Tuned In

Jay Gets Bigger, NBC Gets Smaller

Paul Drinkwater
NBC Photo: Paul Drinkwater

 

 

Jay Leno, apparently, is not going anywhere, but NBC is downsizing. 

Just after NBC Universal head Jeff Zucker raised speculation that NBC may look to reduce the number of nights it programs per week, the New York Times reports that NBC will give Leno a nightly show at 10 p.m. E.T., probably starting next fall.

Ideally, this move would kill more than two birds with one stone for NBC. Let’s count them, shall we?

The bird that will get the most attention at first, but is in the long run less important, is What to Do About Jay. Leno remains a big star, and NBC had been criticized for letting him go—to give Conan O’Brien the Tonight Show slot—because of the possibility he might move on to compete for another network. Possibility eliminated.

Bird two: NBC programming chief Ben Silverman, and Zucker before him, have been almost wholly unable to develop new hit shows. Since Friends went off the air there, it’s been like the dinosaur die-off,  with the occasional minor light like The Office, or Heroes, before it lost its viewers. Leno would relieve NBC of the responsibility to program at 10 p.m., period—a time when network hits have been few and cable networks have stepped in. Fewer slots to fill, fewer bombs to embarrass you. 

[Update: This move, if it goes through, is pure Zucker, by the way. He's never been able to develop programming. His skill is redeploying assets someone else created. Thus the supersized Friends, the third and fourth hour of the Today show and so forth. If Zucker hangs around long enough at NBC U, the ever-growing Today show and the metastasizing late-night block will eventually meet at about 3 in the afternoon—like the two halves of the Transcontinental Railroad joining together—and NBC will have only one show, which will run 24 hours a day with local-news breaks.]

Bird three, and probably the most significant: NBC, like the other big networks—and other big media, including newspapers and magazines—simply has to learn to get smaller. Think of it as de-leveraging, network-style. In an environment of cable,  fewer viewers per network and less easily-found revenue, mounting big-budget entertainment three hours a night is less and less viable.

Will Leno draw hit numbers at 10? Doubtful. A late-night audience of five million would be paltry in prime-time, and even if he pulls slightly more, that won’t be a blockbuster number. [Oh, and there's always the possibility he could pull even less.] But it won’t need to be. As Bill Carter points out in the New York Times, Leno’s show would be much cheaper than a scripted drama, even with his big salary. So the viewer bar is lower. 

But with these birds killed, other birds will spring up in their place. For instance: if Jay is NBC’s new pre-late-night host (um, medium-night host?), and, as Maureen Ryan points out, trying to book the same guests as Conan—then what does that make Conan, who’s now still following Leno (with a break for local news)? Is Conan still the New Jay, or now, in hierarchy, the New Old Conan? Is Jimmy Fallon no longer the New Conan but the new Carson Daly? Is Carson Daly the new Poker After Dark? 

There’s the open question of how Wall Street, Madison Avenue and the rest of the TV business will take the move. Does it look visionary, or smack of desperation? (Can’t it be both?) Silverman and Zucker, one would imagine, must be running out of excuses to send upstairs at GE. 

There’s also the question of general viewership against the competition. The fact is, Jay Leno will lose NBC viewers compared with, say, an ER. [The old successful ER, anyway.] You could argue, in fact, that, in a way, that is exactly the point. This is a move to transition NBC to the smaller-big-network era. Yeah, there will be a lot of buzz about how this is a radical act for a new TV era. But Leno himself is not going to get any more exciting or funny at 10 p.m. than he was at 11:35. People like me will not stick around to watch Jay every night. But guess what? We were being lost anyway, to shows on FX or Comedy Central or NBC’s sister network Bravo—if not to things besides TV altogether.

This is where Jay is like de-leveraging in the economy. He’s a means of making NBC smaller, quickly but stably—ushering it into the age of diminished expectations, to the smaller 10 p.m. audience networks are going to have anyway, but doing so in a way where (a) the fall-off won’t be disastrous and (b) the balance sheet makes sense. That’s the dream, anyway.

The question—one of many unanswerables this move will raise—is whether ABC and CBS will follow suit in some way, or counterprogram and try to reap some reward. A lot of birds will be disturbed by NBC’s stone-throw here. But it looks like they think it may be the only way to save a Peacock.

Related Topics: nbc, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Entertainment

    Angeline Herron / ABC

    The Bachelorette Watch: The Muppets Make A Move on Emily

    The Muppets stop by The Bachelorette so Kermit can make a play for Emily Maynard’s heart. Or something.

    Adele Crosses Huge MilestoneHuffington Post

    Loic Venance / AFP / Getty Images

    Jackie Chan Has (Not) Made His Last Action Film

    Jackie Chan reminds us that English is his second language. And despite rumors, no, he isn’t retiring from action movies, thank you.

  • Tom Shaw

    As I mentioned in the other thread, the “big” three shedding the 10pm hour makes enormous sense (Fox & CW effectively have done that already) – ratings are minimal and there haven’t been any hits in years (thanks NYT for backing me up with hard numbers) – and you reduce the number of hours you have to schedule each week. But instead of simply returning the airtime to the affiliates, this plan comes up roses for all the reasons you mentioned, as well as the delicious irony of NBC brass again trying to pull a switcheroo at the changing of the guard at late night (e.g. the Carson/Leno/Letterman shenanigans).
    -
    And as I pointed out with Fox & FX, and you with NBC & Bravo, as a corporate entity, the networks don’t necessarily have to give up on scripted shows at 10pm – they can just move them to cable. I suspect CBS will continue to stand their ground for another half decade (why not, all they do is write another check to the likes of Eleventh Hour to stay net profitable for that programming hour), but ABC is in a bit of a pickle, with demographically limited cable channels like Lifetime and ABC Family as the only places to schedule adult 10pm dramas on. (Although, again, its not like ABC has _any_ longrunning 10pm shows to lose, now that Boston Legal is going off the air.)
    -
    And no, Leno’s ratings will not be fantastic (I’d guess about +5% from what he currently does at 11:30). But Zucker can still point out that his numbers are far better than the local news and syndicated shows the Fox & CW affiliates are airing.

  • adriaezn

    Someone should write their thesis on the correlating downward spirals of NBC and the U.S. Perhaps when we all woke up around 1999/2000 after having been lulled into a dot-com/Friends/Seinfeld induced stupor we suddenly realized how empty our lives were and rushed to buy houses we couldn’t really afford…There you go. I already started the abstract for you.

    Anywho. The thing that worries me most about NBC is its unwavering determination to not look past the next 2 years (or 2 months for that matter). Once the recession begins to decline (fingers crossed?), and America heads back to work at its assorted fancy new jobs (infrastructure development, green technologies, etc.), it will be looking for something new to watch/do. I applaud NBC for its wise investment in hulu.com. But outside of that single decision, I cannot for the life of me find another example of a smart, youth-oriented decision. My fellow young-persons and I do not want to watch Jay Leno at 10 pm – or at all, for that matter. He is not funny. And that voice, yikes!

    Again and again we see NBC execs relegating hip, new, forward-thinking shows to Bravo because it is too scared/uncertain to back them completely by placing them on NBC. Just imagine if Zucker had let Kathy Griffin, Project Runway, and Next Top Chef be his Tuesday line-up! While I’m sure the network would receive a lot of grief for some of Kathy’s more unappealing life-decisions (oh, the schmemmies fiasco…), could you imagine the number of viewers that kind of contraversy would generate? We all remember how God-awful that “Married with Children” show was when Fox first started out(whatever happened to Ed O’Neill anyways?), but from that dispicable hell-spawn we now have Family Guy! The Simpsons! House! Not the world’s most educated line-up (except for The Simpsons), but a solid ratings-getter nonetheless.

    One drawback to that potential Tuesday line-up: not really a big draw for the 18-40 male demographic. But that’s just it. Demographics are changing. No one spends during a recession like a child-free, young, gay-man experiencing one for the first time. (Trust me, I am one…I still can’t believe these sales!). Women are getting married farther and farther into their lives, leaving their 20s (and nowadays, even early 30s) free for self-indulgent spending. Straight, white men control less and less of this nation’s supply of disposable income. When NBC and advertisers figure this out, then perhaps I’ll start to watch the peacock again.

    (Props to 30 Rock though…I love that show.)

  • plukasiak

    Does anyone else get the sense that this decision re: a new 10 PM format has been in the cards since the announcement of Conan taking over Tonight — and that the Rosie fiasco was not so much about a new “variety” show, but about NBC’s negotiations with Leno?

    I get the sense that the new Leno show will have a somewhat different format than Tonight — that there will be more emphasis on guest performances, and less on Jay himself (he’ll still do a stand-up monologue, but after the first commercial, it will be about the guests, rather than another comedy “bit”).

  • Tom Shaw

    I too thought about that concept Paul (at least, I thought it was Paul) – reduce the number of interviewees, add more comedians and a few scripted bits, and you’re quite near a variety show anyway. But the NYT article tries to make it clear that the format will essentially be unchanged.
    -
    But I doubt the Rosie thing was leverage against Leno – her show would have only been running once a week (just because of the difficulty of scripting 5 nights a week of that – look at how bad the material was for only one night, with who knows how many weeks to work on it). But it was an example of NBC trying to find low budget fare to fill 10pm with (and finding the variety concept totally lacking).
    -
    Again, I am most interested in seeing how ABC responds. Although they have quite a few new shows coming up in the Spring, given that they have already cut the orders for some shows like Cupid, I suspect they already think they’ll be disappointing. Of course, ABC lacks any surplus of talk shows to fill the time with, so perhaps they go back to the future and heavily program news (20/20, Primetime) in that hour again.

  • http://saintsuperman.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/nbc-and-the-future-of-jay-leno/ NBC and the Future of Jay Leno « Saint Superman

    [...] it’s a problem with television these days. It turns out that the Powers That Be can’t seem to figure out how to cope with the Cable Era, which is sad, because the Cable Era has been around for the better part of fifteen years. Most of [...]

  • trifecta

    This is a great opportunity for ABC and CBS. I think shows like the CSI franchise should all be set back to 10PM to counter-program. Jay’s audience demographic is very old for advertisers. I doubt that 20 somethings will start tuning in at 10.
    .
    It’s sad though. 5 hours of prime time tv killed. More and more reality shows. I just hope they don’t revise Dateline NBC 5 nights a week to kill off the other third of their programming.

  • http://www.simonvinkenoog.nl/beeld/Yogi%20-%20Annelies%20Rigter.jpg yogi

    I feel a “you’re doing a heck of a job [Zuckie]” coming on…

  • http://blog.alisascharf.com/?p=6 Alisa Scharf » good news for people who like bad news

    [...] struck a new deal with NBC! Thank God – where else would could we go for a steady supply of Menendez Brothers [...]

  • http://www.broadscaler.com broadscaler

    I recently starting using http://www.OVpulse.com which is a guide to the most watched TV Shows like the Tonight Show, Movies, Cartoons, News and other channels. They have this cool chat ‘overlay’ function so any video I’m watching, anywhere, I can chat over. Their site is updated hourly so for me it’s a time saver if you kow what I mean? don’t have to visit 28+ different sites to get my fix :) An idea whos’e time has come…

  • catskillz1020

    Well trifecta,

    I am a 20 something, 21 to be exact…and have been a nightly jay leno watcher for many years now. I also know plenty of Jay Leno watchers around my demographic age group who watch him as well. Jay Leno is not only a REAL person in my opinion, but entertaining as well. I will definitely give up watching a new Paris Hilton’s BFF episode at 10 to watch an hour of comedy routines by this great legend in show business. Jay has provided me with hours of great entertainment for most of the weeks throughout the year (except for the occasional dying of sickness day which he takes so rarely often), and it’s nice to fall asleep or even TiVO his episodes every night. Jay is popular with a lot of college kids, like Conan, but appeals to a much more broad demographic audience in the same way. I think this decision by NBC will not only help his regular percentage of viewers to his show, but will also help to extend his viewership to middle aged and older viewers in the earlier timeslot.

  • http://sgmusic.wordpress.com/2008/12/11/the-late-shift-part-2/ The Late Shift Part 2? « Steve’s Media Blog

    [...] shift – Conan O’Brien is set to take over the Tonight Show, while reliable ol’ Jay Leno gets his own weeknight 10pm show.  All this news kind of baffles me, to be [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus