Tuned In

The Marriage Ref: Grounds for Divorce

NBC
THE MARRIAGE REF -- Episode 100 -- Pictured: (l-r) -- Photo by: Patrick Harbron/NBC

Last night, NBC gave a demonstration of the difference between so-awful-it’s-awesome and so-awful-it’s-amazing awful. First came the closing ceremonies of the Winter Olympics, which, after the usual nods to the next Olympic site, final benediction by Olympic officials and emotional performances, morphed into a bizarre comic parody of Canadiana that was like a hallucinogenic trip induced by maple syrup. There was a comic monologue by William Shatner. There was Michael Buble and sexy Mounties. There were dancing hockey pucks and giant beavers. (Someone call the Parents Television Council!) The only thing missing was Terrence and Phillip.

And then, just as the ceremonies were reaching a brilliant crescendo of Canadian self-satire, NBC cut away—at least in the Eastern and Central time zones—to the premiere/preview of Jerry Seinfeld’s The Marriage Ref, the most God-awful mishmash of a comedy-variety show to lead into local news on NBC since immediately before the Olympics.

The first bad sign was the animated intro, in which Seinfeld explained the premise—giving couples a “ref” to adjudicate their arguments. It both gave the show corny, low-rent feel (Seinfeld and his wife looked like the work of a not-very-good sidewalk caricaturist) and ignored the fact that, as Monkey See blogger Linda Holmes pointed out, baseball does not have refs.

From there it just got worse, as a studio audience coughed out forced laughter at a lame monologue by host Tom Papa, who brought out the celeb refs for the night: Seinfeld, Kelly Ripa and Alec Baldwin. (Because when you want to find harmony in your relationships, you ask the guy who left an abusive voicemail to his daughter.) Then came the video profiles of the squabbling couples, both of the my-husband-has-a-crazy-idea school: in the first, hubby had his beloved deceased dog stuffed, and in the second, the husband wanted to install a stripper pole in the bedroom.

The couple each seemed camera-ready—very camera-ready, too camera-ready, either as if they were aspiring actors or had been coached, making the show seem phony even by reality standards. Then “reffing,” which was basically the panel trying improv comedy riffs. (It’s funny, ordinary Americans, because the celebrities are laughing at you! Because you’re idiots!)

Then the couple received their verdict, in an interview segment that had all the drama of watching NPR’s Wait Wait Don’t Tell Me as a TV show. Then Natalie Morales tossed a few shovels of dirt on the casket of TV journalism by pulling up “fun facts” on how many Americans stuff their pets or install home stripper poles. Then veteran sports announcer Marv Albert recapped the “funniest” moments of the program you just watched. It was as if someone thought that, if you just piled more and more elements on, somehow they would magically turn into an entertaining show.

It was, at least, an interesting object lesson in how TV works. It proved that, if you are Jerry Seinfeld, NBC will put any program you want on the air, and will give you no network notes. For the sake of my fond memories of the sitcom Seinfeld, I am going to make myself believe that Seinfeld knew this, and was deliberately punking the network.

The big winner in all this: Jay Leno. The Marriage Ref may or may not give him a good lead-in on Thursday nights, but already The Jay Leno Show is looking better in comparison.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Entertainment

    Adam Rose/FOX

    Glee Watch: NYADA, NYADA, NYADA

    Spoilers for the season finale of Glee below:

    One beef I often have with Glee episodes is that they move too fast, go in too many directions, try to cram in too much at once. You might say that about “Goodbye,” the season 3 finale, but in this case that approach seemed about right. It’s an episode about graduation, and graduation is something that, no matter how much you plan for and anticipate it, still goes too fast. Graduating is something you do, but in the moment it feels like something that happens to you, suddenly and all at once, like going over a waterfall.

    Adele Crosses Huge MilestoneHuffington Post

    ADAM TAYLOR/ ABC

    Dancing with the Stars Watch: The Last Dance

    Kelly Clarkson and Gladys Knight perform before the winner of the 14th season of Dancing with the Stars is announced

  • Tom Shaw

    1) Who really wants to take marriage advice from the man who found his wife’s previous marriage to not be an impediment to wooing her?

    2) Just think people, this is the show that NBC decided should get the sweet Thursday slot. Their ratings at 9 and 10 are going to be hideous. Sure hope the Comcast execs have their antacid ready.

    3) That Closing Ceremony really was something else, wasn’t it? It was like they asked a generic American to describe Canada: “They seem pretty good natured, and those Mounty outfits are adorable. They sure love their hockey, eh? I guess they started out as fur trappers and then they didn’t bother to move here. I can’t believe so many stars are actually Canadian and not American!”, and then made a performance out of that. Bizarre.

  • mimsysnark

    So, wait, which was this show: so-awful-it’s-awesome or so-awful-it’s-amazing?

  • mimsysnark

    Plus, I’m guessing one of those choices should have been “so awful it’s awful”? Otherwise, it doesn’t make much sense.

  • http://jjo1sen.wordpress.com jjo1sen

    It was both amazing and awesome how awful it was. It reminded me of Cop Rock. Good job NBC.

  • strt15

    That was quite possibly the most awful television show I have ever seen. Just as the Canadians were getting into their hilarious parody of themselves with screwy comics and inflatable beavers NBC cuts away to that embarrassing mess. If NBC were smart all they would put on the air is sports. And poor Natalie Morales — OMG. Blank air would have been better than that bile.

  • switchshift

    I don’t believe that anything could be worse than Nickelback.

  • http://twitter.com/poniewozik James Poniewozik

    Yeah, sorry–that was a rushed post.

  • katrinav85

    The NBC show I’m looking forward to is “Minute to Win It” on March 14th–they gave it a 2 hour premiere, I’m thinking it’s gonna be pretty good!

  • jimatl

    It made me feel sorry for Natalie Morales.

    Her role in the proceedings made Julie Chen’s Big Brother work look dignified.

  • yakalbi

    Marriage merits a trip to the taxidermist to get stuffed. On top of that NBC truly doesn’t gauge its viewers, by cutting away in the midst of the Vancouver closing ceremonies.

  • Mipiace

    What`s the point of paying, what… like $800 million for an event to own every moment of it, and then cut away from the last bit?

  • makavecki

    I’m gonna have to say I enjoyed the show. It’s refreshing to see people trying to solve their marital problems on the Marriage Ref rather than heading to one of the many divorce court tv shows. With a new celebrity panel each week, this show has a comedic twist in saving marriages.

    Thumbs up Jerry!

  • http://setheisenberg.wordpress.com Seth Eisenberg

    Seinfeld summed it up best in his post-preview chat with Oprah when he said he’s always for smart and against stupid. Normalizing differences in intimate relationships with lighthearted humor, empathy, respect and structure (albeit on a comedic platform) is a smart idea. The airwaves are flooded with anguished examples of couples allowing differences to destroy their marriages and families. Kudos to Seinfeld and NBC for betting that after putting the kids to sleep, millions of couples will tune in for a chance to laugh at ourselves and the sometimes silly disputes that too often end up tragically for the children of divorce and their parents.

  • thatpinoyguy

    Did anybody find Jerry not funny at all? I thought the show was supposed to have him more involved. All the promos had it that way and even the intro but throughout the show he seemed like nothing more than a regular panelist…one who spoked the least and wasn’t funny I might add. This show is a fail. I felt like they weren’t trying to entertain me, I found myself searching and hoping that they would say something laughable to make me like it. But then I realized that shouldn’t be what a good comedy is about. They should bring on the funny and I should have to just sit back and relax and have a good time. It felt like a sporting even and I was hoping they would do good. Yea some of the situation were okay but most seem like common sense. Besides most relationship argument end with the woman having the final say, most cases it cause the guy wants to move on and is tired of the nagging. These situations don’t seem like anything more concerning. Do we really need to watch a show that solves basic common annoyances…I don’t think so. Also what gives with NBC cutting the Olympic ending to show this?

  • doittoherdoittojulia

    Seinfeld took 12 years to come up with this Jerry Springer rip-off? I guess this shows who the real talent was behind his show. I curbed my enthusiasm for this crap after five minutes.

  • courageouslover

    While ultimately a failure, I think the Marriage Ref has some positive value. It’s nice seeing couples who fight get along so lovingly. In Imago Dialogue, we’re led into a conscious experience of love, which allows for deep conflict and HUMOR. This show could have been so much better, but it’s a start.
    Michael Sherman – CourageousLovingNation

blog comments powered by Disqus