Prince Charles: Should Architects Boycott His Talk?

I posted last month about the objections by Prince Charles, famed foe of modern architecture, to a proposed apartment complex in London from the office of Pritzker-prize winning architect Richard Rogers. At the time I mentioned that by excellent coincidence Charles was already scheduled to speak this month to the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA), which is less of a coincidence when you recall that this month marks the 25th anniversary of the famous talk, also to the RIBA, in which Charles first entered the architecture-wars arena with a roar.

It was on May 30, 1984 that Charles denounced modern architecture generally and derailed a proposed modern addition to the National Gallery of Art in London by calling it “a monstrous carbuncle on the face of a much-loved and elegant friend”. The carbuncle design was duly abandoned and new architects chosen. When the dust settled the National Gallery was added to more discreetly by the American architects Robert Venturi and Denise Scott Brown.

The (rough) anniversary of that speech is set for tomorrow. Meanwhile, as a response to Charles’ intervention in the Rogers apartment project, the British architect Peter Ahrends has been urging his fellow architects to boycott the talk. It so happens that it was Ahrends’ firm that designed the proposed “carbuncle” and I guess hard feelings still linger. But the boycott has already fallen flat and tickets for the speech have sold out, which is just as well. Charles and his taste for gemütlichkeit architecture is simply a fact of life that British architects have to live with. There’s nothing to be gained by spurning him, especially given his royal clout. And anyway, it will be interesting to hear what he has to say.

I don’t agree with Charles or his enthusiasm for neo-Classical trimmings and Cornwall cornball, but I’m big on free speech, so you can read the full text of his 1984 address here.

Related Topics: Looking Around
  • Latest on Entertainment

    Jordin Althaus/AMC

    Mad Men Character Study: Sympathy for Betty

    Sue me, but I like Betty Draper/Francis as a character. The problem is that Mad Men doesn’t. Betty’s not the worst character on the show, but she’s probably the worst-served.

    The Boom in Hollywood ImplosionsSlate

    Gods without men the sugar frosted nutsack bringing up the bodies

    The Year in Novels So Far; Plus, Hilary Mantel!

    Though it’s only May, I’ve already read enough novels I love to fill up most of my top 10 list for 2012—including Bring Up the Bodies

  • http://richmonda.wordpress.com/2009/05/10/prince-charles/ Prince Charles « What Not to Build

    [...] Time’s Richard Lacayo comments in his blog here and here [...]

  • http://phoenix.backpage.com/TicketsForSale/cheap-american-idols-live-tickets-us-airways-center/10167022 American Idols Live Tickets American Airlines Center

    American Idols Live Tickets American Airlines Center…

    The French couple was the beginning of the end. They were 20- somethings with a taste for Patchouli oil and loose- fitting clothes. It started badly when they called me around midnight to say their plane had been delayed and they wouldn’ t be at my pla…

blog comments powered by Disqus