Bring Out The Pitchforks! Stewart, Colbert Slam Party of Incitement

The Daily Show

The party of no has become the party of incitement – or at least that seems to be the consensus of the comedic political watchdogs over at Comedy Central. It was the first night back on the air since the passage of the health care bill for both The Daily Show and The Colbert Report, and both hosts came out swinging against a sub-set of Republicans who they seemed to think were less interested in forging debate, or discussing policy, than in fomenting the anxieties and rage of their key voters.

Both shows discussed the mysterious white powder that was delivered to congressman Anthony Weiner’s offices. Then they touched on the bullets and bricks put through the windows of other representatives, the vandalizing of homes, the spitting on black congressmen. The Daily Show opened with a montage that paired John Boehner’s warnings of Armageddon with Rush Limbaugh’s call to get the “bastards,” going on to compare the vitriolic rhetoric of tea party protesters with the recent comments made by Sarah Palin while stumping for John McCain, that “when we take up our arms, we’re talking about our votes.”

Stewart pounced on what he saw as the insincerity of Palin’s indignation – the hypocrisy of one political party claiming that the passage of a bill through congress amounted to a circumvention of America’s political process.  “Real Americans can do whatever they want to threaten people that tyrannically impose their will through a legal legislative process set up through the constitution,” John Oliver ranted ironically in one aside, suggesting that what the minority party in congress really resents is the fact it is in the minority.

The Colbert Report, meanwhile, spoofed the ways in which Republicans have attempted to convert the Democratic health care victory into a glass-half-full situation for their party. Quoting John McCain, that the Republicans will deny the Democrats any cooperation for the remainder of the year, Colbert speculated that not only will a Republican loss over health care help them in the 2010 midterm elections, but also that a 2010 loss would then set up a huge gain for 2012. He also mocked McCain’s obstructionist promise, sarcastically pondering how Obama will cope with the fact that he’s lost all of his bipartisan support. Colbert may have been in character but the message was clear: Keep obstructing, and you’ll keep losing.

Both shows, and both commentators, underscored the peculiar position that the Republican party now finds itself in. The caucus relentlessly stonewalled health care, and lost, and now the only path forward involves rallying a base towards repealing health care – which means stirring up fears about the socialist Obamacare and hoping that a backlash persists all the way through November. The Colbert segment, however, pulled no punches in implying that with all this political posturing, and rhetorical wrangling, the one thing that’s fallen by the wayside is actual legislating. “I will not be denied my indignation,” Colbert proclaimed, “America as we know it is dead.”

Related Topics: colbert report, daily show, health care, republicans, TV Networks
  • Latest on Entertainment

    Getty Images

    ‘Family Feud’ TV Host Richard Dawson Dies at 79

    Richard Dawson, the wisecracking British entertainer who was among the schemers in the 1960s sitcom “Hogan’s Heroes” and a decade later began kissing thousands of female contestants as host of the game show “Family Feud” has died. He was 79.

    14 Revelations From A New Tell-All Book On Christian BaleHuffington Post

    Matt Stroshane / Disney Parks / Getty Images

    Disney's Fantastic Voyage

    The kids are the go-to demographic on the Fantasy, the newest vessel in Disney’s fleet of floating theme parks

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    I can’t believe President Obama had the audacity to make 15 recess appointments! Only 15!! Why didn’t he go for the entire slate of appointments the Republicans have been stonewalling?

  • charlieromeobravo

    Obama and many pundits have correctly assessed the Republican situation with their party base: by taking such an extreme stance against Obama, by questioning his legitimacy and painting him as a socialist/communist/anti-American they’ve put themselves in an impossible position. If they cooperate with him, or even just moderate their rhetoric towards him, they’ll be betraying everything they’ve been telling their base which will loose them votes and help the Democrats. If they continue to stonewall and be the party of No No No! they make people who want to see some work get done unhappy. Further, every time Obama steps in front of a camera and again demonstrates himself to be a mild, thoughtful and moderate guy, the Republicans and tea baggers that are painting him as a wild eyed radical just look crazier and crazier to large middle of the country.

    SO, the Republicans have two choices: double down on the strategy they’ve been working and further drive away sane people OR course correct, start to legitimately work with the majority party, take their lumps from the crazies they’ve been playing to the last two years and start to rebuild their party base out of people outside of the tea bagger set. The second option gives them a real future with a better chance of having a real impact on future policy and law, just perhaps not so much in the near term.

  • charlieromeobravo

    Heh. I was glad to see that he did that. It’s enough recess appointments to get the point across but not so many that people can (legitimately) say that he’s trying to circumvent congressional oversight and senate confirmation. THIS is a good example of how radical he’s not. He does things like this occasionally to remind the Republicans that he’s president and there’s plenty of ways to get things done without them but he doesn’t go out of his way to put a finger in their eye and embarrass them outright. I feel that he genuinely is trying to work with them, he’s just not willing to behave as though they are the majority party which seems to be what they want.

  • jlofton

    “America” as we know it, now, should be dead, and it is dying. Because “America,” as we know it now — and I’m talking here FIRST about what pretends to be the “Church” in this country — has been stiff-necked and rebellious against God, the God of the Bible, the only true God there is. Scripture is littered with the corpses of men and nations who ignored God and His Word, the Lord Jesus Christ (Psalm 9:17). There will be no return to any kind of prosperity or joy until the Church in America repents of its sins. “Politics” will not save us.

    John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com
    Communications Director, Institute on the Constitution
    Host, “The American View” Radio Show
    Recovering Republican
    JLof@aol.com

  • robbert5

    Everybody is allowed his/her opinion, however delusional it maybe.

  • jlofton

    Right, 3.1. And that is precisely what has/is destroying our once great country — the idea that there is no right or wrong, no good or evil, all religions equally valid, make up your own god/goddesses, etc. One problem: THIS IS NOT WORKING!, in case you haven’t noticed. All areas of American life are crumbling. That’s what happens when God is ignored….We must kiss the Son (Psalm 2) or all is lost. Thus saith the Lord….Who never lies.

    John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com
    Communications Director, Institute on the Constitution
    Host, “The American View” Radio Show
    Recovering Republican
    JLof@aol.com

  • archstanton68

    Religious zealotry is a huge threat to this country, and it’s not Islamic fundamentalists that are the biggest concern.
    .
    http://apnews.myway.com/article/20100329/D9EOISE80.html

  • jlofton

    Not talking about “religious zealotry.” Talking about God, Who is NOT a “religion” but IS “zealous” to be obeyed! Talking about the God who our Founders said is the only giver of “rights” and that the sole purpose of government is to protect those God-given rights. We have turned away from God so our “rights” are now endangered by government. This is more than in interesting coincidence. Godless government is not pretty and things will get much uglier if we do not repent and return to God, kiss His Son.

    John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com
    Communications Director, Institute on the Constitution
    Host, “The American View” Radio Show
    Recovering Republican
    JLof@aol.com

  • archstanton68

    god, as defined by you of course. if you were at all self-aware, you’d see a strong similarity between your rhetoric and that of other fanatics from many other faiths, particularly fundamentalist muslims.

  • kaysant

    Nothing that our country is facing now is any harder than what our parents, grandparents and their parents faced. By blowing recent politics out of proportion, putting them on level with a kind of American apocalypse, you do a disservice to past generations. Try and have some perspective.

  • robbert5

    What you are defining as the one right and true way of life is actually a direct assault at the core of what this nation was founded on. The founders wanted everybody to be able to pursue their religion without running the risk of being persecuted. You ahve the richt to believe that your interpretation of religion is the right one, however you do not have the right to impose that belief on others.

    I am wondering what your personal experiences are with godless government and why that is not pretty. Everybody in the current government and congress identifies his/herself with religion of some sort. I am not aware of any elected official in the federal government who is a self proclaimed atheist, i.e. godless.

    And again, everybody is entitled to his/her opnion…etc…

  • schnauzer2

    Of course your god never lies, neother do my imaginary friends.

  • drabidea

    I don’t think 3.1 said anything about there not being a right or wrong or no good or evil. I am also pretty sure there was a document way back when that said we should have freedom of religion. Is it just barely catching up to us? Doubt it.

  • jlofton

    This country was founded on the Word of the “Creator” God of the Bible whether you start our founding in the early 1600s or in the colonial period in the 1700s. Read the colonial charters, all 50 State constitution Preambles, the oaths taken by elected officials. They are all filled with references to God, the God of the Bible. Our Declaration of Independence says explicitly that our rights come from GOD & that it is the purpose of government to protect GOD-given rights and when government becomes destructive of GOD-given rights it is our DUTY to alter or abolish that government! That is THE American view of law and government.

    John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com
    Communications Director, Institute on the Constitution
    Host, “The American View” Radio Show
    Recovering Republican
    JLof@aol.com

  • http://djtrudeau.wordpress.com djtrudeau

    I think it’s good idea to not feed the beast here. You’re not going to convince John of anything. He’s grabbed onto ideas that make him feel superior and he’ll probably never let them go.

  • jlofton

    Right! The “ideas” upon which our country was founded; the “ideas” which, when abandoned, are causing the destruction of our country. So sad that so many who call themselves Americans are clueless re: what this really means.

    John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com
    Communications Director, Institute on the Constitution
    Host, “The American View” Radio Show
    Recovering Republican
    JLof@aol.com

  • anon76

    It appears that some beasts can turn even comments not directed at them into chum. Methinks that with the extended signature in each post, this particular beast is simply doing some creative blog/institute/radio whoring. Shame to ruin a post about two such funny tv personalities with it.

  • jlofton

    How does telling the truth about our founding “ruin” anything? Isn’t free speech wonderful?

    John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com
    Communications Director, Institute on the Constitution
    Host, “The American View” Radio Show
    Recovering Republican
    JLof@aol.com

  • originalray

    Jon Stewart is God!

  • http://dianaparadis.wordpress.com Diana

    Once more, with feeling:

    Don’t. Feed. the. Trolls. John wouldn’t understand history if Thomas Jefferson explained it to him personally.

  • http://jimfromla.wordpress.com jimfromla

    Muslims talk about god.

  • anon76

    Telling the truth about our country doesn’t ruin anything. Whoring around your various links ruins a thread on a topic totally unrelated to the founding of a country. Please do not respond to this with another whore-link to your website/institute/radio program.

  • masurix

    You know what’s funny? I actually got a fear mongering, outrage pandering email from a Democrat the other day. Jennifer Brunner sent one of the most Glenn Beck-esque campaign letters I’ve ever seen and she did accomplish both her goals – fear and outrage. Unfortunately, they ended up directed toward her. Holy cow, is this where even the Democrats are going now? I sent back a scathing reply which I am sure no one read, but she lost my vote with that one. Maybe she figures that’s what she needs to win in Ohio. I’m hoping it’s an act and that she’s just Palin-ing it up for votes and she’s really a level-headed person. But I just can’t support that kind of BS.

  • murdoc829

    The fact that Sarah Palin is still a potent public figure makes me genuinely despair. While I really want to believe what Charlie. . . (way up there) says, I think the Republican strategy is working shockingly well, due largely to playing off America’s classist/racist ugliness in the guise of “free speech” and “anti-socialism.”

    I work at the University of Tennessee, and recently there was an incident in which passersby threw bananas at visiting African-American prospective students and their parents. *Bananas*! Unbelievable. And don’t try to tell me it’s not related to the frothing rhetoric of conservatives, peddling hatred as patriotism and preserving “our” way of life.

    I’m not a big fan of either party, but for God’s sake, at least the Democrats *try* to be reasonable.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    Ah, but one of those “ideas” you are so fond of espousing is that Thomas Jefferson wanted the Constitution to be rewritten every 20 years. Instead, Congress and the Supreme Court has opted throughout our history to simply add to it through amendments

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    My post was one irony of course.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    There is not now and never has been a “Church of America”. That phrase implies a national religion and the framers were careful to ensure a seperation of church and state.

    As to a later of yours, jlofton, I’d like to know where exactly in the Declaration of Independance it says that should EVER abolish the government. Quote please as I have not, admittedly, read the Declaration since college.

  • rtgunlimited

    The true spirit of America involves compromise, something republicans have lately been unable to do. Democrats aren’t perfect, but at least they aren’t trying to tell everybody their way to live is the only right way.

    Fox likes to talk about “jamming the healthcare down our throat” but that’s just carefully chosen language to hide the fact that it was Democratically passed legislation and was in no way forced on the American people.

    The majority wanted it and we got it. Stop whining about it if you didn’t agree on try to do something more productive.

blog comments powered by Disqus