Tuned In

One Last Big (Yet Moving) Show for Michael

The coverage of Michael Jackson’s memorial began early on cable news this morning, with nonstop helicopter video footage from a “private” ceremony for Jackson’s family, while commentators vamped for time and guessed at what was going on behind closed doors.

It was symbolically fitting: Jackson, after all, spent most of his life in the public eye while his private life remained mostly a mystery. Fitting too, that his farewell ceremony should be a gaudy public spectacle—with Jackson himself onstage, in a flower-shrouded golden coffin—since he seemed most comfortable engaging the world through spectacle.

Spectacle, though it was, though, the Staples Center memorial ended up being more tasteful, moving and apt than the week and a half’s media circus that led up to it.

The farewell began with Smokey Robinson coming onstage early, to read statements from Diana Ross and Nelson Mandela. And then, silence. Possibly not planned silence, as there was a gap of several minutes before the ceremony commenced. But for about a minute, not knowing whether to jump in, the networks fell silent–a blessed rest, as the cameras let the hushed crowd and the blue-tinged darkness tell the story.

Ironically, the cable news networks–whose purpose is to fill airtime relentlessly with talk–did the best job of simply letting the memorial play out, including the silences between speakers. Big-network anchors are usually more driven to justify their presence by talking, and Katie Couric and Charles Gibson, in particular, could not still themselves in between performances and speakers. “I think approaching this microphone is Brooke Shields,” Couric would helpfully note, while Gibson observed, “There, a helicopter shot of the Staples Center,” over a helicopter shot of the Staples Center.

Appropriately enough, there was music, much of it Michael’s (Mariah Carey sang “I’ll Be There,” with plunging cleavage and hand gestures, and John Mayer played a guitar instrumental of “Human Nature”). The memorial closed with two songs Jackson wrote for charity, “We Are the World” and “Heal the World.” But Stevie Wonder gave maybe the day’s most moving performance with a serenade of his own “Never Dreamed You’d Leave in Summer” and “They Won’t Go When I Go,” ending with a hushed goodbye. In a way, the spectacle–a parade of memories and big-name stars of today and yesteryear–was the sort of thing an American Idol finale aims for, but animated with real emotion.

Meanwhile, a line of famous speakers paid Jackson tribute, not just high-flown words and poetry (Queen Latifah read a Maya Angelou tribute), but quirky reminiscences. (Latifah also remembered trying to do the robot to “Dancing Machine” and Magic Johnson brought the house down with a story of seeing his friend eat Kentucky Fried Chicken–letting KFC give Staples a run for its product-placement money.)

When Berry Gordy recalled hearing Michael audition for the first time–”This little kid had an incredible knowingness about him”–hearing the source tell the story among friends and family beat a previous week’s worth of commentators making the same point and paraphrasing similar stories in gauzy primetime TV specials. (Gordy also called Jackson “The greatest entertainer that ever lived.” Was there hyperbole? Sure. It was a memorial.)

There were a few interesting themes. The speakers didn’t ignore the controversies around Jackson: Gordy alluded to “questionable choices,” a clip reel included images of tabloid headlines, and Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee vehemently reminded the crowd of his acquittal on child-molestation charges. (It being a memorial, obviously, no one was there to offer a rebuttal.) Placing Jackson’s body in front of center stage, in a gaudy if closed coffin, was one last strange, showy public display for the star, but the cameras and staging avoided too many reminders that the casket was there.

And while Jackson made a point throughout his career of being pan-racial in affect, music and appeal–”It don’t matter if you’re black or white”–the music (beginning with a gospel choir) and several speeches framed him as a more specifically African-American icon than he made himself in life. The Rev. Al Sharpton, besides fervently defending Jackson from allegations of “strangeness,” credited him with changing not just music but politics. White kids, Sharpton said, “grew up from being teenage comfortable fans of Michael to being 40 years old and being comfortable to vote for a person of color to be the President of the United States of America.” Even the slo-mo funeral procession to Staples, on an L.A. freeway, had unintentional overtones of the O.J. chase.

It was finally not a concert, and not just a memorial for a cultural icon, but a goodbye to a son, brother and father, as we were reminded when Jackson’s family took the stage at the end of the event. His daughter, Paris–previously shielded, like all his kids, from the media–had the tremulous last words: “I just wanted to say I love him so much.”

It was a poignant, unusually intimate glimpse at a private relationship of a man who was much gazed at but, finally, little known. It was too bad, yet probably inevitable, that he had to die before we could see it.

Related Topics: funerals, Michael Jackson, Music
  • Latest on Entertainment

    Fashion Week Spotify Playlist

    Listen to TIME’s Fashion Week Playlist on Spotify!

    It’s Fashion Week in New York City and Manhattan is crawling with eccentric designers, stylish socialites and hungry models looking for next season’s big trend. It seems that our invitation to Marc Jacobs’ show got lost in the mail, so to console ourselves we’ve put together a stylish Spotify playlist.

    "The Woman in Black": A Good Old Fashioned Scary MovieSlate

    Jasmin Marla Dichant / Sony Pictures Classics

    In Darkness: How a Swindler Became a Schindler

    Agnieszka Holland’s Oscar-nominated film tells the true story of a Polish-Catholic sewer worker and thief who kept Jews alive in Nazi-occupied Lvov

  • tjladder

    Well done JP. I watched it on NBC, and thankfully, Brian Williams resisted the urge to talk over the silence. It was nice to see the Jackson Family as a family and put on a graceful ceremony without any circus quality. And they put his work as a humanitarian front and center. But for the first time I saw him as a father, not just a man who had these three children in full length veils following him around.

    *

    I doubt this feeling of normalcy will last. The media won’t allow it, and you can’t blame them for not allowing it but at least there was 90 minutes of peace for him.

  • childhoody

    Shame on you for bringing personal bias into Time. After all, how will you feel better about yourself (or your own icon if you have one) if you demonize someone the very same day of his memorial?!

  • carlyt1

    MJ was a great artist but maybe we can return to real news after today. There is a related post at http://iamsoannoyed.com/?page_id=588

  • fan9949

    FINALLY. Never had such a hard time getting a password. I know the word gaudy has no place in this article. I do hope they let him rest in peace but your comment sucks

  • mizrah

    The fact that you took the opportunity to fill this commentary with the most negative words that you could muster about a man with a kind heart apparently means that you have the empathy of a hyena.

  • utgraddad

    James Poniewozik sir – you are an idiot. GO AWAY SOMEWHERE AND STAY THERE.

  • unicycle012000

    Nicely written article. I agree with your assessment, and appreciate your humor. (especially the comments about the media)

  • vettemj23

    James you are retard who needs to go to hell!!!!!!!!!!! You are a senseless worthless jerk!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I wonder what is hiding in your closet, you damn idiot!!!!! Let’s see, I think I will investigate your wreckless nonjournalistic opportunist ass and see what I find!!!!

  • happyinva

    While I usually have respect for Time, and can appreciate the writer’s recap of today’s ceremonies, I can’t help but detect a large undertone of sarcasm and cynicism. Yes, each moment was accounted for in this summary, but it was flowered` with side comments that were both uncalled for and unnecessary. There was more than an obvious emotion towards Jackson, his fans, and his memorial service. It’s almost as if the writer doesn’t understand why this – the tributes, the memorial, the emotion – is occurring on behalf of Mr. Jackson. Lack of understanding does not justify ignorance and a force of opinion on a greater audience. What happened to professionalism?

  • katy19801

    Nope, don’t like your article Mr. Poniewozik. Now’s not the time to be smug. How about a little more heart when talking about someone’s memorial, please?

  • worldwhize

    You are an ass. Too bad you had to spoil a beautiful Memorial with your gaudy article in bad taste. The families taste in coffin was none of your business and “gaudy” it certainly was not.

  • sept30klr

    Please let the man rest! As I notice the TIME Special Commemorative Edition ad on this webpage to make money off of him. Hypocrisy at its worst….

  • bhowell89

    I can’t believe you have a column on Time!!! I thought journalist were supposed to have some kind of objectivity. You obviously missed that class. You equate his funeral procession to the OJ chase. How dare you!!! My grandmother always said “If you don’t have anything good to say, then don’t say anything”. I guess that’s not good advice to you since you need to get paid!!! You’re basically doing the same thing that you’re accusing other journalist of doing in your article:

    Ironically, the cable news networks–whose purpose is to fill airtime relentlessly with talk–did the best job of simply letting the memorial play out, including the silences between speakers. Big-network anchors are usually more driven to justify their presence by talking, and Katie Couric and Charles Gibson, in particular, could not still themselves in between performances and speakers.

    You’re doing the exact same thing in print form!!! Just filling space. You must have a word number requirement.

  • katy19801

    When someone you love dies, I hope you wouldn’t think their memorial to be too “gaudy”. Or when someone says they were the best (fill in the blank) to have ever lived, you don’t remind others that it’s just “hyperbole”. I don’t care if you’re allowed to share your opinion in a column, that is just rude. I didn’t expect to read something so annoying that wasn’t a youtube comment.

  • happyinva

    I recently wrote a letter to the editor regarding this disgrace of an article: letters@time.com

  • upscale2426

    Boycott the Times. The same publication that allowed this article will also be the same publication that will look to make money selling a commemorative Michael Jackson edition.

  • girlto

    Time what a mistake, Gaudy how disrespectful,rude and just plain meanspirited.Your magazine is hypocrital , you make money on MJ and then write trash. I am tongue tied with anger.

  • bhowell89

    Thank you PEOPLE!!! Time needs to know what time it is!!! This is not the day for that.

  • vejones

    I agree 100% with everything you said ! I came home during lunch today, flipped on the tv…and there it was…a remake of the OJ chase !! As if I were in the helicopter, watching the black hearse, with mJ’s casket in it ! the commentators describing every step of the way ! unreal !! and then the congresswoman or whoever she is from Texas….reminding everyone that ” you are innocent until proven guilty…and he was never proven guilty “…yes, at a person’s memorial service is JUST the place to bring that up ! Her whole speach was just a pat on her back to get her votes in the next election! This was not the place or the time to remind or try and convince people that MJ did or did not have his ‘problems’ in the past! Very tacky, if you ask me !
    then the duaghter, whom MJ insisted on keeping out of the public eye, is placed on stage, in front of millions , to profess her love for her daddy…I thought that was very uncalled for….the family should be ashamed of putting a child through that…like she hasn’t been through enough….The only person that spoke that I truly believed and honored was Smokey Robinson. You could tell everything he said was real and coming from his heart…the rest ? ehhhh…

  • neda12

    I actually had to take the time to sign up for an account just to post a comment about this article. Your sarcastic and mean spirited comments make me sick. This article should be pulled as it does not show Time in a good light. The tribute was nothing but spectacular.

  • remembergodhears

    Mr.James Poniewozik

    Your Fired!!!

  • umustbkiddingme2

    It is a disgrace that the US has been held hostage for nearly 2 weeks over the death of a drug addict and a pediphile. While I don’t think this writer has a strong grasp of grammar, I will say he gave as balanced an article as humanly possible. MJ has stripped Farrah Fawcett and numerous other “Hollywood Greats” of their due, because he was like a bad car accident…everyone had to look. Enough! Let’s get back to the people dying for our country, people leading honorable, normal lives, and allow MJs children to find the new reality of their lives in peace and quiet. Let’s glorify the truly deserving, not the “fascinating”.

  • tifo1

    In my recent web searches attempting to learn more about MJ’s final years on this earth, I am so disappointed having come across this. I have never read such a disgusting, heartless, badly written review. You should be fired; your editor should be reprimanded–at least. CNN should be ashamed for having a link to your stupid article. You are an awful, insensitive human. Go work for the tabloids, that’s all you’re worth.

  • dirtysouthtv

    Dear James,

    You did a 90% accurate job of describing the fiasco that we all witnessed earlier today. The only two things that you didn’t touch base on accurately were that pig Sheila Lee and that complete idiot wanna-be-preacher.
    The rest wasn’t too bad (although some may argue if the casket really needed to be there?)
    All of the performers did good or excellent jobs (with the exception of Mariah who is obviously beginning to loose her voice).
    Everyone did a good job except the excuse for sound technicians that on NUMEROUS occasions either had no audio, muted audio, ear monitors too low, ground-loop noise and every other audio blunder known to mankind all in one show (which is what it was-a show, or a production).
    The moral of the story is you did a great job with your write up. Please don’t listen to the people that never knew Michael Joseph Jackson, who and what he really was, and they think they love him and need to attack someone speaking the truth about him.
    Everyone has their opinion of what a great human being he was.

    I wonder what he died from?
    ;-)

    One Love,
    GMC
    President and CEO
    Dirty South TV

  • jeff30269

    Unbelievable, your commnents say much more about you than what happened today.

    No matter what anyone says …it won’t make a difference to you. You are like teflon …it just keeps flowing, so you can keep being the small person you are … expecting some type of superficial sucess around the corner for yourself.

    The memorial was created in an extraodinarily short period of time. The participants must have had a very difficult time, but it was too important to them to miss. The memorial was spontaneous, but spiritual. The participants were humble and appreciative of the opportunity to witness their love for someone they had an enormous amount of repect and love for. Someone they felt had made a difference in this world.

    Where do you come off making your trite comments. It says so much about you.

    You are pathetic. The fact that I have posted this message means that you are also successful in an ironic and perverted way….

  • kori163

    It’s really sad to think that so many people are so ignorant. Although I believe that the media coverage was outrageous and other important stories were overshadowed, we can’t forget the amazing things that Michael Jackson did for so many, not only through his music, but also through his work as a humanitarian.
    I will never shun anyone for their opinions because in all honesty, we all view people and events, places and things, differently. And the media did cover this story for a long while, but that is the state of our world. Entertainers, from Michael Jackson to Tom Cruise, Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt to Justin Timberlake; all of these entertainers receive much more news coverage than any news stories involving wars, famine, and violence.
    But I think that with this shocking death of the greatest entertainer that this world has ever seen, we should try and be respectful of his family, friends, and fans, regardless of what we thought about him as a person.
    I am a musician and personally, I was deeply inspired by Michael, and I will continue to be so every time I see his videos or hear his music.
    I’ll miss you, Michael. May you finally, rest in peace.

  • beauhanks

    Apparently the people who have responded to your review/critique of the event don’t understand the difference between a news magazine and a fan site. (Nor can they distinguish between Time magazine and The Times.) The piece was perfectly balanced. It’s not the place of Time magazine to write an ode. There have been plenty of those, and some of them have been beautiful. But the vehemence over something that is not in the least offensive is amazing. Mariah Carey did show a lot of cleavage, and those hand gestures… hmmm. And gaudy? Do we think a gold covered coffin is gaudy? Apparently not. People, read more actual criticism. It doesn’t mean being negative. It means weighing the good and the bad. There is a clumsy construction, however, on “Spectacle, though it was, though, the Staples Center memorial…” And you missed mentioning the remarkable performance of the Welsh phenom, the 12-year-old Shaheen Jafargholi. It was moving, multicultural, and, since MJ had asked him to appear as part of the “This Is It” show, an elegant passing of the torch.

  • lheinrich

    This article should be pulled. It is in really bad taste. Today was for Michael – there was no need for this. Please reconsider, wiser minds at Time

  • lizy47

    How tacky and unprofessional! I normally don’t blog either but I hope James Poniewozik will no longer be affiliated with Time. It is mindless unimportant Nerds like him who says anything to get recognized. NOT! I feel sorry for your parents.

  • cambridged

    I really hope this will allow the media to move on. The coverage of this spectacle is a poor reflection on our society.
    A paedophile who can sing is still a paedophile.

  • http://www.dirtysouthtv.tv Dirty South TV

    Dear Beau,

    Although your general intelligence is WAY higher than the average person, your accuracy in singers is not so strong. Although Shaheen did a FANTASTIC job today, he will NOT have that voice in 5-7 years from now, therefore null and voiding him to be the torch carrier.
    There is A.J. P. in Las Vegas, Lloyd in Atlanta, Usher Raymond in Atlanta, that idiot Chris Brown in Atlanta, JaMiel Cox in Atlanta and many many others who either still do have their voices or will continue to have their voices.

  • rajem

    This editorial/commentary, was completely tasteless.
    I am surprised that Time would exhibit such a lack of class by publishing this.
    After reading ths, one wonders, if perhaps the publisher of Time Magazine is now employing the same advisers that guided Mr. Jackson into some his bad decisions.

  • http://www.myspace.com/santinacantina santinacantina

    Wow. This is honestly one of the most disgusting stories I’ve ever read written out of Time. Talk about distasteful, rude, bias, and unprofessional. How thoughtless and cruel of you, Mr. James Poniewozik. It’s for people like YOU that Mr. Michael Joseph Jackson wrote “Leave Me Alone,” and you are also part of the reason he is gone. I hope Time recognizes what a bias and unprofessional writer you are. No one cares about what YOU personally think. Your job is to state the facts, and put forth truthful information about the current times.

    Long live the King, forever moonwalking in my ♥.

  • http://www.dirtysouthtv.tv Dirty South TV

    Case in point- 32 and 33
    ;-)
    Enough said

  • selfawareness1

    Mr. James Poniewozik,
    I too had to sign up in order to voice my concerns on this article. You have disgraced Times name…. What could have been a “Grand” piece turned out to be smut, due to your nasty comments.

    I’m curious as to what will be said about you on your day of reckoning. I pray that you have dedicated your hand in labor and humanitarian efforts. If you have not, today is the day to start because you’ll need something to bargain with.

    The Memorial was tastefully coordinated. It allowed people to hear just a small portion of what Michael’s heart was all about.

    God Bless the Jackson Family and God Bless America!

  • zoeymae

    You know…there’s just something that sits wrong with me and your comments. But your choice of words like gaudy and comparing to what all American Idol Fans wish they could see is….tasteless! The Man, his daughter, and family make this real. It’s a death, and unfortunately in the public eye which gives a voice to smart-mouths like yourself lets say to pull all sorts of cuteness out of their butts. Sorry, it’s lost and unappreciated at this time. I hope they don’t look at the media reports about this….ever!

  • http://kingsthrone.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/one-last-big-yet-moving-show-fora%c2%83a%c2%80%c2%9aa%c2%82a%c2%a0michael-tuned-in-a%c2%83a%c2%a2a%c2%82a%c2%82%c2%aca%c2%82a%c2%80%c2%9c-time-com/ One Last Big (Yet Moving) Show for Michael – Tuned In – TIME.com « Intro

    [...] [...]

  • B.A.M.

    I didn’t comment at first but seeing the type of comments this BLOG POST has been getting I feel like I should.

    For the first time today I watched Fox News and wasn’t repulsed. They talked about the funeral but then went on about the economy, about media coverage, and other things I did not see on CNN at all–and without bias too (amazingly). MJ is an international icon but he isn’t the world. There are soldiers dying, riots in Honduras and China, and something in Tehran (haven’t seen news out of there for a long while). Also, apparently our President did something in some big country–if that even matters. Even TMZ of all things covered other things than MJ.

    But this isn’t all bad. Instead of watching the news I decided to read the newspaper and a book. Next time I may just skip the T.V. all together.

    I also didn’t see this post as a attack on Michael but on those taking advantage of his unfortunate death. Whatever.

  • que13

    This is what this hypocrite USED to say about celebrities like MJ:

    “You know who complains about American celebrity culture? Al-Qaeda and the French, that’s who!”

    Link: http://newsbusters.org/people/james-poniewozik

    No HE’S doing all the whining! So which are you nerd? A terrorist or French? I’d guess you’re simply a idiot who’s jealous that no girls liked your nerdy a** in high-school like they did MJ. LOL!

  • miranda444

    thanks for a well observed and written account of the memorial.
    it was very balanced, crediting what should be credited while, as you should, not ignoring the fact that we live in a severely screwed up society.
    i look forward to more of your pieces.

  • katy19801

    To dirtysouthtv – shameless plug there. And you must be friends with Mr. Poniewozik?

  • http://www.dirtysouthtv.tv Dirty South TV

    James,

    NOTHING you said was nasty. Please do not listen to the mindless people that have no clue of reality in front of their eyes.

    Leave James alone, he was almost spot on accurate. What are you people reading? And what did you watch today, CERTAINLY not what we all watched.

    I have a few things I would like to say if someone thinks they “can handle the truth”.

    Michael Jackson is not dead because of James, me or ANY other person with the LONE exception of himself-so blame him for your sadness, not someone who sees things as they really are.
    What is this nonsense?????????????

  • kingsam2754

    Whilst I appreciate your comments – I don’t think the memorial service was gaudy. It had a lot more dignity in it than I thought it would. And while Michael Jackson’s life and relationship with the media is controversial, there is no denying the man’s talent, showmanship and ability to reinvent himself. People obviously took him into their hearts and are very passionate about showing him the honour he deserves. I think you could have held this commentary over for another 24 hours.

  • sinnammon

    Your poor choice of words shows the lack of respect you have for the deceased and in all, Michael Jackson’s family (friends and fans). I’m surprised that it was allowed to be published. What an embarrassment for Time.

  • jayswon

    dude,
    you’re a dick.

  • http://www.ibm.com/ibmpress Ellice

    Gaudy? Fool!

  • onnabugeisha

    As a retard myself, I am offended and demand an apology from vettemj23. You hurt me to my very soul. In fact, I am going to go cry now.

    Damn you, vettemj23. Damn you and your abuse of punctuation straight to hell.

  • profdante

    Wow I cannot believe the reaction that this blogpost has gotten. I think that this summary of the memorial was very honest and fitting and I don’t see anything in it that is deserving of such negative commentary, much less accusations of unprofessionalism. The post is very appreciative of the entertainer and the man, even if there were some (well-deserved) asides about the over-the-topness of the service itself. The instant hagiography surrounding Michael Jackson is startling, to say the least.

  • http://www.dirtysouthtv.tv Dirty South TV

    Plug-when? Friends with James, no-I have never met the man and I really know nothing about him—except that he sees things pretty accurately. I would offer him my friendship at the drop of a dime, he’s real, and he sees and speaks clearly and accurately.

  • cpett

    My respect for Time just went down a notch. While this is nothing more than an opionated pathethic GAUDY article, I’m stunned that Time would link itself to something so tasteless. JP, in many ways, I pity you and hope that your life and your journalistic professionalism gets better because this is as low as it gets!

  • msfinn

    I too feel your comments were mean spirited and self-serving. Why bother to verbalize such triteness. It is demoralizing and you should perhaps take stock of the influence you have as a writer and think about the effect your words have on people. You have an opportunity to make a meaningful contribution to your readers. If not, why do you bother to write? The Michael Jackson tribute was poignant, appropriate and meaningful to millions of people. People are more likely to treat others with respect and dignity after experiencing such a heartfelt memorial. And some of that spirit of well-being will travel and last. It is called goodwill.

  • selfawareness1

    I don’t think Mariah losing her voice should be considered a permanent thing. This happens if you are or have been crying and emotional. Maybe you don’t know anything about the entertainment industry.

    Some of the people on here is just as bitter as Mr. Poniewozik.

    God Bless

  • allie65616

    Boy this generation of Americans who call themselves professional, sure as hell don’t know the meaning of giving a person and their family respect in a time of mourning. I don’t know about you crazy people but I was raised to respect the dead and the sentiments of the memories that are left to their loved ones. As for MJ’s casket, If you look at how many gold records he created in his career it was only fitting that his casket match his history in the profession he was so well known and hunted for.

    I agree with previous comments. . .

    Mr. James Poniewozik you are certainly fired!!!!

  • happyinva

    DirtySouthTV – shameless plugs in both the username and the signature in the initial blog:
    GMC
    President and CEO
    Dirty South TV

  • http://www.aaronendre.com aaronendre

    For the record, I think all of the fans have gone a bit out of control with criticizing Mr. Poniewozik for this article.

    I agree wholeheartedly with everything that he said.

    Part of what made Michael Jackson such an icon was his gaudy, over-the-top, strange style–it’s most of what I like about him as an artist. It’s only fitting that his death, leading up to and including the funeral today be outrageous, gaudy and over-the-top. Which it was, hands down. But I don’t think that’s a bad thing.

    Moral of the story: Michael Jackson is gone. Who cares what anyone writes about him now? Boycotting TIME is just ridiculous and immature.

  • zin18

    James,

    Are you a bad writer, a bad person or both?

    You and your friend Dirty South are amazing. Both of you should realize that you will never be one percent of what Michael was. So you might as well keep quiet. You article will hurt Time and its reputation. Hope someone there has the sense to show you the door.

    How many people do you expect to cry (or even turn up) at your funeral? Think about that. It might teach you to respect the dead and not ridicule others paying homage to the dead.

  • nunzy

    You are a disgrace to time magazine.This is a repugnant article.Funny how people like yourself cite the constitution when it comes to freedom of the press but have no regard for the part that talks about innocent until proven guilty.He was found not guilty asshole.Leave him alone.
    RIP MJ

  • allie65616

    Would you want your children to read nasty things about you if you were to leave them behind? But of course no one bothers to think about the shoe being on the other foot. You are a jerk and have demoralized the work the family did to try and give their loved one some dignity in death.

  • katy19801

    dirtysouthtv – listing your title and company as a signature (gee we’re really impressed).

    As for the Mr. Poniewozik, I’m sure he does speak clearly as a perpetual observer does. The problem with constantly being rational and analytical is that you never fully participate in the human events that shape your heart. I’m not saying this article alone is a symbol of this, but it shows what kind of personality Mr. Poniewozik exudes.

  • julianm09

    What a shame that Mr. Poniewozik got the chance to release this. How inappropiate for an article on a legend’s memorial service to include these mocking comments, this amount of sarcasm and underlying cynism.

    You just couldn’t restrain yourself James, could ya? Its ridiculous.

  • gotmoxie1

    JP-
    I am trying to figure YOU out? This was such a beautiful tribute to a talented man who brought joy to people’s lives. What about YOU would make you see the negative and in fact – look for it?
    Beauty is truly in the beholder. This was a beautiful tribute to a beautiful and sensitive person who I did not know and would not admit to ever being able to “know him”. There is no doubt I could never endure the adulation MJ experienced in this life – could you?
    I see beauty JP and my wish for you is that you could too.

  • B.A.M.

    @ Nunzy: Correct me if I’m wrong but he didn’t say he was guilty. At all. I think many of the commenters haven’t read the blog post as shown by their unwarranted anger.

  • randomornot

    Do people read anymore? All of you who are reading this review of the memorial as a negative screed need to reread it one more time. The author complimented cable media for remaining silent throughout, praised Gordy’s personal recounting, acknowledged the beautiful music–especially Stevie Wonder’s remarkable number, and noted the showmanship (or ‘over the top’) qualities as well–such as the flashy coffin. Seriously, people, you might want to look up the origins of the word Gaudy (hint: refers to an artist’s style) before you let the term overwhelm your emotions. The author believes this memorial service offered all of us a “glimpse” of the man behind the superstar. Let’s not let the urge to “interact” online rob us of our reading comprehension skills!

  • coolarchitect

    All charges against Michael were dropped fair and square. So many people of standing in the community have come forth and said how Michael was around their children and there was never a basis for any of the allegations. It really is slander to question someone’s innocence after they are acquitted. Critics like JP who keep bringing it up should be sued and made to publicly apologize to Michael and his family. Now that would be a true “spectacle” and one to watch. It was really people like him in concert with the greed driven parents of children (upon whom Michael bestowed nothing but kindness), that tortured and killed him slowly. The drugs were not the cause, but the effect of all the stress and sleepless nights that Michael suffered from. The blame rests squarely on the classless media clowns. And this guy James symbolizes all that.

    I have no idea why this guy still remains hired by Time. His reviews are repeatedly unfair, derogatory and in poor taste as is evident by most comments on his articles. He has no class and expects his readers to not have any either. There was nothing remotely “gaudy” about the memorial, but perhaps JP doesn’t know the meaning of the word.

  • lifemagical

    I saw nothing gaudy and I saw nothing strange about this moving and well put together ceremony. It is the most moving memorial I’ve seen in my life! The only hyperbole you were able to point out was that you are considered a journalist. That would be an exaggeration, because you are more like a typical internet troll. This article smacks of so many of your own preconceptions. The funeral procession was nothing like OJ’s drive, but like most funeral processions with maybe more vehicles. How ridiculous can you get? It wasn’t the fact that the cars were moving slowly on a highway that perhaps made you think of OJ, it was more or less your own internalized feelings about a man you’d rather presume guilty. Shame on you – shame on this sad piece of “journalism.”

  • jodita76

    I created an account just so I could comment on this blog by Mr. Poniewozik. The headline that links to this on cnn.com reads, “A strange, gaudy and moving farewell.” I do not know what event Mr. Poniewozik witnessed today, but “strange” and “gaudy” does not describe it. He is obviously biased against MJ based on the language he used and his bizarre assessment of the event. The event was very spartan in its design. MJ had the same casket design that James Brown had. Was that gaudy then, or just when MJ is buried in it? And evoking the OJ chase in describing the funeral procession was tasteless and shows that Mr. Poniewozik simply could not keep his strange and mean-spirited thoughts to him self. This entire blog entry is meanspirited, tasteless, and just plain wrong. Time should consider pulling this atrocious blog entry, or better yet, should consider whether Mr. Poniewozik should keep his employment with the magazine.

  • katy19801

    randomornot – You obviously haven’t much knowledge of the many nuances that make writing so complex. We are angered by the negative TONE of the article. It’s not blatant, but very thinly veiled in such words as “gaudy” which has negative connotations. Gaudy is definitely not often used to praise something.

  • jackie2000

    Wonder what wrong side of the “attempted writing” bed this dude crawled out of this morning?

    Calling the service gaudy??
    It was magnificently beautiful, touching, sentimental and lovely!

    I’m sorry his loved ones must be rolled into their plot with not so much of a sendoff as a wilting flower dumped into the dirt and maybe some ancient hymn sung in monotone….maybe that’s all the poor sap knows.

    Obviously, he his void of all emotion, sharing and the knowledge of God’s love for his chilren (but we forgive him that — God loves even the saps and those who have no evaluation powers or writing talents. He should find his true talent, however – as this ain’t it)

    What is so strange and showy about a closed casket at a funeral?
    This so-called writer sounds like he might be trump MJ in the sheltered life catagory.
    He should do a little research on memorial and funeral services before making such a ridiculous statement.
    It’s spectacle because it was there? was closed?
    What would he have called it if it were open?
    Talk about can’t win for losing — not that MJ or anyone else really cares what this tool says.
    I’m only writing to let TIME magazine — which constantly — and I mean CONSTANTLY solicits me to spend money on this sort of trash and inept writing can STOP wasting its time, money and efforts.
    I will never spend money on this crap.

    His most ludicrous comments are made about no one being there for a rebuttal? huh? rebuttal for what?
    this was a memorial service — not a long ago — been there, done that – ACQUITTED of ALL charges trial.
    That ship has sailed bud….get OVER it!

    You missed the entire tone of the service, incuding the most poingant, intimate sentiments given by Brooke Shields.

    I think you ought to retire early….you are clearly clueless.
    RIP Mike!

  • oneikki

    Michael Jackson tried his entire life to keep his children out of the public spotlight, almost saying to the world, “only over my dead body….” Well Michael…, literally.

  • hawkiebawkie

    what in the world is with time.com? you seem determined to insult michael jackson (and his fans) at every turn (didn’t stop you from selling a “tribute” special magazine though). i used to have so much respect for time. i just don’t get the personal attacks.

    p.s. don’t think i’m buying your tribute edition.

  • ciaress

    1. No, it was NOT hyperbole. It is a fact that Michael Jackson was “the greatest entertainer that ever lived.” I think Motown Founder, Berry Gordy, may actually have a more informed opinion on this matter than you do.

    2. Your synopsis of Michael Jackson’s memorial service is not only disgraceful but sincerely pitiful. It is blatantly obvious that you have taken the opportunity of another human being’s passing to bolster your own sad sense of superiority and obvious lack of true self-esteem. No person with any true sense of self, or human decency, would ever use an opportunity such as someone else’s death for their own narcissistic needs. You poor thing.

    However, in the spirit of Michael Jackson, I will simply wish love and light for you because you missed the substance of this memorial service entirely and clearly have absolutely no capacity to understand it, even with assistance. Hopefully, one day, you may rise out of the depths of your lack of love to join the rest of us in our heartfelt celebration of one of the most deeply loving and phenomenally gifted human beings which God ever created and the world has ever known. Sad to say, you missed it.

    Note to Time Magazine: Please rethink your choice of writers as James Poniewozik is 100% obtuse.

  • sadday12

    This article is absolutely ridiculous, disrespectful and unacceptable. Calling MJ the best entertainer is not hyperbole, although calling you a journalist would be. You should be ashamed for mocking the memorial service of someone’s son, brother and father. Michael was larger than life, but he was still a person, and deserves respect… especially now that he is gone.

  • judasyeast

    Nice read. That “memorial” was a joke as was most of the sensationalism surrounding MJ’s death. He was just a man… a man accused of horrible crimes against children. If he couldn’t dance/sing most of the people on here praising him wouldn’t spit on him if he was on fire.

  • illbethere

    James Poniewozik, you have no respect for the deceased Michael Jackson, nor his family or fans. This article shows the type of person you truely are….heartless, no class, and very unprofessional. I’m surprised by the Time that your unprofessional crap was allowed to be published. What an embarrassment for yourself and for the Time. Find yourself a different line of work.
    Michael Jackson, May you rest in peace! We love you and you will be missed!

  • msfinn

    I have no great desire to interact on-line. However no matter which way you swing it, the nuance of the words “Gaudy” and “over the top” are in the context of this article, judgemental and negative. Didn’t add anything of worth- those words could be contrued as sly/snide takeaways.

  • que13

    #1 recording artist of all time = #1 entertainer of all time, does it not idiot? (If not, what other OBJECTIVE measure do you use?)

  • ciaress

    Another FACT missing in your sad little diatribe: “Michael Jackson is listed in the Guinness Book of World Records as the most charitable entertainer.”

  • boston11

    What was the point of this article? 150 words so that you get paid? This was really in poor taste. You clearly have an opinion about Michael Jackson’s life and the choices he made..you should have written an article about that rather than a thinly veiled judgement piece. I would have respected your honesty had you said what you really wanted to say rather than this annoying, “gaudy”, headline grabbing bit. Perez Hilton showed more class than you just did.

  • jkm2009

    What a beautifully and tastefully done memorial service and what an absolutely tasteless article. As a writer, you should be ashamed of yourself.

  • randomornot

    Katy: Nuance and complexity as they pertain to language is in fact my specialty, but I’m sure that fact won’t sway your take on the writing. I’m trying as hard as I can to see the venom here, but I just don’t. And if the tone you sense in the word gaudy is that annoying to you, I certainly hope you won’t overlook the tone conveyed (connoted) by words such as “tasteful,” “moving” and “animated with real emotion.” Also, as I’m sure you know, this column is editorial and not news. It’s MEANT to be one man’s take on the memorial. As someone skilled in nuance, I’m sure you already recognize that reviews are not news. And this review is WAY more interesting to read than any of the comments pro or con. To me.

  • kgarrett0426

    James Poniewozik ..gotta tell you, I have never heard of you and I have to say that you MUST have been watching something other than what I saw and milloions of others saw. A spectacle? Gaudy? How dare you! I think that the Times should really review the veracity of their judgment in even allowing you the space for your ridiculous, mean spirited dribble. You are the lowest of all professionals and to dishonor a day when finally, we all have witnessed the wonderment and reality that MJ really, truly IS not WAS and Not might of been..the most magnificent entertainer to ever live. You are a parasite and I am sorry I even looked at your stupid piece. Its obvious you know nothing about “pop cultureOR society”…you are dear sir a FRAUD

  • angrydominion

    Well as a member of a veteran journalist organization and seasoned diversity specialist, I will be brief as my expertise speaks for itself. I must state that this article is racist to its core! The reference of a black man in a police chase to a black man’s family in a funeral possession is textbook racism. Your supporters are part of the subtle racism that has permeated during the span of Mr. Jackson’s life and mine. I will not only cancel my subscription to Essence, Time and other Time Warner publications. I am not bothered by yours and others statement of the fact that Mr. Jackson has had intense media coverage. What is institutionally racist is your comparison of OJ Simpson’s plight to Michael Jackson’s funeral as if all the African-Americans are peas-in –the-same-pod. The lack of cultural competence (gaudy coffin) in your article reeks of ignorance, bias and disdain for other cultures and most likely, races. FYI, I was so moved by this (memorial) funeral and seeing a positive slant on Mr. Jackson that I am going to heed his messages. As the Man in the Mirror, I am going to start a campaign to have all Time personnel associated with this post’s approval deliver an apology and also, request their termination. Yes, I want to be started something! I hope others follow. I know that this violates Time, Inc. Code of Conduct. Let’s all go speak with Time Warner Inc.
    Edward Adler, Executive Vice President
    One Time Warner Center
    New York, NY 10019-8016
    Phone 212.484.8000
    and others
    Dawn Bridges
    Corporate Communications
    dawn_bridges@timeinc.com
    Phone 212.522.2494

    Colleen McMillen
    Corporate Communications
    colleen_mcmillen@timeinc.com
    Phone 212.522.1263

    Jane Lehman
    Corporate Communications
    jane_lehman@timeinc.com
    Phone 212.522.0597

    Please follow suit everyone, I am calling this in now to each of the people listed above. Join Me.

  • ciaress

    MICHAEL JACKSON IS DEARLY LOVED ALL AROUND THE WORLD.

    HE, HIS LOVE, AND HIS AMAZING MUSIC WILL BE LOVED AND REMEMBERED FOREVER.

    LONG LIVE THE GREATEST ENTERTAINER THAT EVER LIVED!

    LOVE YOU MORE, MICHAEL. XO

  • vejones

    and what’s funny now, is LA is requesting $$$$$ to help out with the circus that was put on today !! NO ONE asked LA to rent out the stadium, block the roads, put extra police force out there ! IF anyone should help LA pay, it’s the JACKSON’S who made a circus out of someone’s death! Let Mariah , Usher, and all of the other’s that came to ‘mourn’ , pay for it ! Like California doesn’t already owe the people money !!!

  • ferociouswalrus

    Huh. My initial reaction to the article was that it was probably if anything much more reverential than was necessary, but made up for that by being really well written and having some interesting thoughts. I guess some things just cause some people to be very strange. Don’t worry, Mr. Poniewozik, calm heads will prevail. I think in the meantime we can take a step back and enjoy the random weirdness.

    We all only hope that when we die there are those who honor us by writing crass insults in blog comments. That is when we know we are loved.

  • coolarchitect

    The only reason why this guy gets any traffic is because CNN links to Time. Is anyone from Time reading these comments?? Michael touched the hearts of so many people in a positive way and brought so much joy – and on this very day of sadness and when it is a time to be inspired by his thoughts and actions, your classless journalist riles up so many people and causes great division instead?? Is this what journalism means to you, Time?? It is really pathetic and shameful how you will use any means to drum up web-hits and sales.

  • ciaress

    “There is nothing strange about your Daddy. It was strange what your Daddy had to deal with.”

    Reverend Al Sharpton to the children of Michael Jackson

  • dreammoon81

    I normally do not leave comments on the internet but I had to leave one today. I used to respect Time but due to this article I feel like I am reading some tabloid.
    Gaudy was not the word to use today. A man just died! A little bit of respect! His children are going to read this.. I hope someone says something nice about you when you pass.

  • wanderlust2

    He’s a journalist, you morons, not the president of the Michael Jackson Fan Club. And it’s a commentary, not a straight news story, so he has every right to state his opinion. He’s not responsible for writing a report YOU agree with. If you so desperately need your adulation affirmed, go to a fan site, not a newsmagazine.

  • happyinva

    @ randomornot and others like him/her – I find it interesting that out of all of the comments responding to this article, those that are offended by it dramatically outweigh those like yourself, that see nothing wrong with it. There is tone (albeit slight) throughout the entire article. While it is an opinion piece, most people feel that the timing is way off and conveys nothing other than a severe lack of sensitivity for the Jackson family, and the deceased himself. You can defend the piece all day long, but the fact remains that the timing of this article, and the tone within, is offensive considering what it is referencing.

  • randomornot

    Poz–I’m with ferocious walrus (words I never thought I’d write). How to explain the Roshomon (sp) phenom evident in these replies?? How can a nation of people come together in love for MJ yet be divided so distinctly by this column? Can you explain that???

  • smcm2

    I’m not a big MJ fan, and I think there has been way too much coverage the past week. HOWEVER, I think this article was unnecessarily snarky. I watched the memorial. I sort of expected it to be way over the top, but I thought it was very much like many memorial services I have attended in my little town back home, except the participants here all happened to be celebs. They said goodbye to their child, brother, father and co-worker. They paid tribute. They recalled stories of yore. They had a lot of fancy flowers, a fancy casket and a nice meal afterwards–just like we always did. I know some people think it’s weird to do it this way, but it’s the culture I grew up in (only this was on a much grander scale), and to this day, when I go back to my little hometown and witness another funeral, it gives me great comfort. People stop in their tracks when the hearse drives by on the way to the cemetery, men take their caps off, cars pull over and wait for the funeral procession to pass by, the mourners are treated with the utmost dignity and compassion. You can sneer and make fun of the ritual of how a family says goodbye to their child/brother/father, but why would you? Why would anybody? If Time capitalizes on this ritual that they make so much fun, then puts out a special MJ edition, then they are total hypocrites. My sympathies to ANYONE who lays a loved one to rest. Period. Any criticisms can wait.

  • ciaress

    Another FACT for you: Michael Jackson was ACQUITTED of all charges against him. Remember our U.S. Constitution – that whole “innocent until PROVEN guilty” thing? Well, guess what?! Also, an insurance company chickened out and demanded that MJ settle the other false and malicious lawsuit. Here’s a tip from the real world: extremely wealthy individuals attract all kinds of thieves and liars attempting to steal their money. It happens every day, everywhere. Go learn something, James.

  • rainbowbeliever

    I am absolutely shocked that Time would employ anyone of such little sense, professionalism, and humanity. This loser needs to be sweeping floors at Time or put out to pasture. Doesn’t matter if it’s Michael Jackson or Popeye the Sailor Man, he’s in the wrong business. Guaranteed Time is a HUGE loser on this one!! Jimmy boy, it takes one to know one!! Have you ever listened to Man In the Mirror? Maybe you should! Damn I feel sorry for your family. What a total ASS you show them to be. A total embarrassment to all. What a terrible example to set for your family, friends (?), co-workers, and future good journalists. Your best contribution is your great ability to show the world what kind of disgusting soul NOT to be!

  • truthteller7

    This shows how sad and crazed Jackson fans are.
    So the writer used the word “gaudy.” So what? It was gaudy.
    All you lost, sad people need a life.
    Even if he was acquitted, Jackson did STRANGE things with children.
    Open your eyes!
    Jackson is not a god, he’s a human.

  • samwaltpete

    I think many of you missed the author’s point. He is only criticizing the media for the way it has exploited MJ throughout the years. While “gaudy” may not have been the best choice of words because of its sometimes negative connotations, I’m willing to give the author the benefit of the doubt. The primary definition of gaudy is “brilliantly showy.” Personally, I think it is fair to describe an amazing singer and dancer who wears a glittery white glove as brilliantly showy.

  • nbro54

    This memorial was a tribute to the life of Michael Jackson . To compare the funeral processional to having overtones to the OJ Simpson chase is poor taste and just shows how low this magazine has become. How much cash will the publishers of Time make on Michael Jackson’s Commemorative editions.

  • randomornot

    IN general, people don’t phone customer service to relay a positive experience. For the record, I”m a huge MJ fan and looked forward to the memorial as the very important ritual (for grieving) that it was. I might not have planned the same exact event if Ortega asked ME TO produce it, but still–as a fan, I was moved beyond belief. One thing I know for sure is the fact that, when tragedy strikes, people respond differently. I’m not sure, but I suspect that the author of this article would say that he was moved as well. That came through in the writing to me. But maybe I missed something. I’ll give you that!

  • coolarchitect

    That is EXACTLY the point… Michael brought us together and this moron divides us. Words have power, and as journalists because of their ability to reach far and wide they have a bigger RESPONSIBILITY to be FAIR, to be RESPECTFUL, to LEAD the way to a better soceity, rather than cause pain and division… oh but wait, if those words meant anything to the media as we know it, Michael would not have gone through what he did… as did Princess Di and countless other kind and gentle souls… yet there are some that defend these very media folks and their classless writings…

  • nexttouch

    I didn’t think the service was gaudy at all but, rather, moving, sad and memorable. Pray for his children.

  • mizrah

    I think JP was beat up a lot at school. With a name like Poniewozik, who wouldn’t knock him around. I bet he looks like shriveled up noodles in person. LOL!!!

  • ciaress

    “I wonder what he died from?”

    A broken heart.

  • fedup777

    This is a shock factor article intended solely to obtaining as many responses as it has (including mine) and so I couldn’t agree more that it is opportunistic. Nonetheless, it’s interesting that Michael dedicated his life to excellence which I personally find motivating and inspiring. Yet in contrast, this writer has taken his journalistic talent to a sewer of negativity. From someone who has survived cancer, please spend your life in better ways, in ways of lasting impact to the world and not for momentary shock and reaction.

  • randomornot

    How many people who are upset at this writer regularly buy Time on the newsstands or subscribe?

  • truthteller7

    This is like some kind of mass hysteria.
    Get help, people.
    Michael Jackson didn’t know you.
    You didn’t know him.
    If you gave this much attention to your own families we’d have
    a much better world.

  • speakingout22

    This is a very racist article at its best, the epitome of what is wrong with the world. What exactly wrong with the coffin, hatred at its best

  • msfinn

    Commentary: Snarky is snarky. It’s about tone – not what was said but tone of voice. It was unnecessary and that’s my opinion.

  • happyinva

    When you get off track and use words like “gaudy”, “spectacle”, and speak to Mariah’s cleavage and hand gestures, suggest that a title is possibly hyperbole, suggest that a rebuttal regarding defamation (since he was acquitted of all charges, any reference or innuendo is purely defamation) should’ve-would’ve-could’ve been made, make an insinuation about the sudden claim of MJ’s of race (what does his race have to do with anything? He WAS black), along with referencing the OJ Simpson car chase – it leaves people with a bad taste in their mouth. It’s quiet cynicism… definitely not overt – which is something that I give the “writer” credit for. I imagine that being able to veil negative thoughts in writing is a very well honed skill for this Mr. Poniewozik.

  • sajawebb

    I listen to this pollock, and realize that my dad probably had to listen to his dad slam MLK!

  • randomornot

    Cool architect–if you’re mad at the media for its role in MJ’s life, I can’t change that–nor do I want to. But even though I’m not in agreement with you on this article, the article HAS NOT divided me from you…I think we can agree to disagree on one silly article. It hasn’t stripped me of my own personal response to the memorial. Don’t let it rob you!!! I’m loggin off–and dancing in my socks!

  • truthteller7

    Sajawebb, he’s not MLK. And this article wasn’t racist speakingout22.
    You both are lunatics.
    MJ was an entertainer.
    Get a grip.
    Take a breath.

  • ciaress

    By “gaudy,” if you mean exceptionally elegant and tasteful, I agree entirely. It was a simply beautiful service for one of the most unique and loving human beings the world has ever known.

    May you rest in peace with God, Michael.

  • twrushen34

    How dare you! This man brought people together and accomplished more in his life time for mankind than you could ever imagine or compose for yourself! This was a GREAT HUMAN BEING who made it possible for countries of men, women and children to have proper food and other necessities. When was the last time you fed a nation? His music inspired some of the artist you probably have in your iPod! His vision, dedication and desire to change the world sparked a devotion in some of our great leaders of our time. It is NOT your place to judge, only GOD…and I am MOST sure GOD said to him, “WELL DONE MY SON, WELL DONE!”

  • happyinva

    @ truthteller7 – you are dramatically outnumbered in your thoughts… ever stop to wonder why? Maybe it’s not everyone else that’s missing something; maybe it’s you?!

  • ciaress

    This article, written by James Poniewozik, is absolutely racist.

  • randomornot

    FYI: “Over the top” was my phase, not JP’s.

  • truthteller7

    Happyinva, I feel sorry for you if you go along with herd mentality. Popularity means nothing.
    Groupspeak is scary.

  • cambridged

    it seems the online readership would have preferred a puff piece.
    yours was a well written and accurate piece, mr. poniewozik.

    personally i find this whole spectacle disgusting and hope the media will soon return to real news.

    a child molester who can sing is still a child molester.

  • truthteller7

    Everything is racist to you lunatics.
    No one is allowed to have an opinion.
    PC fascists at it again.

  • louclar

    Yes, this was a funeral and usually the body is present at the ‘FUNERAL’.
    There was nothing gaudy, over the top or out of place in today’s service.

    There is and has been enough negativity, and if any one has made this a circus, it has been the media, including Time.

    You, Mr Poniewozik owe your readers an apology, especially since your employer is touting and selling a keepsake issue featuring Michael Jackson right along side your article, thereby ensuring the publication will also benefit from this circus.

  • happyinva

    @ truthteller7 – I now understand why you are missing the disappointment from many regarding this article… it’s ok. You’re right, myself and others are only following a “herd mentality” in expressing our disappointment with this “writer’s” piece. (note the sarcastic tone…) I can assure you that I do not seek popularity from a group of strangers, but it does warm my heart to see that there are more folks with compassion and true comprehension of tone and inappropriateness than not.

  • byemike01

    One less pill-head pedophile on the planet. Los Angeles, and a million fruitcakes might be crying, but rest assured the angels are singing. Hint: If Al Sharpton shows up at your funeral, it’s safe to say that [a] you’re black, and [b] you had serious issues.

    Your music made you…your penchant for kids ruined you…and your drug addiction killed you. You were not the first, and you are not the last. At least Elvis was straight.

    By the way, none of your kids look anything like you. Wonder how THAT happened?

    That story, I’m sure, would be a “Thriller”.

  • msfinn

    Re: randomornot Says: FYI: “Over the top” was my phase, not JP’s.
    I stand corrected -however it is moot.

  • truthteller7

    happyinva, when I talk about “herd mentality” I’m talking about the overall glorification and deification of a mere mortal. That’s what the herd is doing. Listen to the language “He taught us to love.” It’s scary. He’s not God.

  • happyinva

    Truthteller7 – while I have enjoyed this diplomatic back and forth, this will probably be my last response (I’m tired; smile). How appropriate of you to pass judge on what Michael Jackson gave to others. He may not have “taught you to love”, but who are you to say if that lesson was not given through music to someone else. Music has a way of reaching people in a way that families, religions and politics can not. Don’t judge – it’s not in your power to do so. You can only speak for yourself, not others.
    Regardless, the comments expressed AGAINST this article are doing some based on the inappropriateness of the “writers” tone and subtle cynicism. There are some one-offs that are posting based on other reasons, but the overall reaction to this peace is based on the fact that it is not the time for the tone that was expressed.

  • happyinva

    *** forgive the many typos in my last post

  • kindheart2

    James Poniewozik,
    Do what Michael Jackson says to do in “Man in the Mirror”. You need to do some work on yourself, before you can make a contribution of any value to this planet.

  • safari61751

    The controversy will go on and on about Michael Jackson’s life, but anyone who saw that funeral can say it was tastefully done. There was nothing gaudy about it. What funeral and what planet were you on?

  • peterego

    It isnt enough that you are ignorant – you are flat out wrong when you say MJ never discussed his “blackness” in person.

    What about this? 9 minutes of Michael telling kids women and children- BLACK kids, women and children- about racism, how the history books are wrong, how black artists have been mistreated, the list goes on.

    Look at it for yourself.

  • samwaltpete

    truthteller7, while I agree with your “herd mentality” assessment, I disagree with your last statement. Why do you assume to know that God is somehow separate from all of us? Many believe that we are all God and God is all of us. In his lifetime, MJ did indeed set an example of how to love each other. At least give him that.

  • truthteller7

    Happinva, Truce!

    But you can’t deny that the glorification has been out of bounds.
    He’s human.
    Agree with me on that.
    He is not a god.

  • pudgem11

    You obviously had a pre-conceived idea about how you wanted your article to slant….you obviously, also, are not a fan of Michael Jackson…..As a person in their 50′s, I, personally, can say that not all of his music appealed to me, but I always sensed a deep sadness within him….in watching interviews, etc. and, certainly, I could hum along with many of his “tunes.” But, the main point here is that a person has died….yes there was ample media coverage; what would you expect for a famous star, such as he…..(think back to Elvis Presley.) These stars do become “larger than life” but that is the way stardom is….none of us is perfect…..of course, I am sure he had flaws, as we all do, but disrespect is never warranted…..especially in a situation such as this.

  • happyinva

    @ truthteller7: I have to smile – I’ll agree that some of the reactions have been a little over the top, but as a life long MJ fan, it sometimes kind of comes with the territory. But I will agree (more or less b/c I’ve actually seen some folks online talking about committing suicide to be with MJ in death). All in all, it is my sincere hope that the man is finally able to rest in peace, and that his children are able to live a long, healthy and prosperous life… and that the media finally leaves him alone.

  • truthteller7

    I’m with you samwaltpete! God is in all of us.
    And MJ had a good message of love.
    My beef is with the hysterical elevation of a man to god-like status.
    I think it’s a substitute for a real relationship with the real God.

  • hollyny

    I feel that this was a well-written commentary on today’s memorial, which I did not read as being critical, opinionated, disgusting, or any of the many other citicisms heaped upon the writer. In my world, a gold coffin is indeed “gaudy” (showy and extravagant, according to the Merriam-Webster dictionary). Folks, this is an opinion piece, so Mr. Poniewozik’s opinion is perfectly appropriate here, whether you agree with that opinion or not. For those of you who are so upset – you are clearly grieving, but please do not forget the role of the press is not just to say what you want to hear.

  • 1dee05

    Do I detect a bit of snobbery here, Mr. Poniewozik? What’s strange and gaudy is that you would make negative comments about someone’s funeral or memorial service. I was taught by my Mother that comments like yours would be in extremely poor taste for this type of occasion, even in instances where cultural and societal beliefs or customs were quite different from mine. I fear that your Mother might also be scandalized by your manners should she have had the opportunity to read your article. There was really no call for your article full of snide remarks, which does not change a thing except to bring Time down from its usual high publishing standards.

  • byemike01

    “@ truthteller7: I have to smile – I’ll agree that some of the reactions have been a little over the top, but as a life long MJ fan, it sometimes kind of comes with the territory. But I will agree (more or less b/c I’ve actually seen some folks online talking about committing suicide to be with MJ in death). All in all, it is my sincere hope that the man is finally able to rest in peace, and that his children are able to live a long, healthy and prosperous life… and that the media finally leaves him alone.”

    “Lifelong MJ fan”…even after it became clear that he had a disturbing fascination with children?

    And anyone who wants to “be with MJ in death” is just plain creepy, especially considering what he did in life.

    I, too, hope his children are now (finally) able to live a normal, fulfilled life.

    As for Michael…the media has spent more time on him in one day than they did in years of covering the thousands of heroes who gave their life in Iraq, Afghanistan, and hundreds of other remote locales.

    There is something very fundamentally wrong with that.

  • spinbowla

    I read the article and can find no fault. Come on guys just get over yourselves and stop being nasty. I think it was well written and it does make plenty positive comments.

  • truthteller7

    Amen, happyinva

  • happyinva

    @byemike01 – ok, I thought I was done, but I just wanted to respond… yes, I have been a lifelong MJ fan. Why not? Because he was accused of something that he was acquitted for? I believe in the US justice system, don’t you? What does the amount of coverage have to do with respecting the deceased? You might not be old enough to remember what happened when Elvis died. Or John Lennon… but if you are – can you explain what is different about this?
    The rest, regarding fans that are going over the top (like I mentioned before) is just that – fans going over the top.

  • jille08

    I am wondering why this article has such angry personal overtones. I am greatful to have had the opportunity to hear from so many friends of Michael Jackson for a change instead of the pundits and columnists who never knew him. I would be beyond honored to have Maya Angelou and Nelson Mandella pay tribute to me. I thought the service was very well done, especially in such a short time period. I am not sure why cleavage comments and reference to American Idol were called for. Caskets do tend to be at funeral services so I am not sure why that was an issue for you. Yes, Michael Jackson was African-American and nobody ever let him forget it so he is an African-American icon. I am no fan of Rev. Sharpton, but he is right that Michael Jackson was part of the cultural evolution that made a lot of people just a little less color concious. I am a 59 year old white woman and I know he was a part of my evolution. You are certainly entitled to your opinion but I thought that your article was kind of unprofessional and your message was really a bit confusing.

  • byemike01

    Pedophile (Acquitted in LA…think “OJ Simpson”. Settled a civil suit out of court for millions…does that sound like the actions of an innocent man?). Gone. The world is a safer place. Marginally.

    All you “pedophile worshippers” enjoy your moment in the sun. Make sure the whole world knows who you are, and (more importantly) where you live. Give us a chance to defend our kids.

    Bye, Mike…have fun singing karaoke with Jeffery Dahmer.

  • happyinva

    For clarity – MJ did not settle out of court, his insurance company did. Not sure if it matters or not, but it’s a fact. And that same young boy who is now a man, has since retracted his allegations and claimed that he was never mistreated by Jackson. Have you done research on that. Also, why was Corey Feldman never molested? Macaulay Culkin? The millions of other children that visited MJ at his home?

  • byemike01

    You are defending a pedophile. I know all I need to know about you. Here’s the “litmus test” for you…if you have kids, would you let them spend a weekend at Neverland? I already know your answer, and thus, I know all I need to know about you.

  • tbgaskin1

    This article does deserve negative commentary because of it’s negative commentary on this man’s memorial. How about a little tact? Just because you don’t understand the way this memorial played out, doesn’t make it strange or GAUDY. Accept your ignorance of other people and their cultures and get a life! This memorial was in good taste and was well done. They gave great homage to a man who left a remarkable impression in our world. MJ lived his life with exuberance, it was very fitting that his farewell be the same. It was a memorial true, BUT, it was a celebration first. As far as the “pan-racial” comment, get a grip. The man expressed love for people of all races but seriously, he was a BLACK MAN. Deal with it.

  • speakthetruthplease

    I have to say that I am deeply disappointed in Time allowing such a false interpretation of the most moving event I have ever seen. I thank all of the other people who took the time to voice their concerns over this tasteless article. Since others have so eloquently stated the many numerous issues with the writer’s review of the day’s events, I will just focus on a few other points. First of all, the writer is obviously not familiar with Michael Jackson’s body of work. To state that a gospel choir was used to portray him as a “black’ man, and that it was out of place given how he portrayed himself is just plain ignorant. Michael Jackson has often used gospel music as the basis of several of his songs; he respects the music and his relationship with God even if the writer doesn’t. He also used the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King’s speech in one of his songs, another black man by the way. Michael has never denied being a Black man, after all he emulated black legends such as Jackie Wilson and James Brown to name a few. Since when is having the casket of the deceased present at a memorial service considered “gaudy” or a “spectacle”??? I thought that was the whole point – to say “Goodbye” to the individual. Michael Jackson’s memorial ceremony was the epitome of ceremonies. It was a classy, gloriously reflective event designed to celebrate the life of the “greatest entertainer/humanitarian who ever lived”. There’s so many other things I could point out about this writer’s lack of knowledge on the subject he chose to viciously write about. Too bad the writer (and I use that term loosely) did not come away with the message everyone else left with today which was to check your motives by looking at the ‘man in the mirror”. By the way, I will not be purchasing anything from Time magazine in the near future – you need to screen your writers much better than this!

  • colli88

    Perhaps the people posting their disgust with this article do not excel in reading comprehension. I cannot find where it disparages Michael Jackson. In fact, there are several places where the article’s author seems to express positive regard for MJ. For example: “It was a poignant, unusually intimate glimpse at a private relationship of a man who was much gazed at but, finally, little known. It was too bad, yet probably inevitable, that he had to die before we could see it.” I really did not interpret the article as being disrespectful. Interestingly, the people attacking the author are probably behaving contrary to what Michael Jackson would have wanted. I certainly did not know Mr. Jackson but judging from what his loved ones have said about him, I imagine he would have encouraged people to be forgiving of the author (not that there is anything to forgive) and to not behave in a negative manner such as many posters here have done. I’m guessing he would have advocated “turning the other cheek”. It’s unfortunate that Michael Jackson’s love and compassion for others is not being shown by the people who claim to have loved and respected him so much.

  • kairick

    I’m frankly quite shocked. I don’t understand why the undertone was necessary, nor the side commentary and the overuse of the term “gaudy.” I thought we weren’t supposed to speak ill of the dead. “Ill” includes sarcastic prose and comparison of a beloved man’s memorial train to the OJ Simpson chase.

    What vexes me more is that so many people continue to refer to him as a pedophile, when if you recall, it was never proven to be fact, or why some jackhole who calls himself some CEO of something called “Dirty South TV” thinks that putting that in his posts in support of this article makes him somehow credible. The parents of those children should be ashamed of themselves for providing the brainless masses reason to doubt a proven internationally love philanthropist and settling out of court for whatever allegedly happened to their children for x-amount of dollars.

    You don’t speak ill of the dead much less go out of your way to find forums to speak ill of the dead. He was talented, eccentric and led a life of unfortunate circumstances. I’m grateful for what i KNOW he contributed to the international community despite the issues, which is more than most people can say they’ve done with an easy life. He was so beloved he deserved a positive spectacle after the years of negative spectacles his critics made of his life. The ALLEGED BS is just that, BS. Rest in Peace Mike.

  • rarebear777

    Who is this author is James Poniewizak? Think about this everyone. James is two bit reporter trying to make a name for himself. Look at his picture. He is an ugly little man. His article is mean-spirited, rude and filled with jealousy. Who is he to call a casket ‘gaudy’ ? This nobody will always be a nobody. I am a white 61 year old woman,business owner, former TV show host, who was in her twenties watching the Jackson Five, then had 4 children who loved all his music and most recently enjoyed my grandson dancing to Michael’s songs. Shame on the press for falsely accusing and sentencing a man who brought joy to so many people. The media killed him. I hope he has found peace.

  • madswens

    Wow…what a completely disgusting commentary by James Poniewozik. Did that make you feel good to write that? Hopefully, you won’t be around long. The memorial and coverage couldn’t have been done more beautifully done. I wish I could be at your memorial and pass judgement. What a sad individual you must be.

  • happyinva

    @ byemike01 – As a parent, would I allow my child to stay at Neverland. Sure, if I was there… if not, no way. Not b/c it’s – MJ, but it’s b/c I’m a good parent. Why would any parent send their child to stay with a stranger for a weekend. That’s a no-brainer. These parents of the children that sent their child to stay there, or allowed their children to stay in his bed (a parent testified to staying at MJ’s house while their child stayed in his room) need to be looked at closer. Is it not possible to see the reasonable doubt in their charges of child abuse against MJ? It sounds like a set up to me – sending your child to a stranger for a weekend or allowing your child to stay in a stranger’s room, only to sue them later. Setup or child neglect on behalf of the parent. But it’s unfortunate for MJ that instead of resting in peace, he still has folks like yourself and the media wanting to defame his name/character.

  • djf6006

    You sir are GAUDY. How disrespectful can you be? Regardless of your opinion is it too much to ask that you show some respect for the family. Show a little and write about how much good the man did for his fellow human beings. How much have you or any of the other naysayers on this page done? As for the criminal charges remember in this country a person is innocent until proven guilty. What are you and all the other people who left tasetless comments guilty of? Just remember you reap what you sow. I’m done reading TIME. Hope you are not bold enough to issue a collectible.

  • agmcfc

    GAUDY!? I am so aggrieved after reading Mr. Ponchewecki’s nonchalantly contemptuous description of this man’s MEMORIAL service ON THE VERY DAY OF HIS MEMORIAL.

    According to Merriam Webster: “GAUDY implies a tasteless use of overly bright, often clashing colors or excessive ornamentation .”

    Mr. Ponchawacki, what EXACTLY was gaudy about this service? Everyone was dressed in black mourning clothes, the crowds attentive and respectful, some speakers said a few words and some entertainers sang a few songs while some photos played in the background.

    You should be reprimanded by your reporters for inaccurate and irresponsible editorializing.

  • truthteller7

    Most of the people upset about this article would find something wrong even if it were a puff piece.
    It’s like seeing racism everywhere.
    This is a mass sickness.
    A gold coffin, everyone wearing sequin gloves, that is
    the definition of GAUDY, morons!

  • stl719

    It wasn’t strange and it wasn’t gaudy. It was a beautiful memorial for a deserving individual. This article is in poor taste, to say the least, unprofessional and very negative. It may not be a direct attack on Michael Jackson, but there is a lot of unnecessary sarcasm in this article. Maybe you were trying to be witty? Have some respect Mr. Poniewozic!! If you can’t write something decent when covering a memorial, then pick a different topic. How could this be published on this day of all days. Shame on you. I’m surprised CNN put this link on the front page.

  • jackie2000

    this guy should pick up a dictionary:

    gaud⋅y1  /ˈgɔdi/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [gaw-dee] Show IPA
    Use gaudy in a Sentence
    –adjective, gaud⋅i⋅er, gaud⋅i⋅est. 1. brilliantly or excessively showy: gaudy plumage.
    2. cheaply showy in a tasteless way; flashy.
    3. ostentatiously ornamented; garish.

    The service was neither “excessively showy”, “cheapy showy, tasteless or flashy” and the casket was not “ostentatiously ornamented.”
    In fact, it was a simple gold coffin – no embellishments, sedated flowers (I’ve seen more at nearly ALL funerals I have attended), and the service was extremely tasteful and understated.
    AEG did a brilliant job – another word this blogger dude should look up – as he obviously knows nothing about brilliance, or even modest intelligence.

  • tbc58

    I grew up in the 60′s. The Jackson 5 and Osmond Brother’s were our generations Jonas Brothers, (my granddaughter’s favs today). There is no way anyone who was/is a fan of Michael could even relate the family’s processional to the Staples Center as the OJ chase. This is a low blow. OJ did it…Michael didn’t. My thoughts and prayers are with his children and the Jackson family. It was a beautiful memorial service…nothing gaudy or presumptuous. Just fans and a family remembering a beloved special man! I know it will not happen…but, I hope the media will give these 3 children a chance to continue their normal life, as they have lived it. I believe all parties with regards to the children can come to a reasonable solution. Mrs. Jackson is a loving woman and knows the importance and influence of a mother’s love. I so appreciate the Jackson family allowing ME to be a part of this service via the media.

  • ariesinla

    Your comments are careless and inappropriate…completely unworthy of the stature of this event. I feel as if TIME chose the most out of touch, paid-off, pissed-off, desk-jockey to cover the funeral. I am angry right now that you chose to sh#t on this beautiful testiment to an icon, without any regard for the billions (yeah, I said it) of people who have just lost someone they have been encouraged and inspired by. Here’s some advice, do yourself and everyone else a favor – if you aren’t feeling the assignment and can’t do the people who would be reading this article any justice, simply don’t and pass it off to someone who gives a damn.

  • jackie2000

    ps….I, like others here, had to get a doggone acct/pw just to respond to this nitwit…but it’s worth it – because I want TIME to know….this 5th grader caliber of writing will NOT convince anyone to buy their crappy magazine…nor the “gaudy” MJ keepsake edition.
    (apologies to the 5th graders even)

    90% of the thoughtful writers reponding to mr. clueless would do a better, unbiased job of commentary — what great responses!

    (i also clicked over from the cnn site, where i was following coverage – did not know this was TIME and won’t make that mistake again. However – this could be one of those “phishing” sites, too, where the person just lifts TIME’S logo? I mean, really? This is the low brow caliber of TIME now? or just a fake site by some lunatic? LOL)

  • aell1

    Time, seriously poor form on your part. Gaudy, not hardly. This was a class act. Peaceful, spiritual,loving and moving. I wish journalists could find a way to keep their personal feelings out of reporting the real news. I won’t be purchasing your magazines or reading your blogs ever again.

  • http://test810.wordpress.com/ rcaden

    I’m amazed by the reaction that this article has received from overwrought Michael Jackson fans. There’s absolutely nothing inappropriate about what James Poniewozik has written here. If you can’t handle hearing what a disinterested journalist thought about the memorial, go hang out at the fan sites.

    As someone who thought Jackson was a terrific entertainer and a terrible human being, I thought Poniewozik was probably more respectful than Jackson deserved.

  • loodyssey12

    I am not surprised by Mr Poniewozik. I wonder who will show up for his funeral. I hope that he never have to experience burying a child. Every culture and individual has a right to bury their loved one in the style of their choosing. When I was a little girl, I remember my grandmother sobbing about the passing of Marilyn Monroe and Clark Cable and Mahalia Jackson because she was a true fan and loved their respective art. I knew of Michael’s generosity…and as old as I am; I enjoy his music…and his dance moves make me want to get up and dance. HIs music always put a smile on my face…or the melancholy sound of his ballads touches my humanity. I believe Michael was wrongly accused by greedy parents who exploited his vulnerability. The truth will eventually come into the light because those that lied will be tortured by that money ill-acquired. But in the meantime, I pray for his children, their mother and MJ’s mother, may they do the right thing. I also grieve for James Poniewozik because his writing reveals his personal despair and jaded life.

  • karynlg

    Mr. Poniewokik:
    Strange article, with all respect. It’s obvious you’re not an MJ fan, but “the spectacle was the sort of thing an American Idol finale aims for”? What in the world does that mean? And “gaudy”? We must have been watching two different broadcasts.

    Jackson’s memorial was a lot better than most of the services I’ve ever attended, the ones with the parade of “friends” who want to give a last shout-out to their buddy in perfectly bad English. I thought Jackson’s service was terrific – respectful, tasteful and even subdued, with true friends of Jackson’s who spoke – and sang – from the heart.

    What I find a “spectacle” is all the crappy journalism we’ve had to endure in print and on television this past week.

  • leidei

    Wow!!! It takes a lot to get me upset. But the level of ignorance in this has taken me there. It is funny that today I received a notice to renew a membership with Time. I will decline. There was nothing over the top or gaudy with the service or the casket. This was a celebration of his life and although his circle of friends were more known than mine, I have been to home going ceremonies like this. I pray for his children, family, friends, and fans. I also pray that others will allow him to rest in peace.

  • brooklyn2003

    I think that some people seem to destroy what they don’t understand. I never knew that MJ had donated so much of his time and money to those in need. It’s a shame that the only thing the press seems to cover is the bad things. When I see MJ I see a man that all he wants to do is have his chance at childhood back. I’m not a college professor or a big time writer but even I can see a troubled person. I really don’t think he did the things he was accused of. I think he was a target for a fast buck. I think being around children gave him something he had missed out on. I think being around children was something he never got to do. Now come on people look at Neverland Ranch. What do you really see? Someone that wants to be a child…I know his father pushed him to be a star but he really didn’t have to. That child was just born with a gift and you know it. Look at his face when he was with the Jackson 5 performing. He had so much character it just spilled out. He just got too big too fast and we helped. And to think someone that went though what he did the first time in court would ever do something so stupid as to do it again. Now come on. We as humans just have to see something bad in someone. I feel sorry for the man. So what if he was a little different and did things a little different. As far as the face surgeries to me that is someone wanting to be someone else. Now how many of us would do the same if we had the money.. I think the biggest crime here is that stone that we have thrown. Look at all the good he did. If people had turned on me the way they did him at the first sign of trouble I sure wouldn’t have been in a giving mood would you? No I’m not a fan even though I did dance to alot of it in my day. I’m just stepping out of the box for a moment to look in. I feel for his family and his children and for him. Maybe now he can rest. But me and you both know he never will because bad news sells better than good. And where are those articles on his charity work…Get my point…I bet you can find some main page articles on his court troubles but NONE on his charity…But again that’s what sells and we are the ones that go out and buy it on the news stands….

  • cdogblue

    The author’s use of the word “gaudy” was an uneducated one. The word gives the impression his funeral was fake or cheap in a grandiose way. His funeral was a big event, yes but it was fitting considering his popularity and 45 years of success in the entertainment business. Would you have used the word gaudy to describe Princess Diana’s funeral? I doubt it. Her coffin was in front of everyone as it is at most funerals. Why should his be different? Elton John sang at her funeral, and Mariah Carey sang at his.
    You never really told us what was ‘gaudy’ about MJ’s funeral. You should have if you included it in the title of your article. For an otherwise well written article, it was a bad choice of words.

  • loodyssey12

    I know the old guards (Times, Washingto Post, NewYorkTimes and a bunch of other papers and periodicals) are exceedingly challenged by HuggintonPost and the zillion bloggers…so from time to time you have to stoop low to keep up but this was the lowest. So how low do you plan to stoop?

  • salmar6287

    Michael Jackson’s death is a sad thing for his family and close friends as all deaths are to those left to mourn. However, a memorial service for Michael Jackson is not a historic news event nor does it warrant continuing live coverage. He was NOT a hero or dignatary. His life did NOT change the world and neither does his death. He is not someone anyone should emulate nor pay tribute to other than for what he was, an entertainer. I am appalled at the way this very disturbed and somewhat perverted entertainer has been sainted.

  • slopoke88

    So,the funeral procession had unintentional overtones of the O.J. chase? What parallels are you working with to come to that conclusion?! Perhaps TIME released this article to rake up some unintentional overtones of its own. These types of overtones I would expect from a tabloid or some small minded rag but maybe Mr. Poniewozik and the editors at TIME have a new format bent on appealing to a select group of people that feast on less substance and objectivity. A true embarrassment for such a respected
    magazine.

  • karynlg

    Whenever I read articles like this that so obviously lack an overall perspective, I always want to ask how old the columnist is.

  • jackie2000

    For people like rcaden to say most of us posting here are “overwrought” fans is totally missing the point.

    this guy had an assignment and quite simply, could not fulfill in a true journalistic way – that is – with Truth, Integrity, Factually and Fairly.

    It’s not that hard – so he obviously went out of his way to be extremely opinionated (and WRONG) in his choice of words.

    One thing about good writing – it should be done in context.
    This lame effort shows no context of Michaels’ 50 year-old life and 45 years as an entertainer. Imagine how many lives he touched – certainly worthy of the dignified, respectful and quite frankly, extremely subdued service (ie: John Mayer doing the instrumental – quiet…subdued)

    I suspect MJ had fallen off many radars in recent years, but I made an effort to research his life over the last few days and there is an abudance of info out there. With CONTEXT then, you can appreciate the service for what it was….and it was far from the way this guy described it.
    It’s one thing to have an opinion and be right.
    it’s another to be careless, thoughtless, reckless and just flat out wrong — as this guy is.

    For anyone interested in reading an excellent and extraordinarily insightful article about MJ — and very prophetic as well — please see this link to a People magazine article written in — get this — 1984!!!!! (yea, People, but by the writing , you would think it was the WSJ)

    I was so impressed by this guy’s writing — the epitome of superiority — I was moved to learn more about the author.
    I read this yesterday and thought…THIS is how journalists used to write — THIS is talent.
    A far cry from the crap this guy is trying to pass off as
    “reporting”

    anyway — here’s the link:

    http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20196979,00.html

  • fivefootnone

    I dont want to come across as being skeptical….However this was quite the “spectacle”. I wasnt a HUGE Jackson fan…i really wouldnt even label myself as a fan…but i enjoyed his music….I liked his videos. Everyones entitled to live their life. However in all this Hoopla that we saw today we tend to overlook the fact that this man was accused of child molestation…yes he was aquited but would he have been had he NOT been Michael Jackson? I think not and let us not forget he paid out LARGE sums of money to make this go away. Was todays memorial service really an appropriate place for this subject to even have been brought up? There were times during the service I was brought to tears and was truely touched and I liked hearing the stories his friends shared. It made him seem somehow more”human”. Did we really need all the political grandstanding on “innocent until proven guilty” yea lady Im glad you know your job…but we really didnt need proof of that at this time. Did anyone get on CNN and read anderson coopers article or read any of the comments left on that site??? someone said they were touched during Paris’ speech. I was too but I agree with that person that after seeing it a second and third time perhaps it did look a bit “staged” I want to believe with all my heart that she meant what she said but i watched the kids whenever they showed them they looked bored they didnt really look all that upset where was the emotion? Where were the tears? Even when paris broke down I didnt see any emotion from either of the boys. let us not forget these kids were in the presence of their father more than most American kids are now adays..I have children the same age (11 & 7) and I hope to GOD if I were to go tomorrow they would show more emotion than those 3 kids showed today..You out there that have kids: Take a look at the replay and watch the kids do they look distraught is how they were acting how you would want your kids to act if you were to pass away tomorrow?? Dont get me WRONG: My heart breaks for these kids it really does..I fear that the kids are now being thrust into the spotlight that their father so sheltered them from. I dont want to see the children separated I dont want to see Joe Jackson get a hold of them either.. what will happen to these poor kids its for them that my heart truely breaks…some of these people out there are pissed at Rep King but why..?? FREEDOM OF SPEECH, baby…Freedom of Speech.It works both ways.. And hes right… There is WAY too much “Political Correctness” nowadays..when is it going to stop its gotten to the point you cant even speak your mind without people thinking you are a “freak”….I would like to add here that just a few days before Michael died another ICON passed away from cancer where was her fanfare? She had a tasteful and private ceramony and I think thats perhaps what the JACKSONS should have done…they should have atleast had the kids go the private one and then not to the “public” one I think that would have been more along the lines of what MJ wouldve wanted for his CHILDREN….

  • javacupp

    James Poniewozik , you call yourself a journalist? You need a lesson in class. While thd media coverage has been way to much the timing of your article and your bias was not necessary. I don’t believe I will read anymore of your articles. Time should be ashamed of themselves.

  • mashawnda

    I feel that the writer of this article told a recap of the event as he saw it only. It reminded me of a personal blog entry…yet this is TIME magazine.

    I personally felt that the event was very classy and authentic. I loved the pauses during the memorial, and I loved John Mayer’s instrumental, I loved his brother Marlon’s farewell, and I love Magic Johnson’s comments…

    I feel that the reason why the world has been exposed to MJ media coverage overkill…is because people tune in…in the millions maybe more…so because of that reason ( regardless what people write on blogs,in articles, or say in person)…that’s why its a big deal.

    Michael Jackson was and is a big deal…

    He’s this generations Elvis.

    May he now rest in peace.

    - Mashawnda Dowell
    http://www.mashawnda.com

  • javacupp

    James Poniewozik , you call yourself a journalist? You need a lesson in class. While the media coverage has been way to much the timing of your article and your bias was not necessary. I don’t believe I will read anymore of your articles. Time should be ashamed of themselves. This was a very tasteful tribute. Well done to the organizer. Poorly done Mr. James Poniewozik !!!!!!

  • actionjacksonspirit

    Take a look in the mirror…”Take a look at yourself and make a Change!”-Michael Jackson, Man in the Mirror song…
    This article reaks common apathethic views of the millions of people who were “GAUDY” in their attitudes towards the beautiful, well put-together and phenomenal tribute to a spectactular icon and blessed family. Time definitely needs to rethink who they allow to publish idiotic views such as this article.

  • eana1

    Gaudy? What was gaudy? I thought everything was very tastefully done. And even all of the fans (like myself) behaved themselves. Michael may have had a more “razzle dazzle” casket than most. But given that he was more often than not “glitter king” insofar as his wardrobe…and that he made enough $ throughout his career and to leave his family to take care of all of them for the rest of all of their lives…SO WHAT?

    CNN quoted a price on it of somewhere between $15,000 and $25,000. Not too bad at all, given who he was. And let’s face it-if his family had chosen something less expensive and/or “showy” looking, I’m sure you’d have found fault with that, as well.

    To me, THE BOTTOM LINE here is that this man paid a terrible price for helping bring the world closer together, and for making so many so happy for so many years. I hope with all of my heart that he can now REST IN PEACE. And that his family *knows* that NO MATTER WHAT this world may have driven him to…those of us who sensed his huge heart and APPRECIATED how much he added to our lives will love and remember him FOREVER. (((Michael and the Jackson family)))

    Lastly-please look up all possible meanings of the word COMPASSION and see if you can learn ways to incorporate it into your life, Mr. Poniewozik-particularly at APPROPRIATE times.

    ‘Nuff said.

  • bmgillespie

    Why the hate? because it sells. I beleive this one is going to backfire on you though. This was not fat Elvis or a cheating make believe princess. They were not loved world wide. No one outside of their respective country’s gave a damn about either of them. Think about the only people who had world wide appeal and their color other than Mother Teresa, the Pope as many of them there has been have never has this much love. There was another article that mentioned the low turn out outside the memorial. Would you go somewere if you were treatened to go to jail for showing up. This was not by chance but no matter what the media does to try and down him it just makes him that much larger than life which he truly was. I would not have went if I was personally invited but say what you want the media can no longer tarnish his image, he is at rest. So all these articles do is make him bigger than life even in his death. So, please keep them coming, because every article you write means he will never be forgotten and he will not have to have fake sightings as a fake American copycat whose name starts with Elvis. oops! I apologize for any misspelled words being a former spelling bee champ but it will give the opposition something to talk about :().

  • whatiswrong03

    Now I clearly understand you have the right to free speech but how come whenever something involves anyone Black/African-American words are used such as gaudy or spectacle?!! Was Princess Di’s or Elvis’ funeral gaudy or a spectacle!!, “Fitting too, that his farewell ceremony should be a gaudy public spectacle—with Jackson himself onstage, in a flower-shrouded golden coffin—since he seemed most comfortable engaging the world through spectacle.” I mean when are things going to change!!! How come there are no headlines indicating there were no arrest today nor were headlines screaming the same at Obama’s inauguration. Oh there are BLURBS but no serious headline only in D.C. did we see headlines like that.

  • mjfan19

    the man (no, the child) who wrote the comment above me and the horrendous author of this article may as well pack their bags for the planet Neptune and jet off to there, because i don’t know how anyone in their RIGHT MIND could not see the brilliance and accomplishments that Mr. Michael Jackson accomplished over his short 50 years. Yeah, he seemed strange at times, but keep in mind that it doesn’t take much to be a hero. There are everyday people like us who do small things that all MAKE A DIFFERENCE. Unbeknownst to his blasphemous critics, some of whom on this forum, and this IDIOTIC DISGUSTING EXCUSE FOR A WRITER (TIME MAGAZINE, PLEASE DRUG TEST THIS MAN AND REMOVE HIM FROM YOUR STAFF, THIS ARTICLE WAS A MOCKERY OF A GREAT MAN’S LIFE) Michael Jackson clearly made an amazing difference to the lives of many. like his song said, “we are the world” and all of us can make a difference like Michael did to help others. I was never much of a Jackson fan, I’m only 18, but by realizing what this man accomplished over his life and what he was about made me change how I think about the world. He made a difference in my life right there, and he is not even alive anymore. Sorry, let me rephrase that, he is still alive in our hearts. No matter what the critics or the IDIOTIC DISGUSTING EXCUSE FOR A WRITER of this article say, Mr. Jackson’s legacy will never be forgotten and will continue to “heal the world” and teach us how to love forever.

  • jodita76

    Dear Mr. Poniewozik: If you write many many more blog entries like this one, you may just overdose on your own snark, mean-spiritedness, racism, and tastelessness. Then we can all blog about how pathetic your funeral is. Actually, I doubt anyone would notice. Hacks usually go down in obscurity.

  • mumnmgr

    Your article is so very disrespectful and snide, I don’t know how can you call yourself a journalist. What did you expect, the guy that performed in such a big way to be buried in a pine box? You want to compare a farewell to a world-renown performer and humanitarian to the finale of American Idol? Overtones of the O.J. chase? What the hell are you smoking? Your sensitivity score is a -5,5005,394 Poniewozik…I’ve got to remember your name so I never waste my time reading another article of yours ever again.

  • slopoke88

    “Cambridged”- comment 30 – your spelling of pedophile speaks volumes about you and your kind. Question… are you and James Poniewozik related? Check Ancestry.com just to be sure. Chances are good.

  • finallyover

    One less child molester. C’mon folks – the man paid $22 million to shut up a family whose child has been molested. This is one of the worst crimes conceivable. Sure he was a musical genius, but he was a child molester!

  • atlantaspark

    Mr. Poniewozik, Thank you for such a well written article, (even though I think you held back, and may have been too kind). It’s amazing how well you summed up today’s spectacle, in a relatively short article. WELL WRITTEN!
    “Gaudy” is definitely the theme here, you hit the nail on the head! Let’s be honest… everything Jackson and his family ever did was classless and gaudy.
    Jackson was a tactless, tasteless, child molester. It goes to show you, with those “celebrity folk”, they can fall into fame and fortune, but IT NEVER BOUGHT THEM AN OUNCE OF CLASS!!
    (i.e. Michael’s pedophilia, Diana Ross’ shop lifting, Aretha’s {ha ha} ass-tight -outfits, etc. etc.)
    Er, Um, ok, I liked a lot of Michael’s music too. But the deaths of President Reagan and Elvis combined
    didn’t get one tenth this amount of coverage or attention!
    Yes, he made nice music, (sometimes).
    But he was also a self-indulgent, self-mutilating, pedophile, freak!
    He was weird and molested children!!
    The media is acting like it’s the passing of the Messiah!
    Even the more respected media outlets are on the Jackson Bandwagon!
    It’s 24 hours of non-stop glorifying Jackson.
    I found this quote:
    With all due respect , Michael Jackson would have died in prison as a convicted pedophile if he couldn’t have paid off the kids parents , and we’re talking millions and millions of dollars (which is where much of his mysterious loses have gone)… so he was just lucky to die a free man , living in the lap of luxury , instead of in a prison somewhere , maybe he could have shared a jail cell with OJ.
    It’s not news, it’s a ratings game and sensationalism.
    I’m sure a lot of people would be horrified to read this, but I think I speak the truth.
    OK, I wish him to rest in peace. Can we move on now?
    Here’s someone who put it well:

  • finallyover

    Amen to the Congressman on the YouTube video. It’s amazing how MJ fans can gloss over the fact that MJ was a child molester.

  • martika7

    The reference to OJ was ridiculous. For your information, processions at a funeral are common. On the morning of my father’s funeral, I came out of our home to find a crowd of people waiting to accompany us to the church. There were family, neighbors and friends, at least twenty cars following the family.

  • judasyeast

    LOL @ all the cancellation threats! I bet there aren’t 5 people total in these comments that are actual subscribers. It’s interesting that all these crusaders are apparently very pro-pedophilia! What a sick world we live in.

  • wddorch

    How dare you poison this memorial with your disrespectful description using the word “gaudy”. There was absolutely NOTHING gaudy about this service. In fact, it was one of the most graceful and dignified services that I have ever seen.

    Shame on you for writing this article. And shame on the editors of TIME for allowing this garbage to be published.

  • fivefootnone

    WOW..atlantaspark///u have got quite the talent for words and I applaud you… Thank you for bringing up ELVIS and Reagan!! People I wanted to mention earlier and forgot…Point well taken and very much TRUE…. I hate how people compare Jackson w/Elvis… a lotof people say that Elvis made his career of copying off of the blues…He was around BEFORE MJ.in a tribute i saw today it showed a young mj singing james brown songs and doing browns dance moves…so if MJ was influenced by him hes all of a sudden a genius and Elvis is a fraud..whatever…..Many celebrities (usher,timberlake) say that they look up to MJ that he influenced them so what does that make THEM??? Are they frauds too>? I dont think so..I just think that they were influenced by an icon and added their own personal touch…I think people need to take the blinders off and start seeing what they see and NOT what other people (IE: the LIBRAL MEDIA) want them to see… Open your eyes people and make your own decisions and stop being a flock a sheep….The Messiah didnt get laid to rest today…MJ a troubled musician was…let us not forget he was a troubled soul ( thanks to Joe Jackson, father of the year) but that shouldnt excuse him for his sordid past …he did what he did and now the time comes for him to meet his MAKER …and he may have been acquitted in the court room now lets see if hes acquitted by the HIGHER Court of LAW…God Bless his children may they turn out to be atleast half normal…

  • selah5859

    I read the article and although I agree with many of the comments, I believe that Mr. Poniewozik should reserve his opinion to himself. I was there, and I thought that the event was beautiful. I think that we are forgeting the main message of the memorial service, that being what Michael stood for, whom of you would be willing to donate your whole earnings during a tour?

    Mr. Poniewozik did get the last line right, “It was a poignant, unusually intimate glimpse at a private relationship of a man who was much gazed at but, finally, little known. It was too bad, yet probably inevitable, that he had to die before we could see it.”

    I myself was guilty of listening to the media and allowing to have my opinion of Michael tarnished by the speculation. Since his death, I have read about him, viewed interviews with him, my opinion of Michael have changed to what it was when I was a child and loved to hear Michael sing his ABCs. He truly was a beautiful person, although to sensitive to this world. May he be in peace now. My respects to his family, friends and countless fans.
    LETS REALLY LISTEN TO HIS SONG “The Man in the Mirrow”

  • drespice

    Cmon man, gaudy. I felt the entire ceremony was tastful, classy and fit for royalty, even if it is self proclaimed pop royalty. But Gaudy was a poor choice of words for a journalist of your caliber. Maybe you dont understand that you cant send a Michael Jackson on his final farewell the same way you do joe the plumber. I for one was proud of the organizers, the family, and fans for putting on the most memorable farewell of all time. LONG LIVE THE KING

  • jj939

    My mother told me long ago, if you do not have anything nice to say then do not say anything at all….so you can shut the hell up for the rest of your life…shame on you, you are an unfeeling eunuch.

  • drespice

    For your own jounalistic integrity, I hope you read some of the posts and really try to understand where you went wrong.

  • arnettamurray

    Time I didn’t know that you hire racist bigots and the person that wrote this rude and senseless article is racist to the bone. Michael’s funeral was not gaudy nor a spectacle that was Elvis’s outfits that you adored was gaudy. I think this writer should be fired if not I will never by another magazine from Time as long as I will and I will spread the word that Time has writers who are rude and insensitive.

  • awardsmall

    I hope that Time Magazine will seriously consider firing this writer. If this is the magazines point of view, it is scewed and judgemental (how could the editor approve of it?). It is not the type of reporting that the world would wants to read, and the magazine will be boycotted. Negative judgement is out. Love and understanding is in.

  • indefatigable1

    I was so put-off by this article that I signed up for an account just to leave a comment. I have been to several funerals/memorials and they all had people sing, had coffins in the front of the memorial service and they all had slow moving funeral processions to the graveyard. The only difference is that Michael Jackson’s funeral had more people attend because well…more people cared about his death. I am not the biggest fan of the Jackson family but truly believe this was their attempt not only to say farewell to their brother, son and father, but also to give fans the chance to say goodbye.
    Most importantly, I think you should be ASHAMED for trying to turn around Sharptons word to try to make it a black/white thing. Sharpton didn’t just say white people as your sentence tries to elude to. Sharptons exact quote was “And it was that comfort level that kids from Japan, Guana, and France, and Iowa and Pennsylvania got comfortable enough with each other to later it wasn’t strange to us to watch Oprah on television. It wasn’t strange to watch tiger wood’s golf. Those young kids grew up from being teenage comfortable fans of Michael to be 40 years old and being comfortable to vote for a person of color to be president of the United States of America… Michael did that.”

    I’d have to say if anyone is guilty of trying to create a spectacle it would be YOU Mr. Poniewozik.

  • miranda6971

    Poniewozik,
    Wow! How on Earth would you come up with such an evil and disgusting point of view. Do you have any respect for the the dead…for the grieving? I don’t know how you so called “journalists” get paid. The only thing GAUDY about today is your column. It’s full of racist undertones and envy. Why don’t filth like you apologize to everybody about how you misreported the 2005 trial? You just absolutely hate the fact that MJ was vindicated don’t you? The media covered his death like it did because of the world’s outpour. This man made a difference…unlike you. You useless piece of sh_t! What can we do to get trashy “journalists” like you fired? I am soooo glad that the good people around the world outnumber you.
    GAUDY!! You are something else.

  • alsolomon

    I am deeply displeased about this author’s description of Michael Jackson’s memorial service as “gaudy” and a “spectacle”. The use of that term is almost evil in its nature. There were several other barely shielded notes of criticism in this article as well including: 1) “In a way, the spectacle–a parade of memories and big-name stars of today and yesteryear–was the sort of thing an American Idol finale aims for, but animated with real emotion.”; 2) “Was there hyperbole? Sure. It was a memorial.”; 3) “(It being a memorial, obviously, no one was there to offer a rebuttal.)”; 4) “Placing Jackson’s body in front of center stage, in a gaudy if closed coffin, was one last strange, showy public display for the star”; 5) several speeches framed him as a more specifically African-American icon than he made himself in life. I found your article TOTALLY TACKY.

    It is obvious that you do not care for Michael Jackson which of course is your option, however, if you want to refer to yourself as a reporter, could you be more objective?

    Also, for your information, Michael Jackson was an African American and his memorial was typical of African American memorials, the coffin is in the front of the church or auditorium and people speak well of the deceased. Heck, even at the Caucasian memorials that I’ve attended the coffin was in the front of the building.

    I submit to you that MJ’s memorial service was fit for someone who has touched the amount of people that he has touched and for someone who had the type of gift and talent that Michael had. I also submit to you that in death, a person should be given some respect. And please remember that as a journalist, your job is to tell the story without infusing your personal feelings in to the story in anyway unless it is a commentary which I don’t believe this was.

  • atlantaspark

    “fivefootnone”:
    Thanks, and I should add that journalists such as Mr. Poniewozik are a treasure, in these days of “sensational journalism”. He has a talent for truthfully, eloquently, and simply GETTING TO THE POINT! Isn’t that what journalists should do? Yet unfortunately, it’s rare these days. I can’t understand all of the criticism of this article. I thought the article was more than fair, and contained keen insights and interesting comparisons. Mr. Poniewozik was more sensitive than “Whacko-Jacko” deserved. And come on people, yes this was a GAUDY event, or why would else would coverage of a “memorial” be in the ENTERTAINMENT section of Time, as opposed to the NEWS section??

    I also dislike when they compare Jackson to Elvis.
    There is NO comparison! Elvis was generous, Jackson was self indulgent. Elvis was patriotic, Jackson fled the country. Elvis loved kids, Jackson raped them. I could go on.

    They are now trying to find a fitting burial place for Jackson’s body. I have an idea! How about placing him next to his old face, wherever that may be buried?

  • selah5859

    For all of you critics of Michael’s memorial service, let me remind you that Michael has millions of fans around the world. This memorial service provided the opportunity for those fans to have closure. Myself, I am grateful to the Jackson family for giving us the opportunity to say a final goodbye to Michael.
    PLEASE! Let us heal our world…

  • shelleylynn72

    The tone of this article was a bit mean and inappropriate for a memorial. I hope that MJ’s daughter, who spoke so movingly at the event, does not read this. Sure, MJ made “questionable choices”, but he was never mean-spirited. The unusual spotlight he was under throughout his life could have created a vastly more narcissistic personality than ever did. MJ always meant well. As for Mr. Poniewozik, I hope he learns some empathy some day. He would be a better journalist if he had that quality.

  • poppy2262

    It is a shame that we readers have to be subjected to the likes of writers such as yourself. Does compassion or humanity occupy no fitting place in the pages of an esteemed magazine such as the Time?
    I’ve always been an ardent reader, but this article shows the worst of humanity. It is pompous and heartless.
    Appalling really.
    I guess it’s true: “Truth forever on the scaffold, wrong forever on the throne.”

  • jackie2000

    finallyover — do you live in America?
    In this country, we have a wonderful judicial system.
    When a jury ACQUITS you, it is called finding the defendant “Not Guilty”
    (yes, there is a fractional percentage of error — but do some research and you will see — that is likely NOT the case here).

    You are referring to an earlier case — which bolsters the acquittal verdict in the latter even further — as what truly loving, caring parent would accept money in exchange for allowing a real pedophile to go free?
    The family got what they wanted — money on a false charge.
    And MJ had to bear the burden of false allegations for the rest of his life.
    But money really is the root of all evil — as that family is surely learning.
    MJ made the world “a better place”…and now he gets to be in a truly “better place”…with our Heavenly Father.

  • vdrame

    Although I disagree with many of the observations in your article, you are entitled to your opinion and it doesn’t bother me. But I find it odd that you seem to be offended about the African-American presence at MJ’s memorial. Opening the ceremony with gospel music is not framing him as anything other than who he honestly was. Is that what bothers you?

  • atlantaspark

    I CAN’T BELIEVE PEOPLE ARE GLORIFYING A SELF-INDULGENT, CHILD MOLESTING, SELF MUTILATING, FREAK!

  • countrymilf

    Disgraceful piece of so called journalism.
    James, you are ignorant and stupid.
    TIME, the public is calling for this man’s resignation, no matter how many people joined to leave our reactions to this ridiculous display of ingratitude towards a man who has done so much for the world. What have you done today James? Um, showed that you are no one who is nowhere.
    For all the people who believed the stupid media and think Michael was a pedophile, you are a bunch of ignoramuses as well. If you didn’t know and love Michael, you missed out big time and I feel sorry for you.

  • veloly

    Yes, the “allegations” should never be forgotten. The dead is at peace. It is the responsibility for the rest of us, to stand strong and fight the souless, heartless, shameless media, and let the TRUTH shine forever. Feeding the greedy, covering the jealous, justifing the prejudice, are those all that you can do? American media? Talking nonsense and pretending to be intelligence, I prefer to watch the circus! From now on, I am not reading the media coverage to get any wisdom (no way!). It has instead become the good source to observe human nature, and how hollow it can get. Not only on MJ’s case, but also on the war of Iraq, and many many other things happening internationally. Are you happy that you are losing the respect little by little from the public, American media? Keep your dignity, that is at lease what I can say.

  • caili1975

    At least one person finally speaking the truth. Thanks JP great job, well done. This for MJ wonder what happens when OJ (acquitted too) goes.

  • grgkr2304

    CNN and Time utilized MJ and made their business to the best and now they both started negative compaign on MJ and his great memorial. Its shame on Time and CNN.

  • fivefootnone

    whatiswrong03
    Good Point on the news “blurbs” and lack of HEADLINES…It was very hard to find any type of news stories other than that of Jacksons passing. For 2 weeks ive gone on CNN.com for “Headline” News and every article is about jackson…it didnt matter what tab you went under (news, us, crime,etc) you found yourself reading something about Jackson, Im just glad that the day has come and hes finally laid to rest and we can actually read about some real news…Has anyone other than ESPN noticed how many celebraties have passed in the past 2 weeks and even then I think ESPN got the # wrong…but we wouldnt know this cause all weve been hearing about is Jackson…May they all rest in peace…Now lets get on with OUR OWN LIVES

  • miranda6971

    The media’s coverage of this man’s death has been fitting. The world is mourning because he is the greatest entertainter and a humanitarian that has touched many lives. As for memorial…it was beautiful and touching. I cried the whole time. As for your article with it’s racist and hateful undertones…That’s GAUDY! I’m telling ya…jounalism is dead. You’re probably one of the jounalists that mis-reported the 2005 trial. MJ has been vindicated!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • atlantaspark

    MIRANDA6971 you are an ignorant and pathetic. Yes, Jackson has touched many lives, well he’s touched many children’s hineys that is.

  • wanderlust2

    The writer is supposed to RESIGN because he didn’t bow down in reverence to the Holy One? You people are NUTS. As soon as the tranmissions from Mars in your tinfoil hats die down a little, you might want to check a little document called the First Amendment. Granted, you might not consider it as important in your life as Michael Jackson, but it does help prevent a dictatorship. Of course, since you’d obviously like to see this guy arrested for what he wrote, maybe a dictatorship is exactly what you’re after.

  • fivefootnone

    atlantaspark:
    They are all just a bunch of sheep….following along the misguided path…if they opened their eyes they might just be able to see what we’ve all known all along..he didnt get the name WACKO JACKO for NO REASON!!!

  • none7895

    Wow. Someone said this could have waited 24 hours. I think I agree. But then again, 24 hours from now, this opinion piece would have been written by someone else, somewhere else. I’m not a big fan of MJ like most of the commenters here. I didn’t hate him, but I did think he was a bit strange. Felt sorry for him, because like someone else said, he did seem like he meant well. He didn’t seem mean spirited. And he gave a tremendous amount to charity. But maybe he, in his public life, was a bit too much of a child. He wasn’t “nothing but a pervert” like the Representative from NY said in that video clip. I have questions about his past. I don’t believe our judicial system is perfect. Innocent people are convicted; not so innocent people are let go. I’m not saying whether he was guilty or not. I’m just saying that people need to consider this. I do agree that we should be mourning the loss of our soldiers, firefighters, and police officers with the same passion.
    Anyway, someone made a comment about his daughter’s reaction and how it seemed not so authentic. His children were probably in shock. Yes it’s been a week or 10 days, but I’ll tell you something. My father died unexpectedly when I was young also and I was like a deer in headlights during the funeral. People were wailing and carrying on and I’d never seen anything quite like it. My tears were few. I forced myself to show emotion. Why? I don’t know. I was a kid. I was lost. Give the kids a break. They have no mother that they know of personally. Now they’re suddenly in front of a huge crowd of people (and the world really) mourning the loss of their only parent. Perhaps they’ve had some private time to mourn. why do we need to see **everyone’s** tears? Btw, Of course they should be there on the stage; they are part of that family. But hopefully this is the last stage they have to be on for a while. Kids do need normalcy.
    So, yes, the opinion piece here was definitely slanted, and while I wasn’t offended by the bulk of it (not being a fan as I said), I really saw no reason to compare the funeral procession to the OJ chase. That was a low blow and really unnecessary. I don’t think this guy should be fired, but I think it would have made more sense to see this type of opinion piece in a personal blog rather than one associated with a well known news magazine.

  • meinherrsaulnier777

    JP is Jewish. This single fact explains why he chose to have taken the tone that he had. Despite JP being an, obviously preferred and unchallenged, unabashed bigot, racial animus is still gross ignorance and a true displacement of what it is to be human.

    After having read this article of JP’s, I’ll decline getting a copy of TIME’s MJ commemorative issue, I’ll buy something released by the Jacksons rather than persons whose, seeming, raison d’être is a culture of money, hate and divisiveness…

  • artfulmee

    You do realize that the tabloids you refer to in the clip were from one of Michael’s own music videos, right? And I really don’t see what was so gaudy about a gold-plated casket. I thought it was beautiful. For those still calling him a pedophile… I guess you’ve never been wrongly accused of anything yourself. Let’s hope you never are, because apparently an accusation alone is all that’s needed to prove guilt in your world. Needless to say, I won’t be coming to your defense.

  • fewfew50

    be a gaudy public spec
    When i received my issue of TIME MAG this week I was expecting MJ to grace the cover but no he was not there. That left me a little unsettled but then I read this article and I can glean why. So when renewal times comes areound for my sub CANCEL will be my choice. There is more than one way to skin a cat.” This was tasteless and uncalled shows unprofessionalism in journalism. There is already enough hate in the world without knowingly supporting more. Good bye TIME MAG

  • auntyem

    The article says more about its author, then about the subject he writes on, i.e. meanspirited and classless.

  • bodexl

    what a useless article.O.J.?????for God’s sake gimme a break!!!!
    To even put that in your article is completely tasteless.
    How come very people bad-mouth Elvis Presley or John Lennon with all their flaws also?How come all the people who remember the controversies and make it their destiny in life to keep dutifully pointing out are white people?Americans are inherently racist and they will never change…forget Obama.

  • drespice

    well said none 7895. You really seem unbiased and intelligent. I am a fan but not a fanatic, I just took offense to ” gaudy” because its bordering a knock on ttraditional African American home going celebrations which his was abviously patterned after.

  • cambridged

    paedophiles don’t go to heaven..

  • artfulmee

    By the way, the reference to the OJ chase was just hateful. The only two things that chase had in common with the procession was that they both happened in LA and were followed relentlessly by media helicopters. Oh, and I guess both celebrities were black and had had trouble with the law… is THAT the point you were trying to make? Pray tell, exactly what WAS Michael running from today?

  • evv2009

    This article is a joke! For someone who considers himself a journalist; horrible!

    MJ was an icon, he was acquitted of child molestation. He was by far the most notable artist and humanitarian. He’s done more for the world than you have. Go crawl in to a hole and die! Have some sympathy, I hope your when you die your friends and family don’t treat you a certain way for the way you “think.” your a moron!

  • graceson

    Mr.Poniewozik, It might be a good time for you to take a look in the mirror and change your ways. Your choice of words to describe a Memorial Service that a family graciously allowed the world to share were rude and disrespectful. Did you look around the world?
    Millions of people of all ages and races are grieving. Michael Jackson’s family could have kept his Memorial private. Instead they invited all of us in to celebrate the life of their Iconic Michael.
    God Bless them for it. Shame on you.

  • sweetbeagle

    Most of the people reading this commentary must not be getting to the last 2 paragraphs. While I was a bit annoyed at first for the haughty attitude presented throughout much of the article, the last 2 paragraphs show that even a skeptical, cynical writer such as Mr. Poniewozik cannot avoid being “moved” by what he saw today. The last paragraph is a chillingly accurate description of the world we live in and our tendency to gawk at what we do not understand. And by the way, there’s no such thing as unbiased journalism anymore…

  • evv2009

    i’m disgusted that you voted for Obama!

  • atlantaspark

    meinherrsaulnier777:
    you are a dumb bigot and a fool.
    You have no way of knowing what Mr. Poniewozik’s religion is.
    Besides, those Jewish people have been kinder to you coloreds than
    than any other people.

  • evv2009

    sweetbeagle-

    we read it, however it makes no difference when someone writes an entire NEGATIVE article about someone and only writes two measly paragraphs of how their “opinion”. What’s wrong with writing about the legacy that the Jackson’s tried to encompass today? Why couldn’t he embrace what MJ was all about?

    I must be wrong or confused…right!

  • tomi2003

    Out from a people so despised and ridiculed, a blight on the perfect image of humanity that America seeks to be, a people that struggles to make sense of the shame of their heritage in this land, robbed of the organic substance of their history and thus the certainty of their place in the world, and denied human dignity; out from such a people nonetheless emerge certain individuals of phenomenal talents, skills, strengths and achievements which the modern world had never before seen and for which reason they defy definition.
    Michael Jackson is an example of these individuals and perhaps the most well known. The paradox of this great country is that because these individuals are ‘black’ much of what is called ‘white America’ fails to recognize the extraordinariness of these lives. Rather, some seek to be ‘objective and honest’ in their characterization of them. One would suppose this is what Mr. Poniewozik seeks to do in the tone of his description of the memorial held today in honor of Mr. Jackson. Others are not so kind. They can’t wait to discover that scandal, which reaffirms their conclusion that nothing good can come out of ‘that lot’.
    In spite of Mr. Michael Jackson’s frail humanity, Providence selected him as an inspiration to a despondent people, bereft of any hope that their existence could have any meaning other than that which has already been defined for them. The proof that he did a fine job is in the words of those whose lives he touched, and while some may be inclined think his outcome could have been better, the enormous interest in his life and now his death is God’s reward for his courage in bearing his cross. He died well.

  • sheshe21

    The article from Time is why racism and hatred is so prevalent today. Totally shock that an iconic paper would allow such garbage to be written the article and comments from some bloggers, were not necessary the language spewed such ignorance, distaste, envy, and jealously. His service was beautiful and this is how many African Americans send their love ones off we may not have celebrities of that caliber but we have our own celebrities within our community who speaks, sings and share memories of that person. What you wrote was very small minded death resonates differently in every culture and people chose to celebrate it how they please.

    It’s sad that people are so unhappy with their lives that they have to make statements like this. I agree with some posting that if you lost a love one and someone wrote something as cynical about them would you think it was appropriate, but after reading your article you may just think it’s deserving. Let’s hope all you judgmental people live a clean quiet life with no skeletons in your closet which I doubt very seriously! I truly thought it was up to God to judge. But it seems that many people think they are God. To write such an article you thought nothing of his children and his mother how sad.

    As for getting back to the news well his passing did not stop the world from turning I was able to keep up with the world’s current events, what was your issue? If you did not like him why take such interest in his life good or bad. Riddle me this do you follow everyone you think should have been convicted of a crime life and write articles on them?

    Let’s speak on being acquitted and the definition to my understanding – Acquitted is declared not guilty of a specific offense or crime; legally blameless. So riddle me this rude cruel A@# people if he did commit such an act what loving and caring parents would take money for the harm done to their child without exhausting all means of having the person jailed for a crime, then pursue a civil suit for damages done. I’m a parent and I know I do no have the means or attorney power to fight but I would have gave it my all so when I look at my child he/she would have known I did my best and that I truly love them. Because money can not fix what has been broken it may assist with seeking counseling that maybe required and their no guarantee that it will work.

    Remember this The Lord Jesus told the one who is passing judgment on another to first Judge himself. He went on to say that he will be judged by the very same standards that he uses to judge other

    You thought your article was cute believe this what you said you will receive 10 x folds. Hope you find that cute.

  • iamrepulsedbyyourcomments

    some of you people really need to take it down a notch in your “criticism” of the writer of this article, calling for him to be fired and to burn in hell. that is almost as ridiculous as it is pathetic. as someone mentioned, “dirty south” i believe it was, this is not a fan site. the article was balanced, fair and inoffensive to all but you nutjobs who are approaching michael jackson as if he were Mother Teresa.

    look, i feel bad as well for Michael Jackson and his family, especially his children but many of you are just way too over the top about it. try to think more and feel a little bit less. it’ll do you good, obviously. yes, the writer used the word “gaudy” but come on now, we are talking about a gold coffin here. if that isn’t gaudy i don’t know what is.
    the OJ reference was odd and misguided really but come on now!
    i think some of you need to refill your xanax prescriptions.

  • xanderwhite

    Clever to be cynical about a funeral, but tacky as hell.

    Offensive to the readers and embarrassing for the author as well as Time.

    All I need to know about Time. Won’t return.

    X.White, PhD

  • none7895

    thanks drespice. That was really kind of you. :) I guess I can see what you and others are saying about the word “gaudy”. It is a strong word that does seem to scream with negativity when you are talking about someone’s funeral. “Gaudy” belongs to a dress, a pair of shoes, a hat, a dinner, a wedding, but not to a funeral (especially on the day of said funeral).

  • sweetbeagle

    Is there not a distinction between a columnist and a news reporter? I’m assuming this writer’s task was to write a “column”, which is more like an editorial, a blog, or a commentary than a strict news report. Of course this is poor journalism if it had been presented as “news” or an “update.” However, I thought I was reading a commentary, so I was prepared for the snide remarks that he made… and no, I don’t agree with him. I loved Michael Jackson, and yes, it is distasteful to write something negative on the day of his memorial service. That’s why I was glad to see he actually admitted to being “moved.”

  • emmajean2

    A big fat raspberry to you Mr. P. Obviously you were not an MJ fan, and your biased showed in the snipey tone of this story. How rude to say his casket was gaudy,(your opinion in a “factual” story) and it’s presence strange. Perhaps you should attend more diverse memorials and broaden your horizons.

  • brcrk

    Now that that black son of a bitch Micheal, the child molester, Jackson is dead and buried and Lucifer is burning the hide off the perverted bastard. Could we please get on with the “real” news.

    This day will always be remembered as the day the sickest motha alive died!!

    I just dont understand why the press doesnt say, “today Micheal “Sicko” Jackson, the man that paid $20,000,000.00 dollars to the parents of the children he molested, bit the dust and was cast into the belly of Hell. Today all children can start breathing a little easier”.

    Amen

  • slopoke88

    none7895-KIds need “normalcy.” Otherwise they might end up like “atlantaspark” or “truthteller” or James Poniewozik or the Peter King. What possible legitimate comparison is there to todays funeral procession and the O.J. chase? Maybe mean and ugly people are children that were denied “normalcy” and seem to want to make sure we all feel their pain and frustration. Perhaps a “normal” childhood is not enough to become an even-keeled good person. Perhaps we are all “works in progress”. Then again, maybe some people are just mean and ugly, regardless. Millions of people around the world liked something about MJ. Millions of people around the world felt like he touched their hearts and their lives somehow. Millions of people, showing that they cared. Some people just don’t get it. They just don’t understand it. But I think it’s a considerably smaller group of people. A small group of mean and ugly people.

  • bodexl

    I knew atlantaspark was a racist from previous comments…..then it(yes.it…cos you’re not human) says coloreds?????

    iamrepulsedbyyourcomments……I AM REPULSED AT YOUR COMMENTS.
    He wasnt mother Teresa…..he was a man and he deserves dignity.If you people didnt give him in life,why not in death.We all know all the things he was accused of.None were ever proved.If he was guilty why did he progressively withdraw from America?He went to live in an Islamic kingdom.Do pedophiles do that?

    Someone’s father,son,brother dies and the best you can come up with is gaudy???

    Did you footage from all over the world?His impact was great.We dont need anyone to remind us of the cloud over his life.

  • lamike2010

    Wow. The comments of this writer sound like the ramblings of a jealous, spiteful little nerd. Someone must have kicked sand in his face while the rest of the “cool kids” were moon-walking and dancing with GIRLS in clubs. The memorial was very low key considering the wealth and fame of such a person as Michael Jackson. There are less than a handful of people on the face of the Earth that could have 20,000 people fill a stadium in several cities around the world just to watch a big screen monitor. (L.A., Berlin, Tokyo, etc.) Gold coffin is gaudy? He deserved no less. The drive from the cemetery to Staples was like the OJ chase? Are you kidding me? The whole WORLD wanted to watch every second of that ride from the funeral home to Staples. I know I did. He was simply the best entertainer in history and today’s event was entirely appropriate based on that alone.

  • none7895

    slopoke88: by “normalcy”, I meant not being chased by the media and being able to grow up mostly out of the spot light. I think being watched 24/7 (or even half the time) by groups of strangers with cameras probably has bad effects on a child. That was all I was trying to say.

  • mczerlinsky

    Wow is right! The number of people screaming at the author if this article is amazing. I would encourage people to read this article if not once but twice to really get the meaning. He not only is part of the media covering the event, he reminds us how invasive the media can be (from the hovering helicopters over the private time to the inane comments from some of the anchors). He reminds us that while MJ was in the public eye as an entertainer with a huge persona he was also a very private man. And whether you choose to believe it or not, he was as Berry Gordy put it, “the greatest entertainer that ever lived”, but also at times the “centerpoint of numerous allegations and legal challenges”. If you watched the memorial service and really read the article, both are well balanced. Both sides of his life, the public and the private, will be scrutinized for years to come and the memorial only proved that fact.

  • lucy1114

    I watched the news coverage and memorial of Michael Jackson today on CNN. As I was watching it, I thought MJ’s performances were always quite spectacular and I was impressed with how dignified and classy the memorial was. For such a short time of preparation, I thought it was well put together, especially the video’s playing on the screen. As for Mr. Poniewozik’s comments about the gaudy coffin at center stage. Don’t you normally see a coffin at a memorial? And isn’t that person the center of attention, since that is the reason everybody is gathered there? I think all of the fans were grateful to the Jackson family for allowing the coffin to be there to help with their closure. I thought the coffin was beautiful. It was all gold, draped with flowers. I didn’t see how that could be considered gaudy. I’ve heard of way stranger requests that people wish to be buried in. Any funeral procession I’ve ever been in, goes slow. Anybody should know that, if they have ever had to wait for one to pass by them. Yes, MJ was acquitted on the child-molestation charges. So let it go! He had his day in court. If you don’t agree with the way our judicial system works, take it up with your local congressman. As for the prescription drug allegations surrounding his death. Why don’t we wait and see what the toxicology reports say? I live a normal life and I can’t imagine the stress of living the life of Michael Jackson.I don’t remember this much berating of Elvis, Heath Ledger or Anna Nicole Simpson’s drug addictions and death. I’m not a die hard Michael Jackson fan, like it looks like millions all over the world are. I respect their admiration of him. I do think he had an extraordinary talent and deserves to be remembered for that and other accomplishments he achieved. Today was a day for his family, loved ones and fans to say goodbye, to someone they loved. Although he was a super star to the public. He was also a son, a brother and a father to his family. I thought CNN did a great job of covering the memorial. The media was only doing their job today, and they did it far better than you did Mr. Poniewozik. My favorite comment on this blog was short, sweet and to the point…….. Dude, your a dick!

  • jackie2000

    atlantaspark…you obviously don’t get out much, nor do you read much if you call this hack a “journalist”

    and i count no less than 8 articles time is currently running off one page anyway, so obviously TIME mag is keen to offer coverage of every nuance.

    and people who cry “pedophile” clearly don’t know much about that sick, criminal behavior. there is not one – not one — who can go through life without damaging scores of children or have several for many, many years.

    MJ was NEVER convicted of a crime – and someone taking money in exhcange for allowing one to go free would be a far worse criminal in anyone’s book (except maybe yours and this hack writer).
    How is that protecting their own child?

    It’s not — so all things considered – acquittal, someone wanting money instead of “justice” – no ongoing history of any kind of deviant behavior, etc….shows MJ was not as he was accused.
    He had access to thousands of children — and yet — to this day — there is no proof that he was anything other than a kind-hearted, loving, caring, childlike soul.
    (real pedophiles continue their behavior over and over and over).

    this doesn’t even dignify a response — you need to do your own research.
    like the poster earlier, if you really look into his interviews – he has been consistent since childhood — he didn’t have one.
    those were his first words in his first interviews and the last in his last interviews — he never wavered.
    he was a grown man with a repressed childhood – so what.

    all of the jacksons grew up with none of the bad behavior you see from so many entertainers – drugs, alchohol, jail terms, etc.
    that’s pretty remarkable. today’s service speaks for itself.
    no one and no family is perfect – but they did a pretty good job with what they had.

  • lamike2010

    Sorry mczerlinsky. I read the article several times and while the author tried to throw in a few compliments, it was quite evident his true intent and dislike of MJ. I would have expected 100 helicopters in the air instead of 10! This was an event of global proportions. People like you and the auther just don’t get it. I mentioned there were maybe a handful of people on the face of the Earth who could fill stadiums around the world just to view their memorial. I was wrong – I can’t think of ANY other person at this time? Can you?

  • lisasymone

    How dare you JAMES! Your penial view cast between judgemental eyes while possibly downing a bottle of jack daniels reeks of the could of’s, would of’s, should of’s, of your own miserable ‘what the hell good did you ever do anyway’ life. Your cheap pathetic effort to take away the majesty that was Michael is simply a last ditch effort by a middle aged ‘nobody’ who sought to seek to justify through the tip of a pen to diminish an icon worth of an iconic send off. While this article will travel from here to the wastebasket, Michael will live in on eternally, while your pathetic almost non exsistent life will simply end.

  • shaynermaven

    I found the article fairly balanced. Let’s consider the ironies, shall we? MJ was painted as a victim in today’s service. Yet it was his choice to be in the spotlight. If you create a public spectacle then you should not be surprised when that spectacle is judged by the public. The family could have had a private service–they kept saying MJ wanted to be left alone…yet they haul out his gold casket under a glaring light and put on a show for 2.25 hrs, watched by millions, to honor a man who “simply wanted to be left alone!” And a public show, witnessed by millions, is now commented upon and people are furious that not every review is glowing. You really can’t have it both ways–if you want privacy then you don’t do public spectacles. If you don’t want a service or show to be judged then you keep it private for family and close friends. If you (want to) blame the media for MJ’s troubles then you must also hold MJ responsible for choosing to be in the spotlight, courting media attention, and making other choices that caused pain for himself and others. It’s a double-edged sword: when you choose to be a public figure you don’t get to pick and control what others think of you. And you ultimately have the choice NOT to stay in the public eye if you don’t want that life. Fame is a beast that seems to need constant feeding and attention–let’s not forget that MJ, in his adult years, made choices. These choices are ones that ultimately affected his life, likely caused his death, and left 3 children forever heartbroken. And his family (in the name of ‘the fans’) is continuing a public stance. Good or bad it’s all a matter of choices.

  • slopoke88

    none7895- I understood what you were trying to say. I decided to go off on a tangent. I felt the need to address mean and ugly people. As far as MJ’s kids… just my humble opinion but I don’t think there is much of a chance of a “normal” life for them. But that doesn’t mean they won’t have a good life. I wish only the best for them and may God continue to bless them. A normal life is, for many, hard to come by with or without the cameras but, like they say, money isn’t everything… but it sure does help. That’s one thing I doubt those kids will ever have to worry about. But she, Paris, looked like she would trade all the money in the world just to have her dad back. Wow… there’s that tangent again!

  • jackie2000

    tomi and sheshe….MJ crossed color, ethnic, economic barriers and world borders.
    believe me — this type of service is not limited to african americans.
    it is quite common in many cultures, countries to have music, singing, a casket surrounded by flowers, and memories shared at a funeral service and celebration of life.
    i saw nothing different in this service than those of our own
    heinz 57 family of cultural mixes….just on a grander scale.
    i could totaly relate to everything done during this service.

    the writer is just blatantly ignorant of what’s referred to as “human decency”

  • prashantsg

    Your article makes you sound like a junk journalist who doesnt have any damn idea of what it takes to be such a great star like Michael Jackson.. Michael Jackson was one person on earth I feel who proved to the world thats its not just born talent but hard work and perseverance along with it takes all to make a great star. You open your stupid brain to write something about such a caliber of a man only when you will achive atleast 1% of perfection in your field of what MJ achieved in the music world.
    I am very ashamed today to be subscriber of TIME magazine ..I hope TIME realizes the mistake and throw you out soon

  • mczerlinsky

    lamike2010.. I agree with you that the memorial today was an event of global proportion. We have become a society with a fervent need for immediate information. We now have the ability to broadcast what happens in real time all over the world. You say the author has a true dislike for MJ. Go back, and read each paragraph and see if you can find the dislike. Did we really need to see the family time at Forest Lawn before the public event? Could we not have given them the privacy to mourn one final time in private? Many of the speakers (including Brooke Shields) said that MJ was almost child-like in private, but when he was on stage he commanded a presence like no other entertainer. Was he not “most comfortable engaging the world thru spectacle”? I don’t find that to be a bad thing. I find that to be the mark of an incredible entertainer who knew how to bring his talent, his presence and his uniqueness to the world stage. Yes, this was an event of global proportions but it brought LA close to a stand-still. Yes, the funerals of some can do just that, and they too were labeled a spectacle, but the author plainly states that today’s event clearly was more tasteful and moving than all of the publicity his death received prior. Yes, the author was very poignant in his view of the gold coffin, and even of it being in the arena. Many have said he belonged both in the gold coffin, and at the event, and I agree. He needed to be there for his family and his fans. The last two paragraphs spoke volumes in my opinion. Today we saw Michael Jackson, the entertainer, the son, the brother, the father like we had never seen him before. And he had to be dead for it to happen.

  • jackie2000

    shayner….can i just say MJ did NOT “choose” to be in the spotlight.

    That was chosen for him, by his father (and mother) when he was a mere 5 year-old child.
    From then on, he never had a life of his own.
    His life, where he felt “most at home”, as he stated many times over, was on stage.
    Each of us are given gifts from God and MJ acknowledged what his was and was fulfilling his destiny. We should all be so lucky to know precisely what that is.
    This man never said he wanted privacy.
    If you actually not assume you know about him – and look at his interviews though the years – he was extraordinarily consistent.
    What he wanted….was just to be treated as a human being (not a superstar).
    He wanted friendships, people he could trust, honesty – which is why he gravitated toward animals, other child celebrities and children — because all were honest with him and loved him for being a human.
    The children were too young to idolize him and he was a child at heart – a perfect fit.

    It’s interesting to hear him talk about just wanting to go to the grocery store and experience what us regular folk do on a day-to-day basis — just to have normal human interaction — talk to your neighbor.
    he was fascinated by that – and even went out in disguise so he could hear people carrying on normal conversations.
    Don’t you get it?
    By the time he was an adult – he was far to famous — worldwide stratospheric famous to ever retrieve any kind of anonimity…ever.
    Besides, he wouldn’t know it was possible.
    Fame and being known the world over is all HE knew…as well as sharing his gift of song and performing.
    So no, he did not want to be left alone, he just wanted to be treated as a regular guy. It’s certainly not his fault that he wasn’t. That began in childhood and was out of his hands long ago – have some empathy.
    As far as the song “leave me alone” – that only referred to LIES by tabloids….crazy things they made up and reported as fact…so that years later, people still believe some of it.
    (ie: that he had an oxygen chamber at home. he bought one for the burn unit that treated him — one of countless unknown charitable acts. for “fun”, as was his nature, he got in and a photograph was taken. it was reported this was at his home. if you see the pics today, you can clearly see the hospital windows and hospital blinds in the background – nothing like that at neverland)
    i wonder, do people take your fun and private moments/photos and twist them into something ridiculous and then tell your boss and family? The public was, in effect, his “boss”, so these things were very hurtful.
    I hope you are able to do research like I and so many others have done on our own (and don’t rely on trash bloggers like this guy) and I believe you will have different feelings and a different level of understanding of MJ….on a human level…which is all he wanted.

  • bland001

    All I can say is Time Just Lost One. TACKY article or should I say gaudy, self rightous article. How the heck did O.J. come into this? I know you prejudice …… They were both found not guilty and now you want someone to take everything Mike worked for right like O.J. ???? Hate to tell ya, Mike Money Is Too Long for you scavengers to take away from his family. So, next you want his kids to grow up with issues the way Mike did so you can break them down? Won’t happen, they are strong, we all saw that today and remember that the world is round. Think before you tresspass against another person especially the innocent. That is their FATHER you pitiful people are writing about on their last day with him. Dummies, they probably can read several languages and write better than the author of this article. Maybe when Blanket turn 10 he will buy Times and fire all you Aholes. That is what you are afraid of huh? Mike was to big and his money was never about manipulating people he spread LOVE and Gave Back to so many including our Troops. Get your facts together, learn how to research, write and use Ethics. Wow, sorry situation.

    Thank you to all of you who responded with intelligence and taste and know what Respect and consideration is. No consideration is Disrespect and Times showed us they do not respect nobody but their bottom line and are two faced.

    Well Haters, I’m taking my Time magazine back, Time is two faced and I will not spend money on Hate. Time put Michael on the cover and then kick the MAN not just when he is down but when he is DEAD. Cowardly and Coldhearted piece of work. Let’s talk about child abuse, what the heck do you think your writer did with this article, and all the comments that are so nasty, This is abuse to his children. You are hurting them just to get a reaction and sell what???? Psychology 101 on how to get someone to respond to this tacky blog, well guess what I will not ever read Time again. Two Faced. Choose a position and stick with it. learn real journalism like the two ladies that risked their freedom in Korea, learn what a real editorial/article is and how to do it the right way as journalist and a magazine.

    Earn your readers and subscibers. I look for facts not just mixed up facts to stir emotions/opinions to make a dollar I see there are so many others who know what real journalism is too!!!! Not just garbage being posted to get a reaction.

    God Bless the Jacksons.

    Sleep Now Prince Michael, I know you are Smiling down from Heaven and know you raised 3 beautiful strong kids. They will be o.k. they are loved and they have each other the way you planned.

    I know CNN is part of Time but atleast CNN stay one way and let the viewers make their own decisions. That is why I respect CNN, Time learn how to write for real, your worse than the tabloids, tacky…………….

    God Bless

  • jayheard

    I saw a memorial that made it clear why MJ created a Neverland.

    I saw people appearing to cry..yet, had no tears. I saw people I never saw stand up & defend Mike. I saw so many people who let Mike stay the course until his near total distruction. I saw people who took from Mike more than what thay were willing to give.

    I saw a boy chewing a huge mouthfull of bubble gum as if he were at a park..and adults who said nothing. If Mike was a father to any children…I did any childen who behaved as if thay lost a Dad till the end…on que. I saw kids cought up in something so wrong.

    I saw why Mike gave to his trust, His Mother & his created happyness…why he named no family members in his last wishes. Thats why I cried. He was alone. I saw a show that was for everyone, but had little to do with Mike & his true life passion or who he was.

    I’m sorry….but thats what I saw.

  • bodexl

    shaynermaven…..being left alone is different than not wanting to be in the public spotlight.being left alone means the press should stop being judgmental in their reports,stop spreading lies and rumors,stop filling the air with bitterness and jealousy,hatred and bigotry.
    He made a choice to be in the public spotlight but that was because he had music and a message.He was flawed but who isnt?

    Being judgmental at a time of grief is just inhumane and heartless.Being too eager to be ‘balanced’ reeks of cynicism and not wanting to acknowledge his genius.When a man dies you have to appraise the WHOLE of his life,being and achievement,not just a few dark spots of unproven suspicion.
    My father died when I was 10 years old and I dont remember a single bad thing he did.I remember his funeral vividly and all the crowds and the eulogies that poured forth.He was a unique man and everyone wept unashamedly.Was he perfect?No.But the good he had done in life completely overwhelmed all faults he might have had.The good will he gave people follows me till this day.
    I think the press needs to do some inward looking at the way they report things.It’s good to be ‘balanced’ but it’s better to be human.

  • dseloop

    I can only think you haven’t been to many funerals. In parts of the country, a funeral with the casket in the front of the church or funeral home is the norm. (And usually they’re covered with flowers.) I didn’t think anything of it until you wrote about it here. The same goes for the funeral processional–which certainly did not remind me of the OJ chase, but rather the many funeral processionals we had to stop in traffic for in my hometown. I now live in California where the memorial services I have attended never have caskets or bodies.

  • baybiogirl719

    Wow James, I am a Christian so I just had to delete my entire orginal comment because it was too negative & judgmental. I had alot of things to say, but I believe they are not uplifting and you have been bashed enough. A bit of advice would be to take a look at the comments and the feedback and use constructively. Without judgment, I would ask that you do this and look at this as an opportunity to improve where necessary.

  • gomolokai

    Did we watch the same memorial?

    It seemed to me that it was written before the actual memorial and then a few details thrown in afterwords. It was written as if the expectation was for it to be a gaudy spectacle and then the author was disappointed that it wasn’t. But he couldn’t bear to edit the description out, so it was left in.

    I think it was a disgustingly bias piece meant to continue the MJ vilification even after he is dead.

  • dachshund2puppy

    WOW WOW and WOW…. The fact that Time even allowed you to post this IGNORANT and un tactful review of Michael Jacksons Memorial makes me realize its Time to flush Time Magazine down the toilet… I on a regular basis buy Time magazine cus I enjoy the articles, However, after reading this review or should I say (Pile of CRAP) I will say this… I will NEVER buy anything in association with Time Magazine again… shame SHAME on Time for letting you James Poniewozik be a jerk and post this… its obvious to me James Poniewozik has a personal dislike for Michael Jackson, But, this was so un called for on the day of his memorial… Time magazine how dare you… after reading this article time magazine is in my eyes nothing more then a tabloid… huh time who???? exactaly…. LOSERS

    Michael Jackson was a gift from God and loved by millions if not billions of people world wide, and its because of low budget, judgemental, Gaudy, jerks like YOU James Poniewozik that he had to live a life of isolation….

    When gifts like Michael are given, yet, are not cherished, loved and honored by we the people who recieved him then sadly they get taken from us far FAR sooner then they ever should have….

  • missadawn

    I agree with everything said in this blog.

    When I first heard the news Michael Jackson’s funeral was being held at Staples Center, normally a concert venue, I was shocked and it crossed my mind at how unusual that is. Especially the fact Michael Jackson’s body was being laid out in a casket front and center. Seeing the memorial I thought much of it was nothing short of something similiar to an award show/concert. I heard fans in the background, probably the ones who recieved the free tickets to attend, yelling “we love you Michael!” and chanting “Michael!” as if they were expecting him to perform. It was unusual.

    As unusual as it was though, it was much more normal than a lot of people, including myself, thought it would be. I did not like how people like Al Sharpton added race into his speeches, along with others. I also didn’t believe it was necessary one woman brought up (and not even close to being subtle about it) the charges Michael Jackson faced. Even so, they were tasteful with it, and Brooke Shields speech and Jermaine Jackson’s rendition of Michael’s apparent favorite song Smile by Charlie Chaplin seemed very sad and heartfelt. And Michael’s daughter speaking for the first time brought me to tears. It was so heartbreaking.

    It’s good to know that you’re not sugar-coating it like a lot of people are. A lot of people “grieving” Michael’s death are the same people who previously made jokes about him and made negative comments about him.

  • jackie2000

    (sorry to keep posting, but this ignoramous’ statements just gall me to no end)
    take for instance this tidbit: “And while Jackson made a point throughout his career of being pan-racial in affect, music and appeal–”It don’t matter if you’re black or white”–the music (beginning with a gospel choir) and several speeches framed him as a more specifically African-American icon than he made himself in life.”

    What was he watching?
    During “We are the world”, my eyes saw eery race, creed and color represented! The main singer was Asian, his lead guitarist who was also singer, a white Australian, dancers/singers of all colors!!
    Brook Sheilds spoke, John Mayer played, Usher sang what was this guy watching?? Maybe he had to take a lot of bathroom breaks????

    How rude to say someone with a skin disorder shunned his African- American heritage! Michael even once said he was jealous of Lisa Marie, because she could tan — AND — made a point I’ve always thought about myself….why do people like this hack writer make comments about color when legions of whites and light-skinned people risk deadly skin cancer every summer just to look darker…hmmm.
    And not to mention the multi-billion dollar tanning salon and tanning creme industry.

    Of course he will include ALL races — black, white, asian, indian – he was loved the world over. We live in a multi-cultural society in case you haven’t noticed.
    White people listen to gospel music and blacks take part in traditionally white religions (hello? The Jackson matriarch is a Jevohah’s Witness, for goodness sake).
    You are soooo uneducated and bigoted in your writing.
    It’s just too much to even comment — this guy is a complete tool.

    It’s one thing to have opinions, if you can make a case for them – that’s what you’re supposed to do (as a blogger, i guess) — but he cannot even do that.
    TIME magazine — you have failed miserably with this below 10th rate writer…scraping the bottom of the blogger barrel.

  • editorgrl

    ewwww! you should be fired: gaudy, memorial hyperbole, comparison with OJ chase–hideous, insensitive, inappropriate, disrespectful, intolerant…I could go on, but the other readers have spoken for me (most of them, anyway)…cancelling my new subscription to TIME absent a formal apology to MJ’s family, friends, and fans, and publication of your letter of resignation.

  • char02rc

    My respect for TIME after many years just took a nose dive….To start off as if something is wrong with having a CLASSIC gospel song (by a great gospel song writer Andre’ Crouch)at the start of MJ’s ceremony as if the gospel choir took away from his message of tolerance and unity?? What the heck was gaudy about it? Because it’s not the way you’re used to seeing things done??? You have just cost TIME some readers and I’ll be sure to blast this over FACEBOOK to make sure you reap your words of choice!! And to compare his motorcade to OJ Simpson?? You words and feelings showed big time….Angry and tinges of racist remarks….See what happens when you hide your feelings day in day out, they start to seap out of your pores and there’s nothing you can do to hide it..Don’t worry it happens to allot of people….And they and “you” take advantage of major national news stories to vent and attempt to hide behind what the real issue is….If your going to write, stop BSing around and write what you say behind closed doors..Go ahead it will make you feel better….And yes I did a really quick “Profile” of you; I studied under the best to be able to do that!

  • vonstahl

    I was lured by the expression “gaudy” in the link to this article from the CNN main site since I found, watching in my professional capacity as a psychiatrist who also engages in grief counseling, the memorial for Mr. Jackson to be surprisingly ‘private’ considering Mr. Jackson’s fame.

    Mr. Poniewozik used throughout the piece in question a tone of wholly inappropriate cynicism and sarcasm which, considering the fact that the memorial was indeed more than in appropriate limits (always considering Mr. Jackson’s life and fame), can only be sourced for either of three possible reasons (or a combination thereof): to be deliberately hurtful to those grieving in an emotionally involved state, or to stir up controversy to increase readership of the piece in question (i.e. increased number of page loads to post the comments of the enraged etc.). I find either of those two reasons to be despicable. The third possible reason is, that the piece reflects the true opinion of the author, publishing of which I find on the very day on which those who feel an emotional attachment to Mr. Jackson have said their final ‘goodbye’ distasteful in the least.

    TIME published over the time of Mr. Jackson’s career many articles about him, and has now also put Mr. Jackson’s face on its cover, undoubtedly in each case to increase sales of its publications, including, but not limited to the advertising on its website. I find your practice to reap in the financial benefits but yet sit on the sidelines with a wagging finger criticizing how ‘gaudy’ all of this has been morally reprehensible and your obvious will to hurt the grieving ‘for a few bucks more’ disturbing.

    Which brings me back to why I think such practice will not be beneficial for TIME: As a psychiatrist I can not, considering your columnist’s vile take on this, longer see it fit to provide around the Holidays gift subscriptions to my patients for a publication which forgoes rightful criticism where appropriate and useful and puts instead a mean spirited cynicism in place.

  • http://www.dirtysouthtv.tv Dirty South TV

    They’re still bashing you James-wow?
    I stand behind my original words-nothing was said that was incorrect. Why are so many people looking to lash out at the truth when it is what most people claim they need and deserve?
    And you wrote from a matter of fact stance-not an attack stance. You wrote about the good and the bad in accurate levels with the exception of the Texas twit and the Reverend blabbermouth-You could have actually said how distasteful they were using that stage on that time of that date to brag about who they think they are and what their political party says, thinks or does. HOWEVER, the Reverend did totally save himself with his last sentence, and it was a doosey. It was so good that most people didn’t even get what he was all about before he said that last group of words.

    An interesting point that someone brought up today:
    How come some of the closest people in Michael’s everyday life were not present today? I’m sure we’ll all hear why soon, as the media will not let this settle just yet.

  • http://www.dirtysouthtv.tv Dirty South TV

    Dear James,

    I’m beginning to wonder if many of this articles readers are taking their frustrations of Joe Jackson’s actions out on you? I wonder if they even know?

  • gomezpumpkinandmichaeljackson

    I just got three new kittens just 4 weeks old. I named one Michael Jackson.

  • jackie2000

    **~TO ALL COMMENTORS~**:
    Please go directly to TIME magazine and register your complaints about this complete egomaniacal, disgusting, vile creature.

    here’s why — this horrible excuse for a human being is actually on his twitter — BRAGGING about how many of us got DUPED into linking over from CNN and are commenting about his “article.”
    He actually uses the word “retard” on twitter — so we know he is not only a racist, but an equal opportunity-bigot!!!!!
    What a disgrace!!!!!

    I want to say so much more, but out of respect for Michael Jackson and his quiet, loving, peaceful demeanor and message — I am rapping my knuckles to keep from continuing on.

    PLEASE, PLEASE CONTACT TIME DIRECTLY!!
    Let’s get this beyound insensitive — but clearly horrible writer with terrible judgement OFF TIME’s payroll.

    Here are his quotes from Twitter:

    “Signs CNN linked my MJ piece: (1) Traffic skyrockets; (2) Comments fill up with: “James you are retard who needs to go to hell!!!!!!!!!!!”

    btw…his
    bio profile claims he is an “inept gardener” — We know he has that backwards…he is an “inept blogger/writer”.
    He also admits to be a “coin collector”…hahahahaha! okay — we KNOW what his problem is. LOL!

  • jackie2000

    Some choice selections from this scum’s twitter:

    “Perched in a crescent moon”… I’m sorry, but now I have to picture MJ as the Dreamworks logo?

    (yea…he’s actually making fun of one of the most poignant moments of the memorial…brooke shield’s tearful ending — BEAUTIFUL, GORGEOUS PROSE!!!!!!! I am beyond angry at this person!! His writing is like a snotty 1st grader, except all the 1st graders I know are far too intelligent for this kind of trash)

    Here’s another:

    “Wrong song choices, Susan Boyle. Advantage Jafargholi.”

    (referring to the young boy from England who sang his touching song – now he’s making a mockery of that!! DISGUSTING!!)

    and this:

    “Are they tying this final performance into a call for charity (as with USA For Africa)?”

    AGAIN – PLEASE CONTACT TIME DIRECTLY — AND LET THEM KNOW YOUR FEELINGS ABOUT THIS UNPROFESSIONAL AND OUTRAGEOUS BEHAVIOR!

  • jackie2000

    EMAIL YOUR COMPLAINTS TO THE EDITOR:

    letters@time.com

    THAT IS THE ADDRESS TO TIME’S EDITOR.
    This guy has GOT to go….bragging about how many “Hits” he’s getting from CNN because of the use of the word “Gaudy” in the
    headline is the lowest of the low. So, this is great evidence
    he’s writing inflammatory words just to see if he can get “hits”
    from the CNN link.
    For a story of a deceased man’s memorial service?
    How naive of me not to realize that a person could actually stoop that low….but he clearly has dug himself a deep enough of a hole to get that low – like record-breaking low.

    Please let TIME magazine know that you will NOT be answering their constant solitications in the mail for money/subscriptions.
    I prefer to get my news and analysis from real journalists — and this is not an example of something worth paying for.
    Trash never is.

  • jackie2000

    This guy shouldn’t get too excited on his twitter about people linking over from CNN….

    I also read from the same CNN page link:

    “Brief History of Toilet Paper
    Role of the roll
    MENTAL FLOSS
    Role of the roll

    Learn how toilet tissue became a $6 billion industry in the United States”

    That story was far better and informative than this bloggers load of crap…speaking of which….

    I think I’ve just found a new role for the next roll….TIME magazine!

  • msbizzybod3

    First, you should be ashamed of yourself and the way you used this moment to spot out everything “you” thought was unacceptable. Michael was someone that you will never be, respected by many. “TIME” this is a pitiful display of jouralism. Why won’t people just give him peace. And James, you should hope that when your day comes people will respect you as much as I and others have true repect for Michael. One last note, if you continue to write trash like this you might want to start looking for a new career. Sad…

  • panda2526

    First of all congrats to all those with their heads and lives based on reality and IN reality…it was refreshing to read THOSE comments,(umustbekiddingme2, beauhanks, b.a.m., miranda444, etc.) unlike the others (Jackie2000, I think you need to stop being a hypocrite) who take one man’s opinion and lynch mob him for it. THOSE comments left me feeling quite unsettled and less confident of humanity than ever before, NOT the article’s comments. MJ WAS JUST A MAN, regardless of how we individually feel about his lifestyle and choices. People are treating him like he was a god, and what does it matter? In the whole scheme of things, what is it going to change in OUR lives? He was nothing to us other than a image on tv or a note on the radio, we were and ARE nothing to him. Where are the blogs stating outrage and disgust for the children brutalized, murdered, raped, beaten, molested by every manner of person in position of power? What of the children and others killed by drunk drivers every day, and the celebrities that get caught DUI? What of people starving by the thousands? What of innocent people being killed by bombs and terrorists? What of elderly being forgotten and neglected and abused and dying alone and scared? Where is the outrage about the men and women looked up to in entertainment and sports that are bad role-models for the children of the world, including my children? He was a MAN, another man who was in the spotlight and who did not always use his “power” for the good, and now is being immortalized. There are so many thousands that die each moment of each day that are good and decent and powerful in their own way in how they touched the world that we need to pay tribute to in a dignified and genuine way. Not as a self-serving spectacle. I could say more, there are no words to describe my sorrow, not for MJ but for the people left behind that are just angry and bitter and disrespectful to another human because they do not agree with his opinion. One can disagree with another without shaming and disgracing oneself and doing the very thing they are accusing the other person of, and MUCH, MUCH worse. Micheal Jackson is not worth lowering yourself to that level. You act as though you knew him personally, like somehow it makes you somebody because you jump on a “defend MJ” bandwagon. If you could only hear how ridiculous you sound!

  • panda2526

    Jackie2000…I am beginning to really take offense to YOUR writing’s no, not beginning to, STILL. You talk about (among other things) black people taking part in “traditional white religions (the matriarch of the Jackson family being a JEHOVAH’S witness, not the incorrect way YOU spelled it…and it also seems with those statements you are declaring yourself an uninformed and uneducated small-minded individual. I am not attempting to name-call as you so clearly cannot contain in yourself, however, perhaps you should just base your comments on facts and not suppositions. Where DO you get your information from? I am astounded at your lack of good judgement. Not doing yourself any favors here. You are quickly losing any credibility you may have started with.

  • jackie2000

    panda2526 Says: (or is it “pandering to?”) — you obviously didn’t read the comments you are singling people out for.

    We very clearly stated, MJ himself stated many times, he was merely a man — just like all of us.
    His gift was from God and he was merely the vessel.
    So before you go on your long diatribe – please actually read our comments.
    NO ONE is “treating” him or thinks MJ was a “God”….but we do acknowledge….as he did…his God-given talents.

    We are not on a bandwagon — we each explained how we did our OWN research — read, listened to his words and those of his closest friends and confidants — did YOU?
    We have INFORMED opinions…but anyone with half a brain can clearly see that the bloggers comments were NOT informed at all.

    While he’s supposed to be paying attention to the service, he was gleefully posting all sorts of racist, biggoted comments on his twitter account.
    we can agree to disagree — but I will remain on the side of human decency and INFORMED opinions based on facts and proper research, not some guy who collects coins in his mother’s basement and shuns facts and easily accesible information.

    and whoa sister…one crisis at a time…okay?
    only so many hours in the day…don’t worry…every outrage gets its due. right now…this one is getting its fair share.

  • jackie2000

    panda…information is often common knowledge.
    you have access to a computer — please do your own research.

    JW’s have a history of “equality” and over many decades, have attracted people from ALL ethnic backgrounds.
    You have a problem with that??

    I don’t need your approval…as you clearly have your facts twisted and are more interested in a typo than facts.
    But I’m also not here to debate. the facts, when you do your own research, will speak for themselves.
    you will learn the origins of the religion (my hometown and state), who started the religion, the split, the doctrine and it’s inclusion of many backgrounds, which especially led this intially and yes, traditionally white religion to include ALL colors and creeds and gain quite a large african-american following – especially mid-century.

    but please…do you own research. You will learn some wonderful facts.

  • panda2526

    Excuse me…I never realized your opinions were so based on facts, which facts are those??? I HAVE read all the comments, and yours in particular are lifeless and have no meaning. How do you know what you are reading is true, all your so-called research? I am amazed you even respond and further prove my point, you need to get a life and leave MJ alone. You never knew him, and you never will. You lack human decency with all the childish namecalling you engage in, although you claim such. And put this “crisis” in it’s proper place…there are WAy more important things to be getting yourself upset about than some guy writing an article that only stated his personal observation based on his personal experiences and feelings. GET REAL!!! As far as diatribes, take a look in the mirror and then look behind the mirror, (maybe there’s a man there!!!)

  • stephanieg206

    Even though Michael Jackson has been a source of terrible accusations, focus on the positive. The sarcasm, tastelessness for such a well-respected magazine is real surprising. While being controversial on issues is important to a news source, this article really went overboard. What else does your magazine publish that is out of line? Shame on you Time, you’ve lost a lot of readers over this article. If the writer feeds on this negativity, he should be fired.

  • 1bighuskerfan

    Wow, what a comment to make “gaudy”. I thought the service was very well done. I expected something very over the top, but I was suprised. I have lost respect for Time, when they interject personal feelings into there writings. Shame on you to call the service “gaudy”
    I feel your writing is “gaudy”

  • panda2526

    Like I said, Jackie 2000, you can’t beleive everything you read of and you never know who you are talking to, so therefore, you are unaware that you ARE speaking out of hand. I am well aware of the true facts of the JW religion and my comment has nothing to do with anything other than the fact that you spelled it incorrectly and I was making a point that you are making gross statements you have NO idea are true or not, which is laughable, other than all the “research” you do. Other than that, I find it offensive that you elevate yourself to the level of all-knowing and the rest of us uneducated buffoons. What a waste of time. I never blog for exactly this reason. People like you.

  • panda2526

    People, people he’s a CRITIC!!!! for heaven’s sake!!! It’s OK for him to write a piece that is slightly devoid of spirit and and feeling. He accomplished exactly what he set out to do, get people to read his opinion and for them to magically…express theirs!!!!!!

  • elaine814

    oh geez panda, please give it a rest.
    those comments from char, baybio, jackie, miranda and the rest are on point.
    (and you go off on a typo? those facts about Jehovah’s Witnesses – did I spell it alright for you? – are right on. I have family that are Jehovah’s Witnesses and I happen to know that Jackie is right on with her comments)
    You are the one showing ignorance for even going there.

    The comments are about the blogger and how obviously uneducated and ill-informed he is about funerals, of any sort, evidently.
    Not to mention, his comments are not opinions formed out of some rational or factual basis, but random bias and blurbs vomited onto his keypad to get “hits” from what I’m reading and witnessing.

    Anyone can do that. Use “catch” words to get people to link over.
    That requires no imagination, talent or writing skill.
    But it does require an evil, insensitive mind and that has no place in TIME magazine.
    His purpose shouldn’t be to get “hits” or links over from CNN.
    It should be to provide a thoughtful, informed opinion.
    Clearly, from the majority of intelligent responses on here, he did not.
    I will be adding my comments to that letter to the editor link, thank you.

  • gdanie02

    I find it very offensive and tacky James, that you would post this article on the day of Michael Jackson memorial. Have you ever heard of a little respect, not only for Michael Jackson himself, but for his family as well. You covered every aspect of the memorial and I thought that was very well done, but it could have been done without all of the negative, sarcastic, and unsympathetic. Let’s not forget that this is a person. Michael Jackson was not just an entertainer, but first he was a person. Think about if this article was written about you on the day of your memorial or better yet…replace Michael Jackson’s name with your mother’s or father’s name and reread the article that you wrote. How does that make you feel? I USED to love reading time magazine and would even give subscriptions of it for Christmas, but now that I see how Time really works…I don’t think that I will ever read another issue, article, or post. At some point you have to realize when enough is enough…and this is far past enough. It is simply disgraceful.

  • ajjl57

    You people who are giving Mr. Poniewozik a hard time are as crazy as MJ was. Yes Michael Jackson’s music was great but he was what he was, a public person who lived a VERY strange life. The memorial was appropriate for the person it memorialized. Now enough already no more about MJ!

  • remford

    The only things I’ve found to be more of an inexplicable spectacle than the memorial itself has been the litany of ludicrous responses from those who seem to believe that Michael Jackson was somehow more important a person than the entertainer he was, his many “eccentricities” were not bizarre or unusual by even the most extreme definition of those terms, and that nobody is entitled to any opinion of Michael Jackson or the memorial proceedings that isn’t wholly and exclusively positive and full of admiration, especially from an editorial journalist whose job, by definition, is to express an opinion.

    Most bizarre (and pathetic) of all are those who have elevated Michael Jackson to the epitome of tolerance and ideal social values while, at the same time, showing so much overt intolerance for anyone expressing an opinion of or about Michael Jackson that differs from their own. Combined with what can only be described as what seems like a delusional sense that these “supporters” (fans) actually “knew” Michael Jackson on any sort of personal basis shows the extent to which society has devolved into a world where fantasy and celebrity reign supreme rather than the fundamental values and participation in the surrounding world society requires to function.

    My first impression, made only seconds after changing the channel to the “coverage”, was made by the hearse traversing the empty Los Angeles freeways. It immediately transported me back to the 1994 “slow speed chase” that seemed to be one of the many “turning points” in society’s sick fascination with the bizarre. It had nothing to do with any sentiment I may or may not have with respect to Michael Jackson, it is a simple statement of fact that only prefaced the surreal events to follow.

    Though the grief expressed by those paying tribute was undoubtedly since, it brought full-circle the strange and unusual life of this man who seemed to never quite reconcile his loathing the spotlight that afforded him his lifestyle and what seemed like some pathological inability to avoid it as this talented entertainer’s (he was neither less nor more than that) behavior grew increasingly unusual.

  • ajjl57

    Not everyone has class. And not everyone knows “gaudy” when they see it. This memorial was qaudy.

  • loopyvon

    Unbelievable! Thought you wrote a great, fair article there – I’m amazed at how many people see only negativeness. Well written, thanks!

  • kayinga

    A lot of people have their opinion of Michael Jackson. I cannot say he was a child molester because frankly there was no DNA evidence to support it. I do remember reading an article a few days ago about the first accuser in 1993 and he recanted.
    I thought the memorial service was done in taste and for what is was worth, I was fully impressed.
    Maybe Mariah Carey was hoarse and maybe some of the singers sung off key, but they were in mourning. It seemed heartfelt and real.

    A lot of people try and portray this man as a monster and say he is not worth printing anything about. This man had to live in the public eye and his every single move was scrutinized and analyzed by the public and media. So of course his death was going to have major coverage.

    To all of the people that are calling him a pedophile/ molester, I do not seeing you saying anything about ELVIS. He was screwing around with Priscilla when she was very young and yet, every year America celebrates the “KING”

    I think the author of this story was out of line. However, our constitution says he has the right to say what he wants. People like us that are responding to his crap, is only making the matter worse.

  • freedom555

    Thank goodness the tribute show was over. Now they can finally get to work on important stuff like his pyramid and burial chamber. Should be a great attraction at Neverland – do you think $49.95 for admission is too much? After all, MJ still has an extended family to support…

  • nodramapls

    Do you always critic memorial services?
    It was a memorial service. We either watched or didn’t…let it go.

  • sleachshoe

    I for one, liked your article. Your job as a journalist is to give analysis and perspective. I enjoyed your piece. As for those people who commented that it was not OBJECTIVE enough, I disagree. You were very objective in your observations. I suppose it would have been far easier to write a fluff piece that made all of these whiny people happy, but I am glad that you didn’t. People seem to be offended most by the word “gaudy”, but this ceremony was nothing if not that. (I am sorry, but any event with a star studded lineup and an F-ing GOLD PLATED casket is nothing if not gaudy)Please ignore all of these whiny B-tches.

  • tchiynaedu

    I guess it was Oscar Wilde who said that “nearly everyone can sympthasize with the sufferings of a friend but it takes a very fine nature to sympathsize with a friend’s success”. That saying rings true here since you did not display the decency to acknowledge the many good deeds of this elaborately gifted, multi-talented and well-liked individual even in his death. Your article, to say the least, smacks of objectivity and professionalism in its comparism to the OJ motorcade on the LA freeway. The decent people of this world demand an unreserved apology from you. I sense your need for “appetitus divitarum infinitum” in the journalistic realm. Too bad. You are in the same league as that shameless Representative (I guess his name is King, what an ironic name) who tried to demonize the greatest entertainer of all time. Didn’t you hear Barry Gordon say that?

  • jamu2009

    To dirty south tv: This is the year 2009 don’t you think its time to take of the white hood.

  • redrose856

    I am not a blogger, but I had to take some of my valuable time and create an account in order to express my distaste for JP’s opinion in this article. Michael Jackson was a great entertainer. We don’t know much about his personal pain. But it must have ben immense. He was driven by racial prejudice in this country to change the color of his skin, even with all of his success and wealth. It makes me wonder how much hate-mail he must’ve endured. The casket was not gaudy. It was lovely and I am glad that he was there for me to see one last time before he was laid to rest. And I have no idea HOW you could possibly compare his stately funeral procession to a mad crimnal chase. I understand even more now, Michael, why you tried to eradicate the color of your skin. This writer is so unsophisticated that he has tipped us off to his obvious racial prejudice by comparing a funeral procession to a criminal chase just b/c there involved an African-American man in both instances. We are an extremely prejudiced nation. Rest in peace, Michael.

  • chuckb666

    Apart from the debatable use of the term “gaudy”, this editorial is absolutely correct in its description of a reality that some people do not seem able to accept. When I first read this article, I was amazed that someone described so closely what I felt yesterday while watching the MJ memorial. I am myself a Michael Jackson fan and I have a huge amount of respect for him and his family. But that does not mean I am going to pretend there was nothing strange about this event or that any criticism of MJ should somehow be made almost illegal.

  • khanhcasa

    Tasteless for Time to release this article during a Memorial. Poniewozik, shouldn’t you be working for one of those “cheesy” newspaper like, “The Enquirer”?!?!

  • jammor

    To James Poniewozik: I am a 51 year old white, upper middle class, male that grew up idolizing Michael Jackson. Is the only way you can keep your job is to bait readers by being racist and inhumane? You are an idiot and I would not hire you. I just remembered why I do not like to read Time. I made the mistake of giving Time another chance by reading your ignorant article. I hope you do not have children that you teach your ignorance to. God bless Michael’s children and I pray that they are protected from evil people like yourself until they are old enough to protect themselves. I also pray that you set an example, as a journalist, and learn to treat your fellow humans better through your writings. Peace be with you.

  • 8barbarahicks

    I am sorry for you because you obviously are a horribly miserable person. Michael was a special person, it took mean people with vicious lies to cause his life pain. He was something that you will never be kind, generous, loving to all. His talent was something that no one will ever be able to touch. No matter how mean the public is he will live forever, in our hearts, without your approval.

  • vejones

    What’s guady is the Freak died $400 MILLION in debt, and the family puts him in a $25,000.00 casket ??? yup, guady !!
    And as far as what the ol Rev Sharpton said ” Michael wasn’t strange…he had to deal with strange”…well, Old Man Sharpton is at the top of THAT LIST !

  • vejones

    8barbarahicks Says:
    Wednesday, July 8, 2009 at 8:29 am
    I am sorry for you because you obviously are a horribly miserable person. Michael was a special person, it took mean people with vicious lies to cause his life pain. He was something that you will never be kind, generous, loving to all. His talent was something that no one will ever be able to touch. No matter how mean the public is he will live forever, in our hearts, without your approval
    _____________________

    oh, yeah…it’s ALWAYS someone else’s fault !! how typical is THAT!!! Yeah, poor little Mikey, dangling his kid over the balcony…that was someone’s else’s doing, right ? Someone had a knife to his throat, right ? Last night on 20/20, Debbie Rowe said that “that’s normal behavior”…she’s as big a freak as HE IS ! (oh, WAS!)

  • onlytoreply

    I had to create an account just so I could defend Mr. Poniewozik and his article.Clearly the negative posts are from ardent fans of Michael Jackson who are, understandably, sensitive at a time like this. If they were able to look at this article objectively, they could see it is completely accurate and honest reporting. Yes, it was gaudy. The man is in a GOLD coffin, people! This isn’t ancient Egypt. And yes, it was a spectacle. President’s lying in state didn’t receive this much coverage. Unless Michael was a relative or close personal friend of yours, you need to find a little perspective here. There was nothing said directly about him that wasn’t positive, It was entirely based on the event and the coverage it received. I hope Mr. Poniewozik continues to write as he sees it and ignores the closed-minded hatred this article has elicited. I am now a fan. Thank you, James.

  • kdh2011

    These comments are astounding. James, should write another post, using cryptic code words to not draw in Jackson-avengers, so that the regulars can discuss the comments here. I don’t have time to read all the comments (I know breaking one of Sepinwall’s rules for commenting, but c’mon. It’s 7 pages long and mostly repetitive), so if you could select some of the choicest comments posted here and rerun them it would bring me great joy.

  • kdh2011

    These comments are astounding. James should write another post, using cryptic code words to not draw in Jackson-avengers, so that the regulars can discuss the comments here. I don’t have time to read all the comments (I know breaking one of Sepinwall’s rules for commenting, but c’mon. It’s 7 pages long and mostly repetitive), so if you could select some of the choicest comments posted here and rerun them it would bring me great joy.

  • gra98gra

    The most moving time event is when his daughter took stage.
    I hope that she will be able to overcome her sadness
    http://familyigloo.com

  • quietstormx

    I watched and recorded on ABC but I turned to CNN because of all the talking between parts with Gibson. I found Memorial just right not gaudy. It brought and made everyone see and hear most of what HE has done in his short life. People that really, really knew Michael let all of who didn’t. Los Angeles police went overboard closing a highway. I understand they have to keep order whith all the news media camping out at the Jacksons Home… On TV all I saw mostly were police standing around talking in groups of 3 or 5. I think LA police should pay for standing around and charge the news media for being unrully with the trucks. Michael Jackson was sent off right yesterday. He would have been proud of his Family.

  • http://www.bookhopping.wordpress.com Molly

    @kdh2011 — Yeah, I didn’t get through them all either, but it only takes a quick glance to see which commenters aren’t exactly regular TunedIn readers. It seems that not everyone understands this is a commentary on the media surrounding the event, rather than a personal vendetta against Jackson.

  • shortyduke

    I can’t understand for the life of me… why I had to sign up for an account to give my say!
    Gaudy… you could have saved your comments for the slow & mentally challenged friends that you must have. “Time” is making money off of Michael’s death & they allow this to be printed. I thought the casket was in great taste… fitting ONLY for The King. You need to get a life and hope that the next person that passes away (that you know) would have half of the Send Off that was afforded to Michael. May you own Home Life come together… cause it’s obvious that you are a miserable Little Man!
    RIP MJ!

  • rhenson

    People like you have to get their last jab in! …

    Your article is ‘nice-nasty!’ … underlined with sarcasm … Marlon Jackson said it best — ‘Maybe now, Michael, they will leave you alone.’

    We can only hope…

  • tsedwards

    You obviously weren’t a fan of MJ; neither was I. I did not listen to his music, watch his vidios, follow him, but as I watch back at his life now I see how talented and remarkable a person he really was. He never had a chance to EVER be a kid and for that my heart breaks for him. I watched a small portion of the memeorial (wished I could have watched it all) and was blown away with the sincerity of it all. I did not like nor do I respect Rev. Al Sharpton and feel most his comments were out of line and unneccessary. My heart goes out for his children and family. The memorial was BEAUTIFUL and not tasteless at all; exactly the way it should have been. Shame on you for being so negative!! Are you jealous??

  • virtuousbelle

    While some statements/descriptions were correct, the GAUDY comment was not. This celebration of Mr. Jackson’s life was not gaudy or one last strange, showy public display. The family memorialized an outstanding artist and entertainer who has changed pop music. Your personal comments were unnecessary and quite offensive to some people. Please be considerate to the fact that this is a memorial of someones life.

  • webrouzer

    To all the haters: the author did not bash anyone. He gave facts. MJ was NOT a good person, his music was scarcely even played on the radio anymore, his only reason for this final tour was to get out of debt. He let his NEVERLAND ranch go into foreclosure, his animals were starving, he never paid his bills, remember Dubai? He had a deal with the prince, got his money in advance, and simply walked away. Yeah, he is bad alright. He admitted to sleeping with young boys, in the same bed, in their underwear, that is sick. He admitted to giving young boys alcohol. He admitted to giving the young boys pornography. Is that OK with you? it is not with me, I would have severely hurt him if he had admitted that much with my child. No lawsuit necessary. Where were his friends while he was taking over 3000 dollars worth of drugs every month? Brooke Shields gave some tears and talked about what a friend he was, because there was no sexual attraction from either one. hmmmm…. Brooke Shields…..no attraction? I guess she did not look enough Mcauly Caulken. She admitted that she had not seen him since 1991. That sounds like a good friend, “Hey let’s meet every 18 years, or so”.
    Michael Jackson was damn lucky he did not go to prison.
    Those are NOT his children, a black man cannot have white children. They can be 1/2 black, and these are not.
    Another thing….why are the blacks so eager to stand up for him? He did everything in his power to look white.
    Good riddance to bad rubbish.
    Have a great day :-)

  • adrenalink

    I watched part of the ceremony, and I have to say that I found it a bit “indiscreet”. I think the whole thing should have been more private.
    It was ok to commemorate a great entertainer on TV, but it should have been done at a later time, perhaps in the occasion of his birthday. The funeral was not the best stage to hear some of the speeches I heard, or the for the performers to show off.
    I thought that apart from the lovely Paris, everybody else there forgot that there was a dead body on stage. The attempt to “sanitize” Jackson’s death was almost offensive, for they were almost negating his passing and focus entirely on his successful career.
    But this is a man who also lived a very tragic life. He was a whole person, not just an attraction. He too was a human being.
    A little more respect would not have hurt.

  • lisasymone

    This article is lacking the depth and integrity your magazine has been known for. The most satisfying thing that can happen, that will satisfy the millions of fans still mourning one of the greatest entertainers of our time is that Mr. Poniewozik find himself in the unemployment line. FIRE HIM! For he has shown with one article his has some issues that run much deeper than anything Michael ever did.

    I hope you do the right thing, or I fear TWITTER will be used to it’s full force to rise up against TIME, and shut you down. Completely.

    Good Day to you. In the age of TWITTER, FACEBOOK, MYSPACE, and YouTube why mess with this generation who loved this man so much? Remove the article or face the wrath of the internet.

  • uriah2008

    “in a gaudy if closed coffin, was one last strange, showy public display for the star”

    It’s all relative. Report the story, don’t interject your opinion.

  • webrouzer

    lisasymone you are weak, trying to threaten him with the Internet??
    Michael Jackson was a pervert, the world is a better place now. Nobody really cared about him when he was alive and taking drugs. This will take years for the attorneys to get his money.

  • webrouzer

    ¿

  • adrenalink

    I am just going to add that such an extensive media coverage of a funeral, albeit one of a celebrity, possibly indicates that the US economy is going really badly.
    There are more important things going on for the country at the moment, one being the G8 summit in Italy which will determine the direction of the world’s politics, but these really important events have received very little media attention.
    They don’t want us to know we’ll all be screwed.

  • http://www.gordon-ryan.com triplecoil

    From the Oxford English Dictionary: Gaudy – extravagantly bright or showy.

    Seems to be a pretty accurate word in this context.

  • williemannreed

    You are so smart. It was a funeral where was the body supposed to be.

  • xandercrews

    Jesus James. Reading some of the comments made me think you strangled MJ yourself and used the pills as a cover story. Thought this was a pretty balanced well done critique of the memorial service, I wasn’t able to watch it but it sounds pretty accurate. I understand the Golden Coffin (King of Pop blah blah) but I would have to say that’s pretty gaudy. Keep it up James, love your blog always found it to be entertaining and accurate.

  • shara says

    Holy freaking crap. I enjoyed the post, people seem to be seriously missing the point – examining the media angle of the event in a blog post. Don’t let the bastards get ya down, James :)

  • olderlady57

    Finally, a reporter that makes no hesitation making an honest article on the facts. This was in no way harmful to anyone because many who read it will relate to it. The only thing I would have mentioned had I been reporting on the “memorial” was how disrespectful the people in the arena were when they were yelling out during the service. I hate to see the death of one so young when there was so much that could have been done to help him before his life ended so tragically. Such as, having him go to therepy when he was thrust into the limelight and his childhood taken away from him. This it would seem could have helped him cope with the price of stardom.

  • llovejoy

    I have held the Time to a higher standard than you protrayed in this article. As a reporter(commentator or however you wish to be addressed)you should leave all biased, prejudice and critical comments out and just report the news and allow the public(that is if you deem us smart enough)to reach our own conclusion. It seems that you as reporters seems to think that it is your job to tell us how to feel about an issue, when it is simply you being allowed the trusted priviledge to obtain entrance into places and lives that we can not to give us an inside view of the event NOT to tell us how to feel about it! Gee, get a life why dont you? It seems that the media is filled with low self esteemed,opinionated, disgrunts! Who cares what you think? Who cares what I think? Just do your job and REPORT!

  • webrouzer

    Remember when Michael and his lovely wife said that he never had any surgery, except for his tonsils, so he could hit the high note?

    pure BS, but you all knew that right? He said that he changed because he went through puberty. hmmm…cheek implant, chin implant, damn near cut his nose off, scalp work….white woman hair, lips altered and colored red…skin…snow white. Nope nothing wrong here.

    HE WAS A FREAK, DRUG DEPENDENT, CHILD MOLESTER
    :-)

  • thissceptredisle

    I think this BBC website article hit the right note:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8139678.stm

  • keyboreds

    All you people slamming the author are really over the top. In my opinion he wrote a fair and balanced article. Simply because someone has died does not mean that they can only be remembered as perfect in life. Surely you wouldn’t apply that standard to convicted criminals. Jackson was a talented artist and I enjoyed his music. He was also a fantastic philanthropist who did a great deal of positive work in the world. However, that does not mean we should all pretend to be be blind to the glaring negatives of the man, nor to the flagrant commercialism of the spectacle of his “memorial.” I have no problem with the memorial, but please see it for what it is.. a public display by a cast of “celebrities” who wish to endlessly draw attention to themselves and which I am sure is propelling the sales of all of their records to new heights.

    And one last thing.. all of you slamming the use of the word “Gaudy” are implying that it is a negative term, which I am sure would deeply offend the family of the deceased masterful Spanish architect Antonio Gaudi whose name and style were the origin of the word. Please show some respect to the dead, will you?

  • ashton51

    Spectacle? Gaudy? I don’t think so. There seemed to be a sharp undertone of sarcasm and cynicism throughout this article. Shame on you JP, for writing this insensitve filth about such a beautiful person who has only helped people, and never harmed a sole. Accused, but only for the accusers personal gain. This makes me lose all respect for your magazine. The media are the only ones to blame for painting MJ in such a negative fashion. I don’t think they had/have a clue as to what an outstanding and giving individual he really was. Although, most intellengent people no better than to pay any attention to the media lies that are told on a daily basis only to get more viewers and magazines sold.

  • http://poeticgrin.wordpress.com poeticgrin

    This piece is sarcastic, bitter, and biased. By my count there were 15 negative comments… the worst of which was the OJ reference. Complete trash.

  • kirtlandpat

    There is nothing the least bit offensive or inaccurate about this article. Considering the family all wore sunglasses, sequined gloves(one each, of course) and imitation MJ costumes, they were begging for the hatchet. This article respectfully leaves them alone.

  • cynsation

    James, I don’t know why you felt compelled to write such a negative article/opinion of the memorial service. I’m so TIRED of all the haters speaking and writing negative comments since Michael’s death. This is the lowest level of journalism that I’ve ever seen! Things have been said and written as if it’s fact when it isn’t. Irresponsible journalism. The service was not a spectacle nor was it gaudy. Do you know a King represents royalty and a gold casket was appropriate. Did you see the cathedral in Moscow where the President was speaking? I guess that was also gaudy! The last two paragraphs in your article was all you needed to say. You have obviously never been to an African American funeral. I guess the new journalism is to say anything negative than to say nothing at all. You are all hipocrites! I guess you got what you wanted…the most comments you’ve had all year, thanks to Michael!

  • robinwg1

    Are you kidding me? What poor taste! This was a very famous and loved person’s memorial, and you have the audacity to berate his family and fans?? Even to the point that you compare the funeral processional to an O.J. chase?? Who are you to say what a memorial service should look like? From the sounds of it, you don’t even like or appreciate the art of Michael Jackson, nor can you relate to how much this ONE MAN really DID change society as we know it. I remember having an MJ poster in my bedroom and my grandfather asking me why I had a poster of an “n” on my wall?! Now, I have a biracial child who doesn’t have to deal with that nonsense!! Clearly, MJ’s influence is far from your comprehension. Pretty ballsy move to criticize a funeral…any way you slice it. Regardless of how you feel about the man, his family, and his music, again, VERY POOR TASTE.

  • nicci123

    Dear Editor,

    I am mostly offended by Mr. James Poniewozik’s article and recap of Michael Jackson’s memorial service!

    Time should not loose all respect by the lack of intelligence, class and sophistication of this writter by which standards are most of your readers are accustomed to reading from Time.

    Let me point out what was so tasteless:

    1. “Fitting too, that his farewell ceremony should be a gaudy public spectacle”
    2. “since he seemed most comfortable engaging the world through spectacle.”
    3. But for about a minute, not knowing whether to jump in, the networks fell silent–a blessed rest”
    4. “Big-network anchors are usually more driven to justify their presence by talking, and Katie Couric and Charles Gibson, in particular, could not still themselves in between performances and speakers.”
    5. “plunging cleavage and hand gestures”
    6. “In a way, the spectacle”
    7. “letting KFC give Staples a run for its product-placement money”
    8. “gauzy primetime TV specials”
    9. “Was there hyperbole? Sure.”
    10. “(It being a memorial, obviously, no one was there to offer a rebuttal.)”
    11. “Placing Jackson’s body in front of center stage, in a gaudy if closed coffin, was one last strange, showy public display”
    12. “being pan-racial in affect—the music—and several speeches framed him as a more specifically African-American icon ”
    13. “the slo-mo funeral procession —overtones of the O.J. chase.”

    If I have to expalin what was wrong with each line above, then you have bigger judgment problems than I thought.

    How did this get approved for print? Disgusting tasteless judgment on the behalf of Time! You’ve lost another fan of your circulation

    Respectfully

    Nicole Payne

  • xlr8te

    Gaudy? Hardly. Any normal person would be pleased and moved at receiving such a righteous heartfelt send off. I suspect you have a hidden agenda .

  • sambhav7

    Please leave Michael alone at least now…

    You need to grow up…How much popularity he has all over the world, it will take you 7 re births to attain it..hahah.. Nw, Suck that up!!

  • enevola

    Anyone can see that you were coyly trying to bury your nasty, snide comments about the way the Jackson family decided to honor Michael in front of his fans worldwide. How they choose to send off their beloved son/brother/father is not for you to describe. One only hopes that when your time comes, your family will send you off in a large shoe box covered in brown wrapping paper.

    The definition of “GAUDY” includes something done in a tasteless or vulgar manner.

    I suggest that YOU are the GAUDY TASTELESS one.

  • cynsation

    To webrouzer, you are an idiot! You need to go and learn the history of black people. A black man’s seed can create a white child. There are plenty of cases. A couple in England had 2 sets of twins, one black and one white in both cases. Every nasty word you said about Michael you will be held accountable for. I’m glad that God is the ONLY true judge! When you go to Hell, don’t be surprised when you don’t see Michael there. You and James will probably be roommates. Don’t bother responding, I’m done reading such ignorant comments!

  • scarlettmocha

    This article is strange, gaudy and moving. It is a perfect example of what pisses black people off so badly. We see something one way, but whites who control the media report it another way. The memorial ceremony was appropriate and beautifully done (thank you Mr. Erlich (name/sp)). And the person who wrote this article is out of touch if they saw it any other way. I refer to #32 and #33 and say ditto. How dare you say it was gaudy, by whose measure? Your’s?? You must be the stalest, most dried up, most boring priiick on the planet. Why don’t you leave Time and join your buddies at Fox, we don’t need you here. Time it says a lot about your perspective as well – everyone take note here and keep a watchful eye.

  • happyinva

    @ webrouze – A few quick points. 1) his music was still played, it really depends on what your musical preference is, and what station you listen to; 2) he never admitted to any of the things you alledge (sleeeping naked in the same bed, giving children alcohol, showing them porn). Those were allegations made against him, not admissions by him; 3) just b/c the children are not black does not mean they are not his children. He is listed as their father on their birth certificates and has raised them as such since their time of birth. Sounds like a father to me; and finally 4) why wouldn’t blacks, whites or others stand up for him? And for the record, at his memorial, there were more than just blacks there speaking on his behalf. At his last trial, there were many folks (black white or indifferent) that spoke on his behalf. What is with your ignorant and misinformed rant?

  • cholita1978

    Time magazine, has a MJ special edition for sale, but wasted no time in putting this article out there, wow how hipocritical, MJ was a very strange man, no one can deny that, but he was also a very talented man, when someone dies no matter who, the only thing that comes out is how good he/she was. Farrat Fawcet didn’t get that much coverage?, she didn’t need to, she put her illness on public TV out there, showing everyone how she was dying, please talk about publicity. and MJ’s kids don’t look half black, you right those are not his biological kids, but you know what? he reaised them, He is the only dad they know, so that means he is the father of those kids, leave them alone.

  • kcmom23

    Why is everyone so outraged? MJ was not a perfect person and deserves to be spoken about candidly with honesty. But this article speaks about about his memorial, not him…so there is no need for people to get so overreactive.

    Personally I enjoyed parts of the memorial but there were things that made me very sad. Why is no one questioning the decision to parade his children in front of the world like that? That was a planned decision to bring Paris front and center to ensure her father’s memory is sealed as a loving caregiver. That not 100% bad but how many memorials have you been to where the children spoke? None…because that is cruel to do to them.

  • vnova

    Poniewojohovitz or whatever your name is…where else does a coffin generally go except in the centre of the venue. On many occasions, coffins are covered in flowers. Duh. Ever been to a memorial service? Why do you feel compelled to say that it’s “strange and showy?” You’re really scraping the bottom in your obvious attempts to be controversial. Do you get paid for doing this because your writing is distasteful in it’s smugness, sarcasm and insincerity. I agree with most of the people who have expressed similar sentiments here. I will not read your crap again.

  • dpminor

    I believe that Time is truly one of the most respectable and credible news sources available in today’s market. But I must say, what a poor choice of text to be published by Time, who is generally more approriate when covering the passing of another human being. This article was completely distasteful and the far reaching sarcasm was utterly unappreciated. I do hope to see better journalism Time and especially Mr. Poniewozik.

  • tgriff1

    I encourage all of you who are offended by this AWFUL, DISRESPECTFUL article, to BOYCOTT the Michael Jackson Commemorative Edition of Time magazine! Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but to make money from a person’s memomory and then show such disrespect is beyond HYPOCRITICAL!!!!!! Furthermore, Mr. Poniewozik, that memorial service was anything but gaudy, it was a total class act!

    EVERYONE PLEASE BOYCOTT TIME MAGAZINE-DO NOT BUY THE MICHAEL JACKSON COMMEMORATIVE EDITION!!!

  • inwashingtondc

    I can’t believe how many people have responded to this article negatively. I have seen far more damning articles than this one written in the past day or two. I actually believe that this piece was, if anything, too mild.

    Yes, I watched the spectacle that was the MJ memorial. (Although watched is a rather loose term as I mostly had it on in the background.) And wile I appreciate what they were going for, I feel that the event was rather tacky and some parts were even offensive. A memorial is not the place for “preaching” (can someone please explain to me why Al Sharpton is a public figure?) or hearing from political figures who seem to have an agenda all on their own.

    I also found it to be quite hypocritical given that most people seemed to laugh at MJ and roll their eyes at his strange antics while he was alive. But now that he’s gone, everyone is singing his praises.

    I will say this: I’m glad that it’s over and his family has had their moment and now, can we please move on?

  • happyinva

    @ kcmom23 – having a child speak at their parent’s memorial service is not cruel or unusual. What’s unusual is the amount of people that pretend to know all regarding how others memorialize the dead, and come across as ignorant and misinformed.

  • gottalive4him

    Leave Mr.Poniewozik alone. I think he did an amazing job. Yes MJ did a lot of great things, but he did alot of not so great things as well. MJ does not need any further attention, lets focus on the important things in our world. Yesterday was your time to pay your respects.

  • zolanderous

    For those of you that are offended by this d-bag James Poniewozik, you can find him on facebook and essentially “go to work” on him.

  • mahoganymama

    This article, though it attempts to be complimentary, is actually distasteful. There was nothing gaudy or over the top about Michael Jackson’s memorial service. This article demonstrates the gap between African American culture & the mainstream. The family and fans were reserved and dignified during the ceremony. Michael’s casket is supposed to be at his memorial service, as is the custom in the black community. It appears Michael really was blacker than anyone previously suspected! R.I.P. Michael…sleep on! We love you forever.

  • kcmom23

    Wow…so I’m ignorant and uninformed because I care about children and don’t care to watch them exploited by the media. Interesting. Maybe it has something to do with me having my own opinion. Seems that was part of MJ’s message. Tolerance.

  • zolanderous

    You can find James Poniewozik on Facebook ;)

    What a d-bag, like the anchors, it always has to be about the writer and his smug opinion.

  • gr8martini

    At first all these criticisms of the article made me chuckle – such outrage over what I thought was a pretty harmless commentary. After reading about 30 of them I’m confused. As a Canadian, I laugh when Americans talk about freedom of speech. People are “stunned”, “amazed”, and “disgusted” that a writer would dare editorialize on a staged media event like Michael Jackson’s funeral? It feels like the same tone when journalists dared question the U.S. governments reaction to 9-11. Many lost their jobs (including Bill Maher), and it wasn’t their bosses who fired them; it was indignant, ignorant masses like the people who wrote in demanding the head of the author of this article. Land of the free? Only if you follow the mob.

  • valleyvoice1

    Ok with the written coverage of this article until the writer’s true colors emerged when he/she compared this event to “the slo-mo funeral procession to Staples, on an L.A. freeway, had unintentional overtones of the O.J. chase.” What does Michael Jackson have to do with O.J? Oh that’s right, the “media” writer’s vantage point for blacks drawing a huge diverse crowd is almost always certainly synonymous with O.J. Suggestion/demand, next time, try a more sophisticated/educated approach to your analogy like when the freeways were shut down for Regan’s funeral with a huge precession or something on those lines. Micheal we love you!

  • bignik2

    while you wrote a nice piece, your use of the word gawdy was unnecessary and seems to be a slick way of slipping in your personal feelings. I wonder if the same word would be used when describing Elvis’ funeral. I think the only difference is we have more media coverage in 2009 than in 1977.

  • valleyvoice1

    Uneasy with written coverage of this article not sure of its intentions. Then the writer’s true colors emerged when he/she compared this event to “the slo-mo funeral procession to Staples, on an L.A. freeway, had unintentional overtones of the O.J. chase.” What the “HE_ _ ” does Michael Jackson have to do with O.J? Oh that’s right, the “media” writer’s vantage point for blacks drawing a huge diverse crowd is almost always certainly synonymous with O.J. Suggestion / demand, next time, try a more sophisticated / educated approach to your analogy like when the freeways were shut down for Ronald Regan’s funeral with a huge precession or something on those lines. Micheal we love you!

  • gogreen899

    Have some decency. This is someone’s MEMORIAL you are covering, not an awards show or other red carpet event. Famous or not, he deserves to be remembered in the way his family sees fit. Gaudy? Far from it. It was an open forum for friends and family to pay tribute to someone they dearly loved. A few wreathes on a fairly normal-looking casket sounds pretty humble to me- especially for an international superstar like Michael Jackson. His family and the City of Los Angeles were nice enough to provide this final goodbye to a beloved icon. It was viewed all over the world with tearful eyes and genuine emotion. Im sure fans were delighted to get this personal glimpse into the artist’s life and communally mourn their fallen star.

    Save your sarcastic, critical, insensitive commentary for a more shallow topic.

  • venisej

    To umustbekiddingme2 there is just one little point I’d like to make. Everyone has their opinions about the service yesterday- mine was extremely positive. My problem with you and other haters like you claiming “oh it overshadowed Farrah Fawcett and others more worthy”… Farrah was another icon from the 70′s and her death was also tragic but the way she handled dying was dignified and I will always respect her for that. However you stated Michael was a drug addict-well Farrah (and Elvis) were also drug addicts; that’s not a secret in Hollywood. With people of this stature we take the good with the bad but I think the good always overshadows the bad. And where Michael is concerned- he was the greatest entertainer in the world- period whether you liked his music or not- over a billion people worldwide can’t be wrong. And oh yes, in 50 years will you be lovingly remembered as a bonafide legend the same way Michael will? Probably not.. get over it..

  • oli2009

    It is very sad to see how people makes fun of others specially when it comes to a funeral. No respect, no sense of nothing. After all; he was a human being. The death of a brother, son, father, friend. Regardless of who he was. Death is death,’s fuenral, it won’t be someone calling it GAUDY funeral.

  • happyinva

    @ kcmom23 – One can not speak of tolerance, and then in the same breath be judgmental… again, having a child speak at their parent’s memorial is NOT exploitation nor is it unusual. That is my only point. To state that it is shows a lack of understanding as to why countless other children do exactly the same thing.

  • khalisa29

    Wow. Strange? Gaudy? I watched the memorial from beginning to end and neither of those words are befitting. It sounds like this is a SUBjective rather and OBjective editorial. I am shocked that a respected publication such as TIME would allow such rhetoric to be spewed under its label. There was absolutely nothing inappropriate about the memorial service for the greatest entertainer the WORLD has ever seen. R.I.P. Michael Joseph Jackson. Like your brother Marlon said, maybe they will leave you alone now. JP – start with the man in the mirror.

  • randomornot

    Poz,
    Is it really important to have reader feedback such as this? Your post has elicited WAAY more comments than any of the others (on your MEDIA ANALYSIS BLOG), an indicator no doubt, of the high rate of traffic on cnn.com and your editor’s clever headline (including word ‘gaudy’). From the posts it’s obvious that readers can’t distinguish reviews of coverage from reviews of the man’s life or talent, etc. IT’s also obvious that people are very eager to find animus and venom and (alas, the final card) racism in every nook and cranny. Reading the posts just makes me sad–sad that we journalists have to appease everyone these days. That no one is genuinely curious about opinions other than their own. Everyone has to debate everything–using latin, highlighting professional credentials, and (my favorite) such vehement name-calling. How is it that we’re so fragile that we can’t listen to something, ponder it, and move on? Why is every word so loaded? Did you expect this?? Please: Weigh in!!

  • cookiej

    I have never written on a blog before but could not let this pass.
    I agree with the majority of people who think Time should never have let you publish this article. The memorial was anything but gaudy or a spectacle. You should never write for Time or anyone else again.

  • colusakid

    Mr. James Poniewozik,
    This is taking too much of my time, but I too had to sign up in order to raise my voice about my concerns on your article. You have disgraced the TIME name. I will never read TIME again, nor your work. Your article is tasteless, bigoted, ethnocentric and racist-sounding. Just to put to rest any thoughts you may have of me being an African-American, a young person, or a rabid Michael fan, I am a white, 57 year old man who owns two of MJ’s CDs. The man is dead and common courtesy dictates that you show respect for him. Shame on you. Remember, James, what goes around, comes back around. Karma. As a white person, I am ashamed of you and those like you.

  • jpenn1976

    Well, I doubt you (the author) reads these posts. It would be far too damaging to your enormous ego. But if you do, you can clearly see that most people feel you did a very poor job (myself included). Save for Mr.GMC President and CEO Dirty South TV, who is obviously every bit as in love with himself as you appear to be. A touch of class and tenderness would greatly improve your editorial an probably personal flavor/style. That’s alright, I suspect you are simply the type of people that cannot stand to see someone else achieve success or be different than what you call normal. They say “it takes all kind’s” but I think the world would be just fine without people like you in it. I see no benefit to you being around. That said, do us all a favor and find a new job. tabloids would be a good fit. Who knows, maybe TIME is a tabloid these days. I certainly will not be buying any new issues any TIME soon.

  • http://www.asthemoonclimbs.com/blog.php/2009/07/08/leadership-and-intention/ Leadership and intention | Consider This …

    [...] to LA this week. Our gods, it seems, are those who entertain us. Look at the rage elicited by Time’s write-up of the memorial service. Readers there are positively foaming at the mouth at the slightest whiff [...]

  • randomornot

    Gaudy or not, the gold casket may not have been first choice for the author of “Earth Song.” Consider this:

    Gold mining remains one of the dirtiest industries in the world, and jewelry retailers and consumers are increasingly concerned. Gold mining is still linked to violent conflict, people being displaced from their lands and livelihoods, and waterways poisoned with toxic chemicals.

    For more on responsible gold mining see: http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1882059_1882224_1882008,00.html

    Also: http://www.brilliantearth.com/dirty-gold-mining-methods/

  • erinka2483

    JP, thank you for the wonderfully insightful article. You seem to have read my mind. So many aspects of the memorial service seemed fake and “put on.”
    It’s ridiculous that so many people are upset over a review of a memorial that everyone should have known was going to be overly extravagant and “gaudy” (how DARE I use that word!)…..IT WAS A MEMORIAL SERVICE FOR MJ FANS IN THE STAPLES CENTER ARENA! What in the world do you people expect??

  • hrs829

    You are the worst journalist Time has ever had. If you had nothing nice to say – keep your damn prejudice thoughts to yourself. The funeral was not gaudy. Who are you – the god of journalism – to write such an unprofessional article. It is obvious that you didn’t like MJ, therefore you should have passed this assingment to someone else who could be unbiased. Someday you will have to sit in that seat where his family sat or vice versa, your family will sit there for you, I hope no one calls the service gaudy. Your insensitivity and insults amazes me.

  • vickiwatts

    Using the words “gaudy” and “spectacle” in reference to Michael Jackson’s Memorial is reprehensible and the writer should be ashamed. Michael Jackson is and will always be the GREATEST ENTERTAINER on the planet and need we even mention his humanitarian efforts. The man donated $300 Million to charity; he opened his home up to sick and underpriviledged children from every walk of life. Even in death…he’s donating 20% of his estate to charity and all you can talk about is what a “gaudy” casket and service he had. It was a beautiful tribute to a beautiful life for a man that has done nothing but good for the world whether it be creating happiness thru his god-given phenomenal talent or helping to get a sick child in the Middle East a badly needed liver. Do you people talk about those things..NO. Michael is finally at rest and peace yet you the media continue to persecute him as you have always done and for no good reason. What kind of horrible person makes negative comments like this about someone’s CASKET and service?? That’s absolutely outrageousand it’s the height of ignorance as far as I’m concerned!!!

  • savvyhappy1

    This is the first time I’ve commented on this type of situation. I just have to say as many people who type a comment you have as many different ideas. So was the case of JP… he is a journalist and so he wrote what he saw in his viewpoint. So many want to crucify him? What happened to freedom of speech? He didn’t say anything that was raciest in my view. He may have thought that OJ was guilty and MJ’s casket was gaudy but so what? I thought Scott Peterson was guilty too, many thought he wasn’t! Every time something is negative about someone don’t make it raciest. That is crazy. It is a way to silence people so that they shudder to write in their own free way. Of course we have to be tasteful and mindful…. but he was not being racist at all. As far as his comments I read them and some I agreed with and some I did not. But good grief people it was an article and I’m sure there are many others if you look around today and things have been said on TV as bad or worse. My view point on Michael if I might add one is… he went way to far with the face. I look back at the Thriller and thought he looked awesome. He should have stopped there ! He danced wonderful….sometime a little too suggestive but now days that is most all dancers (my viewpoint) don’t sue me.
    My point being don’t get so uptight when someone don’t agree with you, the world is filled with different ideas from your own. Let people have theirs as long as it isn’t down right slander or hate, cruelty, but a viewpoint or off the view of yours sometimes isn’t going to cause your heart to stop !
    My view point about this world… well it’s is going to hell in a hand basket and soon. You’d be better off getting a little steamed about the world around you… your spiritual self, and where your going to spend eternity. If you don’t think there is an eternity, that’s your choice bully for you. I happen to think there is ….one of us is wrong. If your right we lost nothing.. if I’m right you’ve lost everything. So sue me !

  • jenjgo

    I must say I’m surprised this article is associated with TIME mag. As I was reading it I thought this is poorly written. I am an educated white woman who also thought wow! this clearly is written by someone who is racist!!! It’s very obvious to anyone reading the article,yet JP doesn’t know that it shows his racism because he probably doesn’t think he is a racist. He doesn’t get that he is one of the many that Michael had to deal with. I thought the memorial was very dignified, which I believe is the opposite of gaudy. Too bad for TIME mag.lost respect for them..

  • slopoke88

    kdh2011 and molly- Are you two trying to be funny or did it just come out that way? You wrote “so that the regulars can discuss comments here” and “aren’t exactly regular Tunedin readers”. Funny, when I was reading your comments I suddenly starting hearing the voices of Mr. and Mrs. Thurston Howell III from the show ‘Gilligans Island’. You two really made my day. That was so hilarious. The real funny part is that I bet you weren’t trying to be funny but were quite serious and that’s the killer! Thank you so much and have a great day.

  • enikkig

    The funeral procession had unintentional overtones of the OJ chase? We really, really, really reached for that one now didn’t we?

  • timauthee

    We call them stars because they burn brightly. Talent, creativity, presence, opportunity, current public perception, may be ingredients that help make a star. Perfection is not.

    Our stars have the right to live their personal lives in private. They have the right to experience their personal strengths and imperfections in a private manner, just as the rest of us do. All of us have pluses and minuses. However, most of us have the opportunity to succeed and fail without a spotlight. Our stars will never be granted that in regard to their career, however, they should be left to their success and failings as it pertains to their private life.

    Our spirit dictates that we should not stalk or rape or kill our stars. Both the public and the press, indeed the police, get involved in defense of our stars when they are abused in such a manner. However, we turn a blind eye when our stars are degraded in a public manner for their very private failings. Why? For fear that we might be accused of condoning those failings? Our stars are often degraded to the point of despair. Depression, isolation, drugs, self-destruction, and death often result. Our stars and their families, their children, often suffer as a direct consequence of our actions. Once our stars fail in their personal life, and even death results, we then state, “See, I told you they had failings…I told you they were imperfect…they were strange”. Why have we not grown past such immature behavior? Does it make our own failings seem more tolerable?

    There will always be those in the media that will print what they think they know about our stars failings: they’re fat, they’re old, they’re strange, they’re imperfect. Anything that makes one special or different will be ridiculed, as our media seems to prefer ordinary, average and mundane; imagine how bland our lives will be if they succeed in stomping out the flame that makes our stars different and exciting. There will always be those who read the filth of tabloids in the grocery isle. Our stars and their families will suffer in the mean time. They will either harden to our insults or be destroyed. Those of us who know better, must do more than just not condone or encourage this behavior; we must soften our hearts, publically disapprove of it, and boycott those who engage in such ridicule and destruction.

    In part, we made our stars. When it comes to their personal lives, just leave them alone, they’re only human and right now they’re suffering.

    In honor of all those who are obliged not to speak for themselves.

    In Loving Memory of the Extraordinary Michael Jackson and many others who have burned so brightly and left us all too soon.

  • jildee

    It’s a sad affair that when allegations are made about successful people we believe yet none of us has proof. Whatever people are saying about MJ is just nothing but because of jealousy due to his success.”The heart of Man is so wicked and desperately corrupt” that’s why they will try to vilyfy him in any form.It’s a shame, let him rest in peace. Why do we assume he is quilty? How about believing that he was wronged and the other people were lying about him to get money.Why do we believe these people who made the allegations? Why do we always side with the person’s accusing others? If it were you being accused would you want people to believe you or the other person? Let’s think twice before believing in allegations.It’s only the two parties involved who know exactly what happened, other than that let’s all keep off. RIP MJ. Even if the world was mean to you, a million of us will love and remember you forever.

  • songdude

    I will NEVER read another issue of time as long as you write for them. I am sure this is just what you wanted out of this article. You and so many other news media freaks out there are the reason Michael Jackson had to live the kind of life he did. Your a sorry excuse for flesh and bones. I pray you find salvation and change the way feel about human compassion.If more people were like Michael Jackson this world would be a more beautiful place to share.No one is perfect and only God can hold that title. We all must strive to be the most perfect we can be in the face of grace. Now we must pray

  • hcknrck

    Disgusting article. I have lost a lot of respect for Time. I could go on but I will make it brief. He kept his kids out of the spotlight because of people like you. This man has been tortured by the media his whole life. Yet, you scum use him to make money. Even after his tragic death, it doesn’t stop. His brother said it best.”maybe now they will leave you alone”. I don’t expect that. And don’t expect me to read your mag………..let alone buy one.

  • alfablue62

    Gaudy, you have got to be kidding? Where did you get your journalistic credentials from? Learn to keep your personal and not very respectful comments out of this…MJ passing in no way or shape was gaudy, neither was his life for that matter. Despite the idiosyncrisies, he was a nothing but genious, a talant beyond belief, he was a good human being, one who was trecherously betrayed by people he loved most. Let him rest in peace, aren’t you sufficently happy with the damage the media and comments like yours have had in his life? Get a life…

  • erinka2483

    JP is “racist??” Come on people. I was not aware that if a person disagrees with someone’s life style or choices, that person is automatically racist. Those accusations are ridiculous and banal.

  • andrea0507

    This is by far the worst and most critical article I have seen from Time. I usually dont post comments; however, this made me sign up for an account just to let you know that this is very much unappreciated. If the service did not fit your particular taste, fine…but, who are you to criticize. There were some very touching moments. You mourn however you choose and leave others to do the same.

  • roxchester

    I’ve been disappointed with CNN’s coverage of MJ’s passing. On the most part its been tabloid. CNN and Time are supposed to be news organizations, hence, more objective and factual. Here, the author’s comments are bias and sarcastic (examples “hyperbole” “quirky reminiscences” “plunging cleavage” “rebuttal” “OJ” (and the list goes on)). Its not just this article, in general CNN has become more tabloid (this article prompted me to finally write on this issue). This is why I find myself going to The New York Times or BBC websites for actual reporting on the news.

    On a personal note, a person has passed away who has a family and people who love him. This article is disrespectful and rude. I am not saying this as a fan or as someone on the defense (in fact, only in his passing am I learning about MJ’s legacy in music and philanthropy). Its a matter of decency and respect. Overall, I am disappointed in CNN’s reporting and saddened by the irreverent remarks on the day of a person’s memorial.

  • xandercrews

    andrea0507 Says:
    ” If the service did not fit your particular taste, fine…but, who are you to criticize.”
    A T.V. critic.

  • xandercrews

    andrea0507 Says:
    ” If the service did not fit your particular taste, fine…but, who are you to criticize.”

    A T.V. critic.

  • jenschmelzel

    I really enjoyed the article. It’s nice to see that the entirety of the media is not over-obsessed and “completely torn” at the news of Michael Jackson’s death. He was one person. He was one, amazing pop star. It amazes me that this many people are full of tears over one person. Trust me, had one of you died, Michael Jackson would not have cried. I hope I’m not ruining anyone’s day with that.

    For the people who make comments such as, “James you are retard who needs to go to hell!!!!!!!!!!! You are a senseless worthless jerk!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I wonder what is hiding in your closet, you damn idiot!!!!! Let’s see, I think I will investigate your wreckless nonjournalistic opportunist ass and see what I find!!!!” I would like to say: Not only are you too ignorant to come up with a vocabulary large enough to actually insult someone without using multiple exclamation points, but you’re also ignorant enough to personally attack the journalist, who happens to be someone (I’m just going to guess, here) you don’t personally know. Why don’t you try arguing points the journalist made? That is, of course, if you even have a point. You should know that you, my well educated, fellow American, are the reason why this society is ridiculous. This society thrives on celebrity news and gossip instead of things that matter at this moment in time, such as Iran, Iraq and North Korea. Get your panties out of a bunch and pay attention to the real world. Or just simply rid the world of your useless ranting.

  • kb123la

    What an unbelievable CREEP you are, Mr. Poniewozik! “Gaudy”…you ill-bred little ass!

  • prophcm

    James, I cannot belelive that you could be this cruel, you have just further confirmed to me that people can be possessed by Satan himself! What did Michael ever do to you for you to be so hateful of him? Your time could be much better spent by researching the information that has recently come out out indicating that Jordan Chandler has admitted that his father made him lie on Michael Jackson, and in reality Michael Jackson NEVER molested him! Don’t allow your racism and jealousy to reserve a seat in hell for you, seek God while he may be found so that you can learn about love and respect before it is too late!

  • slopoke88

    triplecoil-From the Oxford English Dictionary: Bonehead – a stupid person. Seems to be a pretty accurate word in response to you.

  • lmlconsu

    Just when I’d had it up to here with the hypocrisy of the media and its syrupy fawning over Jackson since his death (as if he were the male, African-American version of Mother Teresa) after its years of post-acquittal sniping at him – this article makes me long for the fawning again, a little. TIME has changed – in another era it’d have chosen someone who was able to write this commentary without displaying his own personal bias. No wonder readership is down.

  • neen86

    I’m with erinka2483. When I read the article I didn’t get a racist tone at all. I may not have agreed with every single thing that was written, but that doesn’t mean I need to jump to conclusions about someone’s opinion. A lot of the people who commented on this have probably never read anything else JP has written, and it doesn’t look like they will after this…which is probably not a huge loss. But those who frequent the tuned-in section of Time, can likely appreciate that this is a blog and the articles written are primarily reviews, designed to express an opinion. You know, that whole freedom of speech thing…

  • quitplayn

    James Poniewozik you are tremendously out-of-order. I used to think this was a reputable organization. Obviously your employment there suggests otherwise. Extremely disappointed in your lack of judgement, taste or professionalism. “Tuned In” must be Tuned OUT. Shame on ‘Time’.

  • southernsocialthought

    Mr. Poniewozik, are you kidding us. Do you know just how many people think of name Michael Jackson and the words descent human being in the same sentence? Your contemptuous depiction for the huge display of affection for an individual whose work connotes the soundtrack for a generation or two of a significant portion of the worlds population was what I will describe as a MESS and it stunk like HOT GARBAGE! I can appreciate different points of view, but your article was not worth the virtual paper it was written on and perhaps you should think about hiring an intern to edit your gaudy work!

  • cindyhd

    Too bad this is going to be on page 8 or 9, but as many other have said…

    I am ashamed at Time for allowing this article of a non “Gaudy” memorial to be posted. What editor approved this? He/she is just as responsible for this tasteless and hmilating article!

    Until James apolgizes, I am going to cancel my subscriptions, and NEVER buy Life again. (After 40 years of being loyal)
    What horrible comments on day of an real man, a humanbeing’s funeral and memorial!!! The family thought it appropriate that Michael’s true fans had his casket at what was basically his funeral. SHAME ON YOU and Shame on Life. Boycott’s already been mentioned too many times, but I’m in….unless an apology or resignation is forthcoming!
    Mr. CEO…did you hear that? Apology or resignation!

  • bacontrail

    Does Time have any openings? I could do a better job than YOU and I rarely write anything! You should be fired. You’re an idiot, not a journalist, an idiot! You should only write about things you “know” and it’s clear you don’t know much.

  • http://www.dirtysouthtv.tv Dirty South TV

    Dear Jamu2009,

    I’m not quite sure what gave you the impression that I wear a white hood, but I nor my black wife (from Africa=A REAL African American) didn’t appreciate that comment.
    Not only is it 2009, but today’s date is July 8th, 2009 and tonight I will be at the Five Spot in Little Five Points (Atlanta, Georgia) from 7-11p.m.-Please do come by and tell me that to my face.

    And P.S. You mental midget, the Clan hates me just as much if not more than anyone else. But, thankfully to you, they now know where I will be tonight-just in case they would like to stop by and find out what I think of them too?
    ;-)

  • prestonsc

    I’m more shocked at the reactions of some of the post to this article. I’m not a big ‘TIME’ guy myself but James Poniewozik hit this one out of the park. Excellent observations!! Many of the post blasting the writer’s matter of the facts doesn’t cease to exist because they are ignored. I was taken aback by how many of the so-called black leadership in this country i.e. Jesse Jackson, MLK III, his sister Bernice, and Al Shapton especially of lauding MJ an African-American icon and continuing that theme throughout afterwards on many media outlets, mostly on CNN. This credited to a man who spent most of his adult life, spending millions to become ‘white’ with surgery on his face, the bleaching of his skin to the point he was actually whiter than me at death. Paying ‘white’ people to sire and bore his all ‘white’ kids.
    I guess you could say it says more about the family than Michael Jackson himself. To loosely quote the scifi writer Scott Westerfield, ‘always give people the truth, there will always be someone mad at you.’

  • awulf39

    I agree, it was gaudy and strange. It started with the brothers wheeling in the gold casket with matching gloves to the memorial ending with Michael Jackson’s daughter speaking about her father while every Jackson family member had to have their hands on her and the microphone. I can’t believe that a man who did his best to shield his children from the spotlight would of appreciated all of his children being thrust on an international stage. Seeing the 7 year olds sad and confused face while holding a doll of his father broke my heart. Shame on the Jackson family!

  • jasperwhite

    Dear Sir,

    While I would not claim to be a committed fan of Michael Jackson; I must take issue with your article. It seems to me you may need to attend a few more funerals or memorial services before you write about them. You commented negatively on the fact that the body was at the service. Most services I have attended have a coffin with a body in it. It is after all a service for the dead individual. Somehow perhaps you missed that. Gaudy? I am not sure if you know what that means. You may not agree with the choice of color for the casket but it wasn’t your funeral. It wasn’t an MTV awards show and it is in incredibly poor taste for you to criticize a memorial service.

  • jaydah

    I will never buy another Time magazine as long as I live. I cannot support such mess……………..

  • rewashin

    I too have signed up for an account just to comment on your article. Time would do well to never let you write for them again. To characterize someone’s memorial as “gaudy”, which it was NOT, reflects on only you sir.

    I do not believe in political correctness, as it were, but sometimes we need to know when to shut up. This, Mr. Poniewozik, was an opportunity for you to SHUT UP which you should have jumped on!

  • roxchester

    I am disappointed that CNN is becoming tabloid. CNN and Time are supposed to be news organizations, hence, more objective and factual. Here, the author’s comments are sarcastic and judgmental (examples “hyperbole” “quirky reminiscences” “plunging cleavage” “rebuttal” “OJ” (and the list goes on)). Its not just this article, in general CNN has become more tabloid (this article prompted me to finally write on this issue). Lately, I find myself going to The New York Times or BBC websites for actual reporting on the news.
    On a personal note, someone has passed away who has a family and people who love him. This article is disrespectful and rude. I am not saying this on the defense (in fact, only in MJ’s passing am I beginning to appreciate MJ’s legacy in music and philanthropy). Its a matter of decency and respect. Overall, I am disappointed in CNN’s reporting and saddened that such irreverent remarks have a forum on the day of a person’s memorial.

  • lustypiratewench

    Just a few comments here.

    Re: Mariah Carey, clearly she was quite upset over the death of MJ. that would explain the cracking of her voice, along with her not being able to hit some of the notes. I also agree that Mariah’s choice of clothing was in poor taste for a memorial service.

    Re: Shaheen Jafargholi. To the person who said his voice would be gone soon – this young man is 12, if I recall my childhood correctly, no one said about a 10 year old Michael Jackson “his voice will be gone”. Do I understand correctly that MJ will be the only child star in history who was able to keep his talent throughout his lifetime?

    Re: you people who are whining about this article. MJ wasn’t just cited ONCE for child molestation. The Los Angeles police dropped an investigation when the supposed victim would not testify – and he wouldn’t testify because his parents were paid a reported 28 million dollars. Check your facts people.

    There was no need for a coffin to be present at this supposed memorial. There was a private service before this “event” and there was absolutely no need for a coffin to be present. Not only did it show some distaste, but it had to be brutal for his children to sit there and look at it for longer than was necessary.

    I can understand fans being upset that this article was not all roses, butterflies and love love love, but this article was clearly fair and balanced. The author reported what he saw. Plain and simple. And the fact that Lee took the time out of her busy schedule to put in an appearance to campaign for office and to taut a bill that will clearly NOT pass in congress or the house, was shameful.

    I do heartily appreciate the fact that the Jackson family in their infinite wisdom did not allow Joe Jackson to get near a microphone or camera to hawk his new “label” or to try to play off his dead child, and the family deserves kudos for that alone.
    Way too many commentators in the television news medium didn’t understand when to shut up, and kudos to MSNBC for not once speaking during the memorial.

    For those of you who will insist that this was NOT a spectacle… Remember what Dame Elizabeth Taylor said about going to the memorial – “I Can’t Be A Part of the MJ Hoopla”. Elizabeth was one of MJ’s best friend – what makes YOU, a FAN ONLY, know better than a woman who shared so much of MJ’s life with him?

    As for the caliber of “fans”, I saw way too many on the news spewing unadulterated adoration for a man who in many ways was right, but in many ways was wrong. In his own words, he said he saw “nothing wrong” with sharing his bed with children. I’m sorry, that is just WRONG. Take some time – and look beyond the glamor and glitter. Look at the reality, and you may understand a little more of real life. This closed eye adoration of MJ has gone on too long. Two weeks is too much for ANYONE.

    Thank you for this article. Detractors aside, you had it spot on.

  • randomornot

    Why stop at boycotting TIME?? Boycott all Time Warner properties–including the Tyra Banks Show, Sarah Conner Chronicles, HBO programming, all Warner Brothers movies (including Dark Knight, Harry Potter, etc.), TBS, Sports Illustrated, Entertainment Weekly, People, InStyle, Essence, Family Circle, and even the PGA tour. MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD!!! (Can you detect the sarcasm?) No Cartoon Network, no CNN, no HLN. This writer must be fired or else–right?? Get a grip.

  • jimmyfresno

    Unintentionally similar to the OJ Chase? The only aspect of similarity was not the actual event, but the perspective from overhead cameras shot from helicopters by the media! This reveals an eerie truth: the media’s cameras can frame a somber event and give it the appearance of a criminal act. If Michael Jackson’s funeral procession had happened first, and the OJ chase second, would this Time writer say that the OJ chase was “unintentionally reminiscent of the Michael Jackson funeral procession?” No, I would think. That would just be bizarre. But to frame it vice versa gives enough of the circus event theme that the writer wanted to confer to the coverage of an otherwise somber occasion. Shame on you.

  • vnilla

    While I do agree there was a lot of coverage of this story. I will be the first to admitt that I watched as much of it as I can. It is a well known fact that American news is known for blowing up the smallest story.
    Micheal Jackson has done a lot for America. Micheal Jackson has done a lot for the world. People take a lot of time to make about comments about how wierd he was, yet they don’t take as much time to understand way he was the way he was. The old expression “Sticks and stones will break you bones, but words will never hurt me” is a lie. The most hurtful and long lasting pain can because by WORDS. I know, I empathise with Micheal. I may not have made the choices he made but I was not exposed to what he was exposed to.
    I love him, he has contributed to all of our lives. we just may not know it. Six degrees of seperations people. I thought the memorial was befitting him. Not “gaudy” Funny, no one ever mentioned that Paris may have wanted to say something on her father’s behalf?
    I have never met him but I cried for him. RIP Micheal and thank you for all you’ve done. This aritcle just served to kick him down again. The sarcasm, why bother attempt to make nice?

  • prestonsc

    ROFLMFAO @ roxchester……”disappointed that CNN is becoming tabloid” “I find myself going to NYT or BBC websites for ‘actual reporting’ on the news”….tells me all I need to know.

    As the great philospher Arthur Schopenhauer said, “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. And finally third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

  • prestonsc

    ROFLMFAO @ roxchester……”disappointed that CNN is becoming tabloid” “I find myself going to NYT or BBC websites for ‘actual reporting’ on the news”….tells me all I need to know.

    As the great philospher Arthur Schopenhauer said, “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. And finally third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”

  • ashanti404

    You…my dear sir are a tackless ass!

    Was that the response you were aiming for? Have some respect and dignity….Time shame on you for playing along with the very assness this jerk speaks of!

  • prestonsc

    ..sorry about the double post

  • cai80

    How many funeral processions you have been through were the cars are flying down the road at break neck speeds? I haven’t been to any in my lifetime. To compare a funeral procession to the OJ chase was in bad taste. Your choice of vocabulary, and what you chose to comment on was also questionable to say the least. Why is private in quotation marks? Obviously, the Jacksons have a big family. The main family unit consisted of 8 siblings many of whom have several children themselves. Not the mention any other close relatives or friends that wanted to say a more personal goodbye to Michael. You obviously need to re-evaluate your definition of objectivity, because yours is skewed big time.

  • vnilla

    What about the boy who recanted his story and said he father made him do it?

  • bcg2009

    The media just can’t seem to resist an opportunity to put Michael Jackson down, even in an article about his memorial. Shame on you. It also can’t resist an opportunity to make some money off of him – selling the special editions, magazine covers, etc. There was nothing gaudy about the memorial service. There was nothing wrong with his daughter wanting to say something about her father; “regular” people do that all the time! There was nothing wrong with Barry Gourdy’s comments – he can believe and say what he wants and he happened to voice an opinion shared by many! What I have learned over the last several days is that the media will vehemently maintain that it has a huge influence on our world, yet will equally vehemently deny any responsibility for the consequences of it’s influence! Michael Jackson was never allowed to be a “regular” person because of our media. He was destined to be an incredible entertainer, but he should not have had to sacrifice living a private life because of it. I cannot even imagine what that would be like. Yet try to point this out to the media and hear the screams of denial. I pray Michael has peace now, and I pray for his family, especially his children, who have to figure out how to live without him. I hope they can live in peace and not spend their lifetimes fighting off the media and the parasites who just want to use them to make some money.

  • marti2904

    Inexcusable article. Gaudy? This memorial was the antithesis of gaudy. They could have put him on display in a glass covered coffin for a week – that would have been gaudy and terrible, but no…the family chose to put on a dignified, tasteful, memorial service for him. Were you so stretched to find something bad to say that you had to reach into such tawdry depths as to compare his funeral procession to the O.J. Chase….really? Disgusting. You cloaked every decent thing you managed to say in a hint of sarcasm. Simply revolting.

  • elwjohn

    For all of those that keep saying “too much press”, I remember when Lady Diana died. There was just as much coverage, and she wasn’t even an American. No one complained then. Some of you are obviously hypocrites, and are showing your petty sides. Michael Jackson was an icon, worldwide-not just here in America. He has been singing and dancing since he was just a baby, and we all loved him for it. Yes, he changed his face, he obviously had self esteem issues, but unlike the rest of us with the same problem he had the money to fund any changes he wanted made. He also had vultures around him looking to profit in anyway they could from this man, and we can see they didn’t have his best interest at heart. It is also obvious to me that with the thousands of kids that spent time at Neverland with Michael only 2 in 20 years have ever claimed to be abused, and one of his cases after hearing the evidence, he was found not guilty. If he was a pedephile, he must have only had the urge once every 20 years. People just want a reason to be hateful. The bible says that “the wages of sin is death”. Michael has paid for all of his sins now with the ultimate sacrifice, his life. We will all have our opportunity to pay up eventually. Let this man rest, let his family grieve, and stop speculating and judging without accurate knowledge.

  • http://www.skzdalimit.com/ skzdalimit

    You people who are bashing the author of this column are pathetic, as was the whole media coverage of Michael Jackson’s death. The man was a pedophile and how he twice escaped prosecution is beyond me. Just because the man “was” a cultural icon to millions (if not billions) does not give him the free pass to do as he pleases.

    Can you honestly look at yourself in the mirror and tell yourself that you are perfectly ok letting your kids sleep with this man? If your answer is yes, Child and Family Services should be knocking on your door.

  • sum1withabrain

    Where do i even begin? Sadly, you reinforced something i had been perturbed by since MJ’s passing; the dual media coverage, in which the sarcastic “good ole way of thinking”, is contrasted by progressive folk who understand that to live a life of incredible celebrity (regardless of race), is a daunting task to undertake. The “OJ Chase?”, REALLY?? Was that the best you could do? You get paid to write stuff like this?? And understand, i honestly feel i insult the word stuff when comparing and contrasting to your collection of misrepresentations. What is a funeral procession supposed to be? Would you have felt more at ease with” Jackson infighting” en route to Staples? Did unity amongst people make you feel that uncomfortable in your own skin? Have you ever listened to MJ’s music? Any music? Gaudy? ? Hardly. A note to you, as obviously you must not have heard, he was the most famous person in the world! His peers are among the most famous in the world. He was an artist…He used his talent to bring all folks together. Must be an odd concept to a divisive, talentless moron. I highly suggest you go to a museum, take in some art, and expand your horizons as a human.

  • jwang1818

    English is not my native language. I have to check the dictionary and find out what Gaudy means. I was very upset after I leaned the meaning.

    Gaudy? Of cause NOT. I am not fan of MJ before yesterday. The media had only reported MJ a weird/bad person after I was born. Now I am. I cannot help crying when I watched the memorial service. I spent the whole day to listen at his most popular songs and watch his old MTV videos. His songs really touched my heart. His smile in the pictures is so genius. I can feel it is from his heart. His dances are so seamless and natural. I really enjoyed them. One lesson I have learned is not to trust what the media says because they are not in ‘NON-PROFIT’ business.

    When we start judging people, please ask yourself if you are the perfect one or not.

  • http://www.dirtysouthtv.tv Dirty South TV

    Dear lustypiratewench ,

    And I quote-Although Shaheen did a FANTASTIC job today (yesterday now), he will NOT have that voice in 5-7 years from now, therefore null and voiding him to be the torch carrier (Michael Jacksons singing replacement).

    In English (please pardon the pun):
    Although Shaheen is a fantastic singer with singing abilities and talent way beyond his years, his voice WILL change and my personal bet is he will not be on quite the same adaptable level as Michael Jackson and not be the torch passee. Talented-yes, have a good musical future ahead of him-sure, Michael’s replacement-never in a million years.

    Any questions?

  • valleyvoice1

    Hey, James Poniewozik from the Times Magazine, I stumbled across this article today. “Even the slo-mo funeral procession to Staples, on an L.A. freeway, had unintentional overtones of the O.J. chase.” I am so disturbed by this comment because it has deeply rooted implications. “unintentional overtones???” to who?? I do not see the connection. Of course, James, I see the world as a mirage of beautiful colors. Your comment implies that you see the world in clear divisions of black and white. I can only image how hard you must have struggled to write about such a beautifully diverse and colorful family. Hey Times, I will never support purchasing or reading James’s publications or Times.

  • 1234wasiu

    I find your article interresting and appreciate your sence of humour!

  • jasands50

    After reading these comments and seeing how many say “may Michael rest in peace”…..HOW CAN HE, his body is being moved around as much as a chest piece. He has been dead 2 weeks now, liking one day, and he is yet to be buried. I watched the memorial in its entirety and when it was all over I hear that the family said that Michael wouldnt be buried until the media frenzy is over. I guess Michael, or his body , will be with us for quite awhile. To me this is quite rediculous. does anyone else agree????

  • themaj

    Poniewozik is absolutely pathetic. I never knew that memorials/funerals was subject to a critique and delusional social commentary. This trash reporter reminds me of the mindless critical barage directed at Michael Jackson carping that he did not have anything to offer the world in his video’s after Thriller. If this is what time has to offer then this magazine will be relegated to fish wrap and canary cage linings.

  • tony1011

    I think that the article was done very well, however I don’t like the way the media went on a frenzy over MJ. He was a great performer back in the 80′s. But hardly anyone paid any attention to his entertainment value since the early 90′s. The man died before his time. Maybe if he was convicted of those so-called crimes he most likely be alive today.

    Tony

    http://anthonyvalentinjr.com

  • tony1011

    I think that the article was done very well, however I don’t like the way the media went on a frenzy over MJ. He was a great performer back in the 80′s. But hardly anyone paid any attention to his entertainment value since the early 90′s. The man died before his time. Maybe if he was convicted of those so-called crimes he most likely be alive today.

    Tony

    http://anthonyvalentinojr.com

  • randomornot

    Why argue for nine pages now? Well….”when someone asserts that Sarah Palin is brilliant, or that the Yankees are the best team in baseball, or that Michael Jackson was not a freak, others not only argue the opposing position, but do so with more conviction than they actually hold. We are an argumentative species.”

    http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1909019,00.html

  • lustypiratewench

    Dirty South TV – I was trying to just make the point that this is no telling what will happen to this young man in the future. If 31 years ago, someone would have said that Michael Jackson was going to be bigger than Elvis – people would have gone insane. I remember when my mother first heard that Frank Sinatra had died – she said there would never be another Frank Sinatra. Well of course not! And there will also never be another Michael Jackson, I appreciate that too. Talent wasn’t a question with EITHER. You can’t tell me that in the future, there will never be another star that will be as BIG if not bigger than MJ, because no one can tell who will come down the pike. I was not trying to play down talent – I was trying to make a small comparison and maybe an association between YOUTH and not knowing what will happen in the future. If I didn’t express that with the eloquence that I would have hoped, I apologize. My main point is that these people who are disrespecting the author because he can’t or didn’t see this memorial they way that they WANTED him to see it.

  • mlandry53

    There was nothing “gaudy” about the memorial. It’s dissapointing to see that some people will always find something negative to say about Michael Jackson and his family.

  • kilabee62309ily

    this is the most rude blog i have ever read. as writer’s you should at least have respect for a dead man.just because he is an icon doesn’t not mean he is not human you have degraded him for too long leave him alone and let him REST IN PEACE. stop thinking about your paychecks and pay your respect to a man who went through hell his whole life. you give him the same respect he gave you. just because you have the power of the pen doesn’t mean you tarnish his name.this is so ridiculous how you talk bad about some one if you would have actually listen to the message instead of judging him you would have realized that he deserves his title. why did you not speak this badly about ELVIS? i believe Micheal’s memorial service was very well Orchestrated. maybe you should play your tape back and watch the whole thing again because what you just said is unflattering.

  • nancycen

    I wish it was you who is lying in the coffin. Comparing to Michael, you are nothing but a mean creature!!! You go to hell!

  • lovealwaystoo

    I am disappointed with some of the comments in this article and also the comments by some readers calling Michael Jackson a child molester. I love this country for the freedom of speech but on the other hand the internet has introduced a new type of cowards. Michael was found ‘NOT GUILTY’ by OUR American Judicial System and our peers. Why did the families take the money if they truly felt that Michael molested their children? What about the numerous other children that spent time with Michael and NEVER had the same accusations. TIME we are disappointed with this article and the writer’s choice in words but one thing you will not be able to dispute, Michael Joseph Jackson is the KING OF POP, THE GREASTEST ENTERTAINER TO EVER LIVE, LOVED BY MILLIONS AROUND THE GLOBE! We love you MJ!

  • skanaga

    You, Mr. Poniewozik should be absolutely ashamed of yourself. The 2-hour long memorial service was intended to honour an Icon, but more importantly, a father, son and brother. And in those 2 hours, you could not keep your cynical thoughts to yourself. It is often said that people only speak good of you at your death bed. But, unfortunately, you have demonstrated that you cannot even give Michael Jackson that courtesy. I find this article in extremely bad taste, as is reflected by most of the comments. TIME should redeem itself by pulling this appalling piece out!

  • slopoke88

    neen86 – When you say I’m with erinka2483 does that mean you don’t think that just because one disagrees with another that they should be labeled a racist or that JP is a racist? Freedom of speech is one thing but responsible journalism is another. I think it was irresponsible to make any kind of comparison with the funeral procession and the O.J. chase. Though JP may have meant no foul intent, the perception seems to be otherwise. I did some checking on caskets and the ones that can afford it often choose metal caskets because of their durability and status. It was a bronze casket. It wasn’t made of gold. Just copper and tin and other relatively inexpensive metals. Hey… it was for Michael Jackson. The King of Pop. What should he have been buried in? The word “gaudy” infers something absurd or ridiculous. It infers something deeper in our society about a separation of ideals. Opinions long held by groups of people about a persons background or breeding. Opinions many feel whose roots can be traced back to the core of racism. Cultural differences that have one group of people pointing the finger at another group that they don’t see eye to eye with. That is the perception. As a journalist, how your article is perceived is something that goes beyond freedom of speech and into a personal awareness of how your readers may perceive what you have an opinion about. Judging by the responses, JP hit a nerve. A nerve that seems to be connected to a perception of racism. Intended or not, true or not, that seems to be the nerve that was hit. JP should’ve seen it coming. Then again… maybe he did.

  • dwdesire3

    I’d have to say this is the most tactless and “gaudy” work of journalism I’ve seen by TIME. Im surprised that TIME allowed this article to be released. I understand that we have the freedom of speech and all but you are getting paid for your thoughts right now. That means there should some sort of professionalism, which includes knowing your audience. Not only does the article affect JP’s personal image,but it also affects the image of TIME.

    I think the memorial was great. I would understand if this memorial wasn’t the most watched program, and people didnt fly from all over the world to be as close as they could be to the man who changed generations of thinking. But he did and it did…so I think it was perfect and the under-handed comments are unnecessary..

  • jesswalk

    I wasn’t planning to post a comment, but several of the posts I have read have made me quite angry and fired up. First of all – this is a BLOG posting, which means it WILL be rather subjective… And there is nothing wrong with that. Secondly, this in no way reflects what TIME.com believes to be true; this posting is simply the writer’s opinion, which he absolutely has a right to express ON HIS BLOG. BLOG, PEOPLE. BLOG. OPINION. SUBJECTIVE. BLOG. Thirdly… What is wrong with you people?! All of the “shame on you” comments make me sick and disgusted. JP – I love your writing style and appreciate all of the things you had to say. You’re just being honest about your perspective of the event ON YOUR BLOG… Wake up, people. The blogosphere is ripe with opinions and subjectivity – take it or leave it. But don’t criticize this writer for his well-written words.

  • http://www.dirtysouthtv.tv Dirty South TV

    Dear lustypiratewench,

    Thank you with the clarifications.
    I agree with you on all but one point-”If 31 years ago, someone would have said that Michael Jackson was going to be bigger than Elvis – people would have gone insane” makes me think that you believe he was bigger than Elvis (the man he purposely modeled himself after entertainment wise). Even marrying Elvis’s daughter and buying most of the music rights to Elvis’s music still didn’t quite push him to that top spot. Now, was he close-you bet he was. There are way too many statistical reports that are accurate that still to this day prove that Elvis was the most famous and most popular musical artist in our human history.
    Now, with all of that said, does Michael’s passing and all of the world-wide media attention on all of the related subjects (why, what from, what good did he do in his life, what bad did he do in his life etc.) that will be relentless for months at the very least I believe may have a legitimate chance at finally achieving that goal. I think it sucks that he had to die to reach this status step that he wanted so badly. Michael was such a smart marketing genius on top of being one of the greatest entertainers of all time-I would have liked to see him get to enjoy it while he was still alive.

    Entertainment is a very difficult life to live, for all involved. I am surprised at how many people forget that the true greatest entertainer of all time was Otis Redding, who accredited his success to Little Richard-as did James Brown. They were all influenced by Otis and the Macon Magic (Macon, Georgia’s long list of who’s who’s in the music business)-INCLUDING Elvis, who inspired Michael Jackson. They were all great, they all had “different” things about them that obviously stood out (both good and bad), yet they all truly were great entertainers, and some of them were great song (lyric and music writers), and some of them were good humanitarians too.
    Michael, as well as all of the other great entertainers that have passed and will pass will be missed by me personally. What they did one way or another musically will always be with me, and what they did personally will come and go with my memories-both good and bad-and that is the truth no matter who likes who and who hates who and who is jealous of who or who might not even fully “know” who.

    One Love,
    G.

    P.S. 2 things;
    1-You seem to really love music, if you would like to ‘search’ us and contact us, I will be happy to have you as our guest at one of the events that we hold or cover.
    2-There is an abundance of knowledge waiting for minds that crave it. Search it out and take yourselves on a musical and historical journey. I promise it will be a pleasant ride. It’s kinda cool how many of today’s and yesterdays artists and bands personally know and love each other, yes, even they are or were fans of each other.

  • mnyano

    “One Day In Your Life”, JP, the “Man In The Mirror” will “Rock With You” because of this “Bad” “Tabloid Junkie” you created of “Billie Jean” and/or “Ben”, whichever comes first, a “Speed Demon” who recently had just “Gone Too Soon” and whose funeral you said had created a “Jam” and was at it’s “Thriller” worst, gaudy.

    “Is It Scary?” Poor, JP. “Scream.” “Scream Louder.” “Heaven Can Wait.”

    Seriously, JP, “Come Together”, don’t be such a “Smooth Criminal”, and say that you just “Wanna Be Starting Something”.

    “Beat It” now before there’s “Blood On The Dance Floor”. Just always, “Remember the Time” when “We Are The World.” “They Don’t Really Care About Us” do they? Oh JP, “The Way You Make Me Feel” makes me wanna “Heal The World”.

    “This Time Around”, though, at “The Break of Dawn” in “History”, you just “Don’t Walk Away”. Period. You gotta put the “Smile” back on the faces of the “P.Y.T.(Pretty Young Thing)” if you can’t be “Just Good Friends.” At least “For The Lost Children”, okay? And that yes, “Dirty Diana or, the “Superfly Sister is not “Dangerous”, you should know that.

    But, “Whatever Happens”, “You Rock My World”, so, yes, “Keep The Faith”, you, “Tabloid Junkie”, you.

    “Don’t Stop Til You Get Enough.” “You Are Not Alone.” “I’ll be there.”

    “I Just Can’t Stop Loving You. It’s Human Nature. Black or White.”

    -The “Stranger In Moscow”

  • http://www.dirtysouthtv.tv Dirty South TV

    Not “Bad” Moscow, not too “Bad” at all. Good “J.O.B.” (Gwen Guthrie)
    ;-)

  • happyinva

    @ tony1011 – You are incorrect… MJ was still producing music and it was played on R&B stations. It really all depends on what you listen to. Look at up his last album – Invincible, released in 2001. Major hits from that album include the songs “You Rock My World” and “Butterflies”.

  • happyinva

    If you’re truly disappointed, you can send an email to the following:

    dawn_bridges@timeinc.com,
    colleen_mcmillen@timeinc.com,
    jane_lehman@timeinc.com

  • agmcfc

    For those of you just tuning in, the HEADLINE to this article has been changed:

    Yesterday it said:”MICHAEL’S TRIBUTE: A STRANGE, GAUDY, MOVING FAREWELL.”

    Today it says: “One Last Big (Yet Moving) Show for Michael”

    But the nonchalantly, sarcastic and contemptuous account in the body of the article remains. There is nothing worse than taunting and mocking a deceased person. This is intentional infliction of emotional distress on the family at the worst time in their lives. It is also infliction of emotional distress on anyone who respected MJ as a successful artist and have a lifelong association with his artistry and his music. It is particularly offensive to the family as Black Americans because to the extent black traditions were reflected in the service, they were puzzled over and then ridiculed by this article.

    You don’t have to be an MJ fan to make the objections that have been made by the people who have posted comments here.

    The author did not have to celebrate MJ but he didn’t have to denigrate his MEMORIAL service on the DAY OF HIS MEMORIAL either. The service was appropriate to his life and stature as an entertainer.

  • panda2526

    I quite think the OJ anaolgy was interesting…remember when we sat transfixed to our tvs when the OJ “chase” went on, and even though we were watching another human being self-destruct before our eyes (did not MJ self-destruct over the course of his life as the world watched in horror and repulsion AND adoration??) and his life unravel before us, we could just NOT stop watching? Neither could the world. It was hypnotic, and the media was there, tucked into every nook and cranny, every crack, every hole, every available aircraft to bring us, the world, this breaking story…LIVE…to bring us every gory and private detail, NOT unlike what just happened in the last two weeks and at MJ’s memorial yesterday. The world stands transfixed, as though they just can’t tear their eyes away from this rivetting spectacle. And that is what it is, a spectacle. What one person finds “gaudy” another would find beautiful. It is a matter of taste. The definition in the dictionary simply states that among other meanings, gaudy: marked by extravegance or SOMETIMES tasteless showiness; OR, also, exceptional, ie. a gaudy batting average. Was the casket either of these? YES, and gaudy does NOT have to have the negative connotation so many are ascribing to it. James analogy was relative…spoken from a viewpoint that MANY do not agree with, however, it was like watching some slow motion unravelling of someone’s last moments, something so intimate yet completely trasparent to an entire world. And we watched. I find a hypocrisy here…how can so many people respond to another’s opinion in such a unyeilding and judgemental manner about a man who tried to teach a world to NOT be judgemental and that it doesn’t matter who and what you are and what you believe? Why has the reality tv market exploded? Because people just can’t help watching another person either destroy or be destroyed. And we just can’t get enough. Give the guy a break…he’s a tv critic. He’s paid to observe the media from a different perspective. Doesn’t make him wrong. And we read it. What does that make us?

  • kayinga

    I am going to have to address this comment because it caught my eye. One thing you are correct about is the way the black community has embraced Michael Jackson. I am black {African American} myself and I believe that we as a race has some issues at times.

    I.E. O.J. Simpson clearly had no ties to our community and when he was arrested my people gave him undying support. I just don’t get it. He clearly felt disdain for his race as a whole. When he made it to the top, he divorced his wife and married a white woman. He was never seen with a black woman since the first wife.

    Michael was the same way. We accepted the fact that he had some type of skin disorder, but then he made it worse by changing his features. Then his kids are clearly white. He married white women and supposedly dated white women. He invited non black kids to his home. Yes, Emmanuel Lewis was a friend at one point in time, but as far as other black kids, I do not see anyone else in the black community stepping up and stating that he invited them over for tea and cookies besides his siblings children.

    The only reason why Michael embraced the black community is because he needed our support during his trial. That is it plain and simple. Once he had that support and was acquitted he clearly went back to doing the same old thing again and again. Even before his death he was talking a non black child on tour to sing the song that made him an international star.

    It is sad how we {blacks} have strived and fought to break down barriers as a whole and when someone finally does make it out, they slap us in the face by turning their backs on us.

    Michael entertained us. He made us want to get up and dance. He made us proud and made us turn away in embarrassment. However, I do not remember seeing him speak out for us.

  • http://botd.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/top-posts-1168/ Top Posts « WordPress.com

    [...] One Last Big (Yet Moving) Show for Michael The coverage of Michael Jackson’s memorial began early on cable news this morning, with nonstop helicopter video [...] [...]

  • juslove

    Your screen name is perfect because umustbkiddingme with the self-serving crap you posted!? You are’nt being held hostage by anyone ;we are still a free country! TURN OFF YOUR T.V ,change your channel or dont read what you are not interested in !

    I would also advise you to spell check before you attempt to criticize!
    The correct spelling is p-e-d-o-p-h-i-l-e ,I-D-I-O-T! As I recall he was never convicted of anything and,the last I checked we were still in America where that counts for something. Farrah was not robbed of anything as far as I am concerned .Those that loved her did and will continue to celebrate her accomplishments and will mourn her loss accordingly.However the loss of Michael Jackson does not have to be trivialized nor minimized in order for that to take place.

  • juslove

    Maybe you and “Dear James” should form a partnership..? Since you apparently only responded to this article for publicity for your little backroom company and he obviously has grace and empathy of equal stature..
    Do you personally know anything more that Michaels middle name ? I doubt it.Who are you to imply anything negative about him? Whatever he died from is irrelevant THE MORAL OF THIS POST IS THAT YOU ;NOR ANYONE ELSE HAS THE RIGHT TO MAKE SUCH UNDIGNIFIED STATEMENTS ABOUT A MAN YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT at such a terrible time of loss for his loved ones!! I PITY YOU AND DEAR JAMES’ FAMILY! I hope that they are not subjected to such callous remarks from such small minds as you and your comrads.

    How will they feel when people DO’NT WONDER or care that someone such as you YOU DIED (much less what FROM) ?.. wink …wink.
    By the way genius Mariah is’nt likely “losing her voice” .What you heard was EMOTION.I am sure you are unfamiliar with that term ;as it takes someone with a heart to relate…

  • juslove

    Cambridge before you decide to try and convict Michael post-humously as a ??paedophile ???learn to spell. PEDOPHILE .You and the author display equal talent and empathy. By the way an IDIOT that can blog is still an IDIOT.

  • juslove

    Wow byemike..you actually wrote your post to:Michael?
    …and let me be sure I have this right.. he is the wierdo in your eyes?Interesting…?further it is idiotic racist people like you that have caused weaker,less educated,and less economically sound countries than ours to view us as fools. I sincerely hope that Al Sharpton has the chance to read this blog and hopefully attend YOUR funeral since …[b] you had serious issues.

    I dare not attempt to convince you of the fallacies and rhetoric the media depend on to gain “fans/believers” such as yourself ;because I doubt that you are intelligent enough to even comprehend the notion that just maybe; YOU CAN’T BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU READ!

    Otherwise we would all read your blog and be convinced that your ignorant insults and insinuations have merit. Elvis was straight? ok?

  • joebobattacks

    James Poniewozik– You sound as bad as Bill O’Reily.

    It’s shameful to think that a writer for Times Magazine in the year 2009 could say such misguided things.

    I personally despise Al Sharpton and I don’t particularly care for Sheila Jackson, but for you to not understand that Jackson was an African-American icon boggles my mind. It doesn’t matter what Michael did to himself with regard to his plastic surgeries. He still came from a black family and was raised as a black person.

    African-American’s themselves are not straight off the ivory coast. African-American is a mixture of African, White, and Native American. Therefore, it would make sense that “blackness” is not solely linked to color or appearance but it is a culture or an “imagined” community.

    For you to not acknowledge that Michael Jackson broke down barriers over the last 40 years means you have little understanding of ethnicity in America. Or worse, you were unaware that there were any barriers in the first place.

    Perhaps in order for you and a few select others to accept him you need to brand him as something other than what he was. The basis of your argument resting solely on his obvious troubles and self-loathing.

    Michael Jackson being an African-American icon does not exclude anyone. Michael Jackson was still a transcending figure who crossed all ethnic and racial lines and appealed to the masses, which paved the way for this country to do something other countries could never do, elect a Black (or bi-racial) president in a country with a pre-dominantly White population. Acknowledging Michael Jackson’s heritage as a black man is a unifying thing, not a divisive one.

    In the end, race is a social construct. There’s only one race of people–humans. Michael Jackson showed us that people could look beyond such things and come together. That’s his legacy–not a “gaudy” gold coffin.

    When people like you and Bill O’Reily deny his heritage it takes away from all those accomplishments.

  • repzak

    I take one important lesson away from reading (some) of the comments here: Human beings are able to subvert and sully even the most pure message – even or perhaps especially when said message is delivered by their “hero”.

    MJ spoke of love, compassion and human dignity. And yet all his fans here seem to have recently crawled out of the deepest sewer and spill their hate, bigotry and anger all over JP.

    Why am I reminded of a very famous Jewish carpenter who spoke a very similar message, and yet would later have crusades, witch hunts, burnings at the stake and the Inquisition as some of the perversions humanity managed to create from his words?

    This was a balanced piece – it had compassion and reverence for MJ and it had some less positive comments too. It is not a puff piece but it’s certainly not a hit piece either.

    If you – as a human being – can’t handle that your idol is not uniformly idolized, sainted and sanctified by everyone, then you are well on your way to perverting your idols core values and beliefs, and become the true Judas.

  • topherwilson

    Touchy, touchy, touchy. Frankly, I’m much more disappointed in the JP bashers than I am in JP. Honestly, what was written about Billy Mays on one of the other Time blogs after he died was in less taste than this article.

    Having sat through the entire memorial, I have to say that what was written in this article pretty much matches up with some of the feelings I had. Spectacle? Yes. Gaudy? At points. There were times where I was very uncomfortable watching it, where it felt almost voyeuristic. A helicopters sending a live feed of the family as they entered/exited their private ceremony was unnecessary. Hearing speakers touch on Jackson’s previous cases–especially the congresswoman’s almost proud proclamation–was unsettling and at times felt inappropriate. Though as my father said, “Just because a man’s died doesn’t mean you forget the bad.” But how many people does it take to comment on a man’s turmoil at a memorial service?

    I have mixed feelings about his daughter speaking. One half of me says it was absolutely beautiful and it was indeed the most poignant aspect of the entire ceremony. At the same time, I do sort of agree with some commenters on other blogs who think that a child’s grief over the loss of a parent should be private (though I believe that she herself chose to speak, unlike some of the latter group).

    Quite honestly, what I find most uncomfortable is that the coffin was there. Could they have done the memorial service without his body being present? Yes, and it still would have been as moving as it was when Brooke Shields or Paris spoke.

    But now we have this article, this (what is essentially a) review/recap of the memorial service, and everybody is freaking out because a)misinterpretation of the tone or b)a few choice words or c)both. Instead of jumping down his throat because of what he wrote, how about taking some time to figure out that his tone is in no way disrespectful? Like I said, the other Time writer who wrote about Mays last week was in much less taste with his article than James. Back off and go focus on Bill O’Reilly and his remarks, which were also in much less taste and way more disrespectful than this.

  • panda2526

    Elaine…I have many exceptions to Jackie’s comments (as I did to many others), not the typo itself, I’m not that infantile, only pointing out to her her “mistake”. Whatever. I make typos all the time, although I try to correct them first. She speaks as though she is an authority on many subjects, and yes, I too believe that a person needs to be informed in order to make an informed opinion. But her comments about JW’s and the mother of MJ were what I took exception to. Unless she has first hand knowledge of what she writes, I suggested she think first about putting her opinions to type. That is not wrong for me to do this, along with all the other people that have done the same. I personally have first hand knowledge of the religion, not just from reading some web articles or “researching” it on Wickipedia or whatever. I also do not have this information second-hand, as in being at arms length. I did not like her insinuations that all of us who were disagreeing with what seems to be the majority on this particular blog are misinformed fools and obviously unlettered and ordinary! All I was saying is that there are so many disturbing things in this world for people to be so inflamed about than this. We need to put it in perspective, really, and not be hypocritically bashing someone so vehemently and name-calling and damning one to hell for writing something not all would agree with. Seems ludicrous to me that people who claim to love this dead man would respond with such hate and malice toward a live one! In MJ’s life, did he always do things that were correct? He was not perfect by any means. So allow for others to differ and do not support the ones that resort to mud-slinging to get their point across. Two wrongs don’t make a right.

  • panda2526

    Jackie, it can’t be a “traditionally WHITE religion” if God said thousands of years ago that in every nation the man that fears him is acceptable to him. I was questioning your source of information that makes you think that it is a traditionally white religion that includes people from all races and ethnic backgrounds in the last few decades, and no, I do not have a problem with that. It is the basis of that love for all people and God that the “Law” (Mosaic) was fulfilled. But it is not a “new” or “recent” idea you seem to suggest, or maybe I am reading you wrong. THe many men and women of old that worshipped God and born before Christ were of all different backgrounds. Job was Oriental. Peter preached to a man from Ethiopia who wanted to be baptized. That is only a couple of examples. I have researched this subject for 39 years, believe me, I HAVE my facts straight, and they are NOT twisted as you say. When I research I go straight to the source, what does the Bible REALLY teach? Not what some man says. But if he can back it up by scripture and prove he has not taken it out of context and that it is in harmony with the rest of the Bible, then I base by beliefs on that. Anyone can write anything and it will have elements of truth. We must be careful of everything we read and from what source it comes. I have been taught that you treat people how you want to be treated and when I read your comments among MANY others and not just yours, I was dismayed to see how people were treating each other over a man that died and one that none of you knew personally!! Research it all you want, you will NEVER know the whole story OR the real man. I just wish that people had this much passion to change the world in positive ways in other areas of life that need changing, ie all the ones I listed that you mocked me for being concerned about. All people do who turn on each other is perpetuate more of the same hate and prejudice, not against race but against an idea or an opinion. If you and all the others did not agree with his assessment while he wore his “critic” hat, then you could have all just mouseclicked your way away from it and kept all your negative thoughts and bashing to yourself. That is what creates controversy, people responding to negativity with negativity. I did not single you out at first, only after it touched a nerve of mine when you brought up some opinions that I felt were wrong. Is that not what happened when you read James opinions?

  • msgrace2u2

    ATTENTION TO ALL WHO FOUND THIS “REVIEW” OFFENSIVE CHECK OUT THE LINK BELOW TO LEARN MORE ABOUT PONIEWOZIK.

    See this jerk’s disrespect for Michael at http://muckrack.com/poniewozik
    Biased from the start.
    Want to talk “guady?” Look at some eurocentric furnishing (the royals anyone?) or Donald Trump (ever see his house?) or Graceland the home of your “Almighty King” who appropriated the blues and rock and roll. “Elvis was a hero to some but he never meant %^*% to me, MF him and John Wanye.” I hope that TIME mag. fires your racist ass.

    Michael Jackson the real and only KING, now and forever. THE GREATEST OF ALL TIME. Just ask the tens of millions that worship at his alter.

    Idiot.

    From a former subscriber to TIME magazine.

  • sibarita66

    People, take it easy. The article is solid, a bit cynic at times, but truthful. MJ was a great, yet flawed artist and that is the truth. When people die people only try to remember the good, and that is OK, but the reality is that in order to improve ourselves and others is that the truth needs to be told. I like MJs music and i like the article. Great job!!

  • karynlg

    The people who sued MJ for molestation were after money. If he was guilty it would have come out and he would have been convicted. End of story.

  • karynlg

    Jackson was never convicted of child molestation. The people who accused him wanted money. If he was a molester, he would have been convicted.

    Also, Michael Jackson gave far more millions to charity than Elvis ever did. Look it up.

  • http://tvtattle.com/wordpress/2009/07/07/291/ — TV Tattle

    [...] how well-produced it was Daughter Paris upstaged the memorial sideshow // Where was TV perspective? Cable news outshined networks // ABC, CBS couldn’t keep their mouths shut “Laverne and Shirley’s” Big [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus