All-TIME 100 Novels

Critics Lev Grossman and Richard Lacayo pick the 100 best English-language novels published since 1923—the beginning of TIME.

87 comments
Paolo_Giordan
Paolo_Giordan

I know every list is so individual, but what about McCarthy and "The Road"? And where is Hemingway?

Thank you Time, for an Italian reader this is a great choice of English Literature!

StashGoings
StashGoings

Good list overall, I'd have liked to see Confederacy of Dunces on there.

npotash
npotash

I thought it was really funny that two of the comments they chose to highlight came from rabid, offended Ayn Rand fans, outraged that she wasn't included.

creekhousecache
creekhousecache

I hate lists that try to usurp my own opinion. I have my own idea of what is good and what is stupid. I can read, hopefully you can too.

ManuelGomez
ManuelGomez

Slaughterhouse Five, in my opinion, is number one.


OsandNattyBohs
OsandNattyBohs

Let's just all be happy that there is finally a reading list out there that doesn't have Twilight, Harry Potter or Fifty Shades of Grey on it.  Looking forward to the 100 best novels published before the beginning of TIME.  Sad to see I have to suffer through Gravity's Rainbow to complete the list though, as the only positive reviews I've heard have come from people who read it so that they could say they were intellectual enough to have read it.

sundeepkk
sundeepkk

Not a single book by Plum? No, no, no, no

JuanCarlosMaciasR
JuanCarlosMaciasR

I think this list is a little short, what about, French, British, Spanish literature? Titles like: Hamlet, Little Prince, Don Quixote, many more! 

RobertHanson
RobertHanson

The Picture of Dorian Gray should be on the list.

OhMyAbdil
OhMyAbdil

Where on earth is Brave New World? The Count of Monte Cristo? Pillars of the Earth? I'm disappointed.

AlanCharbonneau
AlanCharbonneau like.author.displayName 1 Like

The Count of Monte Cristo was written after 1923? Who knew?

OhMyAbdil
OhMyAbdil

@AlanCharbonneau There are small Inuit children who have no access to internet who are better trolls than you.

OhMyAbdil
OhMyAbdil

@Pwashere "He wasn't be sarcastic to provoke an emotional response, he was being sarcastic to show that you are an idiot" - How are these two aims any different? If someone called you an idiot, that leads to an emotional response. Awful argument.

Also, I have already admitted to making a mistake in not reading the criteria. Read my comment again. What I objected to was the way he responded to my query. 

To be quite honest, your comment was even stupider than my original one was. Stay in school.

Pwashere
Pwashere

He wasn't be sarcastic to provoke an emotional response, he was being sarcastic to show that you are an idiot. He can only be a troll if his original intent was to provoke an emotional response, when that obviously wasn't the case.

Pwashere
Pwashere like.author.displayName 1 Like

He wasn't be sarcastic to provoke an emotional response, he was being sarcastic to show that you are an idiot. He can only be a troll if his original intent was to provoke an emotional response, when that obviously wasn't the case. It is your fault if you don't read the criteria and make a stupid comment not his.

OhMyAbdil
OhMyAbdil

@AlanCharbonneau You replied to my comment sarcastically. Sarcasm usually provokes an emotional response. In internet slang, trolls make comments or replies with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response. You are a troll. The other books I mentioned were written after the time period specified, which shows that I'm not a troll. I didn't read the criteria, so I made a comment with my opinion on the list, which you replied to in a discourteous manner, which is something trolls do. Nice try, though. Better luck next time.

AlanCharbonneau
AlanCharbonneau like.author.displayName 1 Like

There is a difference between sarcasm and trolling. Try googling the terms.

You complain that a book published in 1844 is not included in a list of books written in 1923 or later. Why would that be surprising? Either you are the one who is trolling, had no idea when Dumas lived, did not read the criteria of list construction, or some combination of those possibilities.

Hubert39
Hubert39

Hey folks.. remember this is just two peoples list. Their are hunderds of people with different list.

Best books and movies is like picking best food, cars, colors, sportteams, religions etc.

Everybody has an opinion...

georges.melki
georges.melki

So, Messrs.Grossman and Lacayo, you honestly think that neither "A Farewell to Arms", nor "For Whom the Bell Tolls" are worth including in your list??? Aren't both far more important than, say, Lolita? This is at least what I thought when I read these three novels, but I could be wrong...After all, English is only my third language, and literature is not my specialty!

CarterChen
CarterChen

Wait... Ulysses isn't even on here. Is this some kind of sick joke?

ldphillips0104
ldphillips0104 like.author.displayName 1 Like

Let me help you out by quoting the very first paragraph of the introduction to this list: "The parameters: English language novels published anywhere in the world since 1923, the year that TIME Magazine began, which, before you ask, means that Ulysses (1922) doesn’t make the cut."

SamDeSoto
SamDeSoto

I am ultimately surprised that Fahrenheit 451 and Brave New World are not on the list. They are two of the greatest dystopian novels of all time, and  are written so beautifully and poetically. 

Maggor
Maggor like.author.displayName 1 Like

where is Crime and Punishment, Anna Carenina, War and Peace, The Name of the Rose, One Hundred Years of Solitude?  or is only best English writers ?

ldphillips0104
ldphillips0104

Novels published since 1923. It notes that in the very first paragraph of the introduction.

BelindaRenaBachtiar
BelindaRenaBachtiar

More on my wishlist. But it's kinda sad when I don't see The Alchemist or 1Q84 or The Tales of Two Cities up there. And no Harry Potter series? Is it not grand enough to make it on the list?

amal.m002
amal.m002

@BelindaRenaBachtiar 

Hello Belinda,

 a well wisher

There's much much better books than harry potter--the book is defenetly not grand enough. 

julio_tos
julio_tos

What about The naked and the dead by Norman Mailer?

DavidCrownover
DavidCrownover

I agree with most of the list. Kudos for Catch-22, and Lord of the Rings. I would also include The Hobbit . I understand you can't overload with JRR Tolkien . Thanks for your efforts. You might have considered When Worlds Collide by Balmer and Wylie and After Worlds Collide having to do with a planet-sized asteroid hitting the earth . Very timely. Excuse the pun ! Letters from The Earth by Mark Twain I guess missed the year date cut off...

Alexa
Alexa

Shouldn't this list be more properly described as 100 all time best "English" novels? It excluded way too many important non-English works to be taken seriously as "all time best novels".

OsandNattyBohs
OsandNattyBohs

@Alexa The criteria for the list at the head of the page specify that this is a list of the 100 best English language novels since 1923.

MichaelWBergen
MichaelWBergen

Thank you for the great list. Thank you for not including Hawthorne and Melville or Twain. We are finally past the founding fathers.  taught many of the books considered classics now. it so good to see the mystery writes and the sci-fi writers finally included among the best. I majored in philosophy in the 60s and Ayn Rand was being damned even them for selfishness as a virtue philosophy. But she has been dead right about tis pervasiveness today, hasn't she?

aztecprincess
aztecprincess

I think if some of these titles had been properly translated into Spanish when I was younger, or had they been available in México a while ago, I would've read more of them... However, The Catcher in the Rye, To Kill a Mockingbird, Beloved, The Great Gatsby, are indeed among my favorites! ;)

FogodoEon
FogodoEon

W-h-e-r-e-'-s  K-E-R-O-U-A-C ? in Canada?

Jshnayer
Jshnayer

Eh, I understand why Atlas Shrugged didn't make the cut, but I think it's rather unfair not to include The Fountainhead. All this talk and apologizing about not including Ulysses, but not even a mention of The Fountainhead. Admittedly, Atlas Shrugged does suffer from things like the 60 page interjection of pure didactic philosophy, but the Fountainhead is a beautifully written and intricate novel--and most people, fans of Rand or not, will admit that. Most likely the authors of the list eschewed Fountainhead because they've been conditioned to recoil violently to the mention of Rand's name and start mouthing the usual talking points (wasn't there a rape scene? Isn't it hypocritical of her to accept that Social Security and Medicare that she was legally forced to pay for, not to mention walk on sidewalks? Didn't she commit the unforgivable sin of having an affair, which no author of any repute would dare dream of doing?). But they did encourage people to challenge them, and I think the many comments about Rand in this message thread give credence to the value of her novels. They don't make it into the "best of" lists, but still sell by the millions every year and remain enduring classics--I think that's something special.

salamipizza
salamipizza like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

@Jshnayer The Fountainhead was even better than Twilight but not as good as Captain Underpants

tegar
tegar

heavy reading not my suit

ScottMullin
ScottMullin

Doesn't it seem like someone who is a fan of "At Swim-Two-Birds" would write the title correctly (instead of "At-Swim Two Birds")?

AlexW
AlexW like.author.displayName 1 Like

I find it truly representative of the current mindset, lacking of theology and geometry, to make a list that chronologically discriminates against the classical work of Boethius. Apparently De consolatione philosophiae lacks some particular perversion which today's literary critics are seeking!

OH FORTUNA!  --- Seriously though, I wish John Kennedy Toole made the cut. : (

creepykittyeyes
creepykittyeyes

I have to say, this list feels a little flawed. Perhaps if you did a list of books that actually encompassed all of time, and books that were actually written in other languages too. Guess what, guys? The English language isn't the end-all, be-all.


notLostInSpace
notLostInSpace

I am not a conservative, but would argue that "Atlas Shrugged" is a lot more important literature than Portnoy's Complaint!  Where is "All the President's Men"?  "Dune".  Any Stephen King on there?  I'd suggest "the Shining".  I have not read nearly enough of these, but got to think "Lolita" is not all that important either.  I'd put "The Devil in the White City" over several of these.  Also "Tailor, Tinker, Soldier, Spy".  How about an entry for Ian Fleming?

DavidCrownover
DavidCrownover

Good point ! Absolutely ! Ian fleming influenced a whole generation of movies and writers!