Tuned In

iRefuse: Why I Am Not Buying an iPad (Yet)

Someday, after I wash out of journalism, I am going to go into the lawnmower business. I am going to invent a really awesome, beautifully sculpted lawnmower. I will convince the press that my lawnmower will save their imperiled business model. Then I can sit back, relax, and watch news outlets fall over themselves to liveblog the day my lawnmower goes on sale.

OK, I have some nerve writing that, as an employee of the magazine that put this on the cover. But there is a question worth asking: of all the news organizations heralding the iPad—and, more important, making apps and creating content for it—how many of their employees will actually own one, and thus be able to consume their own e-publications?

Not me, not yet. Do I want an iPad? Sure! I just don’t want to buy one. And it’s a conflicted decision because I’m not just an Apple junkie but a media writer. (That latter fact is my go-to rationalization if I give in to gadget lust and buy one tomorrow.) Since we’ve heard so much from journos who are smitten with the iPad, here are a few of the reasons this one is waiting:

I work in print media, and so don’t have a secure enough future income. Totally a joke! Because the iPad is going to save print media, get people to start paying money for content again and take us all back to the days of Johnny Apple’s giant expense account! Seriously, though, I have kids and a mortgage and a seriously conservative budgeting habit. My heap of home gadgets notwithstanding, I am a cheap bastard, and so it matters to me that…

I don’t know what I would do with it yet. I love portable computers; I’m tethered to my laptop. I love touchscreens; I clutch my iPhone like Don Draper fondling a pack of cigarettes. But I have these devices now, and while many of the things the iPad’s apps can do seem undeniably neat, there isn’t one—yet—that makes me jones to add another screen to my life. (Not to mention pay orders of magnitude more than for my iPhone’s apps.)

I don’t know what you will do with it yet. For a media writer, this is the bigger issue. Hundreds of thousands of pre-orders notwithstanding, the iPad is not yet a mass medium. Not after (checks watch) fourteen hours, anyway. I’ll consider it an essential, something I need in order to understand how media is being consumed today, once it actually is being used en masse. As with the iPhone—which I bought a year or so after it came out—it’s the sort of product whose function is really revealed once people start using it and figure out what it’s for. If they do.

I actually like reading on the iPhone. No seriously. Not just email and news; I read entire novels on Kindle for iPhone. Which makes me a freak. Also, I like watching video on it. Playing games, looking up information, getting directions, downloading recipes–most of which activities, I suspect, are that much cooler/effective on a larger screen. But $500 cooler? See “cheap bastard,” above. Point being: I absolutely want the mobility, tactility and ability to access the cloud that the iPad promises. For now, though, I feel I already have that, enough to satisfy me anyway. (Ask me again next week.)

It’s not going to change my video life—yet. Put Hulu on the iPad and we’ll talk. Make the offerings of the major networks available, make it into some kind of real substitute for a cable subscription and I’d be interested. So far, however, I see various versions of things I can do on my computer, TiVo or iPhone.

I’m not an early adopter. Forget computers—I’ve never so much as bought a new car. Being the first to touch the new thing is as heady and short-lived a thrill as snorting a line. As with my iPhone, I’ve never yet regretted waiting for the cheaper, better second generation of anything, and the few times I have bought early—like the first-gen Intel Core Mac that seemed to become too slow the second I opened the box—I’ve definitely regretted. (Note: The iPad is probably different! Everything about the iPad is different!)

It’s one more damn thing. This is my most nebulous reason, yet the most important. I use my laptop for work and don’t see the iPad replacing it. I don’t see it replacing my iPhone either. So the question is, do I heed Steve Jobs’ call for a “third screen” between the laptop and smartphone—and the accompanying permanent obligation of annual upgrades in my budget? Not to be corny, but I honestly believe a major source of misery in modern life is that we have too much crap—and thus, are too beholden to the financial obligations to support that crapload of crap. That costs us money, time, freedom and happiness. So throwing one more trinket on my camel’s back is a big-deal decision.

I’m secretly hoping that, if I whine about it enough, someone else will buy it for me. You can send it to my office!

Related Topics: consumption (or lack thereof), demurrals, ipad, online video, that thing that people are talking about, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Entertainment

    IFC Films

    Kerouac's On the Road Comes to Cannes: Where's the Beat?

    Walter Salles’ film of the Beat Generation classic wastes a strong cast, including Twilight‘s Kristen Stewart, in a needless tribute to ’50s wanderlust

    Adele Crosses Huge MilestoneHuffington Post

    Adam Rose/FOX

    Glee Watch: NYADA, NYADA, NYADA

    Spoilers for the season finale of Glee below:

    One beef I often have with Glee episodes is that they move too fast, go in too many directions, try to cram in too much at once. You might say that about “Goodbye,” the season 3 finale, but in this case that approach seemed about right. It’s an episode about graduation, and graduation is something that, no matter how much you plan for and anticipate it, still goes too fast. Graduating is something you do, but in the moment it feels like something that happens to you, suddenly and all at once, like going over a waterfall.

  • http://uber.la jmacofearth

    Yes, your post has many valid points. All of them miss the amazing fact that the iPad itself is the source of the excitement. If you’ve played with an iPhone and then gone back to your dumb phone, you know the experience. So it’s a new catagory. And it’s NOT a replacement for your laptop. But WOW, ignore it at your own peril, journo or not.

    http://bit.ly/ipad-dreams

    We’re over it already. But just getting started as well.

    @jmacofearth

  • http://extralong.wordpress.com Larry

    Once more, the 21st century’s Toys-R-Us manages to delude buyers. What does the iPad offer? Nothing. There, I said it (as ML would say). Nothing except less of a life. It is a childish thing. Nothing wrong with childish things, but let’s not pretend it’s anything more.

  • kirascurro

    join the party, sister, i, too, read all my books on my iphone. it makes me kinda sad that i have no more need to ever buy a physical book again. i get such pleasure from reading, but the physical part will not be missed. plus, i’m saving trees!

  • http://davelja1.wordpress.com davelja1

    I own 3 Macs – a desktop and 2 Macbooks, 1 brand new.
    Do I crave an iPad? You bet! Am I buying one? Nope.
    It doesn’t fit into all that I typically do. So, yesterday, I took a trip to the mall, and finally did what I’ve promised myself I’d eventually do. I bought an iPhone. Don’t care about AT&T’s issues. I’m just fed up with things that don’t work, and that’s the case with the big V’s phones on its network. Like everything it pumps out, Apple’s products just plain work. No headaches. No hassles. Power up. Touch. Tap. Click. You’re doing everything the product promised. That’s why the iPad will sell. Will I resist? Sure, until the urge hits me and I break my own promise and buy one. From the fruit to technology, Apple is my favorite fruit.

  • http://uber.la jmacofearth

    It’s okay if you don’t “get it” yet. You will. Believe me, you will. As Mr. Jobs said in his keynote, it would take a phenomenal device to warrant a new category between the mobile phone and the laptop… That said, after an hour or so on the iPad, you’re gonna be amazed.

    Sure, we all need to turn off the screens and go outside. More so we need people to quit texting when they should be relating. But this new machine is not going to spoil any outside experiences. Go outside, enjoy life. Use your phone when you are alone or need to do business.

    And diss this new device all you want. You can go down in the history books as someone who said it was doomed to failure. Now if you’re holding Kindle or Nook stock, you might look at the number of books available free on the iPad. I’ll be doing some book reviews of the best in the near future.

    http://bit.ly/ipad-dreams

    @jmacofearth

  • skmars

    “Not an early adopter” – you are that rare American who still believes in (and practices) delayed gratification. Respect.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    I’m not buying one. Sure, it looks great and is probably a fun toy, but that’s all it is–a toy. These days were’re too wired to our electronics. People texting while driving; kids playing games on their phones while in school. I have a Blackberry and after the first month, I had to delete my email accounts from it. I wasn’t getting any work done.

    As for reading “books” on any type of computer…I’ll save trees by going to the library, or buying used books. Saves money too. And those used books I buy, I turn around and donate them right back to the charity I got them from. So they make money on the same book twice.

  • http://uber.la jmacofearth

    Of course in the end the iPad is just a new computer. For the price of a MacBook I got a device that doesn’t even have a keyboard… The day after provides some clarity on yesterday’s iPad Partaaaay! http://bit.ly/ipad-hangover

  • Bemused

    Dude–Enough with pimping your blog. Three times in one comment section is a bit much, no? We get it.

  • http://uber.la jmacofearth

    bemused: whatever… two different posts and responses to this article… and your “value add” is?

  • ljfalcon

    Another new toy? Ok, do you have a use for the thing?
    I have watched Electronics (including the computer) grow and change since I got my first one as parts in a box. Do you need this thing?

  • http://www.bookhopping.wordpress.com Molly

    I more or less thought just about everything you said above. And then my husband (who is a definitely an early adopter) and I bought one anyway, and now I’m totally sold. I didn’t think the iBook app, with its backlit screen, would tempt me away from my nook — but it so does. The Netflix app is amazing, and the picture quality is so much better than my MacBook. Marvel Comics and Scrabble are both fantastic. And this is all based on the limited time I had with it; prying it out of my husband’s hands has not been easy.

    I have to say, though — Time’s app leaves a little to be desired. I’ve been tempted to subscribe to the print Time, but we already have more magazines stacking up in our house than we actually read. I would love the option of subscribing to Time on the iPad — I think my chances of reading each (or most) issues on it are pretty good, and the layout, from what I saw, looks beautiful. Right now, though, all Time offers is the option of buying a single issue for $4.99, which doesn’t appeal to me at all.

  • http://twitter.com/poniewozik James Poniewozik

    My understanding is–and I don’t understand the technical reasons it’s not possible yet–but that it will be possible to offer subscriptions and some type of subsciption rate through the app. When, how, how much etc. are obviously business-side decisions, not mine.

  • Brew

    I think it’s funny that you think you’re adding value.

  • http://www.bookhopping.wordpress.com Molly

    Thanks for the reply. I kind of figured you weren’t necessarily on the app-creation team, but thought I’d use what venue I could to voice my thoughts. It just seems that if print media outlets are counting on iPads to get people to pay for their content again, they could at least meet us halfway. I’m willing to pay for the graphics and convenience the app offers…just not through the nose.

  • http://uber.la jmacofearth

    The Harvard Business Review has a great piece on what has to happen next for the iPad to be successful. In an effort to continue the dialogue here’s a link and response to that article.

    http://bit.ly/ipad-evolves

  • dwldmo

    Wow james! I never knew I would find a reasonable, objective review of the iPad in the “Tuned In” section of TIME. I just couldn’t agree with you more after checking it out today on the Apple store. It seems like every single review on the internet has been written by an Apple Geek (Stephen Fry’s TIME article was a disgrace). After the initial hoopla has subsided, we will find that iPad really doesn’t fill a so-called “imaginary” gap between my laptop & iPhone. I’m pretty content right now, Mr Jobs……thanks for asking.

  • Dave

    Not to jump on the bandwagon late, but here’s my two cents…

    The funniest thing about my resistance to the iPad is that it actually fills a potential need for me. My wife and I don’t have smartphones (*gasp* Maybe I should change my name to “Neanderthal Dave,” though I do have a BB for work). We don’t have a laptop. We have our desktop PCs that we play WoW on and use for pretty much everything, and we have our non-cable-or-satellite TV for watching basic programming. An iPad would be absolutely perfect for us.

    But there are two reasons we’re not buying one. 1) Money. Maybe once all my debt is paid off, and I have a new garage, roof, furnace, etc. in my house, I’ll let myself spend a grand on an iPad. 2) Apple is scary. If you haven’t seen the Cracked article, google “5 Reasons You Should Be Scared of Apple.”

  • reehmeo

    I concur, I really don’t want a third gadget (okay I do WANT one) but another online fee (so I can use it on the train to nyc). I finally broke down and bought new macbook pro instead of the ipad due to limitations on browsing (hulu, netflix streaming, etc.). It simply isn’t close enough to a laptop yet for me to replace it. How about a REAL ipad that will replace my iphone and laptop. Then i’ll be first in line . . .

blog comments powered by Disqus