ve taken my shots at him over the years, though, I also admire Zucker in a lot of respects. I believe he has a strong big-picture idea of where media are going as a business, and of the pressures on broadcast TV as audiences shrink and old revenue streams are endangered. I interviewed him many times and found him to be sharp and well-spoken on those kinds of questions.

It was when it came to, well, putting TV shows on the air that Zucker had a problem. He was a skilled TV executive who proved his chops running the Today Show, but he never seemed to have the golden gut needed to make strong picks in primetime entertainment, especially dramas and sitcoms. His best moves were tactical: supersizing shows like Friends, expanding Today. But I never got the feeling that he had any aesthetic sense for what scripted shows were right for NBC, or even what he himself liked.

Putting Jay Leno in primetime was the ultimate Zucker tactical move. And to be fair, while it was not a raging ratings (let alone creative) success, Leno did equal or slightly better his late-night rating while cutting costs. But the Comcast acquisition empowered the affiliates who hated Leno as a news lead-in, and The Jay Leno Show was quickly yanked so that discontented stations did not scotch the deal. (Leading to the Jaypocalypse with Conan O’Brien.)

The Comcast buy, it turned out, was also the end of Jeff Zucker at NBC; it just took a little longer. He had quite a long run, though—surprisingly long—and like him or not, substantially helped shape broadcast TV as a business. If not as an art form.

Related Topics: jeff zucker, NBC, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Entertainment

    IFC Films

    Kerouac's On the Road Comes to Cannes: Where's the Beat?

    Walter Salles’ film of the Beat Generation classic wastes a strong cast, including Twilight‘s Kristen Stewart, in a needless tribute to ’50s wanderlust

    Surprise! The Lowest-Rated Show in Broadcast History Is Actually GreatSlate

    Adam Rose/FOX

    Glee Watch: NYADA, NYADA, NYADA

    Spoilers for the season finale of Glee below:

    One beef I often have with Glee episodes is that they move too fast, go in too many directions, try to cram in too much at once. You might say that about “Goodbye,” the season 3 finale, but in this case that approach seemed about right. It’s an episode about graduation, and graduation is something that, no matter how much you plan for and anticipate it, still goes too fast. Graduating is something you do, but in the moment it feels like something that happens to you, suddenly and all at once, like going over a waterfall.

  • itsanhonor

    Nice timely post title.

  • Rorschach

    In my head this means Parks and Rec comes back sooner (I know it does not mean that in any way at all but I like the delusion)

  • http://www.thesmogger.com Michael

    It’s only 2 years too late…poor NBC, I don’t know if it will ever be able to recover. This hasn’t been the most promising week. http://www.thesmogger.com

  • seanfromnj

    I don’t think Parks and Rec will come back early because Zucker is out (he probably won’t even be out at the time it does come back, the Comcast deal has to go through regulatory hearings and all). It’ll come back early because Outsourced will crash and burn and NBC will need to fill its slot.

  • http://thelostplace.wordpress.com thelostplace

    I am taking a Mass Communications class in college and we are learning about this exact thing, coincidentally.

    We learned that after the abolition of the fin/syn rules, it lead to more vertical integration. Taken to the extreme with Zucker it lead to managing for margins. For example, putting Leno on primetime because even though it might get as high ratings as other shows, it will still make a better profit margin because it’s cheaper to produce.

    Well, at least NBC still has a few good shows: The Office, 30 Rock, Parks and Rec and Community. Not too many other though.

  • The Hoobie

    (Formerly “thehoobie”—I just figured out how to fix my screen name in WordPress, yay.)

    @James: Interesting to read your more-charitable post versus Mo Ryan’s scorched-earth one.

    Yeesh—If I were Jeff Zucker, I’d be cowering in a corner protecting my genitals the second Ryan’s post hit the Intertubes.

    Heck, after reading Ryan’s post, I want to cower in a corner, and I didn’t greenlight “Joey.”

  • Bemused

    Has Parks and Rec (my fave of the Thursday sitcoms, too) finished taping its season yet?

  • http://twitter.com/poniewozik James Poniewozik

    Yeah, I mean, Zucker was a crap programmer–I have the Joey and Coupling and Emeril reviews to prove it. But I’ve never quite got the sense of personal ownership that people have in NBC, as opposed to other networks. If CBS makes some crap like $#*! My Dad Says, people mock it, but they don’t take it like a personal affront. (By which I don’t mean Mo here, but basically the last 10 years or so of NBC criticism.) I know on some level it comes from the history of Seinfeld & Cosby &c., but that idea of identifying with a broadcast network is just alien to me.

    And the funny thing is, as bad as Zucker was with programming the handful of broadcast shows I even care about now–still largely NBC (The Thursday comedies, FNL). Not that I disagree with any of Mo’s points re Zucker as a programmer.

  • The Hoobie

    I don’t quite get the fervor, either! I know the bottom line is that TV’s a business, and I can see where a lot of Zucker’s decisions would seem to make some good business sense. Too bad they were also creative and PR disasters that turned around and bit the bottom line in the… bottom. (Sorry.)

    (One reason I was glad to hear that Comcast was buying NBC was that suddenly we could watch episodes of The Office On Demand for free—in another mercenary move that seemed to backfire, NBC had been charging a buck a pop for each episode On Demand. So the Comcast purchase was instantly better for our bottom line. [I now hereby forswear using the phrase "bottom line" for the rest of my comment; sorry.])

    I’m starting to wonder if AMC is becoming the New Old NBC in terms of expectations of quality—sometimes in an upside-down kind of way; an attitude I saw here and there in early recaps and reviews of Rubicon seemed to be “Oh, AMC, you think just because you’re getting this reputation for being the home of quality television I have to watch and love every damn show you put on?! Well, I don’t! So screw you and screw this weird, slow-moving show!” Bizarre.

    The truth for me is that yes, absolutely, AMC’s imprimatur on a show will mean I give it more of a chance than I might have otherwise, but at the same time (and here I’m putting aside the fact that if—God forbid!—AMC does not renew Rubicon, I will suffer a Mo Ryan–esque aneurysm of grief), if AMC were to put on a show that wasn’t that good, my reaction would probably be “Well, not my cup o’ tea” or “Huh, AMC’s magic didn’t seem to work this time, oh well,” but I wouldn’t be moved to rain scorn upon their heads unto the seventh generation. It’s not their moral obligation to supply me with good TV, you know? …Even when a network is well and thoughtfully run, I’m sure putting artistically and popularly successful shows on the air is like catching lightning in a bottle. I can’t think of one broadcast or cable network that hasn’t had some barking creative dogs.

  • The Hoobie

    Oh, my comment above is not at all to say that I don’t appreciate Mo Ryan’s passion and strong point of view. Or to defend Zucker. :-)

  • Bemused

    Damn–I just read on Ausiello that production doesn’t even begin until next week!

  • http://hollywoodjuicer.wordpress.com hollywoodjuicer

    Be patient, Parks and Rec fans, the show is just gearing up for production. I’ve seen the sets being hauled out of storage and reconstructed over the past three weeks, and the rigging crews are starting to rough in the lighting. I’m working on another show at the same studio, so am not sure exactly when they’ll start shooting, but imagine the first episodes will be in the can by the end of October.

  • andrewraff

    Parks & Rec split the production on its third season into two parts: the first part started the day after season two wrapped, so that the hiatus could coincide with Amy Poehler’s maternity leave. A bunch of season 3 P&R episodes are in the can already so that the show could have premiered in the fall as per usual before picking up production again.

blog comments powered by Disqus