All-TIME 100 Novels

Critics Lev Grossman and Richard Lacayo pick the 100 best English-language novels published since 1923—the beginning of TIME.

  • Share
  • Read Later
111 comments
JordanKnowles
JordanKnowles

This list has a couple glaring omissions: A Farewell To Arms, being the most obvious of those. I mean, by your standards The Corrections is better than A Farewell To Arms? It's all subjective of course, but that doesn't mean I agree with it! I'd argue Birdsong's case on this list: it's one of the best books I've ever read that takes place in the First World War (with A Farewell To Arms). I also feel that The Hours should be on this list. The inclusion of Never Let Me Go but not The Remains of The Day is also questionable- both should be on this list, but I think the latter is more deserving. However, it is rather a good list: Atonement is a bloody good call.

nonentity80
nonentity80

"One hundred years of Solitude", "Of Mice and Men, and "Stranger" not on the list???? How about more modern novels like "The Wind-up Bird Chronicle"

SaeedShaikh
SaeedShaikh

Surprisingly there are lot of good books are missing from the list.......... few of them are (1) WAR AND PEACE BY LEO TOLSTOY (2) WUTHERING HEIGHTS BY CHARLOT BRONTE (3) ANNA KERENNINA BY TOLSTOY (4) THE OLDMAN AND THE SEA BY HEMINGWAY (5) THE MOTHER BY MAXIM GORKY (6) DR.ZIVAGO BY BORIS PASTERNAK (7) THE OUTSIDER BY ALBERT KAMUS ......... 

realsleep
realsleep

@SaeedShaikh  The rules of the list are:  post 1922 and in English.

That leaves off most of your list.

ben_mines
ben_mines

Re: Pale Fire.

All bets are off with respect to the identity of the narrator?

No, sir. 

It's perfectly simple.

Professor Kinbote is the nom de guerre of Charles Xavier the II which is the nom de folie of Professor Botkin through whom the ghost of John and Hazel Shade are guiding the narrative.

realsleep
realsleep

@ben_mines I'm not so sure that Brian Boyd's John Shade is a ghost guiding the narrative is right.

nevadasmith68
nevadasmith68

Cather is absolutely the worst writer of all time.

ketariver
ketariver

I'm glad to see that Everybody's going to have a pet peeve about some apple left out of the barrel. That said, Ken Kesey's Sometimes a Great Notion should be on this list (along with One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, which made the list). Don't ask me which other book should be taken off just to make room. Just change the name to the "Best 101..." I'm glad to see Raymond Chandler's The Big Sleep make the list and its author receive the recognition he richly deserves (Hammett, too).

NOT_ESPN
NOT_ESPN

I have to admit my reading list from my reading teacher (Mrs. Robinson) in junior high hasn't been updated since 1972 and it did contain Ulysses which I never did read.  I have become inspired by this story and am going to read a book from the 100 you're talking about.  I kept (and lost it) my top books list for, perhaps, 30 years:  it inspired me to read The Plague, The Bridge of San Luis Rey, (Plato's) The Republic, Les Miserables [sic], The Old Man and the Sea, The Grapes of Wrath, The Devil and the Doctor, Tess of the D'Urbeville's, Leaves of Grass, and the works of Marcus Aurelius.  There were more on that list that I otherwise would never have searched out:  short stories by Thurber, The Great Gatsby (which I started but never finished), many 19th century English novelists, the works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, and the works of Edgar Allen Poe.  There have been books written in the last 40 years I should read to see what I missed.  Thanks for the update.

TimaTotoro
TimaTotoro like.author.displayName 1 Like

Sci Fi is whole unrepresented in this list.

Bob_LaBlaw
Bob_LaBlaw

@TimaTotoro-- Neuromancer is science fiction, so the genre isn't TOTALLY unrepresented.

realsleep
realsleep

@Bob_LaBlaw @TimaTotoro Snow Crash is on this list, too.  1984 is often considered Sci-Fi.  So that is 4 out of 100, which is about the rate of quality in Science Fiction writing, I'm afraid.  (The genre gets thin fast down the list!)

TimaTotoro
TimaTotoro

should have said wholly underrepresented - "Ubik" is also on the list as well - but where is Fahrenheit 451, or Brave New World, or Dune, etc...

bdmaglich
bdmaglich

L. Frank Baum. Mark Twain. More Bellow, More Heller. Less Judy Blume. More Irish writers in general should be included (if this is supposed to be English, Irish American authors list. List needs serious reworking.

Paolo_Giordan
Paolo_Giordan

I know every list is so individual, but what about McCarthy and "The Road"? And where is Hemingway?

Thank you Time, for an Italian reader this is a great choice of English Literature!

StashGoings
StashGoings

Good list overall, I'd have liked to see Confederacy of Dunces on there.

npotash
npotash

I thought it was really funny that two of the comments they chose to highlight came from rabid, offended Ayn Rand fans, outraged that she wasn't included.

creekhousecache
creekhousecache

I hate lists that try to usurp my own opinion. I have my own idea of what is good and what is stupid. I can read, hopefully you can too.

ManuelGomez
ManuelGomez

Slaughterhouse Five, in my opinion, is number one.


OsandNattyBohs
OsandNattyBohs

Let's just all be happy that there is finally a reading list out there that doesn't have Twilight, Harry Potter or Fifty Shades of Grey on it.  Looking forward to the 100 best novels published before the beginning of TIME.  Sad to see I have to suffer through Gravity's Rainbow to complete the list though, as the only positive reviews I've heard have come from people who read it so that they could say they were intellectual enough to have read it.

sundeepkk
sundeepkk

Not a single book by Plum? No, no, no, no

JuanCarlosMaciasR
JuanCarlosMaciasR

I think this list is a little short, what about, French, British, Spanish literature? Titles like: Hamlet, Little Prince, Don Quixote, many more! 

RobertHanson
RobertHanson

The Picture of Dorian Gray should be on the list.

OhMyAbdil
OhMyAbdil

Where on earth is Brave New World? The Count of Monte Cristo? Pillars of the Earth? I'm disappointed.

AlanCharbonneau
AlanCharbonneau like.author.displayName 1 Like

The Count of Monte Cristo was written after 1923? Who knew?

This comment has been deleted

realsleep
realsleep

@OhMyAbdil @AdamReis The irony here is that you called him a bad troll, but you are STILL responding multiple times a month later! 

This is one of the more successful Internet trollings I've encountered.

AdamReis
AdamReis

@OhMyAbdil @AdamReis

"To be quite honest, your comment was even STUPIDER than my original one was. Stay in school."

Read your comment again lol

Pwashere
Pwashere

@OhMyAbdil This is a public forum. He wanted to show the rest of the forum why you were wrong along with you. If I call someone an idiot in a public place, it is because I want everyone to know that I think that person is an idiot. Just think about it like this: When I post on something like this, I do it with the assumption in mind that there wont be a reply. If you look at the rest of the comments on this forum, very few of the people have bothered to reply. Of course, you did; and blew this completely out of proportion by insulting everyone who disagrees with you about the definition of "troll." By the way, if we were to look at "troll" in a dictionary, we would all be dead wrong, so it rather stupid to argue over the definition of a slang word which barely has a proper definition. People use the word "troll" however they damn well please on the internet.

AdamReis
AdamReis like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @OhMyAbdil @Pwashere You know there is more dignity in admitting that you are wrong. All you need to say, if you are going to say anything at all, is: "I didn't realize this list was only composed of post-1923 novels" or "I thought the Count of Monte Cristo was a modern novel" whichever was the case.  Now you are falsely calling people trolls, and then those that side with them as being "stupider" (which isn't a word)...I'm just sitting here saying to myself, "why does this guy keep digging this grave deeper and deeper". Don't respond to this. For your own sake.

Pwashere
Pwashere

He wasn't be sarcastic to provoke an emotional response, he was being sarcastic to show that you are an idiot. He can only be a troll if his original intent was to provoke an emotional response, when that obviously wasn't the case.

Pwashere
Pwashere like.author.displayName 1 Like

He wasn't be sarcastic to provoke an emotional response, he was being sarcastic to show that you are an idiot. He can only be a troll if his original intent was to provoke an emotional response, when that obviously wasn't the case. It is your fault if you don't read the criteria and make a stupid comment not his.

AlanCharbonneau
AlanCharbonneau like.author.displayName 1 Like

There is a difference between sarcasm and trolling. Try googling the terms.

You complain that a book published in 1844 is not included in a list of books written in 1923 or later. Why would that be surprising? Either you are the one who is trolling, had no idea when Dumas lived, did not read the criteria of list construction, or some combination of those possibilities.

Hubert39
Hubert39

Hey folks.. remember this is just two peoples list. Their are hunderds of people with different list.

Best books and movies is like picking best food, cars, colors, sportteams, religions etc.

Everybody has an opinion...

georges.melki
georges.melki

So, Messrs.Grossman and Lacayo, you honestly think that neither "A Farewell to Arms", nor "For Whom the Bell Tolls" are worth including in your list??? Aren't both far more important than, say, Lolita? This is at least what I thought when I read these three novels, but I could be wrong...After all, English is only my third language, and literature is not my specialty!

realsleep
realsleep

@georges.melki  Lolita is almost the perfectly constructed  book.  Which makes it HUGELY important.

CarterChen
CarterChen

Wait... Ulysses isn't even on here. Is this some kind of sick joke?

ldphillips0104
ldphillips0104 like.author.displayName 1 Like

Let me help you out by quoting the very first paragraph of the introduction to this list: "The parameters: English language novels published anywhere in the world since 1923, the year that TIME Magazine began, which, before you ask, means that Ulysses (1922) doesn’t make the cut."

SamDeSoto
SamDeSoto

I am ultimately surprised that Fahrenheit 451 and Brave New World are not on the list. They are two of the greatest dystopian novels of all time, and  are written so beautifully and poetically. 

bdmaglich
bdmaglich

@SamDeSoto Yeah! And where are Austin, Bronte sisters (at least Charlotte and Emily!). Judy Blume, really? Not more Baldwin, Huxley, Carson, Flannery...

Maggor
Maggor like.author.displayName 1 Like

where is Crime and Punishment, Anna Carenina, War and Peace, The Name of the Rose, One Hundred Years of Solitude?  or is only best English writers ?

ldphillips0104
ldphillips0104

Novels published since 1923. It notes that in the very first paragraph of the introduction.

bdmaglich
bdmaglich

@ldphillips0104 Ok, since 1923 so not Austin, Brontes, but still this list has about 30 titles that deserve to be on there and leaves off many important, significant American and English authors.



BelindaRenaBachtiar
BelindaRenaBachtiar

More on my wishlist. But it's kinda sad when I don't see The Alchemist or 1Q84 or The Tales of Two Cities up there. And no Harry Potter series? Is it not grand enough to make it on the list?

amal.m002
amal.m002

@BelindaRenaBachtiar 

Hello Belinda,

 a well wisher

There's much much better books than harry potter--the book is defenetly not grand enough.