Tuned In

No Abortion? No Accident

As I mentioned Monday, the new CBS comedy Accidentally on Purpose is based on a memoir by time.com film critic Mary Pols. Pols, like her alter ego played by Jenna Elfman, in real life got pregnant accidentally by a much younger man. Unlike Elfman’s character, but like many other women with unplanned pregnancies, Pols had considered getting an abortion. The TV version of her does not—much like most pregnant women on TV since Maude’s anomalous abortion over three decades ago—and in an essay for Double X, Pols asks why:

I sold the option [to the story], and in doing so, I have had to let it go. I do see why the barest outline of our lives would make an appealing premise for a TV show, although I don’t think anyone should aim to make their lives sitcom fodder. (Once, in my first trimester, I suggested to Matt that we move into together to co-parent. “That sounds like a sitcom,” he said, dubiously. I dropped the idea immediately.) And remembering that Billie is not me is to the key to good mental health amid the weirdness of all this.

(Disclosure: my editor forwarded this link but neither she nor Pols asked me to blog about it. I just thought (though, as I wrote before, I didn’t like the sitcom) that it was an interesting story, and I’m guessing you will too.)

Related Topics: abortion, accidentally on purpose, mary pols, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Entertainment

    HBO

    Girls Watch: A Spartan Existence

    Hannah comes home to East Lansing and visits the netherland between college and full-fledged, independent adulthood, in an outstanding episode co-written by Judd Apatow.

    Adele Crosses Huge MilestoneHuffington Post

    Melinda Sue Gordon / Cogan's Productions

    Killing Them Softly: Brad Pitt's the Hitman, But the Movie's Not a Hit

    He’s a mob enforcer, and a cool dude, in Andrew Dominik’s laggard crime drama

  • kdh2011

    It’s just not worth it for a major network. The nation is seriously split on the topic and there would certainly be a controversy. I don’t think there is enough potential for the increased publicity to lead to increased viewership for the controversy to be worthwhile.

    Additionally, the newtorks’ obsession with attracting young viewers (maybe not CBS) could also play a role. The percentage of pro-choice people is highest for a certain age group who were alive for the courtroom fights. Young people today are more opposed to abortion than previous generations. Why would a network risk alienating young people (and very old people, I suppose)?

  • http://memles.wordpress.com/ Myles

    I am officially crossing my fingers for next year’s development cycle to feature a sitcom about a person whose life was turned into a sitcom.

    I’d watch.

  • jdt67

    Actually, across the board, younger Americans are more pro-choice and most polling will back that up — even polling done by Consevative groups.

    I thnk it would have been more realistic if the character considered abortion and then opted not to, but this is a sitcom, after all.

    Oh, and it was a bad sitcom.

  • archstanton68

    Isn’t that called “Curb Your Enthusiasm”?

  • http://tvtattle.com/2009/09/24/2326/ — TV Tattle

    [...] Why hasn't "Accidentally on Purpose" considered abortion, like its real-life inspira… Mary F. Pols, the film critics whose book inspired the CBS sitcom, says the character played by Jenna Elfman is not her, and "I have had to let it go" that not everything will mirror her life. [...]

  • http://www.digg.co.za/?p=6468 digg » Blog Archive » Roundup: Guttmacher Study Proves that, Yes, John Boehner, Family Planning and the Economy Are Linked

    [...] Time: No Abortion? No Accident [...]

  • kdh2011

    Some reading for those interested in the young people/abortion topic. I’m unwilling to spend a lot of time finding articles to support what I posted (this is not the appropriate forum for this topic either), but here are a few articles from the NY Times. These are not the best sources and I’m sure the polls themselves are out there somewhere, but if you’re here and interested, then you’ve got Google too.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/30/style/surprise-mom-i-m-against-abortion.html

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/12/opinion/12douthat.html

    I’m not going to provide the full Bluebook citation because that would be crazy but not crazy exciting. I can’t provide any anecdotal information to back this up because although I am 18-24, I am also a rational human being, and therefore I discuss abortion with my peers as little as possible. There is possibly nothing worse in life than enduring a group abortion debate (note: hyperbole! But seriously, it’s awful).

blog comments powered by Disqus