Charles in Charge?

Chelsea Barracks Apartments (rendering)/Images: Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners
Chelsea Barracks Apartments (rendering)/Images: Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners
Though Tuned In has upped its politics-and-news content as the election gets closer, I haven't covered campaign ads much. That's partly because we have the rest of the political blog world for that, but also because I hardly ever see campaign ads, except online and on cable news. As a TV critic with Tivo and screeners, I don't see many ads, period. And also, I live in New York, whose electoral status is not much of a cliffhanger. I am curious, though, and lucky me, I have an audience of far-flung TV watchers. So tell me: Where do you live, and what kind of campaign ads are you seeing? What sort of issues are they targeting where you live? Are they positive or negative? And are there any you've actually liked?

Britain’s Prince Charles, the sworn enemy of modern architecture, has gone on the offensive again. Earlier this week he attacked a plan for a large but mostly low-rise apartment development project. Designed by Richard Rogers’ firm, Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners, it would be built on a site in west London across from Christopher Wren’s Royal Hospital. The site is being developed by a firm owned by the royal family of Qatar. Charles wrote to the head of the firm and to the Prime Minster of Qatar urging them to drop Rogers as architect for the project.

The Prince meanwhile is promoting an alternative scheme by Quinlan Terry, an historicizing architect who’s a favorite of his, which of course turns out to be a historical pastiche of the kind Terry is known for. (Among other things, he renovated the interiors of 10 Downing Street for Margaret Thatcher.)

I’m always strongly in favor of historical preservation, but the idea that historic buildings can only be surrounded by faux historic new construction is a huge mistake. It almost always leads to faux historic mediocrity. The real problem with the Rogers proposal for the Chelsea Barracks project, as it’s called, is that it’s never looked particularly interesting in any of the images I’ve seen of it.

Proposed Chelsea Barracks Project (aerial view)
Proposed Chelsea Barracks Project (aerial view)
Reports The Hollywood Reporter, Barack Obama has purchased a half-hour of primetime on CBS on Wednesday, Oct. 29. Obama is close to a deal with NBC as well, it says, and may strike one with Fox, depending on a possible baseball conflict. Smart idea or waste of money? I guess it depends what you do with it. If you're not roadblocking every network, you may just be driving ratings up for whatever network isn't carrying your mega-ad—unless you offer something that stokes genuine curiosity. (Hey, maybe he could get Sarah Palin to show up!) If you do roadblock every network—well, people are going to get ticked off that you roadblocked every network, aren't they? It will be interesting to see what he does with the time, anyway. Obama's airtime purchase, at 8 p.m. E.T., will knock Gary Unmarried off the air for the night. That's change we can believe in!

The Qataris probably thought they were assuring themselves an easy ride in the approval process for their project by signing up one the Big Two of British architecture. (Norman Foster of course being the other name.) But the banality of the proposal from Rogers’ firm opened the way for the Prince to step in with a banal proposal all his own.

Proposed Chelsea Barracks project
Proposed Chelsea Barracks project
Barack Obama has finished a deal to air his half-hour campaign pitch on NBC as well Oct. 29, James Hibberd reports. In the process, he will do what Pushing Daisies could not: knock Knight Rider off the air. Hibberd further wonders whether other networks will air Obama's spot for free, as news coverage, given public interest in the election and lack of interest in pretty much everything else the networks have put on this fall. One question would be how non-paid coverage of the spot would fall under equal-time rules. For the paid spots, the networks are obligated to offer John McCain similar time and prices, but it's unclear whether the McCain campaign would be interested or could afford the unspecified price tag. I say, let's take it further: if no one is watching fall TV shows to begin with, let's make it into a sitcom! There's already a cast: his crazy, gaffe-making business partner; the cranky old guy next door; and the folksy, wise-cracking hockey mom. It sells itself! Anyone have a title for it? "Oh, 'Bama!"? "According to Barack"?

Exterior stairways are a Rogers signature, and the transparent exterior stairwell in the drawing at left is a nice touch, but if you’re going to go up against Christopher Wren, you need to do better.

You can find the Guardian’s story about the whole fracas here.

Related Topics: Looking Around
  • Latest on Entertainment

    Jordin Althaus/AMC

    Mad Men Character Study: Sympathy for Betty

    Sue me, but I like Betty Draper/Francis as a character. The problem is that Mad Men doesn’t. Betty’s not the worst character on the show, but she’s probably the worst-served.

    The Boom in Hollywood ImplosionsSlate

    Gods without men the sugar frosted nutsack bringing up the bodies

    The Year in Novels So Far; Plus, Hilary Mantel!

    Though it’s only May, I’ve already read enough novels I love to fill up most of my top 10 list for 2012—including Bring Up the Bodies

  • crankyoldwoman

    O.M.G. Not again. H.R.H. is a nice old codger who’s good to his Mum and actually has done a lot of good, but there’s no way he should be head of state in the 21st century. When he’s mentioned that he talks to plants, advocates frauds like homeopathy, and sells organic products from his estates at extortionate prices, I’ve wanted to beat my head on my desk. This is my country; we need to elect our head of state – someone who actively wants the job and can represent us in the world without making us look like a bunch of 17th century serfs.

    Back to the republic project.

  • http://c-monster.net/blog1/2009/04/09/the-digest-040909/ The Digest. 04.09.09. at C-MONSTER.net

    [...] Prince Charles still try to shove old architecture down everyone’s throat. [...]

  • http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2009/04/20/architects-to-prince-charles-butt-out/ Architects to Prince Charles: Butt Out – Looking Around – TIME.com

    [...] | Comments (0) | Permalink | Trackbacks (0) | Email This I mentioned a few weeks ago that Britain’s Prince Charles had inserted his Royal Self into the plans for a proposed apartment complex in London designed by Richard Rogers’ firm. Charles [...]

  • http://hragvartanian.com/2009/04/20/more-starchitect-hypocrisy/ The Prince & the Starchitects, A Tale of Hypocrisy — Hrag Vartanian

    [...] Time Magazine: More photos of the Rogers project here [...]

  • http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2009/06/16/prince-charles-in-charge-%e2%80%94-the-plot-thickens/ Prince Charles in Charge — The Plot Thickens – Looking Around – TIME.com

    [...] Posted by rlacayo | Comments (0) | Permalink | Trackbacks (0) | Email This In April I posted a few times about the latest royal architectural dust-up in Britain, where Prince Charles stepped in at the [...]

  • ncisnero

    This writer, Mr. Lacayo is obviously ignorant of good traditional architecture that has been built today. If he knew a little bit of what Quinlan Terry has done, he would know that he is as authentic as it gets. Rogers’ scheme was arrogant and disrespectful to the historical fabric of Chelsea not to mention highly unsustainable. If you are for historic preservation then you’d care that Rogers was going to destroy the Victorian chapel on the site too.

    Going back to traditional building practices is not only sustainable and durable but it reflects universally acceptable humanist principles. Rogers built an out-of-scale mechanical scheme and we’d all feel like robots living in it.

  • ncisnero

    I’m proud of the courage Prince Charles has shown. Why else have a Prince if he can’t make a few decisions once and awhile. He is saving Britain from some of the worse unsustainable architectural design decisions of the decade.

  • ncisnero

    Rogers’ scheme is as unsustainable as it gets in architecture and urbanism. If you care anything for your planet then do some more research and cut your Prince a break. He’s doing a lot of good. Traditional architecture IS sustainable architecture and can adapt to a modern world. Our world can not sustain any more glass and steel boxes…we do not have the energy to maintain these buildings.

blog comments powered by Disqus