Tuned In

House's Riskiest Operation Yet

After the jump, TIME writer and House aficionado John Cloud shares his (spoilery! you’ve been warned!) thoughts on last night’s House: 

No one watches House for the traditional medical-drama bits—the operating-room theatrics; the intra-doctor sexual assignations; the sweet little child patients that cause some character to bellow wetly, “We have to save her!”

The show isn’t above such ER tropes, but at heart, just like its Vicodin-addicted, jaundiced and spiteful title character, the show has no heart. Rather, and I say this as someone who has seen every episode, House is mainly a showcase for the comedic talents of Hugh Laurie, who plays Gregory House as an unflinchingly odious know-it-all who will never, ever be revealed to have a soft spot of love for humanity underneath. Each episode is a collection of harsh jokes punctuated by medical-ethics dilemmas of the sort that keep college students talking all night (would you let an abusive, alcoholic mother die so that you can harvest her kidney for her blameless daughter?). I can’t say I’m a fan of House because it would be like calling oneself a fan of cheap bourbon: rather, the show merely—and reliably—does what it should.

So it’s rather shocking to see the outpouring today for one of House’s colleagues, Dr. Kutner (Kal Penn), who has committed suicide for reasons that aren’t clear (and reasons that the show may never make perfectly clear, since that’s how House rolls). One of the strangest aspects of the grief for the Kutner character—which Fox invites you to express here—is that the actual writers of the show would find a wonderfully ruthless way for House to mock it all. If you’re so sad about Kutner’s suicide that you want to blog it, why are you watching House? That Grey’s Anatomy might work better for you.

Still, you have to hand it to Fox: it took a show that was struggling under the weight of a fifth season and got it more attention than in years. Until last night, the show had become the single most formulaic television product since Jeopardy. Each episode opens with characters we don’t know, one of whom will turn out to have a rare illness that only one man in the world—our (anti-)hero—could possibly diagnose. Very often, those openings try to trick you by showing an old or sick character being attended to by someone who appears healthy—and (surprise!) it’s the healthy one who will turn out to be sick. (In fact last night’s episode began that way.)

Earlier this season, the writers seemed to acknowledge that the formula was wearing thin. They wrote a scene in Episode 518 in which House is goofing off with matchbox cars in his office—one of which he literally causes to jump over a toy shark.

The most brilliant aspect of the Kutner death was not that Fox successfully kept it secret before last night (in fact there had been spoilers swirling in the fan community about a major character who would die). Rather, the episode—true to House form—didn’t end with Kutner’s suicide but rather opened with it, presenting it as one of those mysteries that House has to figure out. Of course, the twist is, he can’t figure it out: “You worked with him every day for two years, and you never saw this coming,” Wilson tells House.

“No one saw it coming,” House shoots back.

“But you see everything coming … You’re terrified that you’re losing your gift, who you are. And I’m terrified of what you’d do then.”

The show has also been plainly terrified by this prospect, and it will be interesting to see how the writers come back from this shaky, maudlin territory.

A funny side note: the episode featured a guest appearance by Meat Loaf (who was credited as “Meat Loaf Aday”). His character offers to die in order to give his dying wife his liver. House says, “If he’s gonna do this, he’s gonna do this for love”—which is funny because, of course, Meat Loaf would famously “do anything for love.” 

Related Topics: house, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Entertainment

    Sony Pictures

    The Vow Is Wow on a Lovely Valentine's Weekend

    Denzel Washington and The Rock also score well, and even Jar Jar Binks finds a few fans, as moviegoers plight their troth big-time

    Cancel the Oscars, Air the After-PartiesSlate

    Stephen Vaughan / 20th Century Fox

    New Photos From Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter

    The film, based on Seth Grahame-Smith’s mashup novel, hits theaters this summer.

  • Andy from MA

    Jim, great line about the cheap bourbon. I think I like the dialogue above all else and I come late to this show only watching first run episodes over the last two weeks. I’ve been watching the repeats on USA network.

    There isn’t much good dialogue left on free TV. I’m not an HBO subscriber, so I’m sure I’m missing some shows there but probably not.

    House is a combination of Nero Wolfe and Sherlock Holmes and his staff and friend Wilson are a combination of John watson, MD and Archie Goodwin. I could listen without video and know what was going on. Unlike 24.

  • rhys1882

    I enjoy House in the same way I enjoy the original CSI. They are both very formulaic yet somehow, within that formula, they are able to make very entertaining episodes. Part of it has to do with the characters. Both CSI and House have very well developed characters with genuine personalities, instead of the faux personalities most shows create. The characters in House and CSI actually make decisions and take actions based on their personalities, as well as have genuine flaws that work their way into those decisions and actions, instead of the fake flaws that most generic TV show characters have where they have a “checkered past” but in the present they are pretty much squeeky clean. It’s notable in CSI and House that you don’t really know much about the character’s backgrounds, yet you still have a sense of their personalities. Whereas other shows create elaborate backgrounds for their characters, but then don’t give their present actions any depth. Similarly, CSI is very formulaic in that it is a mystery that only these people can solve and there is always the exact amount of information necessary to solve it, as well as always the available tools to decipher that information. However, to be honest, if you boil any story line down to its basic elements it will fit a generic archetype, whether its TV or movies. Only the truly extraordinary shows are able to break out of those generic storytelling archetypes, like Mad Men, Breaking Bad, or Brotherhood. For the rest, it’s a question of whether they can make it entertaining and even clever within the restrictions of that formula. House is just a procedural like CSI, Law & Order, or the multitude others. “Procedural” is just another word for “formula.” But it’s a great show because it keeps the formula interesting.

  • http://tv-eh.com Diane

    Hmm, I think I have been watching a different show from John Cloud. Though if I only saw season 5 I might agree.

  • fleetline

    Interesting inside joke: Meat Loaf’s character was named Eddie in this episode, same as his role in Rocky Horror Picture Show.

  • chipc1999

    Thanks, James, for the spoiler warning and the spoiler-free headline. Too bad Yahoo’s news aggregator for Time changed it to “Suicide on House: The Show’s Riskiest Operation.” I couldn’t miss the fact that Kal Penn had left the show, or that Kutner died, or even that he died in the first 10 minutes, thanks to my My Yahoo! page (putting EW’s interview & Penn’s reason for leaving right up top) and a usually pretty spoiler-free pop-culture blog. But I’d managed to avoid the cause of death until tonight. And to top it off, that’s when I learned that “House” doesn’t appear on Fox.com until 8 days after the show airs and that it’s not on Hulu or Amazon either. I’m glad I recently learned about surfthechannel.com so I could at least see the episode that everybody and her mother wanted to tell me all about.

    Sorry for the rant, but I’m really very good at avoiding spoilers when I want to. I don’t know much of anything that happened in the last 3 seasons of “The Wire.” I’m pretty sure that one character doesn’t make it all the way to the end, and that the last season is about newspapers. That takes work, but I’m willing to do it. But in these days of time-shifting viewing, a major spoiler like this should be respected more than it was.

  • lostepic

    I am not quiet sure how I feel about the transition. Of course after reading the interview with Penn, I can see how the writers were put in a creative hole, however, it may have saved the show and given it the boost it needed to get out of the usual redundancy of the show. I love the show dont get me wrong. the sarcasim, cynism, and genius of House that is Greg Laurie, who oddly enough didnt have any decent filmography to his name before the show, is amazing. But I am afraid I failed what I am good at doing as well. I have an offbeat scheduale and usual try to watch the show the day after but Yahoo headlines spoiled it thus the death of lack the impact and suprise I may have felt if I didnt know. The sad part is that I knew someone was going to die and after checking my email tuesday morning I saw the headline “House and Suicide” with Penn’s pic. Then I knew that when I watch the show after work it was ruined. But I will say this that the death has brought new life and again thrown a kink in the smug sureness that House thought he could figure it out. The latter half was fantastic, I forgot about the patients and cared more about what House was doing with the death. Which is what the show about to the producers suprise mid-first season.

  • psychotherapybrownbag

    As a suicide researcher, it was hard not to take a clinical perspective when watching this episode. Generally, this is problematic because TV shows tend to depict things horrible and perpetuate misinformation. On the whole though, I thought the show did a fairly good job. House’s comment that the method of choice indicated panic was completely incorrect, but the writers never said that it was correct, so that’s fine. I’m particularly pleased that the show mentioned 1-800-273-TALK at the end of the program. Part of me feels like I’ll be as frustrated as House that I can’t learn more about this situation in the future!

    http://www.psychotherapybrownbag.com

  • merbelle

    “But in these days of time-shifting viewing, a major spoiler like this should be respected more than it was.”

    I completely, utterly, disagree, chip. Yes, Time did it nicely here; making a general headline and warning in a subheader. However, the planet doesn’t owe you its discussion of a TV airing. Are we to now never have “day after” discussions because you feel like just catching up on the weekend and want us to wait for you? Should all the news services have every fan check in before they report TV items of interest? Should Kal Penn secretly move out of his apartment in LA in case someone in Phoenix is on vacation on an island where there’s no satellite TV or internet service?

    There has to be a standard. People shouldn’t have to wait a few days to discuss TV shows once they’ve been aired in case chip didn’t have time to watch. Once the original airing has hit all the time zones in the country of origin, nothing in that airing is a spoiler any longer. It’s up to you to suck it up and realize that.

    As to this season, I think there’s been an admirable attempt to shake up the formula. But the chemistry seems lacking, and the absence of Kal Penn may bring that to fore.

  • http://botd.wordpress.com/2009/04/09/top-posts-1077/ Top Posts « WordPress.com

    [...] House’s Riskiest Operation Yet After the jump, TIME writer and House aficionado John Cloud shares his (spoilery! you’ve been warned!) thoughts [...] [...]

  • chipc1999

    @merbelle: As I noted in my post, I understand it’s my responsibility to avoid spoilers if I don’t want to be spoiled. And I never said people shouldn’t discuss something after it’s aired, for Pete’s sake. I just didn’t want a spoiler in a headline on my damn home page, and I don’t think that’s too much to ask the day after something happened. It’s not like I was asking for someone not to reveal what Rosebud was — just some consistency between this post’s headline & care to reveal anything, and the aggregator’s too-revealing headline. There’s a fine line to walk (and I used to, when I was an entertainment reporter for eight years), but it can be done.

blog comments powered by Disqus