Tuned In

Nearly 18 Million for Jay. Does It Matter?

Last night, the first broadcast of The Jay Leno Show drew a whopping 17.7 million viewers, many of them with their original teeth. As the guy who wrote the story with the “Future of TV” cover line, I should probably just leave it at that and call it a day. But let’s take a look at what does and doesn’t matter about that number, in ways that are both good and bad for Jay:

* First, the obvious. It was a great number, surpassing the public guesses I’d seen out there yesterday (and probably surpassing NBC’s expectations)—but it should have been a great number. It was Jay’s first show; he’s one of the most well-known figures on TV; he had little original-broadcast competition; he had a three-month, multimillion-dollar promotional campaign; and his sails were filled with the fortuitous winds of Hurricane Kanye. That set of circumstances is only going to happen once.

* The demos were not as good. I kid about that “original teeth” line, but preliminary numbers indicate that about 60 percent of his viewers were above 50 (and thus ignored by advertisers in setting rates), a very high percentage. When it’s a matter of Conan losing to David Letterman in overall viewers, NBC will adamantly tell you the only number they care about is the 18 to 49 demographic number. I await the press release to see whether that remains the case.

* On the other hand: it beats 7.7 million. Even if there’s nowhere to go but down, that’s still a lot of people sampling the show. A surprisingly low number would have been a bigger deal than a surprisingly high number, and it would have signaled a long two years for NBC.

* It doesn’t matter if the critics don’t like it. As should by obvious by now. If you read the reviews, you’ll see that TV critics did not care for The Jay Leno Show any more than his Tonight Show, which it so closely resembled. That did not stop him from winning his timeslot for the past 15 years.

* It doesn’t matter if you don’t like it, either. I exaggerate, but only slightly. It cannot be overemphasized that Leno’s show is first and foremost a cost-cutting move. It’s a fifth or less expensive than airing scripted dramas; therefore, what would be a bad number for Law & Order would still leave NBC in the black on Jay. Now, Jay’s ratings can’t be too bad; if he cripples Conan, or inspires a mass revolt by affiliates with a low lead-in for the local news, that’s disaster. But the normal physics of ratings do not apply.

Bottom line: Jay’s ratings will drop a lot from here—again, remember Katie Couric—let alone next week, when his show is on against network originals. On the other hand, his show is a rare and powerful creation: a TV show that is not just critic-proof but even ratings-proof—or, at least, ratings-resistant.

Jay will lose a lot of viewers; that’s a given. But at least he’s got a lot to lose.

Related Topics: jay leno, TV Ratings, TV Ratings
  • Latest on Entertainment

    HBO

    Girls Watch: A Spartan Existence

    Hannah comes home to East Lansing and visits the netherland between college and full-fledged, independent adulthood, in an outstanding episode co-written by Judd Apatow.

    Adele Crosses Huge MilestoneHuffington Post

    Melinda Sue Gordon / Cogan's Productions

    Killing Them Softly: Brad Pitt's the Hitman, But the Movie's Not a Hit

    He’s a mob enforcer, and a cool dude, in Andrew Dominik’s laggard crime drama

  • Tom Shaw

    The number I saw was a 5.1 in the 18-49 demo.

    Although it’s ironic that you link to Hibberd for the ratings – he was one of the few people saying the estimates were way under, noting that Conan (with a smaller pre-existing fanbase, and less promotion) netted a 3.8 for his premiere, 90 mins later in the night. Leno getting a 5.1, for this one airing, isn’t much of a surprise.

    Personally, I’m not going to even watch the numbers for another month. Let the viewers have their full sampling of CSI: Miami vs. Castle vs. Leno for a few weeks and then let’s see how the situation settles – and then compare those values with the lean months of December / January to see how the lesser repeats strategy is likely to pan out over the 52 week average.

  • doubleang

    I’ve been curious, James; what did you think of your article’s tagline, “The future of TV”, being used in the promos for the show? (as that was not what the article was about)

  • http://twitter.com/poniewozik James Poniewozik

    You get used to being blurbed, and networks will always choose what works best for them. I didn’t write the line–cover lines are always decided at the most Olympian levels of the magazine–but (especially when you add the “Seriously”) it’s double-edged: it’s not meant as a compliment (or for good OR bad, for that matter). It just is.
    I’m guessing NBC loved the cover, and the article–not so much. Of course they’re going to use the one they like. That’s entertainment.

  • anon76

    Oh come on, James. Meta-ratings criticism is fine, but no comment on content? I don’t have much to say, either, but I did like Seinfeld’s line about how retiring a show in the 90′s was different than in the Brett Favre-Lance Armstrong ‘double-0s’

  • http://twitter.com/poniewozik James Poniewozik

    I did a separate review of the first night’s show; it’s the post directly below this one.

  • anon76

    Uh, I knew that. Just checking to see if YOU remembered writing it. Yeah, that’s the ticket!

blog comments powered by Disqus