Tuned In

It's Not HBO. It's Basic Cable TV.

MadMen103Bweb.jpg
AMC’s Mad Men. AMC

The New York Times’ Bill Carter rounds up the hot hot hot summer that basic cable TV has been having, with The Closer, Army Wives, Mad Men, Saving Grace, Damages and others becoming critical or commercial hits or both.

The summer-is-the-season-for-cable story is a bit of a perennial, but cable does seem to be hitting a kind of critical mass this year. Quality-wise, there hasn’t been a single big-network fall pilot I’ve been as enthusiastic about as Mad Men, for instance. But while these stories tend to pit basic cable against the shrinking broadcast networks, there’s a noteworthy flip side to the story: none of the aforementioned shows are on HBO, either. There’s a revealing snippet in Carter’s interview with Mad Men creator Matthew Weiner:

“Mad Men” had been a finished script for years. Mr. Weiner said, when he got a call “out of nowhere” that AMC was interested, he first thought the offer might be leverage to get a deal at HBO. But once he heard AMC’s plans for the show, “I said to myself, this is where I want to be.”

Now, yeah, yeah, I’m thinking the same thing you are: If HBO had offered Weiner a deal before he signed with AMC, he’d have disappeared, leaving a little cartoon puff of smoke and a pen spinning in place on the unsigned AMC contract. Maybe.

But I’m not totally cynical about his statement. He may have a practical point. At HBO, Mad Men would have been one of many dramas, and if it didn’t explode out of the gate, it could have easily been cancelled. With AMC willing to stake money and prestige on the show to brand itself, the bar is lower and the chance of success higher: get the good reviews and even modest ratings, and you can easily keep your show on for several years, running it exactly the way you want to with AMC’s gratitude. That’s as close to a creative blank check as you can get.

Granted, that check is a smaller one. Mad Men is lush for basic cable, but the budget constraints sometimes show in the little things, like the credits sequence, which looks like something a first-year graphic-design student threw up on YouTube. (HBO lavishes care on its opening credits like Roman emperor throwing himself a triumph.) But there’s a real argument nowadays for a creator with a great show to take it neither to the big networks nor to HBO but a hungry, basic-tier network.

It’s not like HBO has self-immolated. John from Cincinnati may have disappointed a lot of people (some of them occupying offices at HBO), but Flight of the Conchords is a niche critical hit. Its fall drama Tell Me You Love Me is going to divide critics (I really like it, but some critics are already calling it dull and pretentious)–but whatever its reviews and sexual controversy, it’s a quiet, cerebral show that’s never going to be a big popcorn entertainment like The Sopranos.

It’s not just the big networks, in other words, who need to be worried about basic cable now. But HBO can take comfort in one thing: Carter didn’t even bother to mention Showtime.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Entertainment

    Jordin Althaus/AMC

    Mad Men Character Study: Sympathy for Betty

    Sue me, but I like Betty Draper/Francis as a character. The problem is that Mad Men doesn’t. Betty’s not the worst character on the show, but she’s probably the worst-served.

    The Boom in Hollywood ImplosionsSlate

    Gods without men the sugar frosted nutsack bringing up the bodies

    The Year in Novels So Far; Plus, Hilary Mantel!

    Though it’s only May, I’ve already read enough novels I love to fill up most of my top 10 list for 2012—including Bring Up the Bodies

  • Jim ATL

    To pile on… Two points:
    On AMC, which has never had a original series, it can be that network’s Flagship series, its Sopranos. Instead of suffering from comparisons, a la “Well, it’s good, but it’s not as good as The Sopranos…”

    Also, despite the massive share of newsprint/blogspace that every HBO show commands, Mad Men is probably available in 4 or 5 times as many households as John from Cincinnatti.

  • BeerBaron

    Cable also seems to be following HBO’s lead in using web and On Demand platforms to expand their series’ audiences. Most of the shows mentioned in that story are available on Comcast’s OnDemand service — Mad Men, Saving Grace, State of Mind, Army Wives, and The Closer, and I’ve also watched TBS’ My Boys, BBC’s Jekyll and PBS’ Bill Moyers Journal. It makes sense: people watch less primetime TV in the summer, so why not give them the chance to check out new series on their own schedule? (I realize that people with TiVo essentially have everything on demand). I guess the ratings for first-run episodes might suffer if people know they can watch anytime OnDemand, but the flip side is viewers checking out a show OnDemand, then liking it and tuning in every week.

    So cable is not only outpacing the networks in producing quality series, but also in how they’re presented. It almost seems quaint that NBC expects me to be in front of the TV at the same day and time every week to watch 30 Rock.

    And I’m not even close to burying HBO. It currently lacks a huge “buzz show”, but what makes all of these premium and cable series great is that they don’t need or try to appeal to a massive audience.

  • Jayne

    I was excited that AMC was getting into original programming, but I’m having a hard time with “Mad Men” so far. Yes, I get that it’s set in 1960. But it seems to favor style over substance. And the opening credits look like they were done by a Hitchcock wannabe. Very “Vertigo.” Still, I’ll watch tonight in the hopes that we’ll get some character development. There’s a very funny author who posts hysterical recaps of each episode, written as two minute plays. At this point, I like them more than the show itself. Here’s the one for last week’s episode:
    http://www.unboundedition.com/content/view/1869/50/

  • Wizard63

    I am hooked on Mad Men. It’s the little, or subtle things that make this show seem all too real. One that jumped out at me this week was when Don’s wifey was reading to the kids. She was reading from a series called The Book House Books, a series I was brought on in the late forties and fifties. A small touch, but they continually do things like that and catch very precisely the time and place. And the internal tension for both Don and Pete is palpable. The show captures the underlying alienation of the “gray men” who populated the late fifties and were just beginning to see the cracks in the societal structure at the end of that decade. To me, each show stands almost on its own as a set piece. BTW, got a lead to your blog from Goodman’s column in SFGate. Glad I did.

  • Leah

    I worked in an ad agency in the early 60s. This program is so right on I feel like I am watching reruns on that part of my life.

  • LA

    Mad Men is a revelation. I love that the pacing differs from typical programming and that the story is meted out in small delicious morsels. Bravo to AMC.

  • http://colee1.wordpress.com colee1

    Nicole here and I think AMC has done a phenomenal job of grabbing shows like Mad Men and Walking Dead. My DVR records these shows so I don’t have to be at home in front of the TV at air-time and the HD versions are included in the HD programming I get free for life. Although I work for DISH I must say that I enjoy these hits in HD through DISH Network and wouldn’t have it any other way.

blog comments powered by Disqus