Tuned In

To Salahi or Not to Salahi? NBCU Takes a Poll

Say you happen to have the rights to make a reality show starring an infamous couple who—in the name of getting on a reality show—breached security at the White House by crashing a state dinner. On the one hand: to put them in a reality series would effectively reward their behavior, and how, making them even bigger celebrities, giving them ancillary business opportunities, and telling other reality aspirants that no bad deed will go unrewarded. On the other hand: Ka-ching!

A dilemma, a dilemma indeed. You could look into your soul. You could talk to trusted family members and confidantes. You could fall back on the moral instruction you received from your religion, your parents, your upbringing in a civil society.

Or you could do like NBC Universal: take a poll.

Broadcasting & Cable’s Marisa Guthrie writes up a remarkable find: an online poll NBCU has conducted to gauge what kind of backlash it would get if it cast the Salahis in Bravo’s The Real Housewives of D.C. (or—the language is vague on this—possibly even in their own reality show). Among the “agree or disagree” questions: “Featuring this couple on a reality show would be rewarding their actions” and “They are train wreck characters who I would love to see more of.” (I suspect there is a large subset of the population that would answer “yes” to both.)

This is a little like a man sitting his wife down with a hypothetical questionnaire: “Agree or disagree, honey: Lap dances are harmless fun that in no way reflect on a man’s commitment to his marriage.” That is: if you’re even asking the question, it’s a pretty good indication of which way your thinking is trending.

It shouldn’t be surprising, but it’s pretty black-and-white proof that media companies’ approach to the ethics of their work is entirely situational. NBC Universal knows that it would be rewarding the Salahis for antisocial behavior. It just wants to know (a) if it could get away with it and (b) how badly its brand would be damaged by the attempt.

Am I a cynic for suspecting the answer to those questions are (a) probably and (b) I doubt the company really cares much anymore?

Related Topics: bravo, nbc universal, reality tv, tareq and michaele salahi, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Entertainment

    Adam Rose/FOX

    Glee Watch: NYADA, NYADA, NYADA

    Spoilers for the season finale of Glee below:

    One beef I often have with Glee episodes is that they move too fast, go in too many directions, try to cram in too much at once. You might say that about “Goodbye,” the season 3 finale, but in this case that approach seemed about right. It’s an episode about graduation, and graduation is something that, no matter how much you plan for and anticipate it, still goes too fast. Graduating is something you do, but in the moment it feels like something that happens to you, suddenly and all at once, like going over a waterfall.

    Adele Crosses Huge MilestoneHuffington Post

    ADAM TAYLOR/ ABC

    Dancing with the Stars Watch: The Last Dance

    Kelly Clarkson and Gladys Knight perform before the winner of the 14th season of Dancing with the Stars is announced

  • http://www.simonvinkenoog.nl/beeld/Yogi%20-%20Annelies%20Rigter.jpg yogi

    No, not cynical at all, because when I started reading, I thought NBC probably wont even care about the results or will skew the results to allow them to put these idiots on tv…maybe that just means I’m a cynic too though.

  • Rorschach

    That’s pretty disgusting. Isn’t there a rule about not profiting from crimes? I thought a convicted murderer couldn’t sell an autobiography for example. Anyway, I agree with your ‘a’ and ‘b’ and I believe a third reason is justification. A poll that finds a majority is in favor is a way to cover their ass. “How can you criticize us when the majority of Americans agree?”

  • http://www.hotmommagossip.com/2009/12/18/network-tests-the-waters-for-a-salahi-reality-show/ Network Tests the Waters for a Salahi Reality Show | Hot Momma Celebrity Gossip Blog

    [...] NBC Universal seems to clearly know that it would be rewarding the Salahis for their bad behavior and at the same time cast themselves in a very bad light, but seem perfectly willing to do to so if they think it will attract enough viewers and thereby make money.  Another perfect example of how big corporations put the bottom line ahead of ethics and morals? [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus