Tuned In

Obama Shifts Health Presser for NBC & the Hoff

America’s Got Talent. And, Wednesday night, America is getting yet another President Obama press conference, this one focused on the President’s pitch for health-coverage legislation. Can it get both? 

It will on NBC, which agreed to carry the press conference after the White House moved it an hour earlier, guaranteeing that David Hasselhoff would still be able to judge child singers and circus acts on the network’s highest-rated summer show. [Update: Also, this Wednesday features Meredith Vieira's exclusive interview with Susan Boyle—so hard to get, considering she was made a star by AGT's British sister show—so you can see how this was a conundrum of conflicting journalistic imperatives.]

As with the President’s last press conference, ABC, CBS and NBC will carry it, while Fox will abstain. And the scheduling move shows that, six months and numerous primetime appearances into his presidency, Obama’s ability to command primetime real estate is not unlimited. 

There’s been political debate as to whether the networks are obligated to carry the press conference (because healthcare is such a pressing public issue) or to skip it (because the presser is an orchestrated political event). Ultimately, it’s not the politics that dictate the networks’ decision here, but money. They give up millions in ad dollars to carry primetime press conferences commercial-free. And considering the anemic ratings for Obama’s recent ABC special on healthcare, it doesn’t bode well for the presser as a lead-in to any network’s later programming. 

I can’t say I feel strongly about the networks’ carrying the conference. (As I noted last time, networks chose not to carry pressers under Clinton and both Bushes as well.) Journalistically, their news divisions have a responsibility to cover the issue; whether they do so by giving blanket coverage to a particular press conference is their call. And while there is still a (diminishing) percentage of Americans who receive only broadcast TV, with the conference to be available on cable (including Fox News), online and on radio, the issue is less actual access than it is deference, appearance and publicity. 

On the other hand, I would hope at least that the networks based their decision on newsworthiness, and not the ad dollars generated by a night of programming in a low-rated summer for broadcast TV. With viewers abandoning network TV in droves, the White House is the least of any broadcaster’s problems right now.

Related Topics: Barack Obama, politics, press conferences, News Media
  • Latest on Entertainment

    HBO

    Girls Watch: A Spartan Existence

    Hannah comes home to East Lansing and visits the netherland between college and full-fledged, independent adulthood, in an outstanding episode co-written by Judd Apatow.

    Adele Crosses Huge MilestoneHuffington Post

    Melinda Sue Gordon / Cogan's Productions

    Killing Them Softly: Brad Pitt's the Hitman, But the Movie's Not a Hit

    He’s a mob enforcer, and a cool dude, in Andrew Dominik’s laggard crime drama

  • plukasiak

    I think that Fox has the right idea this time — this press conference is an effort at agenda setting by the President, rather than a reaction to some developing situation that the American people need for information about. Obama is trying to play catch-up after dropping the ball (or more accurately, handing it to the health/insurance industry parasites who own people like Max Baucus and Ron Wyden) on health care reform, and it shouldn’t be the job of the networks to provide a President with “mulligans”.

  • jimatl

    While the White House is the least of any broadcasters problems, it sure isn’t the solution, either. As you point out, the news divisions are obligated to serve the public interest (and mandated, too) but I don’t see how not covering this event is abdicating that. As you point out, anyone who wants this live, unedited coverage can easily find it.

    I would say it is precisely BECAUSE viewers are abandoning network TV in droves that each of the Big 4 are taking a hard look at carrying these pressers/addresses. Why pass on millions of dollars that I am sure a network’s programmers would like to plow into developing programming? Perhaps shareholders might want even to have every bit of revenue coming into the company in such a challenging ad market.

  • http://tunedin.blogs.time.com/2009/07/21/the-wanted-not-needed/ The Wanted: Not Needed – Tuned In – TIME.com

    [...] Tuned In A blog about television by TIME’s TV critic James Poniewozik. Tuned In Feed   Daily E-mail Updates   « Previous PostObama Shifts Health Presser for NBC & the Hoff [...]

  • cross1

    I don’t think that it’s that big a deal if the networks don’t carry the “minor” press conferences simply because their are networks dedicated to news now. And if you can’t see it on cable, than you can pull it up on the internet. No cable? Try PBS. This issue comes back to the questions brought up following Walter Cronkite’s death about will the 5:30 newscasts be signifigant anymore. It’s just a different world.

  • renerg

    If the networks want to be seen as ‘serious’ news organizations they MUST carry the actual NEWS! It is bad enough when channels like CNN have endless Michael Jackson interviews with someone like Larry King (who USED to be a newsman and is now a celebrity follower). This topic is very important to the future of our country and American’s need to be involved. Taking a stand ‘for’ or ‘against’ isn’t going to work. Healthcare is getting more expensive and there is no ‘status quo’. Now if only the networks could start being more informative with the news rather than just looking to spread opinions and scare people in to watching. I guess if we demand that type of broadcasting we may just get it.

blog comments powered by Disqus